Performance and the Formal Organization of Greek Tragedy

29 b. The recognition anagnorisis: a change from ignorance to knowledge producing love or hate between the persons destined by the poet for good or bad fortune. According to him in the best and most powerful tragedies, the reversal and the recognition occur together and create surprise. c. A scene of suffering pathos: a destructive or painful action, such as death on the stage, bodily agony, wounds, etc. Thus, the tragic plot is structured to arouse and shape emotions Aristotle concedes that tragedy is not true in the sense that history is true. He therefore stresses that a tragic plot is not an exact imitation or duplication of life, but rather a representation or mimesis. The concept of representation acknowledges both the moral role of the writers and the artistic freedom needed to create works conducive to proper responses. A tragic plot, therefore, consists of a self-contained and concentrated single action. Anything outside this action, such as unrelated incidents of the major character, is not to be contained in the play. The action of Oedipus the King, for example, is focused on Oedipus’s determination as king of Thebes to free his city from the pestilence that is destroying it. Although other aspects of his life are introduced in the plays dialogue because they are relevant to the action, they are reported rather than dramatized. Only those incident integral to the action are included in the play. To sum up, Aristotle’s definition of tragedy is related to his idea that tragedy, as a dramatic form, is designed to evoke powerful emotions and thereby, through catharsis, to serve both a salutary and ethical purpose. The tragic incident and plot must be artistically constructed to produce the “essential tragic effect”. Therefore Aristotle stresses that plot and incident, arranged for this effect, form the end or goal of tragedy

D. Performance and the Formal Organization of Greek Tragedy

On performance days, the competing playwrights staged their plays from morning to afternoon, first the tragedies, then the satyr plays and after these, comedies by other writers. Because plays were performed with a minimum of scenery and props, dramatists used dialogue to establish times and locations. Each tragedy was performed in the order of the formally designated sections that modern 30 editors have marked in the printed texts. It is therefore possible to describe the production of a play in terms of these structural divisions. 1. The First Part Was the Prologue, the Play’s Exposition There was considerable variety in the performance of the prologue. Sometimes it was given by a single actor, speaking as either a mortal or a god. In Oedipus the King, Sophocles used all three actors for the prologue Oedipus, the Priest, and Creon, speaking to themselves and also to the extras acting as the Theban populace.

2. The Second Part Was the Parados, the Entry of the Chorus into the Orchestra

Once the chorus members entered the orchestra, they remained there until the play’s end. Because they were required to project their voices to spectators in the top seats, they both sang and chanted their lines. They also moved rhythmically in a number of stanzaic strophes turns, antistrophes counter turns, and epodes units following the songs. These dance movements, regulated by the rhythm of the aulos or flute as in military drill, were done in straight-line formations of five or three, but we do not know whether the chorus stopped or continued moving when delivering their lines. After the parados, the choristers would necessarily have knelt or sat at attention, in this way focusing on the activities of the actors and, when necessary, responding as a group.

3. They Play’s Principal Action Consisted of Four Episodes and Stasimons

With the chorus as a model audience, the drama itself was developed in four full sections or acting units. The major part of each section was the episode. Each episode featured the actors, who presented both action and speech, including swift one-line interchanges known as stichomythy. When the episode ended, the actors withdrew. The following second part of the acting section was called a stasimon plural stasima, performed by the chorus in the orchestra. Like the parados, the stasima required dance movements, along with the chanting and singing of strophes, antistrophes, and epodes. The topics concerned the play’s developing action, although over time the stasima became more general and therefore less integral to the play. 31

4. The Play Concluded with the Exodos

When the last of the four episode-stasimon sections had been completed, the exados literally, “a way out”, or the final section, commenced. It contained the resolution of the drama, the exit of the actors, and the last pronouncements, dance movements, and exit of the chorus.

5. The Role of the Chorus Was Diminished as Greek Tragedy Evolved

We know little about tragic structure at the very beginning of the form, but Athenian tragedies of the fifth century B.C.E. followed the pattern just described. Aeschylus, the earliest of the Athenian writers of tragedy, lengthened the episodes, thus emphasizing the actors and minimizing the chorus. Sophocles made the chorus even less important. Euripides, Sophocles’s younger contemporary, concentrated on the episodes, making the chorus almost incidental. In later centuries, dramatists dropped the choral sections completely, establishing a precedent for the five-act structure adopted by Roman dramatists and later Renaissance dramatists.

E. Irony in Tragedy