Closing Description of Cycle II

commit to user lxxxix comprehension by giving the tasks or quizzes based on the text given. The quizzes consisted of main idea question, detail question, inference question, and word meaning question. Most students could answer them well. Moreover, they could answer inference question. “Who was Morrison? Morrison was person who cheated people of Wetumka.” The students who gave right answer could be described in the table 4.6 below: Table 4.6. The Result of Post Reading in Meeting 1 Cycle 2 Question Category R Meeting 1 Main Idea 17 students 42.5 Detail 40 students 100 Inference 28 students 70 Word Meaning 26 students 65 n 40 students Notes: n= number of students R= number of students who gave right answers

2. Closing

It was 5 minutes to end the class. Before saying goodbye, the researcher asked the students’ difficulties and what they felt during this activity. Fortunately, student AG wanted to deliver her opinion. She said “Mom, I don’t have difficulties to do it. Prosedurnya gampang diikuti dan kita senang dengan teknik ini, Mom” The researcher replied “Ok. Thanks for your comment. We continued next week. Good bye.” commit to user xc b Meeting 2 1 Opening The second meeting was held on Monday, December 27 th , 2010 at 11.30 a.m. The researcher and collaborator entered the class. Then, the researcher greeted the students and checked the attendance list. Four students were absent. 2 Main Activities a Pre reading activity Before the researcher distributed the text, she gave some clues related to the topic given. “Which one do you like living in village or in town?” the researcher asked the students. They answered simultaneously Village, Mom.” The researcher replied “Why? Do all of you live in village?” “Betul mom, enak tinggal di desa. The air is so fresh; the situation is free from noise, pokoke enak mom.” “Ok, what about the others? Who lives in town?” Researcher continued. “Saya Mom.” I like living in town because the facilities are complete.” Then, the researcher wrote the title on whiteboard and asked the students to predict the text. They answered that it was about simple people. b While reading activity The researcher instructed students to make their own pairs freely. Then, she distributed the text entitled “Plain People”. Next, she asked the students to do peer tutoring sessions as what they had done in previous meeting. They produced main idea question, detail question, inference question, and word meaning question and provided their answers. There was one student who raised her hand to get assistance from the researcher. She was doubtful whether her inference question commit to user xci was correct or not. “Mom, betul ga inference question dari kalimat- If an Amish farmer gets sick, relatives families and neighbors will milk his cows, plant his fields, and harvest his crops - Do Amish people like to help each other?” Researcher said “Yes, that’s right.” All of pair did their best work. They could be good tutors since they could give feedback if their tutee answered incorrectly. It could be proved below: FY: “What does paragraph 2 concern about? DK: “Amish Life” FY:” Kurang spesifik jawabanmu. Coba dibaca lagi, amish live very simple, Their homes have no carpets on the floors, no pictures on the wall, no electricity. Jadi, main ideanya Amish’s way of life is very simple Oke, sekarang detail question. Where did Amish people settled?” DK: “They settled in the state of Pennsylvania.” Another illustration could be seen below: AL: “Why are Amish field successful although they do not use modern machine?” DW: “Because Amish believe Jesus.” AL: “Why are Amish field successful although they do not use modern machine?” DW: “Because they work together.” AL: “Hampir betul. Dikit lagi.diliat lagi clue nya DW: “Because they are hard worker and diligent.” AL: “Ya. Well done”Next, what is the meaning of persecuted in line 15?” DW: “Cruel” AL: “Yes, you are right.” c Post reading activity After some pairs presented their result of peer tutoring, the researcher gave quizzes to them. They answered the questions in pair. Next, the researcher chose the students in random to answer the questions while the others listened to and gave comments of their friends’ answers. The researcher noticed that more students participated to answer the questions. Moreover, all questions could be commit to user xcii answered well only in 10 minutes. Most of the answers were correct. It could be seen in table 4.7 below: Table 4.7. The Result of Post Reading in Meeting 2 Cycle 2 Question Category R Meeting 2 Main Idea 21 students 52.5 Detail 38 students 95 Inference 29 students 72.5 Word Meaning 30 students 75 n 40 students Notes: n= number of students R= number of students who gave right answers 3 Closing To close the meeting, the researcher pointed one student to state her feeling after doing this activity. She said “It was fun, mom. Teknik baru ini ga buat boring.” Researcher said “Thanks for your comments. Oke class I think the time is over. See you next week.” The researcher and collaborator left the class at 12.57 p.m. commit to user xciii c Meeting III 1 Opening The third meeting was conducted on Monday, January 3 rd , 2011. The researcher greeted the students and she also did not forget to say happy new year for all students. Then, the researcher checked the attendance list. 39 students attended the class and 1 students was absent because of sickness. 2 Main activities a Pre reading activity To warm the students up, the researcher wrote the title on whiteboard and the students were asked to predict the text. The researcher also gave some clues to make them easy to guess what the text talked about. “Do you like being a housewife?” The researcher said to one of the students. “Yes, Mom. Tapi juga pengen kerja biar bisa dapat uang sendiri.” Researcher continued “So, you want to be both carrier woman and housewife. That’s good. Now, I want to ask the male students. What do you think if the husbands stay at home and the wives go to work?” Student RK replied “I disagree, Mom. Karena suami yang harus cari uang.” Reseacher said “It is lucky for the woman who will be your wife because you will be a good husband.” All of the students laughed. b While reading activity After putting students together in pair, the researcher distributed the text entitled The Life of Housewives and Househusbands in the United States” The students began to do peer tutoring sessions. They had understood well about the procedure of peer tutoring. Therefore, there were no students who were confused commit to user xciv to do this activity. They could make questions based on the categories. When the researcher walked around to monitor the students, she noticed that student HC could not only produced inference question but also provide its answer. His question is “Why do most children enjoy the day-care center? because there are a lot of toys and games.” Furthermore, most of students could find the right main idea, make inferences, and predict word meanings. It could be seen when they do peer tutoring in pair. The tutors gave the main idea question, inference question, and word meaning question while the tutees answered them correctly. They played the role of tutors and tutees very well. They responded each other and provided feedback. It could be illustrated as follows: CB: “What is the main idea of paragraph 2? KM: “Many women work outside the home” CB: “Yes, you are right. What is the meaning of earn in line 16?” KM: “search” CB: “What is the meaning of earn? liat konteksnya.” KM: “Aku coba lagi ya. jawabnya get. Betul ga?” CB: “Good answer. Now, inference question. Why do the women work outside the home?” KM: “Because they want to get money.” CB: “That’s right.” c Post reading activity In post reading activity, the researcher gave the quizzes based on the text given. After finishing the quizzes, the researcher invited some of them to read their answers so that the other students could check whether the answer was right or not. In this post reading of meeting IV, the students showed that they gave the right answers. The researcher was happy to see the progress. In conclusion, based commit to user xcv on the quizzes in post reading activity, it could be seen that the students’ reading comprehension had improved see the table 4.8. below Table 4.8. The Result of Post Reading in Meeting 3 Cycle 2 Question Category R Meeting 3 Main Idea 28 students 70 Detail 40 students 100 Inference 28 students 70 Word Meaning 31 students 77.5 n 40 students Notes: n= number of students R= number of students who gave right answers Students’ correctness in post reading of each meeting increased. Before peer tutoring were implemented in reading class, the students needed extra time to complete the quizzes and the correctness of their answers were low. After implementing it, the number of students who gave right answers improved. In meeting 1, the students who had right answer in main idea question was 42.5, 52.5 in meeting 2, and 70 in meeting 3. Besides, the students who gave right answers in detail question in meeting 1, 2, 3 in sequence were 100, 95, and 100. In addition, in meeting 1, the students who had right answer in inference question was 70, 72.5 in meeting 2, and 70 in meeting 3. Also, 65 students could answer word meaning questions in meeting 1, 75 in meeting 2, and 77.5 in meeting 3. commit to user xcvi 3 Closing The time showed 12.45 p.m. It means that the time for reading class was over. To end the class, the researcher invited the students to give suggestion about peer tutoring technique. Student ES said “No suggestion. Peer tutoring is effective, Mom. Bisa memotivasi kita buat belajar reading.” Researcher replied “Thanks for your comment. Any else?” No answered. They kept silent. Then, the researcher continued “if there is no comment, I will end the class and don’t forget to attend the post test next Monday, January 10 th . See you next week.” The researcher and collaborator left the class at 12.56 p.m. d Meeting IV In this meeting, the students got post test 2. It was held on January, 10 th 2011. The test was the same thing applied in pre test. It ran smoothly. All students attended the test. This test was done to know the students’ mean score after treatment of cycle 2.

3. Observing

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION USING RECIPROCAL TEACHING (A Classroom Action Research at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 13 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

1 8 196

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION BY USING BUZZ GROUPS TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

3 163 93

A COLLABORATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY (A Classroom Action Research at the Fourth Semeseter Students of English Education Department of IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro in the Academic Year of 2013/2014.

0 0 5

OPTIMIZING MIND MAPPING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ THINKING SKILL FOR READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2013/2014).

0 0 14

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

THE USE OF LEARNING CELL TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research of the First grade Students of SMA N1 AMPEL in the Academic Year of 20152016) A GRADUATING PAPER Submitted to the Board of Examiners as Partial Fulf

0 1 109

The Use of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) to Improve Students Reading Comprehension (Classroom Action Research in the Tenth Grade Students of SMK Diponegoro Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2016/2017) - Test Repository

0 0 202