Cycle II Description of the Data
improved. There are many students who had prepared the media and source for learning when the teacher came in the classroom.
The students‟ activity in paying attention to the teacher is 83.01. It means that there is improvement in this activity. In the cycle I, there are still some
students who didn‟t pay attention to the teacher but in cycle II, most of students pay attention to the teacher.
The percentage of students‟ activity in answering the teacher‟s question is 68.1. Although there is no significant improvement, the percentage in this cycle
is higher than in cycle I. so, it shows that the students who did this activity are increased.
The percentage of students who are enthusiasm in responding teacher‟s question is 62.38 . This percentage is higher than the percentage in the cycle I.
In the cycle I, the percentage of the students‟ activity in responding teacher‟s
question is about 48.03. It means that there is improvement in this activity. There are many students who are enthusiasm in responding the teacher‟s question.
The students‟ activity in doing the task well is 85. There is very significant improvement in this activity which is about 30.43. Most of the
students did their task well because they didn‟t find many difficulties. They are confident in speaking because the teacher had motivated the students to speak
English. The percentage of students who learning speaking well is about 89.71.
The percentage of this activity in cycle I is 75.65. It describes that there is improvement in this activity. The students can learn speaking well, because they
can understand the material easily. The next students‟ activity is the activity in not giving up in answering the
questions from the teacher. This activity has percentage about 66.03. The percentage of this activity had improved. Many students feel that they can answer
the teacher‟s questions. From all activities which are observed above, all of the activities had
improved and the average is 75.52. It shows that the indicators of the research had been reached
that the average of the percentage of the students‟ activity had to reached until 70 or more.
The students‟ score of their motivation in learning speaking is gotten from the questionnaire.
The percentage of students‟ score of motivation can be described on the table below:
Table 4.6 Score of Students’ Motivation in Learning Speaking Cycle II
Interval f
F
relatif
F
relatif
kumulatif 86 - 91
9 23.68
100 92 - 97
3 7.89
76.3 98 - 103
8 21.05
60.4 104 - 109
6 15.79
47.4 110 - 115
6 15.79
31.6 116 - 121
6 15.79
15.8 38
Minimum score: 86 Mean : 102.87
Maximum score: 120 Standard Deviation: 10.53
According to the table above, the average of studen ts‟ score of motivation
is 102.87 . It shows that the average of students‟ score of motivation is in the high
category. The category of students‟ motivation can be seen on the table below:
Table 4.7 The Category of Students’ Motivation in Learning Speaking Cycle II
Category Mean
Students’ score score
percentage student
percentage
low x 65.3
x 47 -
medium 65.3 ≤ x ≤ 102.7 47 ≤ x ≤ 73.36
19 50
High x 102.7
X 73.36 19
50
Based on the table above, there are 50 of the students whose the score of motivation in learning speaking is in the medium category and 50 is in the
high category. It indicates that the students had high motivation in learning speaking by Contextual Teaching and Learning.
The students‟ speaking score was gotten from the post test II. The average of students‟ speaking score can be described on the table below:
Table 4.8 The
Students’ Speaking Score in Cycle II
Student Comprehension Fluency Grammar Vocabulary Pronunciation Total
A1 7
6 7
7 6
67 A2
7 7
6 6
6 62
A3 6
6 6
7 5
61 A4
8 8
8 8
8 80
A5 6
6 6
7 7
65 B1
7 5
6 7
5 61
B2 8
8 7
8 7
75 B3
7 6
6 7
6 64
B4 7
7 7
8 7
73 B5
7 7
7 7
7 70
C1 7
7 7
8 6
71 C2
8 8
8 8
6 76
C3 5
5 6
7 6
61 C4
7 7
6 8
6 69
C5 6
7 6
6 7
63 D1
7 6
6 7
6 64
D2 7
7 7
7 6
68 D3
8 7
6 7
6 66
D4 7
7 7
8 7
73 D5
7 8
8 8
7 77
E1 8
7 7
8 7
74 E2
8 8
7 7
7 72
E3 8
6 6
7 6
65 E4
7 6
6 7
6 64
E5 8
8 8
8 8
80 F1
7 7
8 8
7 76
F2 7
7 7
8 7
73 F3
8 8
8 7
6 73
F4 7
6 6
7 6
64 F5
8 7
7 8
7 74
G1 8
8 8
8 7
78 G2
7 8
8 8
7 77
G3 6
6 6
7 6
63 G4
7 7
7 8
7 73
G5 7
6 6
6 6
61 H1
8 7
7 8
7 74
H2 8
8 8
8 8
80 H3
8 8
7 8
7 75
Average 70.18
Based on the table above, the lowest score of post test II is 61 and the highest score is 76. The average of
students‟ speaking score is 70.18. It indicates that the students‟ speaking score had reached the goal of research, even better than
in cycle I.
d. Reflection
After analyzing the data by observing and evaluating the data from observation, interview and questionnaire, the writer inferred that the students had
high motivation in learning speaking by using Contextual Teaching and Learning. Most students are confident and not fear in making mistake in speaking English.
So, the writer concluded that in cycle II, the students‟ motivation had improved
and had reached the goal of research.