Thinking Framework CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
means that, this research is conducted with the artificial condition and it is made by the researcher.
The reason for choosing this an experimental method; the writer wants to know the influence of reciprocal teaching technique toward students’ reading
comprehension. Actually, an experimental research is divided into four designs which include: true experimental, quasi experimental, weak experimental and single subject
experimental. The writer uses quasi experimental research design that is specifically using two classes; the treatment class which is taught reading comprehension use
reciprocal teaching techniquethen the control class which the writer taught in conventional technique.
Based on John W. Creswell, he stated that quasi experiments include assignment, but not random assignment of participants to groups. This is because the
experimenter can not artificially create groups for the experiment. Randomly assigning students to the two groups would disrupt classroom learning. Because
educators often use intact groups schools, colleges, or school district in experiments, quasi-experimental designs are frequently used.And he added that in
quasi – experiment we can apply the pre-test and post-test.
4
It means that, quasi experiment is not random, thus the researcher have to select the populations.
And also, Creswell add that in the experimental research the researcher can give pre-test and post-test. Pre test provide to measure on some attribute or
characteristic that you asses for participants in an experiment before they receive a treatment and posttest is a measure on some attribute or characteristic that is assessed
for participant in an experiment after a treatment.
5
Thus, the researcher can apply pre- test before she conduct the treatment to see the first condition of the students and in
the last meetings, the researcher can give the students post-test, to see how far the students’ reading comprehension after they were given the treatment.
4
John W. Creswell, Educational Research planning, conducting, and evaluating quatitative and qualitative research, third edition, New Jersey: PEARSON, 2008, p. 313.
5
Ibid. 301.