Acting a Description of Cycle II

commit to user lxxxvii

2. Acting a

Meeting 1 1 Opening It was on Monday, December 20 th 2010, at 11.30 a.m. when lesson started. The researcher greeted the students and checked the attendance list. There was one student who was absent because of sickness. 2 Main Activities a Pre reading activity In pre reading activity of first meeting, the researcher gave the students some exercises in finding main idea, finding detail, drawing inferences, and predicting word meaning from context due to the fact that they still had difficulties in these four skills. Before the students did the exercises, the researcher reviewed some strategies which she taught before in previous meeting about how to find main idea, find detail, draw inferences, and predict word meaning from context. The researcher believed that the students needed that kind of review very much. Doing this way, she often confirmed to students whether her explanation was acceptable or not. After that, the students finished the exercises. They could answer almost all of the exercises correctly. Next, the researcher did brainstorming with the students by asking “are you ever cheated by someone? Could you tell your experience to your friends?” No one answered. Then, the researcher pointed one of them. He was ST. He said that he was ever cheated by his friends. His friend brought his money and ran away. When he told his story, the students ED said “how pity you are” commit to user lxxxviii b While reading activity In while reading activity, students were put together into pairs or dyads. Then, the researcher gave them a text to read entitled Sucker Day. Like in previous meeting, they did peer tutoring sessions. They seemed relax and enjoy during this activity. It proved that they had known the concept of peer tutoring deeply. They made questions based on the category and responded them well. Moreover, they were interested in being a tutor and a tutee. They generated questions, answered them and gave feedback each other. It could be illustrated as follows: ME: “What is the main idea of paragraph three?” SR: “Morrison sold advertising space to businesspeople in Wetumka.” ME: “Yes, you’re right. Next, who caught Morrison?” SR: “Sheriff in Missouri” ME: “Your answer is right. Was the advertising space sold out?” SR: “No.” ME: “Was the advertising space sold out?”She repeated the question because the answer was wrong SR: “No.” ME: “Salah tau The answer is yes. The clue was in paragraph 3 last sentence. when Morrison left town, his suitcase was filled with much money that he got from the businesspeople Kopornya udah terisi penuh uang. So, it means the advertising space was sold out. SR: “O begitu ya.ok I know now” ME: “What is the meaning of “frowned”? SR: “Without smiling” ME: “Yes, you’re right.” Almost all of the pairs participated well in this activities. They were actively asking each other. They were so enthusiastic to follow the procedures of pair tutoring. This activity needed 40 minutes to finish. c Post reading activity In post reading, there were three pairs who represented their result of peer tutoring. It ran smoothly. Then, the researcher wanted to evaluate their commit to user lxxxix comprehension by giving the tasks or quizzes based on the text given. The quizzes consisted of main idea question, detail question, inference question, and word meaning question. Most students could answer them well. Moreover, they could answer inference question. “Who was Morrison? Morrison was person who cheated people of Wetumka.” The students who gave right answer could be described in the table 4.6 below: Table 4.6. The Result of Post Reading in Meeting 1 Cycle 2 Question Category R Meeting 1 Main Idea 17 students 42.5 Detail 40 students 100 Inference 28 students 70 Word Meaning 26 students 65 n 40 students Notes: n= number of students R= number of students who gave right answers

2. Closing

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

Applying Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Discussion Text. (A Classroom Action Research in the Third Grade of SMA Fatahillah Jakarta)

5 42 142

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION USING RECIPROCAL TEACHING (A Classroom Action Research at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 13 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

1 8 196

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION BY USING BUZZ GROUPS TECHNIQUE (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

3 163 93

A COLLABORATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY (A Classroom Action Research at the Fourth Semeseter Students of English Education Department of IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro in the Academic Year of 2013/2014.

0 0 5

OPTIMIZING MIND MAPPING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ THINKING SKILL FOR READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2013/2014).

0 0 14

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

THE USE OF LEARNING CELL TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research of the First grade Students of SMA N1 AMPEL in the Academic Year of 20152016) A GRADUATING PAPER Submitted to the Board of Examiners as Partial Fulf

0 1 109

The Use of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) to Improve Students Reading Comprehension (Classroom Action Research in the Tenth Grade Students of SMK Diponegoro Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2016/2017) - Test Repository

0 0 202