they  could  write  a  procedural  text  based  on  the  structure.  And  20.69  of  the students, they could not write a procedural text based on the structure.
Question  number  8  was,  whether  the  material  about  a  procedural  text  by using  generic structure and language features  gave  interest  or not.  Most students
93.10 answered that the material which I gave was interesting. And 6.90 of the students answered it was not interesting. It can be concluded, the teacher could
give the interesting material. Question  number  9  was,  whether  the  material  about  a  procedural  text  by
using generic structure and language features gave, make the students  feel bored or  not.  Most  students  93.10  answered  that  the  material  which  I  gave  did  not
make them feel bored . And 6.90 of the students answered it was make them felt bored. It can be concluded, the teacher could give the interesting material, so they
did not feel bored during the lesson. Question  number  10  was,  whether  the  students  got  any  knowledge  after
learning  material  or  not.  All  of  the  students  100  answered  that  they  got  any knowledge after learning material.
4.2.3 Results of Obsevation of Cycle 1
In cycle 1, the students were unfamiliar with the genre – based approach, because
they had never been heard before. Therefore, firstly, I had to explain about what is genre
– based approach. During  the  cycle  1,  I  gave  some  warm
–  up  questions  related  to  the materials, such as kinds of genres, what the definition of procedural text is, what
the  social  function  of  procedural  text  is,what  the  generic  structure  and  language features of procedural text are, etc.
The students were able to tell me examples of genre, they also could explain the  definition  of  procedural  text,  but  they  were  not  able  to  explain  the  generic
structure  and  language  features  of  procedural  text.  The  students  only  kept  quiet; some  of  them  answered  the  generic  structure  of  a  procedural    text,  and  most  of
them couldn‟t answer my questions.  After I explained the material, I asked to the students to work in a group, then they wrote a procedural text based on the topic
which  I  gave.  There  were  only  three  groups  out  of  seven  groups  shared  their writing to the class. I assumed that they were shy to share their answer although
they had made it. During  the  teaching  and  learning  process  of  cycle  1,  most  of  the  students
looked enthusiastic join to the class, they listened to my explanation attentively, I assumed  that  the  students  were  curious  to  know  my  explanation  about  genre
– based approach. Only a few of students looked sleepy and chat with her friend. It
might  be  caused  my  voice  was  not  really  loud  and  my  eye  contact  only  in  one side. When we disccused the material together, there were six students  who asked
me about the generic structure, language features, technical words, and adverb. Overalls,  most  of  the  students  seemed  interested  and  motivated  to  my
teaching. But, the students were not too active in answering and asking questions. The  classroom  looked  too  quiet  and  the  students  were  too  shy  to  share  their
writing or even  asked to  me related  to  the genre – based approach. On the other
hand,  they  were  able  to  finish  the  test  on  time.  I  concluded,  the  teaching  and learning process in the cycle 1 ran well.
4.2.4 Result of Observation of Cycle 2