Selection of tutoring pairs, or dyads: This step involves putting

commit to user xxxv During the intervention the tutor would read a passage to the tutee and the tutee would follow along with a photocopy of the passage. The tutee would then read the passage back to the tutor, while the tutor followed along providing corrective feedback. After five minutes the students would switch roles and repeat the procedure. The higher performing student always began the session as the tutor. This procedure enabled the weaker reader to hear and see the passage prior to oral reading. Once the students became skillful at the tutoring procedure, the teacher introduced comprehension questions to the tutoring sessions. After each student orally read for five minutes, heshe would summarize what was just read and answer questions pertaining to the reading such as “what is the first thing you learned? or “what is the most important thing about who or what in the text?” Prior to the peer tutoring intervention, the students in both the control group standard classroom instruction and in the tutoring group were assessed on measures of reading comprehension Peters in http:www.unicommons.com node6975. According to Gresham in http:www.lehigh.eduprojectreachteachers peer_tutoringpeer_tutoring_step_1.htm, there are seven steps of peer tutoring. They are as follows:

1. Selection of tutoring pairs, or dyads: This step involves putting

students together into pairs. · Dyad selection does not have to be structured at all; kids respond well with peer tutoring regardless with whom they are paired, even if high achievers are paired with low achievers. The only really important guideline in dyad commit to user xxxvi selection is to avoid putting best friends together, as well as pairing worst enemies together. Students are less likely to be productive in these cases. · Students may be paired with peers who achieve at levels the same or different from their own. However, if you are concerned with pairing based on achievement, a good method of pairing is as follows: o List the students in your class from highest to lowest achievers. This does not have to be very precise, just a general ranking. o Divide the list in half, now giving you two groups of students o Number each group. For example, in a class of 28 students, you will now have two groups of 14 students, ranked lowest to highest. Number each group, which means you will have a 1-14 group and a 15-28 group. o Pair the highest student with the lowest student for a 1-14 group and a 15-28 group. For example, students 1 and 14 will be paired, 2 and 13, 3 and 12, 15-28 group. And so on. For the other group, students 15 and 28 will be paired, 14 and 27, 13 and 26, etc. If you have a class with an odd number of students, never fear It is ok to have one group of 3 students. Furthermore, you will likely have at least one absentee on a given day, and in this instance you can “mix and match”. · You should change the dyads every 2-3 weeks to prevent the students from developing patterns of behavior or responding. Additionally, changing dyads allows for a “fresh start” and can provide the opportunity for a student to become better acquainted with someone else. commit to user xxxvii

2. Task Structure: Deciding how and when to Use Peer Tutoring: Even

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION USING RECIPROCAL TEACHING (A Classroom Action Research at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 13 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

1 8 196

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION BY USING BUZZ GROUPS TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

3 163 93

A COLLABORATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY (A Classroom Action Research at the Fourth Semeseter Students of English Education Department of IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro in the Academic Year of 2013/2014.

0 0 5

OPTIMIZING MIND MAPPING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ THINKING SKILL FOR READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2013/2014).

0 0 14

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

THE USE OF LEARNING CELL TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research of the First grade Students of SMA N1 AMPEL in the Academic Year of 20152016) A GRADUATING PAPER Submitted to the Board of Examiners as Partial Fulf

0 1 109

The Use of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) to Improve Students Reading Comprehension (Classroom Action Research in the Tenth Grade Students of SMK Diponegoro Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2016/2017) - Test Repository

0 0 202