Ibrohim, 2008. This book eventually gives information to participants on what to do after data in the lesson study is collected and how to make the report of the result of
monitoring and evaluation is more valuable.
II. STRATEGY OF THE WORKSHOP
The workshop should be allocated for a three hour classroom activity. For the first fifteen minutes, the participant will discuss on the basic concept of monitoring and evaluation to
raise similar perception and specifically, the discussion should obtain some key aspects of monitoring and evaluation in mathematics learning and the lesson study program
itself. This is followed by comprehensive discussions on designing observation sheet, practice observing classroom activity, understanding the basic rules of collecting data in
lesson study, developing sheet to analyse findings up to understanding monitoring and evaluation for the a whole lesson study cyclic. The discussion will be facilitated with
worksheets, videos, and documentations provided by the local lesson study team see appendices.
III. THE CONTENT OF THE WORKSHOP
A. The Value of Monitoring and Evaluation
The terms of monitoring and evaluation may be distinguished by its products. Monitoring should result a portrait of a whole activity, but evaluation should produce a judgement
whether an activity has indicated desired goals. Certainly, these terms are closely related since they may look at the same things at the same time. Hence, these terms are often
used concurrently.
An activity of monitoring and evaluation in general are proposed not only at assessing how well the program have been managed and how successful the program has been, but
also at indentifying any obstacles, finding solutions to problems and obtaining feedbacks from participants in order to revise or to develop further program.
As broadly conceived, the main goal of lesson study is to improve the quality of teaching practices. Accordingly, the main goal of monitoring and evaluation in lesson study is to
look more deeply on how teaching process is conducted and how students learn the teaching material. Monitoring and evaluation in lesson study are profoundly
advantageous for the team because these activities will inform on how successful the lesson study is and more importantly, provide facts on the impact of the lesson plan
towards students’ understanding in mathematics. Therefore, monitoring and evaluation in lesson study is impossibly underestimated.
B. Subject and Object of Monitoring and Evaluation
The person or the team who conduct monitoring and evaluation is often called the subject of monitoring and evaluation. Things or persons which are monitored or evaluated are the
object of monitoring and evaluation. The team should have sufficient knowledge and capability to manage the lesson study program and to improve quality of mathematics
learning. This team is responsible to develop monitoring and evaluation instruments as well as to prepare the report.
Basically, a lesson study activity includes three steps: plan, do and see Syamsuri Ibrohim, 2008. It should have been discussed in the previous topic that the first step
includes studying lesson plan, selecting research lesson, anticipating student thought,
planning focuses of data collection. The second step, do, is when one team member teaches and the others collect data by taking notes of behaviour and any documentation.
Whereas the third step, see, is to share collected data, interpret, analyse and revise planning based on the information obtained from data. Hence, monitoring and evaluation
should cover these steps.
There might be two key aspects of monitoring and evaluation in lesson study in mathematics education:
students’ learning process and lesson study cycle. It could be found various aspects in mathematics learning, however Takahashi and Yoshida 2004
suggested that lesson study team should determine what kinds of data must be collected during observation in order to conduct meaningful discussion and to carry out effective
sharing in the see activity. Commonly, focus of observation is a problematic aspect of students’ learning that is going to solve. This is frequently called the research lesson.
Some possible focuses of monitoring and evaluation on mathematics learning process are students’ interactions, students’ worksheets, misconceptions, motivation, learning
independency, group differentiation, teaching style and so on; while those on lesson study activity are classroom situation, school management, maintenance of each step in lesson
study, collaboration among teachers and so on. These are objects of monitoring and evaluation. Choosing the most desired focus to study during the lesson would narrow
discussion and provide more in depth understanding of the research lesson.
Since lesson study is actually a study proposed by every participants involved in, then each of them who should collect the data for monitoring and evaluation. In other word,
the subject of monitoring and evaluation are every lesson study participants. However,
there should be someone who is appointed as the monitoring and evaluation facilitator, who is responsible for distributing instruments, compiling files and documents, also as a
moderator when discussing lesson plan or analysing collected data. Otherwise, the result of monitoring and evaluation is unwell organised.
To sum up, objects of monitoring and evaluation in lesson study might be: 1 students’
behaviour during learning defined in the research lesson, or 2 mathematical understanding according to the lesson goal and 3 supporting factors during plan, do and
see activities. The subject of monitoring and evaluation should be every lesson study personnel and facilitated by a lesson study team leader.
C. Method of Monitoring and Evaluation
