PENUTUP PENGARUH CITRA PERUSAHAAN, RELATIONSHIP MARKETING DAN KEPERCAYAAN PADA NIAT BELI ULANG KONSUMEN: PENGUJIAN EFEK MODERASI KOMUNIKASI GETOK TULAR.

59

BAB V

PENUTUP

5.1

Kesimpulan

Berdasarkan hasil analisis data dalam penelitian yang telah dilakukan, maka

dapat ditarik kesimpulan sebagai berikut:

1.

Mayoritas responden yang berbelanja

online

untuk produk

fashion

adalah

responden wanita yang berusia dibawah 25 tahun dengan pendidikan terakhir

SLTA. Besar pengeluaran responden mayoritas berkisar Rp 1.000.000 - Rp

3.000.000 per bulan. Frekuensi responden berbelanja

online

yaitu 6 bulan 1

kali dengan pengeluaran untuk berbelanja

online

kurang dari Rp 500.000

dalam sebulan.

2.

Terdapat

pengaruh

citra

perusahaan

secara

signifikan

pada

tingkat

kepercayaan konsumen. Untuk mengetahui seberapa besar pengaruhnya,

dapat dilihat pada nilai

Standardized Coefficient Beta

sebesar 0,472 yang

berarti bahwa citra perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh positif terhadap

kepercayaan dan nilai t hitung 7,729>1,65251 (t tabel) dengan tingkat

signifikansi 0,000, maka citra perusahaan berpengaruh secara signifikan pada

kepercayaan. Dengan demikian disimpulkan bahwa citra perusahaan

mempunyai pengaruh positif secara signifikan pada kepercayaan konsumen.

3.

Terdapat pengaruh

financial relationship marketing

secara signifikan pada

tingkat

kepercayaan

konsumen.

Untuk

mengetahui

seberapa

besar

60

0,264 yang berarti bahwa

financial relationship marketing

mempunyai

pengaruh positif pada kepercayaan dan nilai t hitung 3,941>1, 65251 (t tabel)

dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,000, maka

financial relationship marketing

berpengaruh secara signifikan pada kepercayaan. Sedangkan untuk pengaruh

social relationship marketing

dapat dilihat bahwa

Standardized coefficient

Beta

sebesar 0,368 berarti bahwa

social relationship marketing

memiliki

pengaruh positif pada kepercayaan. Nilai t hitung adalah 5,705>1,65251 (t

tabel) dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,000 maka

social relationship marketing

berpengaruh secara signifikan pada kepercayaan. Sedangkan untuk

structural

relationship

marketing

menunjukkan

bahwa

tidak

berpengaruh

pada

kepercayaan karena nilai signifikansinya 0,096>0,05. Dengan demikian

disimpulkan bahwa

financial relationship marketing

dan

social relationship

marketing

mempunyai pengaruh positif secara signifikan pada kepercayaan

konsumen, sedangkan

structural relationship marketing

tidak berpengaruh

secara signifikan pada kepercayaan konsumen.

4.

Terdapat pengaruh kepercayaan secara signifikan pada niat beli ulang

konsumen. Untuk mengetahui seberapa besar pengaruh kepercayaan dapat

dilihat pada

Standardized Coefficient Beta

sebesar 0,641 yang berarti bahwa

kepercayaan berpengaruh positif pada niat beli ulang konsumen. Nilai t

hitung yaitu sebesar 12,041>1,65251 (t tabel) dan tingkat signifikansinya

0,000 maka kepercayaan berpengaruh secara signifikan pada niat beli ulang

konsumen. Dengan demikian dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa kepercayaan

61

konsumen mempunyai pengaruh positif secara signifikan pada niat beli ulang

konsumen.

5.

Komunikasi getok tular positif bukan sebagai variabel moderator dalam

hubungan kepercayaan dan niat beli ulang konsumen. Nilai signifikansinya

0,236>0,05 berarti bahwa komunikasi getok tular positif tidak memperkuat

pengaruh kepercayaan pada niat beli ulang secara signifikan. Sedangkan

untuk komunikasi getok tular negatif, menunjukkan nilai yang signifikan (Sig

= 0,013 < 0,05) sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa komunikasi getok tular

negatif sebagai variabel moderator yang memperlemah pengaruh kepercayaan

pada niat beli ulang.

5.2

Implikasi Manajerial

Dari hasil penelitian ini, berikut adalah implikasi manajerial yang bisa

diterapkan oleh para pemilik

online shop

.

1.

Diharapkan

online shop

baik yang sudah besar maupun yang baru didirikan

dapat terus menerus meningkatkan citra perusahaannya. Kepercayaan

konsumen pada suatu

online shop

sangat dipengaruhi oleh seberapa baik citra

perusahaan/

online shop

tersebut. Citra yang baik dapat menjadi kunci sukses

bagi sebuah

online shop

dalam menarik kepercayaan calon konsumen. Untuk

meningkatkan citranya,

online shop

dapat menggunakan strategi seperti selalu

menepati janjinya kepada konsumen dan memberikan pelayanan yang baik

kepada konsumen.

62

2.

Online shop

perlu terus untuk menjaga hubungan dengan konsumennya baik

dari segi finansial maupun sosial. Melalui strategi dari segi harga misalnya

pemberian diskon atau

voucher

dapat mempengaruhi kepercayaan konsumen.

Selain itu,

online shop

perlu untuk bersikap ramah dan melayani konsumen

dengan baik. Dengan hubungan sosial yang baik maka konsumen menjadi

lebih percaya. Selain itu juga akan terbangun hubungan jangka panjang

dengan konsumen.

3.

Komunikasi getok tular menjadi sesuatu yang penting bagi

online shop

.

Selain itu, komunikasi getok tular dapat menjadi strategi promosi yang bagus

dalam dunia maya sekaligus menjadi ancaman karena informasi akan tersebar

dengan mudah. Jika informasi yang negatif tersebar, maka akan mengancam

niat beli ulang konsumen. Dengan demikian diharapkan

online shop

dapat

melakukan usaha untuk mengurangi getok tular negatif di kalangan

konsumen seperti misalnya memberikan hadiah atau

gift

kepada konsumen

yang pernah dikecewakan untuk tanda permintaan maaf. Selain itu,

online

shop

juga perlu untuk tetap membangun getok tular positif untuk menarik

minat konsumen baru.

5.3

Keterbatasan Penelitian

Meskipun penulis telah berusaha sebaik mungkin dalam melakukan

penelitian, namun penulis menyadari adanya keterbatasan dalam penelitian ini,

yaitu antara lain:

63

1. Penelitian ini berfokus pada

online shop

yang menjual produk

fashion

,

sehingga hasil penelitian belum tentu relevan apabila diaplikasikan pada

online shop

maupun industri yang menjual produk lainnya, sehingga

disarankan untuk penelitian selanjutnya dapat meneliti dengan objek yang

berbeda.

2. Responden yang direkrut hanya berjumlah 210, sehingga untuk penelitian

selanjutnya bisa menambahkan responden yang lebih banyak agar lebih

mewakili populasi.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abd-El-Salam, E. M., Shawky, A. Y., & El-Nahas, Tawfik (2013), “The impact of

corporate image and reputation on service quality, customer satisfaction and

customer loyalty: testing the mediating role, case analysis in an international

service company”,

The Business & Management Review

, Vol. 3 No. 2.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A., (1986), “The moderator-mediator distinction in

social psychological search: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”,

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

, Vol. 51 No. 6, 1173-1182.

Becerra, E. P., & Korgaonkar, P. K., (2009), “Effects of trust beliefs on

consumers’ online intentions”,

European Journal of Marketing

, Vol. 45 No. 6.

Ben-Rechav G. G., (2000). “Relationship selling and trust: antecendent and

outcomes”,

Published doctoral dissertation

, Portland State University

Broutsou, A., & Fitsilis, P., (2012), “Online trust: the influence of perceived

company’s reputation on consumers’ trust and the effects of trust on intention for

online transaction”,

Journal of Service Science and Management

, Vol. 5, 365-372.

Chiu, K. H., & Hsu, C. L., (2010), “Research on the connections between

corporate social responsibility and corporation image in the risk society: Take the

mobile telecommunication industry as an example”,

International Journal of

Electronic Business Management

, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 183-194.

Claro, D. P., Borin, P. & Zylbersztajn, D., (2005). “Relationship marketing

strategies: when buyer and supplier follow different strategies to achieve

performance”,

Brazilian Administration Review

, Vol 2 no. 2, pp 17-34.

Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Deborah, C., (1990), “Relationship quality in

services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective”,

Journal of Marketing

,

Vol. 54 No. 3.

Curtis, T., Abratt, R., Rhoades, D. & Dion, P., (2011), “Customer loyalty,

repurchase and satisfaction: a meta-analytical review”,

Journal of Consumer

Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior,

24.

Dajan, A., (2000),

Pengantar Metode Statistik

, Jakarta: LP3ES

Deb, M., & Chavali, K., (2010), “Significance of trust and loyalty during financial

crisis: a study on customer behavior of India Banks”,

South Asian Journal of

Management

, Vol. 17 No.1.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D., (1991), “Effects of price, brand and

store information on buyers’ product evaluations”,

Journal of Marketing Research

,

Vol. 28 No. 3.

Emergence

Marketing

(2007),

dari

http://www.the-marketeers.com/archives/Indonesia%20Internet%20Users.html#.UyHyRM6UGcJ

diakses tanggal 14 maret 2014

Fan, Y. W., & Miao, Y. F., (2012), “Effect of electronic word-of-mouth on

consumer

purchase

intention:

The

perspective

of

gender

differences”,

International Journal of Electronic Business Management

, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp.

175-181.

Flavian, C., Guinaliu, M. & Torres, E., (2005), “The influence of corporate image

oh consumer trust: a comparative analysis in traditional versus internet banking”,

Internet Research

, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 447-71.

Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S., (1999), “The different roles of satisfaction, trust

and commitment in customer relationships”,

Journal of Marketing

, Vol. 63 No. 2.

Gürses, S., & K

ı

l

ı

ç, K. C., (2013), “Corporate image aspect of corporate

management in healthcare industry: Definition, measurement and an empirical

investigation”,

International Business Research

, Vol. 6 No. 12.

Hahn, K. H., & Kim, J., (2009), “The effect of offline brand trust and perceived

internet confidence on online shopping intention in the integrated multi-channel

context”,

International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management

, Vol. 37 No.

2.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R., (1998),

Multivariate Data Analysis

, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Harris, L. G., & Goode, M. M. H., (2010), “Online servicescapes, trust, and

purchase intentions”,

Journal of Services Marketing

, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 230-243.

Hsu, C. L., Lin, J. C. C., & Chiang, H. S., (2013), “The effect of blogger

recommendations on customers’ online shopping intentions”,

Internet Research

,

Vol. 12 No. 1.

Huang, C. C., Yen, S. W., Liu, C. Y., & Huang, P. C., (2014), “The relationship

among corporate social responsibility, servicece quality, corporate image and

purchase intention”,

International Journal if Organizational Innovation

, Vol. 6

No. 3.

Junaidi,

(2010),

Titik

Presentase

Distribusi

t,

diakses

dari

http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com pada tanggal 2 Mei 2014

Kamtarin, M., (2012), “Effect of electronic word-of-mouth, trust and perceived

value on behavioral intention from the perspective of consumers”, International

Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

, Vol. 1

No. 4.

Khan, M. S., Naumann, E. & Williams, P., (2012). “Identifying the key drivers of

customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions: an empirical investigation of

Japanese B2B services”,

Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and

Complaining Behavior

, 25.

Kimery, K., & McCord, M., (2002). “Third-party assurances: Mapping the road to

trust in e-retailing”,

Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application

,

Vol. 4 No. 2, pp 63-83.

Limbu, Y. B., Wolf, M., & Lunsford, D., (2012), “Perceived ethics of online

retailers and consumer behavioral intentions: the mediating roles of trust and

attitude”,

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing

, Vol. 6 No. 2.

Lin, L. Y., & Lu C. Y., (2010), “The influence of corporate image, relationship

marketing, and trust on purchase intention: the moderating effect of

word-of-mouth”,

Tourism Review

, Vol. 65 No. 3, pp. 16-34.

Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., & Piew, T. Ho., (2010), “The effect of shopping

orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers’

online purchase intention

”, International Business Research

, Vol. 3 No. 3.

Ling, K. C., Daud, D. B., Piew, T. H., Keoy, K. H., & Hassan, P., (2011),

“Perceived risk, perceived technology, online trust for the online purchase

intention in Malaysia”,

International Journal of Business and Management

, Vol.

6 No. 6.

Lo, Y. H, (2012), “Does word-of-mouth effect really matter? The case of chinese

tourist travel experience in Taiwan”,

The Journal of International Management

Studies

, Vol. 7 No. 2

Maclnnis, D. J., & Price, L. L., (1987), “The role of imagery in information

processing: review and extensions”,

Journal of Consumer Research

, Vol. 13, pp.

473-91.

MarkPlus Insight Indonesia Netizen Survey (2013), “Tiga jenis produk paling

http://www.the-

marketeers.com/archives/tiga-jenis-produk-paling-sering-dibeli-konsumen-secara-online.html#.UyHxV86UGcI diakses pada tanggal 14 maret 2014.

Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G., (1993), “Factors affecting trust in

market research relationship”,

Journal of Marketing

, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 88-101.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994), “The commitment-trust theory of

relationship marketing”

Journal of Marketing

, Vol. 58 No. 3, pp. 20-38.

Nguyen, N. & LeBlanc, G., (1998), “The mediating role of corporate image on

consumers’

retention

decisions:

an

investigation

in

financial

services”,

International Journal of Bank Marketing

, Vol. 16 No. 2, 00. 52-65.

Olaru, D. & Purchase, S., (2008), “From customer value to repurchase intention

and recommendations”,

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

, 23/8,

554-565.

Robertson, T.S.,& Gatignon, H., (1986), “Competitive effects on technology

diffusion”,

Journal of Marketing

, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 1-12.

Smith, R. E. & Vogt, C. A., (1995), “ The effect of integrating advertising and

negative word-of-mouth communications on message processing and response”,

Journal of Consumer Psychology

, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp 133-51.

Soetomo, H., (2001), “Power-trust-commitment in relationship marketing”

Published Doctoral Dissertation

, Nova Southeastern University

Sugiyono (2004),

Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis

, Bandung: Alfabeta

Sugiyono (2007), Statistika Untuk Penelitian, Bandung: Alfabeta

Turban, E., Lee, J., King, D. & Chung, H. M., (2000),

Electronic Commerce: A

Managerial Perspective

, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

Umar, H., (2003).

Metodologi Penelitian

, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Weiwei, T., (2007), “Impact of corporate image and corporate reputation on

customer loyalty: a review

”, Management Science and Engineering

, Vol. 1 No.2.

Wu, W. L. & Lee, Y. C., (2012), “The effect of blog trustworthiness, product

attitude, and blog involvement on purchase intention”,

International Journal of

Management & Information Systems

, Vol. 16 No. 3

LAMPIRAN 1 Kuesioner

KUESIONER

Pengaruh Citra Perusahaan, Relationship Marketing, dan Kepercayaan pada Niat Beli Ulang Konsumen: Efek Moderasi dari Komunikasi Getok Tular (Word-of Mouth Communication)

No: ……..

Nama :

Jawablah pertanyaan di bawah ini dengan melingkari!

1. Jenis Kelamin:

a. Pria

b. Wanita 2. Usia:

a. Di bawah 21

b. 21-25

c. 26-30

d. 31-35

e. 36-40

f. Di atas 40

3. Pendidikan terakhir:

a. SLTP

b. SLTA

c. S1

d. Pasca Sarjana (S2/S3)

4. Apakah Anda pernah melakukan online shopping / berbelanja secaraonline untuk produk

fashion(pakaian, tas, sepatu)?

a. Ya

b. Tidak

5. Seberapa sering Anda membeli barangonline?

a. 1 minggu 1 kali

b. 1 bulan 1 kali

c. 3 bulan 1 kali

d. 6 bulan 1 kali

e. 1 tahun 1 kali

f. Lebih dari 1 tahun 1 kali

6. Berapa pengeluaran pribadi Anda per bulan?

a. Kurang dari Rp 1.000.000,00

b. Rp 1.000.000,00 – Rp

3.000.000,00

c. Rp 3.000.001,00 – Rp

5.000.000,00

d. Lebih dari Rp 5.000.000,00

7. Berapa besar pengeluaran yang Anda gunakan untuk berbelanja produk fashion secara

onlinedalam sebulan?

a. < Rp 500.000,00

b. Rp 500.000,00 – Rp

1.000.000,00

c. Rp 1.000.001,00 – Rp

2.000.000,00

d. Rp 2.000.001,00 – Rp

3.000.000,00

e. Di atas Rp 3.000.000,

Untuk pertanyaan selanjutnya, berikan tanda centang (V) pada kolom yang ada untuk menjawab pernyataan yang ada!

STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju TS = Tidak Setuju

N = Netral S = Setuju

SS = Sangat Setuju A. Citra Perusahaan

Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

1. Secara umum, saya percayaonline shopini selalu dapat memenuhi janjinya kepada konsumen

2. Online shopini memiliki reputasi yang bagus

3. Saya percaya reputasionline shopini lebih unggul dari pesaingnya

4. Online shopini pertama muncul dalam ingatan saya di antara online shopyang ada

5. Online shopini pantas direkomendasikan

6. Saya memiliki kesan yang baik padaonline shopini

7. Online shopini mempunyai maksud baik dan pantas dipercaya 8. Menurut saya, online shopini memiliki citra yang baik secara

umum

B. Relationship Marketing

Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

1. Online shopini memberikan diskon kepada saya untuk pembelian berikutnya

2. Online shopini mengingatkan saya keuntungan sebagai langganan/anggota

3. Online shopini membantu saya menghemat uang pada produk yang bernilai sama

4. Online shopini selalu memperhatikan saya sebagai seorang individu

5. Online shopini selalu ramah

6. Online shopini mencantumkan nama saya ketika bertransaksi 7. Online shopini tidak menawarkan kepada saya layanan yang

mempunyai nilai tambah. Contoh: retur *

8. Online shopini tidak memberikan layanan yang sulit

didapatkan di tempat lain. Contoh:money back guarantee* 9. Online shopini tidak memberikan saya pilihan dan saran

C. Kepercayaan

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

1. Saya menemukan bahwa perlu khawatir dalam bertransaksi denganonline shopini*

2. Online shopini tidak jujur*

3. Online shopini selalu sesuai harapan saya 4. Online shopini tidak selalu dapat dipercaya* 5. Kualitasonline shopini tinggi secara konsisten 6. Produknya tidak sesuai dengan harga*

7. Berbelanja dionline shopini membuang waktu*

8. Saya percaya dengan kualitas produk dan kualitas layanan online shopini

9. Saya percayaonline shopini akan sadar pada komitmen kepada konsumen

D. Niat Beli Ulang

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

1 Kemungkinan saya berbelanja dionline shopini sangat tinggi 2 Jika ingin membeli produk fashion, saya akan

mempertimbangkan berbelanja dionline shopini

3 Kemungkinan saya akan mempertimbangkan berbelanja di online shopini sangat kecil*

4 Kemauan saya membeli produknya sangat tinggi 5 Saya berniat membeli produk darionline shopini lebih

sedikit dalam beberapa tahun mendatang*

6 Saya mempertimbangkanonline shopini sebagai pilihan pertama saya

E. Komunikasi Getok Tular

No Pernyataan STS TS N S SS

1 Saya memberikan umpan balik positif padaonline shopdan akan memberitahukan kepada orang lain

2 Saya memberikan umpan balik positif dan akan

menyebarluaskan keuntungan berbelanja dionline shopini 3 Saya memberikan umpan balik positif dan akan

merekomendasikan kepada orang lain

4 Saya memberikan umpan balik negatif padaonline shopdan saya akan mengadu melalui media sosial

5 Saya memberikan umpan balik negatif dan akan

menyebarluaskan kekurangan berbelanja dionline shopini 6 Saya memberikan umpan balik negatif dan tidak akan

merekomendasikan kepada orang lain

LAMPIRAN 2

HASIL UJI VALIDITAS

1. Citra Perusahaan

Correlations

citra1 citra2 citra3 citra4 citra5 citra6 citra7 citra8 totalcitra citra1 Pearson

Correlation 1 .583 **

.394** .215** .395** .516** .401** .405** .673** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .002 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

citra2 Pearson

Correlation .583 **

1 .577** .227** .484** .533** .479** .353** .718** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

citra3 Pearson

Correlation .394 **

.577** 1 .260** .475** .524** .529** .393** .707** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

citra4 Pearson

Correlation .215 **

.227** .260** 1 .411** .391** .343** .283** .538** Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

citra5 Pearson

Correlation .395 **

.484** .475** .411** 1 .757** .636** .546** .809** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

citra6 Pearson

Correlation .516 **

.533** .524** .391** .757** 1 .715** .578** .864** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

citra7 Pearson

Correlation .401 **

.479** .529** .343** .636** .715** 1 .602** .810** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

citra8 Pearson

Correlation .405 **

.353** .393** .283** .546** .578** .602** 1 .714** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

totalcitr a

Pearson

Correlation .673 **

.718** .707** .538** .809** .864** .810** .714** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

2. Financial Relationship Marketing

Correlations

Relationship1 Relationship2 Relationship3 totalfinancial Relationship1 Pearson Correlation 1 .721** .498** .867**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

Relationship2 Pearson Correlation .721** 1 .618** .901**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

Relationship3 Pearson Correlation .498** .618** 1 .815**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

totalfinancial Pearson Correlation .867** .901** .815** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

3. Social Relationship Marketing

Correlations

Relationship4 Relationship5 Relationship6 totalsocial Relationship4 Pearson Correlation 1 .455** .427** .414**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

Relationship5 Pearson Correlation .455** 1 .433** .689**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

Relationship6 Pearson Correlation .427** .433** 1 .798**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

totalsocial Pearson Correlation .414** .689** .798** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

4. Structural Relationship Marketing

Correlations

Relationship7 Relationship8 Relationship9 totalstructural Relationship7 Pearson Correlation 1 .558** .455** .783**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

Relationship8 Pearson Correlation .558** 1 .582** .870**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

Relationship9 Pearson Correlation .455** .582** 1 .832**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

totalstructural Pearson Correlation .783** .870** .832** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

5. Kepercayaan

Correlations percaya 1 percaya 2 percaya 3 percaya 4 percaya 5 percaya 6 percaya 7 percaya 8 percaya 9 totalper caya percaya 1 Pearson

Correlation 1 .594

** _.447** _.475** _.403** _.495** _.460** _.392** _.343** _.742**

Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 2

Pearson

Correlation .594

** _{1 .359}** _.454** _.396** _.567** _.497** _.510** _.371** _.745** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 3

Pearson

Correlation .447

** _.359** _{1 .315}** _.367** _.467** _.507** _.424** _.437** _.664** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 4

Pearson

Correlation .475

** _.454** _.315** _{1 .367}** _.506** _.546** _.361** _.402** _.693** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 5

Pearson

Correlation .403

** _.396** _.367** _.367** _{1 .481}** _.376** _.478** _.463** _.668** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 6

Pearson

Correlation .495

** _.567** _.467** _.506** _.481** _{1 .551}** _.499** _.453** _.786** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

percaya 7

Pearson

Correlation .460 **

.497** .507** .546** .376** .551** 1 .443** .417** .749** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 8

Pearson

Correlation .392 **

.510** .424** .361** .478** .499** .443** 1 .507** .705** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

percaya 9

Pearson

Correlation .343 **

.371** .437** .402** .463** .453** .417** .507** 1 .665** Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

totalper caya

Pearson

Correlation .742 **

.745** .664** .693** .668** .786** .749** .705** .665** 1 Sig.

(2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

6. Niat Beli Ulang

Correlations

niat1 niat2 niat3 niat4 niat5 niat6 totalniat niat1 Pearson Correlation 1 .525** .545** .483** .433** .538** .802**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

niat2 Pearson Correlation .525** 1 .411** .500** .364** .498** .749** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

niat3 Pearson Correlation .545** .411** 1 .333** .417** .461** .714** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

niat4 Pearson Correlation .483** .500** .333** 1 .379** .499** .720** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

niat5 Pearson Correlation .433** .364** .417** .379** 1 .394** .665** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

niat6 Pearson Correlation .538** .498** .461** .499** .394** 1 .772** Sig. (2-tailed) _{.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000}

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

totalniat Pearson Correlation .802** .749** .714** .720** .665** .772** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

7. Komunikasi Getok Tular Positif

Correlations

getokpos1 getokpos2 getokpos3 totalgetokpos getokpos1 Pearson Correlation 1 .646** .637** .870**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

getokpos2 Pearson Correlation .646** 1 .612** .863**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

getokpos3 Pearson Correlation .637** .612** 1 .872**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

totalgetokpos Pearson Correlation .870** .863** .872** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

8. Komunikasi Getok Tular Negatif

Correlations

getokneg1 getokneg2 getokneg3 totalgetokneg getokneg1 Pearson Correlation 1 .865** .744** .929**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

getokneg2 Pearson Correlation .865** 1 .823** .958**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

getokneg3 Pearson Correlation .744** .823** 1 .916**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

totalgetokneg Pearson Correlation .929** .958** .916** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000

N 210 210 210 210

UJI RELIABILITAS

1. Citra Perusahaan

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

.874 8

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N citra1 3.1857 .87975 210 citra2 3.3762 .74910 210 citra3 3.1905 .80780 210 citra4 3.2810 .83701 210 citra5 3.6333 .84368 210 citra6 3.6000 .87057 210 citra7 3.6476 .86374 210 citra8 3.6190 .81705 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

citra1 24.3476 18.706 .554 .867

citra2 24.1571 19.023 .629 .859

citra3 24.3429 18.791 .607 .861

citra4 24.2524 20.008 .399 .883

citra5 23.9000 17.765 .734 .848

citra6 23.9333 17.134 .805 .839

citra7 23.8857 17.633 .733 .847

citra8 23.9143 18.682 .615 .860

2. Financial Relationship Marketing

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N Relationship1 3.1714 1.04865 210 Relationship2 3.2000 .94742 210 Relationship3 3.1857 .98252 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

Relationship1 6.3857 3.013 .676 .763

Relationship2 6.3571 3.092 .775 .664

Relationship3 6.3714 3.431 .598 .836

3. Social Relationship Marketing

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N Relationship4 3.3524 .90168 210 Relationship5 3.6381 .80220 210 Relationship6 3.5333 .87569 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

Relationship4 7.1714 2.018 .520 .602

Relationship5 6.8857 2.255 .526 .599

Relationship6 6.9905 2.115 .504 .622

4. Structural Relationship Marketing

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N Relationship4 3.3524 .90168 210 Relationship5 3.6381 .80220 210 Relationship6 3.5333 .87569 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

Relationship4 7.1714 2.018 .520 .602

Relationship5 6.8857 2.255 .526 .599

Relationship6 6.9905 2.115 .504 .622

5. Kepercayaan

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N percaya1 3.2476 1.13053 210 percaya2 3.5524 .86374 210 percaya3 3.2095 .79707 210 percaya4 3.1810 .87802 210 percaya5 3.2238 .85415 210 percaya6 3.4238 .95667 210 percaya7 3.5857 .91494 210 percaya8 3.4143 .80357 210 percaya9 3.4524 .77033 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

percaya1 27.0429 24.271 .630 .866

percaya2 26.7381 25.974 .665 .861

percaya3 27.0810 27.166 .574 .869

percaya4 27.1095 26.395 .599 .867

percaya5 27.0667 26.790 .571 .869

percaya6 26.8667 24.901 .707 .857

percaya7 26.7048 25.587 .664 .861

percaya8 26.8762 26.750 .623 .865

6. Niat Beli Ulang

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

.833 6

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N niat1 3.3476 .90618 210 niat2 3.4762 .88685 210 niat3 3.3333 .84905 210 niat4 3.1857 .84649 210 niat5 3.1429 .81174 210 niat6 3.2857 .90416 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

niat1 16.4238 10.016 .687 .788

niat2 16.2952 10.458 .616 .804

niat3 16.4381 10.841 .576 .812

niat4 16.5857 10.808 .585 .810

niat5 16.6286 11.287 .520 .822

niat6 16.4857 10.232 .645 .797

7. Komunikasi Getok Tular Positif

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

.836 3

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N getokpos1 3.5619 .73105 210 getokpos2 3.4810 .75274 210 getokpos3 3.6524 .81147 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

getokpos1 7.1333 1.973 .714 .758

getokpos2 7.2143 1.949 .694 .776

getokpos3 7.0429 1.812 .688 .784

8. Komunikasi Getok Tular Negatif

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 210 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 210 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's

Alpha N of Items

.927 3

Item Statistics

Mean Std. Deviation N getokneg1 2.5762 1.00544 210 getokneg2 2.5095 1.00354 210 getokneg3 2.6286 1.02371 210

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

getokneg1 5.1381 3.746 .842 .903

getokneg2 5.2048 3.589 .904 .853

LAMPIRAN 3

ANALISIS KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN

Statistics

gender usia

pendidikan terakhir

pernah belanja online?

frekuensi belanja

online

pengeluaran pribadi perbulan

pengeluaran untuk belanja online per

bulan

N Valid 210 210 210 210 210 210 210

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Gender

gender

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid pria 82 39.0 39.0 39.0

wanita 128 61.0 61.0 100.0

Total 210 100.0 100.0

2. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Umur

usia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid dibawah 21 102 48.6 48.6 48.6

21-25 tahun 88 41.9 41.9 90.5

26-30 tahun 13 6.2 6.2 96.7

31-35 tahun 1 .5 .5 97.1

36-40 tahun 3 1.4 1.4 98.6

diatas 40 3 1.4 1.4 100.0

3. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pendidikan Terakhir

pendidikan terakhir

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid SLTP 5 2.4 2.4 2.4

SLTA 159 75.7 75.7 78.1

S1 43 20.5 20.5 98.6

Pasca Sarjana S2/S3 3 1.4 1.4 100.0

Total 210 100.0 100.0

4. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Belanja Online

pernah belanja online?

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid ya 210 100.0 100.0 100.0

5. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Frekuensi Belanja Online

frekuensi belanja online

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid 1 minggu 1 kali 3 1.4 1.4 1.4

1 bulan 1 kali 34 16.2 16.2 17.6

3 bulan 1 kali 42 20.0 20.0 37.6

6 bulan 1 kali 50 23.8 23.8 61.4

1 tahun 1 kali 41 19.5 19.5 81.0

lebih dari 1 tahun 1 kali 40 19.0 19.0 100.0

6. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pengeluaran Pribadi per Bulan

pengeluaran pribadi perbulan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid kurang dari Rp 1.000.000 64 30.5 30.5 30.5

Rp 1.000.000 - Rp 3.000.000 132 62.9 62.9 93.3 Rp 3.000.001 - Rp 5.000.000 6 2.9 2.9 96.2

lebih dari Rp 5.000.000 8 3.8 3.8 100.0

Total 210 100.0 100.0

7. Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan Pengeluaran Belanja Online

pengeluaran untuk belanja online per bulan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid kurang dari Rp 500.000 175 83.3 83.3 83.3

Rp 500.000 - Rp 1.000.000 31 14.8 14.8 98.1 Rp 1.000.001 - Rp 2.000.000 4 1.9 1.9 100.0

LAMPIRAN 4

ANALISIS REGRESI LINIER SEDERHANA

1. Pengaruh Citra Perusahaan pada Kepercayaan

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 totalcitraa . Enter

a. All requested variables entered. b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .472a .223 .219 5.04240

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalcitra

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1518.723 1 1518.723 59.732 .000a

Residual 5288.558 208 25.426

Total 6807.281 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalcitra b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 15.043 2.003 7.509 .000

totalcitra .554 .072 .472 7.729 .000

2. Pengaruh Financial Relationship Marketing pada Kepercayaan

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method 1 totalfinanciala . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .264a .069 .065 5.51850

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalfinancial

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 472.887 1 472.887 15.528 .000a

Residual 6334.394 208 30.454

Total 6807.281 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalfinancial b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 24.683 1.473 16.757 .000

totalfinancial .587 .149 .264 3.941 .000

3. Pengaruh Social Relationship Marketing pada Kepercayaan

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method 1 totalsociala . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .368a .135 .131 5.31973

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalsocial

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 920.978 1 920.978 32.544 .000a

Residual 5886.302 208 28.300

Total 6807.281 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalsocial b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 17.402 2.289 7.602 .000

totalsocial 1.268 .222 .368 5.705 .000

4. Pengaruh Structural Relationship Marketing pada Kepercayaan

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method 1 totalstructurala . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .115a .013 .009 5.68273

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalstructural

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 90.250 1 90.250 2.795 .096a

Residual 6717.031 208 32.293

Total 6807.281 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalstructural b. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 27.616 1.647 16.764 .000

totalstructural .295 .176 .115 1.672 .096 a. Dependent Variable: totalpercaya

5. Pengaruh Kepercayaan pada Niat Beli Ulang

Variables Entered/Removedb

Model

Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method 1 totalpercayaa . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 .641a .411 .408 2.95819

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya

ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1268.845 1 1268.845 144.996 .000a

Residual 1820.183 208 8.751

Total 3089.029 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya b. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 6.694 1.105 6.058 .000

totalpercaya .432 .036 .641 12.041 .000

LAMPIRAN 5

ANALISIS REGRESI LINIER BERGANDA MODERASI

Efek Moderasi Komunikasi Getok Tular Positif

Variables Entered/Removedb Model Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 totalpercayaa . Enter

2 totalgetokposa . Enter

3 percayaxgetokposa . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Model Summary Mod

el R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics R Square

Change F

Change df1 df2

Sig. F Change 1 ,641a ,411 ,408 2,95819 ,411 144,996 1 208 ,000 2 ,655b ,430 ,424 2,91755 ,019 6,835 1 207 ,010 3 ,658c ,433 ,425 2,91465 ,004 1,412 1 206 ,236 a. Predictors: (Constant),

totalpercaya

b. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokpos

c. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokpos, percayaxgetokpos

ANOVAd Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1 Regression 1268,845 1 1268,845 144,996 ,000a

Residual 1820,183 208 8,751

Total 3089,029 209

2 Regression 1327,029 2 663,514 77,950 ,000b Residual 1762,000 207 8,512

Total 3089,029 209

3 Regression 1339,023 3 446,341 52,541 ,000c Residual 1750,005 206 8,495

Total 3089,029 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya

b. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokpos

c. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokpos, percayaxgetokpos d. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta

Toleranc

e VIF

1 (Constant) 6,694 1,105 6,058 ,000

totalpercaya ,432 ,036 ,641 12,041 ,000 1,000 1,000 2 (Constant) 4,763 1,317 3,618 ,000

totalpercaya ,395 ,038 ,586 10,373 ,000 ,863 1,159 totalgetokpo

s ,285 ,109 ,148 2,614 ,010 ,863 1,159

3 (Constant) -1,066 5,079 -,210 ,834

totalpercaya ,589 ,168 ,875 3,507 ,001 ,044 22,642 totalgetokpo

s ,872 ,506 ,452 1,724 ,086 ,040 24,985

percayaxget

okpos -,019 ,016 -,495 -1,188 ,236 ,016 63,068 a. Dependent Variable:

Excluded Variablesc

Model Beta In t Sig.

Partial Correlation

Collinearity Statistics

Tolerance VIF

Minimum Tolerance 1 totalgetokpos ,148a 2,614 ,010 ,179 ,863 1,159 ,863

percayaxgetok

pos ,206

a _{2,289 ,023 ,157 ,342 2,925 ,342} 2 percayaxgetok

pos -,495

b

-1,188 ,236 -,083 ,016 63,068 ,016 a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), totalpercaya

b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokpos c. Dependent Variable: totalniat

CollinearityDiagnosticsa

Model

Dimen sion

Eigenval ue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions

(Constant) totalpercaya totalgetokpos

percayaxgetok pos

1 1 1,983 1,000 ,01 ,01

2 ,017 10,734 ,99 ,99

2 1 2,963 1,000 ,00 ,00 ,00

2 ,021 11,802 ,00 ,72 ,65

3 ,016 13,777 1,00 ,28 ,35

3 1 3,936 1,000 ,00 ,00 ,00 ,00

2 ,042 9,673 ,02 ,00 ,00 ,01

3 ,021 13,603 ,00 ,04 ,03 ,00

4 ,000 103,933 ,98 ,96 ,97 ,99

EfekModerasiKomunikasiGetokTularNegatif

Variables Entered/Removedb Model Variables Entered

Variables

Removed Method

1 totalpercayaa . Enter

2 totalgetoknega . Enter

3 percayaxgetoknega . Enter a. All requested variables entered.

b. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Model Summary

Model R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Change Statistics R

Square Change

F

Change df1 df2

Sig. F Change 1 ,641a ,411 ,408 2,95819 ,411 144,996 1 208 ,000 2 ,642b ,412 ,406 2,96204 ,001 ,459 1 207 ,499 3 ,655c ,429 ,421 2,92505 ,017 6,269 1 206 ,013 a. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya

b. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokneg

c. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokneg, percayaxgetokneg

ANOVAd Model

Sum of

Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 1268,845 1 1268,845 144,996 ,000a

Residual 1820,183 208 8,751

Total 3089,029 209

2 Regression 1272,873 2 636,436 72,539 ,000b

Residual 1816,156 207 8,774

Total 3089,029 209

Residual 1762,518 206 8,556

Total 3089,029 209

a. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya

b. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokneg

c. Predictors: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokneg, percayaxgetokneg d. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) 6,694 1,105 6,058 ,000

totalpercaya ,432 ,036 ,641 12,041 ,000 1,000 1,000

2 (Constant) 7,295 1,418 5,145 ,000

totalpercaya ,425 ,037 ,631 11,389 ,000 ,926 1,080 totalgetokneg -,051 ,075 -,038 -,678 ,499 ,926 1,080

3 (Constant) ,253 3,142 ,080 ,936

totalpercaya ,658 ,100 ,976 6,577 ,000 ,126 7,955 totalgetokneg ,821 ,356 ,605 2,306 ,022 ,040 24,877 percayaxgetok

neg -,029 ,012 -,655 -2,504 ,013 ,040 24,721 a. Dependent Variable: totalniat

Excluded Variablesc

Model

Beta

In t Sig.

Partial Correlation

Collinearity Statistics

Tolerance VIF

Minimum Tolerance

1 totalgetokneg -,038a -,678 ,499 -,047 ,926 1,080 ,926 percayaxgetok

neg -,065

a _{-1,180 ,239 -,082 ,932 1,073 ,932} 2 percayaxgetok

neg -,655

b

-2,504 ,013 -,172 ,040 24,721 ,040 a. Predictors in the Model: (Constant),

totalpercaya

b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), totalpercaya, totalgetokneg

c. Dependent Variable: totalniat

CollinearityDiagnosticsa

Model Dimension

Eigenv alue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions

(Constant) totalpercaya totalgetokneg

percayaxgetok neg

1 1 1,983 1,000 ,01 ,01

2 ,017 10,734 ,99 ,99

2 1 2,885 1,000 ,00 ,00 ,01

2 ,102 5,315 ,01 ,09 ,69

3 ,013 15,072 ,99 ,90 ,30

3 1 3,841 1,000 ,00 ,00 ,00 ,00

2 ,125 5,545 ,01 ,01 ,01 ,01

3 ,033 10,833 ,04 ,02 ,03 ,05

4 ,001 57,103 ,96 ,97 ,96 ,94

6

Jawaban Responden untuk Profil Demografi

No

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

2

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

3

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

4

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

5

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

6

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

7

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

8

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

9

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

10

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

11

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 2.0

12

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

13

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0

14

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

15

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

16

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0

17

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

18

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0

19

2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

20

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

21

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0

22

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

23

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

24

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

25

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

26

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

27

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

28

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

29

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

30

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

31

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

32

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

33

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0

34

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

35

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

36

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

37

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

38

1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

39

2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

40

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

41

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

43

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

44

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

45

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

46

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

47

2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

48

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

49

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

50

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

51

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

52

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

53

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

54

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

55

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

56

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

57

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

58

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

59

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

60

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

61

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

62

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

63

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

64

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

65

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

66

1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

67

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

68

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

69

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

70

1.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

71

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0

72

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 1.0

73

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

74

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

75

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

76

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

77

2.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

78

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

79

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

80

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

81

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

82

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

83

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

84

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

85

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

87

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

88

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

89

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

90

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

91

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

92

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 2.0

93

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

94

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

95

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

96

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0

97

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

98

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

99

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

100

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

101

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

102

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

103

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

104

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

105

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

106

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

107

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

108

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

109

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

110

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

111

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

112

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0

113

1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

114

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

115

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

116

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

117

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

118

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

119

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

120

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

121

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

122

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

123

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

124

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

125

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

126

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

127

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

128

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

129

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

131

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

132

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

133

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

134

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

135

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 1.0

136

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

137

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

138

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0

139

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

140

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

141

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0

142

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0

143

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0

144

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

145

1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

146

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

147

2.0 4.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

148

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

149

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

150

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

151

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

152

1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0

153

2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0

154

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

155

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

156

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

157

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0

158

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0

159

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 1.0

160

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

161

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

162

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

163

1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0

164

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

165

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

166

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

167

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

168

1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

169

2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

170

2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

171

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

172

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

173

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0

175

2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

176

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0

177

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

178

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

179

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0

180

1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 1.0

181

2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

182

2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0

183

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

184

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

185

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0

186

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0

187

2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

188

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0

189

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0

190

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0

191

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0

192

2.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0

193

1.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

194

1.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 3.0

195

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0

196

1.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 3.0

197

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 4.0 2.0

198

1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0

199

1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 3.0

200

1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 2.0

201

1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0

202

2.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 1.0

203

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0

204

2.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 2.0

205

1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 1.0

206

2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0

207

2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0

208

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 2.0

209

2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0

Jawaban Responden untuk Citra Perusahaan

No

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Total

1

3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 31.0

2

3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 29.0

3

4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 37.0

4

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.0

5

4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 28.0

6

4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 28.0

7

4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 33.0

8

3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 29.0

9

4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 31.0

10

2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 22.0

11

5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30.0

12

4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30.0

13

4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 29.0

14

2.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 24.0

15

4.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 22.0

16

3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 29.0

17

2.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 30.0

18

4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 31.0

19

3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.0

20

2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 22.0

21

4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 30.0

22

2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 28.0

23

2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 16.0

24

4.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 29.0

25

3.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 26.0

26

4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 37.0

27

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.0

28

4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 31.0

29

3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 33.0

30

3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 28.0

31

2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 26.0

32

2.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 30.0

33

3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 20.0

34

3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 29.0

35

2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 27.0

36

3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 27.0

37

4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 26.0

38

4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 32.0

39

4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 29.0

40

3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 21.0

41

2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 23.0

43

4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 32.0

44

4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 33.0

45

4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 32.0

46

4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30.0

47

5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 36.0

48

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.0

49

3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 27.0

50

4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 30.0

51

3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 33.0

52

4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 32.0

53

4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30.0

54

3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 23.0

55

5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 34.0

56

4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 31.0

57

4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 37.0

58

4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 29.0

59

3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 22.0

60

3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 29.0

61

4.0 4.0 5.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 31.0

62

4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 35.0

63

4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 28.0

64

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.0

65

1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 18.0

66

5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 35.0

67

2.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 16.0

68

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 28.0

69

2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 25.0

70

3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 24.0

71

4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 26.0

72

3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 28.0

73

2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 20.0

74

2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 20.0

75

3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 29.0

76

3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 31.0

77

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 26.0

78

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 26.0

79

4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30.0

80

4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 29.0

81

2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 22.0

82

2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 22.0

83

3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 30.0

84

3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 27.0

85

2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 22.0

Titik Persentase D istribusi t

d.f. = 1 - 200

Diproduksi oleh: Junaidi

Diproduksi oleh: Junaidi (

http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com

), 2010

Page 1

Titik Persentase Distribusi t (df = 1

–

40)

Pr 0.25 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001

df 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.050 0.02 0.010 0.002

1 1.00000 3.07768 6.31375 12.70620 31.82052 63.65674 318.30884 2 0.81650 1.88562 2.91999 4.30265 6.96456 9.92484 22.32712 3 0.76489 1.63774 2.35336 3.18245 4.54070 5.84091 10.21453 4 0.74070 1.53321 2.13185 2.77645 3.74695 4.60409 7.17318 5 0.72669 1.47588 2.01505 2.57058 3.36493 4.03214 5.89343 6 0.71756 1.43976 1.94318 2.44691 3.14267 3.70743 5.20763 7 0.71114 1.41492 1.89458 2.36462 2.99795 3.49948 4.78529 8 0.70639 1.39682 1.85955 2.30600 2.89646 3.35539 4.50079 9 0.70272 1.38303 1.83311 2.26216 2.82144 3.24984 4.29681 10 0.69981 1.37218 1.81246 2.22814 2.76377 3.16927 4.14370 11 0.69745 1.36343 1.79588 2.20099 2.71808 3.10581 4.02470 12 0.69548 1.35622 1.78229 2.17881 2.68100 3.05454 3.92963 13 0.69383 1.35017 1.77093 2.16037 2.65031 3.01228 3.85198 14 0.69242 1.34503 1.76131 2.14479 2.62449 2.97684 3.78739 15 0.69120 1.34061 1.75305 2.13145 2.60248 2.94671 3.73283 16 0.69013 1.33676 1.74588 2.11991 2.58349 2.92078 3.68615 17 0.68920 1.33338 1.73961 2.10982 2.56693 2.89823 3.64577 18 0.68836 1.33039 1.73406 2.10092 2.55238 2.87844 3.61048 19 0.68762 1.32773 1.72913 2.09302 2.53948 2.86093 3.57940 20 0.68695 1.32534 1.72472 2.08596 2.52798 2.84534 3.55181 21 0.68635 1.32319 1.72074 2.07961 2.51765 2.83136 3.52715 22 0.68581 1.32124 1.71714 2.07387 2.50832 2.81876 3.50499 23 0.68531 1.31946 1.71387 2.06866 2.49987 2.80734 3.48496 24 0.68485 1.31784 1.71088 2.06390 2.49216 2.79694 3.46678 25 0.68443 1.31635 1.70814 2.05954 2.48511 2.78744 3.45019 26 0.68404 1.31497 1.70562 2.05553 2.47863 2.77871 3.43500 27 0.68368 1.31370 1.70329 2.05183 2.47266 2.77068 3.42103 28 0.68335 1.31253 1.70113 2.04841 2.46714 2.76326 3.40816 29 0.68304 1.31143 1.69913 2.04523 2.46202 2.75639 3.39624 30 0.68276 1.31042 1.69726 2.04227 2.45726 2.75000 3.38518 31 0.68249 1.30946 1.69552 2.03951 2.45282 2.74404 3.37490 32 0.68223 1.30857 1.69389 2.03693 2.44868 2.73848 3.36531 33 0.68200 1.30774 1.69236 2.03452 2.44479 2.73328 3.35634 34 0.68177 1.30695 1.69092 2.03224 2.44115 2.72839 3.34793 35 0.68156 1.30621 1.68957 2.03011 2.43772 2.72381 3.34005 36 0.68137 1.30551 1.68830 2.02809 2.43449 2.71948 3.33262 37 0.68118 1.30485 1.68709 2.02619 2.43145 2.71541 3.32563 38 0.68100 1.30423 1.68595 2.02439 2.42857 2.71156 3.31903 39 0.68083 1.30364 1.68488 2.02269 2.42584 2.70791 3.31279 40 0.68067 1.30308 1.68385 2.02108 2.42326 2.70446 3.30688

Catatan: Probabilita yang lebih kecil yang ditunjukkan pada judul tiap kolom adalah luas daerah

dalam satu ujung, sedangkan probabilitas yang lebih besar adalah luas daerah dalam

kedua ujung

Diproduksi oleh: Junaidi (

http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com

), 2010

Page 2

Titik Persentase Distribusi t (df = 41

–

80)

Pr _{0.25 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001}

df 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.050 0.02 0.010 0.002

41 0.68052 1.30254 1.68288 2.01954 2.42080 2.70118 3.30127 42 0.68038 1.30204 1.68195 2.01808 2.41847 2.69807 3.29595 43 0.68024 1.30155 1.68107 2.01669 2.41625 2.69510 3.29089 44 0.68011 1.30109 1.68023 2.01537 2.41413 2.69228 3.28607 45 0.67998 1.30065 1.67943 2.01410 2.41212 2.68959 3.28148 46 0.67986 1.30023 1.67866 2.01290 2.41019 2.68701 3.27710 47 0.67975 1.29982 1.67793 2.01174 2.40835 2.68456 3.27291 48 0.67964 1.29944 1.67722 2.01063 2.40658 2.68220 3.26891 49 0.67953 1.29907 1.67655 2.00958 2.40489 2.67995 3.26508 50 0.67943 1.29871 1.67591 2.00856 2.40327 2.67779 3.26141 51 0.67933 1.29837 1.67528 2.00758 2.40172 2.67572 3.25789 52 0.67924 1.29805 1.67469 2.00665 2.40022 2.67373 3.25451 53 0.67915 1.29773 1.67412 2.00575 2.39879 2.67182 3.25127 54 0.67906 1.29743 1.67356 2.00488 2.39741 2.66998 3.24815 55 0.67898 1.29713 1.67303 2.00404 2.39608 2.66822 3.24515 56 0.67890 1.29685 1.67252 2.00324 2.39480 2.66651 3.24226 57 0.67882 1.29658 1.67203 2.00247 2.39357 2.66487 3.23948 58 0.67874 1.29632 1.67155 2.00172 2.39238 2.66329 3.23680 59 0.67867 1.29607 1.67109 2.00100 2.39123 2.66176 3.23421 60 0.67860 1.29582 1.67065 2.00030 2.39012 2.66028 3.23171 61 0.67853 1.29558 1.67022 1.99962 2.38905 2.65886 3.22930 62 0.67847 1.29536 1.66980 1.99897 2.38801 2.65748 3.22696 63 0.67840 1.29513 1.66940 1.99834 2.38701 2.65615 3.22471 64 0.67834 1.29492 1.66901 1.99773 2.38604 2.65485 3.22253 65 0.67828 1.29471 1.66864 1.99714 2.38510 2.65360 3.22041 66 0.67823 1.29451 1.66827 1.99656 2.38419 2.65239 3.21837 67 0.67817 1.29432 1.66792 1.99601 2.38330 2.65122 3.21639 68 0.67811 1.29413 1.66757 1.99547 2.38245 2.65008 3.21446 69 0.67806 1.29394 1.66724 1.99495 2.38161 2.64898 3.21260 70 0.67801 1.29376 1.66691 1.99444 2.38081 2.64790 3.21079 71 0.67796 1.29359 1.66660 1.99394 2.38002 2.64686 3.20903 72 0.67791 1.29342 1.66629 1.99346 2.37926 2.64585 3.20733 73 0.67787 1.29326 1.66600 1.99300 2.37852 2.64487 3.20567 74 0.67782 1.29310 1.66571 1.99254 2.37780 2.64391 3.20406 75 0.67778 1.29294 1.66543 1.99210 2.37710 2.64298 3.20249 76 0.67773 1.29279 1.66515 1.99167 2.37642 2.64208 3.20096 77 0.67769 1.29264 1.66488 1.99125 2.37576 2.64120 3.19948 78 0.67765 1.29250 1.66462 1.99085 2.37511 2.64034 3.19804 79 0.67761 1.29236 1.66437 1.99045 2.37448 2.63950 3.19663 80 0.67757 1.29222 1.66412 1.99006 2.37387 2.63869 3.19526

Catatan: Probabilita yang lebih kecil yang ditunjukkan pada judul tiap kolom adalah luas daerah

dalam satu ujung, sedangkan probabilitas yang lebih besar adalah luas daerah dalam

kedua ujung

Diproduksi oleh: Junaidi (

http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com

), 2010

Page 3

Titik Persentase Distribusi t (df = 81

–

120)

Pr _{0.25 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001}

df 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.050 0.02 0.010 0.002

81 0.67753 1.29209 1.66388 1.98969 2.37327 2.63790 3.19392 82 0.67749 1.29196 1.66365 1.98932 2.37269 2.63712 3.19262 83 0.67746 1.29183 1.66342 1.98896 2.37212 2.63637 3.19135 84 0.67742 1.29171 1.66320 1.98861 2.37156 2.63563 3.19011 85 0.67739 1.29159 1.66298 1.98827 2.37102 2.63491 3.18890 86 0.67735 1.29147 1.66277 1.98793 2.37049 2.63421 3.18772 87 0.67732 1.29136 1.66256 1.98761 2.36998 2.63353 3.18657 88 0.67729 1.29125 1.66235 1.98729 2.36947 2.63286 3.18544 89 0.67726 1.29114 1.66216 1.98698 2.36898 2.63220 3.18434 90 0.67723 1.29103 1.66196 1.98667 2.36850 2.63157 3.18327 91 0.67720 1.29092 1.66177 1.98638 2.36803 2.63094 3.18222 92 0.67717 1.29082 1.66159 1.98609 2.36757 2.63033 3.18119 93 0.67714 1.29072 1.66140 1.98580 2.36712 2.62973 3.18019 94 0.67711 1.29062 1.66123 1.98552 2.36667 2.62915 3.17921 95 0.67708 1.29053 1.66105 1.98525 2.36624 2.62858 3.17825 96 0.67705 1.29043 1.66088 1.98498 2.36582 2.62802 3.17731 97 0.67703 1.29034 1.66071 1.98472 2.36541 2.62747 3.17639 98 0.67700 1.29025 1.66055 1.98447 2.36500 2.62693 3.17549 99 0.67698 1.29016 1.66039 1.98422 2.36461 2.62641 3.17460 100 0.67695 1.29007 1.66023 1.98397 2.36422 2.62589 3.17374 101 0.67693 1.28999 1.66008 1.98373 2.36384 2.62539 3.17289 102 0.67690 1.28991 1.65993 1.98350 2.36346 2.62489 3.17206 103 0.67688 1.28982 1.65978 1.98326 2.36310 2.62441 3.17125 104 0.67686 1.28974 1.65964 1.98304 2.36274 2.62393 3.17045 105 0.67683 1.28967 1.65950 1.98282 2.36239 2.62347 3.16967 106 0.67681 1.28959 1.65936 1.98260 2.36204 2.62301 3.16890 107 0.67679 1.28951 1.65922 1.98238 2.36170 2.62256 3.16815 108 0.67677 1.28944 1.65909 1.98217 2.36137 2.62212 3.16741 109 0.67675 1.28937 1.65895 1.98197 2.36105 2.62169 3.16669 110 0.67673 1.28930 1.65882 1.98177 2.36073 2.62126 3.16598 111 0.67671 1.28922 1.65870 1.98157 2.36041 2.62085 3.16528 112 0.67669 1.28916 1.65857 1.98137 2.36010 2.62044 3.16460 113 0.67667 1.28909 1.65845 1.98118 2.35980 2.62004 3.16392 114 0.67665 1.28902 1.65833 1.98099 2.35950 2.61964 3.16326 115 0.67663 1.28896 1.65821 1.98081 2.35921 2.61926 3.16262 116 0.67661 1.28889 1.65810 1.98063 2.35892 2.61888 3.16198 117 0.67659 1.28883 1.65798 1.98045 2.35864 2.61850 3.16135 118 0.67657 1.28877 1.65787 1.98027 2.35837 2.61814 3.16074 119 0.67656 1.28871 1.65776 1.98010 2.35809 2.61778 3.16013 120 0.67654 1.28865 1.65765 1.97993 2.35782 2.61742 3.15954

Catatan: Probabilita yang lebih kecil yang ditunjukkan pada judul tiap kolom adalah luas daerah

dalam satu ujung, sedangkan probabilitas yang lebih besar adalah luas daerah dalam

kedua ujung

Diproduksi oleh: Junaidi (

http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com

), 2010

Page 4

Titik Persentase Distribusi t (df = 121

–

160)

Pr _{0.25 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001}

df 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.050 0.02 0.010 0.002

121 0.67652 1.28859 1.65754 1.97976 2.35756 2.61707 3.15895 122 0.67651 1.28853 1.65744 1.97960 2.35730 2.61673 3.15838 123 0.67649 1.28847 1.65734 1.97944 2.35705 2.61639 3.15781 124 0.67647 1.28842 1.65723 1.97928 2.35680 2.61606 3.15726 125 0.67646 1.28836 1.65714 1.97912 2.35655 2.61573 3.15671 126 0.67644 1.28831 1.65704 1.97897 2.35631 2.61541 3.15617 127 0.67643 1.28825 1.65694 1.97882 2.35607 2.61510 3.15565 128 0.67641 1.28820 1.65685 1.97867 2.35583 2.61478 3.15512 129 0.67640 1.28815 1.65675 1.97852 2.35560 2.61448 3.15461 130 0.67638 1.28810 1.65666 1.97838 2.35537 2.61418 3.15411 131 0.67637 1.28805 1.65657 1.97824 2.35515 2.61388 3.15361 132 0.67635 1.28800 1.65648 1.97810 2.35493 2.61359 3.15312 133 0.67634 1.28795 1.65639 1.97796 2.35471 2.61330 3.15264 134 0.67633 1.28790 1.65630 1.97783 2.35450 2.61302 3.15217 135 0.67631 1.28785 1.65622 1.97769 2.35429 2.61274 3.15170 136 0.67630 1.28781 1.65613 1.97756 2.35408 2.61246 3.15124 137 0.67628 1.28776 1.65605 1.97743 2.35387 2.61219 3.15079 138 0.67627 1.28772 1.65597 1.97730 2.35367 2.61193 3.15034 139 0.67626 1.28767 1.65589 1.97718 2.35347 2.61166 3.14990 140 0.67625 1.28763 1.65581 1.97705 2.35328 2.61140 3.14947 141 0.67623 1.28758 1.65573 1.97693 2.35309 2.61115 3.14904 142 0.67622 1.28754 1.65566 1.97681 2.35289 2.61090 3.14862 143 0.67621 1.28750 1.65558 1.97669 2.35271 2.61065 3.14820 144 0.67620 1.28746 1.65550 1.97658 2.35252 2.61040 3.14779 145 0.67619 1.28742 1.65543 1.97646 2.35234 2.61016 3.14739 146 0.67617 1.28738 1.65536 1.97635 2.35216 2.60992 3.14699 147 0.67616 1.28734 1.65529 1.97623 2.35198 2.60969 3.14660 148 0.67615 1.28730 1.65521 1.97612 2.35181 2.60946 3.14621 149 0.67614 1.28726 1.65514 1.97601 2.35163 2.60923 3.14583 150 0.67613 1.28722 1.65508 1.97591 2.35146 2.60900 3.14545 151 0.67612 1.28718 1.65501 1.97580 2.35130 2.60878 3.14508 152 0.67611 1.28715 1.65494 1.97569 2.35113 2.60856 3.14471 153 0.67610 1.28711 1.65487 1.97559 2.35097 2.60834 3.14435 154 0.67609 1.28707 1.65481 1.97549 2.35081 2.60813 3.14400 155 0.67608 1.28704 1.65474 1.97539 2.35065 2.60792 3.14364 156 0.67607 1.28700 1.65468 1.97529 2.35049 2.60771 3.14330 157 0.67606 1.28697 1.65462 1.97519 2.35033 2.60751 3.14295 158 0.67605 1.28693 1.65455 1.97509 2.35018 2.60730 3.14261 159 0.67604 1.28690 1.65449 1.97500 2.35003 2.60710 3.14228 160 0.67603 1.28687 1.65443 1.97490 2.34988 2.60691 3.14195

Catatan: Probabilita yang lebih kecil yang ditunjukkan pada judul tiap kolom adalah luas daerah

dalam satu ujung, sedangkan probabilitas yang lebih besar adalah luas daerah dalam

kedua ujung

Diproduksi oleh: Junaidi (

http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com

), 2010

Page 5

Titik Persentase Distribusi t (df = 161

–

200)

Pr _{0.25 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001}

df 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.050 0.02 0.010 0.002

161 0.67602 1.28683 1.65437 1.97481 2.34973 2.60671 3.14162 162 0.67601 1.28680 1.65431 1.97472 2.34959 2.60652 3.14130 163 0.67600 1.28677 1.65426 1.97462 2.34944 2.60633 3.14098 164 0.67599 1.28673 1.65420 1.97453 2.34930 2.60614 3.14067 165 0.67598 1.28670 1.65414 1.97445 2.34916 2.60595 3.14036 166 0.67597 1.28667 1.65408 1.97436 2.34902 2.60577 3.14005 167 0.67596 1.28664 1.65403 1.97427 2.34888 2.60559 3.13975 168 0.67595 1.28661 1.65397 1.97419 2.34875 2.60541 3.13945 169 0.67594 1.28658 1.65392 1.97410 2.34862 2.60523 3.13915 170 0.67594 1.28655 1.65387 1.97402 2.34848 2.60506 3.13886 171 0.67593 1.28652 1.65381 1.97393 2.34835 2.60489 3.13857 172 0.67592 1.28649 1.65376 1.97385 2.34822 2.60471 3.13829 173 0.67591 1.28646 1.65371 1.97377 2.34810 2.60455 3.13801 174 0.67590 1.28644 1.65366 1.97369 2.34797 2.60438 3.13773 175 0.67589 1.28641 1.65361 1.97361 2.34784 2.60421 3.13745 176 0.67589 1.28638 1.65356 1.97353 2.34772 2.60405 3.13718 177 0.67588 1.28635 1.65351 1.97346 2.34760 2.60389 3.13691 178 0.67587 1.28633 1.65346 1.97338 2.34748 2.60373 3.13665 179 0.67586 1.28630 1.65341 1.97331 2.34736 2.60357 3.13638 180 0.67586 1.28627 1.65336 1.97323 2.34724 2.60342 3.13612 181 0.67585 1.28625 1.65332 1.97316 2.34713 2.60326 3.13587 182 0.67584 1.28622 1.65327 1.97308 2.34701 2.60311 3.13561 183 0.67583 1.28619 1.65322 1.97301 2.34690 2.60296 3.13536 184 0.67583 1.28617 1.65318 1.97294 2.34678 2.60281 3.13511 185 0.67582 1.28614 1.65313 1.97287 2.34667 2.60267 3.13487 186 0.67581 1.28612 1.65309 1.97280 2.34656 2.60252 3.13463 187 0.67580 1.28610 1.65304 1.97273 2.34645 2.60238 3.13438 188 0.67580 1.28607 1.65300 1.97266 2.34635 2.60223 3.13415 189 0.67579 1.28605 1.65296 1.97260 2.34624 2.60209 3.13391 190 0.67578 1.28602 1.65291 1.97253 2.34613 2.60195 3.13368 191 0.67578 1.28600 1.65287 1.97246 2.34603 2.60181 3.13345 192 0.67577 1.28598 1.65283 1.97240 2.34593 2.60168 3.13322 193 0.67576 1.28595 1.65279 1.97233 2.34582 2.60154 3.13299 194 0.67576 1.28593 1.65275 1.97227 2.34572 2.60141 3.13277 195 0.67575 1.28591 1.65271 1.97220 2.34562 2.60128 3.13255 196 0.67574 1.28589 1.65267 1.97214 2.34552 2.60115 3.13233 197 0.67574 1.28586 1.65263 1.97208 2.34543 2.60102 3.13212 198 0.67573 1.28584 1.65259 1.97202 2.34533 2.60089 3.13190 199 0.67572 1.28582 1.65255 1.97196 2.34523 2.60076 3.13169 200 0.67572 1.28580 1.65251 1.97190 2.34514 2.60063 3.13148

Catatan: Probabilita yang lebih kecil yang ditunjukkan pada judul tiap kolom adalah luas daerah

dalam satu ujung, sedangkan probabilitas yang lebih besar adalah luas daerah dalam

kedua ujung