Digital resources
58 Digital resources
Overview
• provide the technical and cultural infrastructure to support digital resource creation, sharing,
Priority 3 places a substantial emphasis on digital
adaptation and re-use.
resources as a key vehicle for transforming education and addressing the personalisation agenda. While it
Implementation and uptake
identiies that much progress has been made in this Of the 125 respondents, 94% said their organisation area, it recognises the need to:
provided access to digital resources. The vast majority • increase the quantity and range of resources
provided access to digital resources for staff (91%) that are available to teachers
and students (90%). Far fewer supported access for • increase the quality of those resources,
parents or other members of the community (49%). which includes increasing the innovation of
For more details see panel 22 . their design so that it takes full advantage of
The 117 respondents who indicated that their the interactive nature of ICT and moves away
organisation offered access to digital resources were from content delivery
asked to specify the nature of those resources. The most commonly provided resources were locally developed or procured: ‘Access to institution/ department-level collections of digital resources’
22 Access to digital learning resources
(85%), followed by ‘LA/regional collections of digital resources’ (62%). A relatively small proportion of
When we asked respondents to identify which groups of users their organisations provided with access to
organisations were planning to provide access to digital resources, we found some variations across
additional sets of resources; the maximum being the respondent groups, which are shown in Figure
16% of respondents, who said they were planning 22.1. Most noticeably, all respondents from the
to provide access to the NEN resources. Panel 23 RBCs provided access for all three groups of people
(p59) shows a breakdown of the resources provided. (staff, students and parents/other members of the community). Commercial respondents were the least
Additional questions explored the extent to likely to provide access to digital resources for staff and
which organisations had implemented copyright students, and more likely to provide access for parents
management and/or resource standards management or the community than the post-16 or pre-16 sectors.
(for instance SCORM compliance enabling transfer Not surprisingly, the post-16 sector is the least likely to
of resources to other systems). Some 37% (of provide access to parents or the community. the 117) reported that their organisation had
Figure 22.1 Who is given access to digital resources?
implemented copyright management, with a further 25% planning to do so. And 46% of organisations had implemented resource standards management,
with a further 25% planning to do so. In the post-16 group these igures seem to relect the
lack of college policies on the re-use of e-learning
materials that is reported in the literature 94 .
centage of Per respondents 40%
As already noted (p20 Learning platforms:
Implementation and uptake ), a major focus of the use of learning platforms was on accessing content.
Access provided for
Given the patchy uptake of learning platforms, it seems reasonable to conclude that use of digital
Staff
Students
Parents/ community
resources in learning platforms is also uneven and generally low. This relects the reported position in FE
RBC (n=5) 100%
and sixth-form colleges, where for example only 13%
Pre-16 (n=52) 90%
of colleges using NLN materials reported that in 2005 their use was common practice 95 .
Post-16 (n=38) 95%
Commercial (n=10)
Other (n=20) 95%
All (n=125) 91%
Referred to in Digital resources: Implementation and uptake
Example 11 – Access to diverse commercial
23 Digital learning resources provided
resources via a single sign-on
Figure 23.1 gives a breakdown by sector of the
In one LA the use of a sophisticated portal
resources that are already being provided.
enables widespread use of digital resources from diverse commercial sources. This complements an e-portfolio system which is used for hosting
Figure 23.1 Digital resources provided, by sector
home-produced content. When Curriculum Online initially emerged, there 100%
was anxiety about the proliferation of URLs and
usernames/passwords, which the LA thought might
inhibit digital resource use. Primary schools in
centage of
particular felt overwhelmed, so the LA developed
Per respondents 40%
the portal as an easier starting point for schools.
The portal provides users with one central log-in to around 40 suppliers’ systems. The user can log in 0%
Resources
with the username and password that they have been given for the portal and can then access and cross-
search all the resources from any supplier that their
Regional
school has paid for.
Institutional/ Departmental
For the portal to work, the LA negotiated with
Local authority/
suppliers to gain access to the metadata for their
RBC (n=5)
digital resources. Merging all of this metadata with school purchasing information resulted in the ability
Pre-16 (n=48)
to cross-search material from different suppliers (so
Post-16 (n=37) 84%
long as a school had paid for access to that supplier’s
Commercial
data). This worked well but was dependent on the
quality of suppliers’ metadata. Initially this was a
Other (n=19)
problem, which meant that search results were dominated by those suppliers’ resources which had
All (n=117)
been tagged properly. Feedback to other suppliers that their resources were not coming up in searches encouraged them to improve their tagging.
This shows the following.
The system has been very successful both in saving • Commercial respondents were less likely than other schools money through aggregated procurement
sectors to provide access to collections of digital arrangements and also in usage levels. Around half
resources and, not surprisingly, where they were the schools in the LA are regular users of the system.
providing access to digital resources these would The main technical problem they have had relates to
be ones that they had developed themselves. systems from suppliers which track students’ activity
• NLN, RDN and FERL resources were most often in order to give them feedback on their progress.
used by post-16 organisations.
However, the LA has found ways to overcome this • NEN resources were most often used by RBCs, and from their perspective, though at least one supplier least often by commercial and post-16 respondents.
feels that the quality of the service they can provide • Regional collections were least often used by to schools has been reduced. The LA has also had post-16 respondents’ organisations.
problems because some teachers are reluctant to
• Pre-16 organisations were most likely to use
tell students their usernames and passwords as the internally developed digital resources. teachers want to keep the portal for their own use.