Parliamentary Debate. The researcher conducted a pretest in a form of a speaking test, three times treatments, and the posttest.
The design of the research is as follows:
T1 X T2
Where:
T1 : Pretest
T2 : Posttest X : Treatment
Setiyadi, 2004 The  reason  why  the  research  applied  this  method  was  that  he  would  like  to
holistically  examine  and  observe  the  natural  phenomenon  that  occured  in  the debate  activity  done  by  the  2
nd
grade  students  of  senior  high  school.  He  also would like to know whether the Asian Parliamentary Debate was applicative and
significant towards the teaching of speaking process.
3.2.    Subjects
The subjects of this research were the students of XI A II class, SMAN 5 Bandar Lampung  academic  year  20132014.  The  research  was  conducted  in  five
meetings,  one  meeting  for  the  pretest,  three  meeting  for  the  treatments,  and  one meeting for the posttest. The sources of the data were the teacher, students as well
as  the  students’  performances  in  the  debate.  Then,  the  researcher  was  observing the students when they performed the debate in front of the class.
3.3.    Variables
Hatch and Farhady 1982:12 states that variable as an attribute of person or of an object  which  varies  from  person  to  person  or  from  object  to  object.  In  order  to
assess  the  influence  of  the  treatment  in  the  research,  variable  can  be  defined  as independent and dependent variables.
According to Hatch and Farhady 1982:15, types of variable are as follows: 1.
The independent variable is the major variable that was investigated by  the researcher.
2. Dependent variable is the variable that the researcher observed and measured
to determine the effect of the independent variable. In this research, the independent variable is known as the treatment variable. The
writer proposed two variables in this research, as follows: 1.
Asian  Parliamentary  Debate  technique  as  independent  variable  X  because this variable was the major and investigated.
2. Development of students’ speaking components was the dependent variable
Y  because  this  variable  determined  the  effect  of  the  Asian  Parliamentary Debate technique.