II. LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter discusses about concept of speaking, type of speaking, concept of teaching speaking, concept of role play, advantages and disadvantages of role
play, procedure of teaching speaking through role play, theoretical assumption
and hypothesis.
2.1 Concept of Speaking
Speaking is oral communication that is used to express ideas, feeling, and thought among the people. According to Bryne 1984 speaking is oral communication. It
is a way process between speaker and listener and involve productive and receptive skill of understanding. It means that at least two people in speaking
process, they are speaker and listener. The speaker gives the information or message to the listener and listener tries to understand the spea
ker’s ideas.
Meanwhile according to Doff 1987: 2 in all of communication or conversation two people are exchanging information or they have a communication or
conversation need. There are some reasons for people to communicate with each other, one of which is to tell people things they do or to find things out from other
people.
Furthermore, speaking is one of the central elements of communication of an interactive process in which an individual alternately takes the roles of speakers
and listeners to communicate information, ideas, and emotions to others using oral language Sister, 2004:7
. So, the situation of the students’ emotion affected the quality of speaking. The main goal of speaking is to communicate. So, to deliver
the ideas effectively the speaker has to understand the meaning of all things that will be delivered.
Brown 2001:250 states that speaking is an interactive process of constructing meaning that involves producing, receiving, and processing information.
Moreover, the form and the meaning of speaking depend on the context in which the conversation occurs, including the participant themselves and the purpose for
speaking. According to Chaney 1998:31, speaking is the process of building and sharing meaning through the use of verbal and non-verbal symbol, in a variety of
contexts. So, based on this definition, speaking can take place if the speaker uses verbal symbol like words and non-verbal symbol like gesture to convey his
intention.
Based on the theory above, it can be concluded that speaking is the process of interaction between speaker and listener in which the speaker sends the message,
while the listener receives and process it in his mind, his feeling or opinion to express the ideas in order to understand the intention of that message for the
purpose of respondi ng to the speakers’ message.
Generally, there are five components of speaking skill, i.e. Comprehension, pronunciation, fluency, grammar, and vocabulary Syakur, 1987:3:
Comprehension
According to Heaton 1991 comprehension is the ability of understanding the speakers’ intention and general meaning. It means that
comprehensibility focuses on the students’ understanding of the conversation. Comprehensibility measures how much interpretation is
required to understand students’ responses.
Pronunciation
It refers to the ability to produce easily comprehensible articulation Syakur: 1987. It means that, pronunciation is the way for students to
produce clearer language when they are speaking.
Fluency
Fluency is the ease and speed of the low of the speech Haris, 1978:81. Fluency refers the smootnes of flow which sounds, syllables, words, and
phrases are joined together when speaking. So, fluency can be defined as the ability to speak fluently.
Grammar
It is needed for students to arrange a correct sentence in conversation. When we speak to other people it means that we express some of our ideas
and thought orally, both listener and speaker should be understand each other.
Vocabulary
Vocabulary refers to the selection of the words those are appropriate to the topic and occasion.
However in this research, the components of speaking that are observed were pronunciation, fluency, and comprehension. According to Heaton 1991, there
are some criteria for analyzing oral ability as follow:
Table 2.1 Rubric of Scoring System
Range Pronunciation
Fluency Comprehensibility
100-90
Excellent Pronunciation only very
slightly influenced by mother tongue. Two or
three minor grammatical and lexical
errors. Speaks without too
great an effort with a wide range of
expression. Searches for words
occasionally but only one or two
unnatural pauses. Easy for the listener
to understand the speaker intention
and general meaning. Very few
interruption or classification
required. 89-70
Very good Pronunciation is
slightly influenced by mother tongue. A few
minor grammatical and lexical errors but most
utterances are correct. Has to make effort at
times to search for words. Nevertheless,
smooth very delivery on the whole and
only a few unnatural pauses.
The spea ker’s
intention and general meaning are clear. A
few interruption by the listener for the
sake of clarification.
69-60
Good Pronunciation is still
moderately influenced by mother tongue but
no serious phonological errors. A few
Although shehe has made an effort and
search for words, there are unnatural
pauses. Fairly Most of what the
speakers say is easy to follow. Their
intention is clear but several interruptions
grammatical and lexical errors but only one or
two major errors causing confusion.
smooth delivery mostly. Occasionally
fragmentary but succeeds in
conveying the general meaning. For
range of expression. are necessary to help
him to convey the message or to seek
clarification.
59-40
Fair Pronunciation is
influenced by mother tongue but only serious
phonological errors. Several grammatical
and lexical errors, some of cause confusion.
Has to make an effort for much of
the tome often has to search to desire
meaning rather hating delivery and
fragmentary. Range of expression often
limited. The listener can
understand a lot of what he said, but he
must constantly seek clarification. Cannot
understand many of the speaker’s more
complex or longer sentences.
39-30
Poor Pronunciation seriously
influenced by mother tongue with the errors
causing a breakdown in communication. Many
basic grammatical and lexical errors.
Long pauses while searches for desired
meaning. Frequently and fragmentary
halting delivery. Almost gives up
making the effort at the times. Limited
range of expression. Only small bits can
be understood and then considerable
effort by someone who is used to
listening to the speakers.
29-10
Very poor Serious Pronunciation
errors as well as basic grammatical and lexical
errors. No evidence of having mastered any of
the language skills areas practice in the
Full of long unnatural pauses.
Very halting and fragmentary
delivery. At times gives up making the
effort very limited. Hardly anything of
what is said can be understood. Even
when the listener makes a great efforts
or interrupts, the speaker is unable to
course. clarify anything he
seems to have said.
2.2 Type of Speaking