14
4  The  psychological  empowerment  X2;  in  this  present  study,  it  refers  to  the empowerment  which  is  conceptualized  into  four  cognitions;  they  are  meaning,
competence,  self-determination,  and  impact  Chiang  and  Hsieh,  2012;  Tutar  et  al., 2011.
5 The Asta Brata leadership X3;  in this present study,  it refers to the  leadership which
exemplifies  the  essential  natures  of  Almighty  God, Hyang  Widhi,  which  are
implemented as a totality which greatly contributes to the great authority which a leader has;  as  a  result,  heshe  can  easily  activate  the  human  resources,  especially  hisher
subordinators  when  doing  their  jobs  Wiratmaja,  1955;  Yasasusastra,  2011;  Kariyadi, 2013.  Such  eight  natures  are  referred  to  as  follows:
Indra  Brata,  Yama  Brata,  Surya Brata, Casi Brata, Bayu Brata, Dhanaba Brata or Kuwera Brata, Paça Brata, and Agni
Brata. The  variables  of  the  present  study  are  measured  using  the
Likert  Scale  with  the interval  of  assessment  which  starts  from  score  1  completely  disagreeing  to  score  5
strongly  agreeing.  Each  indicator of  the  variable  made  up  of  several  items  is  measured using the average value.
3.2 Population, Sample, and Research Respondent
This  present  study  was  conducted  at  the  manufacturing  UMKM  in  Gianyar Regency,  Bali  Province.  The  manufacturing  UMKM  includes  wood  craft,  rattan  craft,
precious  metal  craft,  textile  industry, batik  and  tenun  ikat  industries.  The  samples  were
taken using the quota sampling approach, totaling 90 key human resources taken from 30 manufacturing UMKM in Gianyar Regency.
3.3 Types, Sources and Method of Collecting Data
The data needed  in the present study  include the  qualitative and quantitative data. The  quantitative  data  include  the  number  of  UMKM,  the  number  of  employees,  the
respondents’  ages.  The  qualitative  data  include  the  in-depth  descriptions  of  the respondents’ perception of creativity,  innovation, structural empowerment, psychological
empowerment,  and  the asta  brata  leadership.  The  data  were  taken  from  the  primary  and
secondary  data  sources.  The  primary  data  source  included  the  research  respondents,  and the secondary  data source  included the  Cent
er of Statistics Badan Pusat Statistik ‘BPS’ and the Bank of Indonesia’s publications in the Economic and Financial Statistics of Bali
15
Province.  The  data  were  collected  through  the  research  instrument  questionnaire  and interview.
Before  the  research  instrument  was  used  to  collect  the  data,  its  validity  and reliability  were  examined.  The
product  moment  correlation  was  used  to  examine  the validity of the instrument. The instrument is stated to be valid if the coefficient value of the
correlation  between  the  score  for  each  item  of  question  and  the  total  score  for  every variable  is  positive  and  higher  than  0.30  or  r    0.30.  The  reliability  of  the  internal
consistency was used to examine the reliability of the instrument in which Alpha Cronbach ά  was  calculated.  The  research  instrument  is  stated  to  be  reliable  if  the  score  for  the
Alpha Cronbach is higher than 0.60 ά≤0.60.
The result of the examination of the instrument validity proved that the instrument can  be  stated  to  be  valid  as  the  coefficient  value  between  the  score  for  each  item  of
question and the total score for every variable showed that the coefficient value was higher than 0.30 r  0.30. Similarly, the result of the reliability of the instrument proved that the
instrument  can  be  stated  to  be  reliable,  as  the  value  of  the Alpha  Cronbach  for  every
variable is higher than 0.60 ά ≤ 0.60.
3.4 Data Analysis Technique
This  present  study  employed  the  quantitative  approach  supported  with  the descriptive  analysis.  The  technique  of  analysis  used  was  the  variance-based  structural
equation model or what is referred to as Component-based SEM, namely, the Partial Least Square PLS.
4. Results 4.1 General Description of UMKM Used as Sample
UMKM  plays  a  strategic  role  in  the  economic  growth  and  supports  the government’s program to create job opportunities. The competition which is getting tighter
and  the  fact  that  there  are  more  and  more  overseas  products  and  services  have  been challenges  to  UMKM,  especially  the  manufacturing  UMKM  in  Gianyar  Regency.  What
has  seriously  challenged  the  manufacturing  UMKM  is  how  to  survive  such  an  uncertain situation.  Those  who  are  involved  in  UMKM  should  be  creative  and  innovative  to  make
use of the opportunities available.
16
Those  who  were  used  as  the  samples  of  the  study  were  creative  and  innovative enough to make use of the opportunities available in order to survive. In this present study,
innovation  includes  the  innovation  in  creating  new  products  and  modifying  the  existing products.  In  the  last  two  years,  several  manufacturers  created  new  products  which  had
never been produced before such as lamp shades, ketzel painting, silver bracelets with the
black dragon as the motive, bracelets with what is called cangkang kerang as the motive,
Balinese  carved  bracelets  with  the  face  as  the  motive,  bracelets  with  red  garnet  as  the stone, dragon bones, rings with the topaz blue stone flower as the motive, and so forth.
Such products are marketed in local markets and are exported. Out of the UMKM used as the samples in the present study, 7 23 percent market their products in domestic
markets,  while  23  77  percent,  the  rest,  market  their  products  in  local  markets  and overseas.
4.2 Respondents’ Characteristics
The respondents of the present study were the employees who played key roles in the  success  achieved  by  the  Manufacturing  UMKM  in  Gianyar  Regency,  totaling  90.
Based  on  the  result  of  the  study,  it  was  identified  that  the  dominant  employees  were females  84  percent.  This  indicates  that  the  UMKMs  involved  in  the  creative  industry
were activated by mothers. If viewed from their ages, they were between 20 and 50 years of  age.  Most  of  them  62  percent  were  senior  high  school  graduates;  some  8  percent
were university graduates. However, viewed from their working experience, they had been involved  in  the  manufacturing  business  for  a  relatively  long  time.  Out  of  them,  21  23
percent had been involved in the manufacturing business for 11 – 15 years, and 16 percent
were involved in the creative industry for more than 20 years.
4.3 Results of Data Analysis
In the present study, PLS with Program SmartPLS  was used to analyze the data.
Based on the result of the data analysis, the empirical model of research was produced as shown in Figure 1 as follows.
Based on what is shown in the  Figure 1, the result of the outer model is described in order to identify the validity and reliability of the indicators used to measure the latent
variable. In addition, the evaluation of the inner model is also described in order to identify
17
whether  the  accuracy  of  the  model  and  the  result  of  the  examination  of  the  research hypothesis.
1 The Result of the Outer Model
The evaluation of the outer model was used to examine the validity and reliability of the indicators used to measure the construct or the latent variable. In this present study,
the variable of the Structural Empowerment X1, the Psychological Empowerment X2, Creativity  Y1,  and  Innovation  Y2  are  classified  as  the  outer  model  with  reflective
indicators,  whereas  the  variable  of  the Asta  Brata  leadership  X3  is  classified  as  the
formative outer model. In the reflective outer model, evaluation was made   by examining the  convergent  and  discriminant  validity  of  the  indicator  and  the  composite  reliability  of
the  indicator  block.  In  the  variable  of  the  formative  outer  model,  evaluation  was  made based on the relative weight. The results of the evaluation of the outer model are described
as follows.
1 Convergent Validity
The result of the examination of the outer model showed that the outer loading of every  indicator  of  the  Structural  Empowerment  variable  X1,  the  Psychological
Empowerment X2, Creativity Y1, and Innovation Y2 is higher than 0.5; in addition, it
18
also  showed  that  the  T-statistics  is  higher  than  0.96  the  critical  point  in  the  5  alpha, meaning that all the indicators are valid for measuring the variables.
The evaluation of the  measurement of the Asta Brata Leadership  variable X3, if
viewed from the Outer Weights, showed that the  T-statistics of several indicators X3.2, X 3.4,  X  3.5,  X  3.6,  X  3.7  is  less  than  1.96,  meaning  that  it  is  insignificant.  However,  in
relation to this, it is impossible to delete the insignificant formative indicator. The reason is that if the insignificant formative indicator were deleted, then the essence of the construct
would change Hair et al., 2013 in Sholihin and Ratmoni, 2013. Therefore, if viewed from the  outer  loading,  the  validity  of  the  construct  shows  that  all  the  indicators  of  the
Asta Brata  Leadership  variable  are  higher  than  0.5  and  the  T-statistics  is  higher  than  1.96,
meaning that all the indicators are valid for measuring the variable.
2 Discriminant Validity
The discriminant validity was examined by comparing the score for the square root of average variance extracted AVE of every variable with the correlation among the other
latent variables in the model. The related data are presented in Table 1. Table 1 The score for the square root of average variance extracted AVE of every
variable and correlation among the variables
Variables AVE
√AVE Innovation
Asta Brata Leadership
Creativity Psychological
Empowerment Structural
Empowerment Innovation
0.8067 08.898
3 1
Asta Brata Leadership
0.7519 0.8671
0.8272 1
Creativity 0.8835
0.9399 0.8446
0.8009 1
Psychological Empowerment
0.7597 0.8716
0.8397 0.7226
0.7728 1
Structural Empowerment
0.9319 0.9653
0.8051 0.7377
0.8513 0.8065
1
Based on the data in Table 4.8, it can be identified that the AVE values of the five variables which were analyzed are higher than 0.5, and that the AVE root  value of every
variable  is  higher  than  the  correlation  among  the  variables,  meaning  that  the  latent variables  such  as  the  Innovation  variable  Y2,  the  Creativity  variable  Y1,  the
Psychological  Variable  X1,  the  Structural  Empowerment  variable,  and  the Asta  Brata
leadership  variable  predict  that  their  indicators  are  better  than  the  other  latent  variable indicators. Based on the result of such an analysis, it can be explained that the discriminant
validity of the model is enough.