√ √
8. Determining with formula:
6.76 9. Determining
in significance level 5 with degree of freedom df: df = N1+N2 -2
df = 30+30-2 df= 60-2
df= 58
Because the score of 58 was not mentioned in the table, the writer used the closest to 58 which was 60 degree of freedom. Thus, the writer gained
: Degree of significance 5 = 2. 00
10. The comparison between and
From the calculation above, it was found that the result of was 6.76
and the degree of freedom df was 60. In this research, the writer used the degree of significance 5. It can be seen that degree of freedom df and the degree of
significance 5=2.00. By comparing the result of
and on the degree of
significance 5 2.00, thus the writer summarized that was higher than
. It means that
alternative hypothesis was accepted and null
hypothesis was rejected because . Thus, there was significant difference
after teaching reading comprehension by using reciprocal teaching technique at
the second grade of SMP Dwi Putra SaruaCiputatTangerang Selatan academic year 20132014.
C. The Interpretation of the Data
Based on the formulations above, the results of the statistic calculation indicated that the result of
was 6.76 and the degree of freedom df was 60 while the degree of significance 5 = 2. 00. Comparing
to each values of the degree of significance, the writer found that
2.006.76. Thus,
was higher than
. Because
was higher than score obtained from the result of
calculating, thus, alternative hypothesis was accepted and
null hypothesis was rejected.
Based on the explanations above, the writer could interpret that teaching reading comprehension by using the reciprocal teaching technique
was success. And also, based on the data that were calculated above, it could be conclude that there was positive influence of reciprocal teaching technique
toward students’ reading comprehension.
34
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. The Conclusion
This research was conducted to look at the influence of reciprocal teaching technique in teaching reading comprehension. A quasi-experiment
research was decided as a design for this research by organizing pre-test and post-test. And that the result of
was 6.76 and the degree of freedom df was 60 while the degree of significance 5 = 2.00. Comparing
to each values of the degree of significance, the writer found that
2.00 6.76. Thus,
was higher than .
Based on the quantitative result of this study, it could be concluded that there was positive influence of reciprocal teaching technique toward students
reading comprehension. To increase the students’ reading comprehension, the teacher and students worked cooperatively by four steps, those are predicting,
questioning, clarifying and summarizing.
B. The Suggestion
After the writer made the conclusion, he tried to make some suggestions. There were some suggestions for the students, the teachers and
the next researchers. The first was for the students, reciprocal teaching technique is expected
to increase their confidence and bravery to ask a question, to show their argument and also to build their thinking skill.
The second was for the teacher, reciprocal teaching technique could be used in teaching reading comprehension, because it was an effective technique
to increase their ability in reading comprehension, and become more creative in learning reading text by doing well-steps of the technique.
And the last was for the next researchers, the writer would like to provide this skripsi as reference for conducting the research and hopefully it
would be useful for them.
35
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alderson, J Charles. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Arifin, Zainal, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2010. Arikunto, Suharsimi, ProsedurPenelitian, Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Caldwell, Jo Ann Schudt. Reading Assessment A Primer for Teacher and
Coaches: Second Edition. New York: The Guildford Press, 2008. Carter, Carolyn J. Why Reciprocal Teaching?. Journal for educational leadership.
1997. Cotterall, Sara. Reciprocal Teaching: A Problem-Solving Approach to Reading.
Guidelines a Periodical for Classroom Language Teachers. 12, 1990. Creswell, John W. Education Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating
Quantitative and Qualitative Research – Third Edition. New Jersey:
Pearson, 2008. Daiek, Deborah B and Anter, Nancy M. Critical Reading for College and Beyond.
New York: McGraw Hill, 2004. Doolittle, Peter E. et. al., Reciprocal Teaching for Reading Comprehension in
Higher Education: a Strategy for Fostering the Deeper Understanding of Texts,
the article
was accessed
on February
2013, at
http:www.isetl.orgijtlhe. Flynn, Naomi and Rhona Stainthorp, The Learning and Reaching of Reading and
Writing, West Sussex: Whurr Publishers Limited, 2006. Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Teaching. New York: Longman
Publisher, 1991. . How to Teach English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 2007.
. How to Teach Reading. Essex: Pearson Education Limited, 1998.
Izquierdo, A. Felipe Vela. Reciprocal Teaching a Useful Tool in Increasing Student Talking Time. Journal for English Teaching Forum, 2004.
