Methods for organochlorine insecticides analyses in soil, water, plants and their monitoring

4. Methods for organochlorine insecticides analyses in soil, water, plants and their monitoring

4.1. Quantitative determination of organochlorine insecticide residues by GC- ECD and GC-MS techniques

For qualitative and quantitative organochlorine insecticides determination in soil two methods for multi-residues analyses have been applied: gas-chromatography with electron

112 Pesticides – Recent Trends in Pesticide Residue Assay

capture detector (GC-ECD) and gas-chromatography with mass spectrometer detector (GC- MS). Standard stock solution of 1000 mg/L (19 organochlorine insecticides) has been prepared from which dilutions up to 1 mg/L were made.

Standards solutions for calibration curve were prepared in the range of 0.025 mg/L –

0.5 mg/L with intermediate points of 0.05; 0.1 and 0.25 mg/L, and were injected into GC- ECD.

No. crt. Organochloride insecticide Retention time (minute)

1. HCB

2. Lindane ( لا -HCH) 11.57

9. α - endosulfane

10. β - endosulfane

11. Endosulfan sulfate

12. pp’- DDD

13. pp’- DDT

14. pp’- DDE

Table 5. Retention time of organochlorine insecticides from mixture Since at these retention times some interferences from also soil can occur, a second GC-MSD

method has been tested, being reccomended and frequently used in pesticides residue analyses. In this context, standard solutions were prepared for 11 organochlorine insecticides in the range of 0.1 - 0.5 mg/L and were injected into GC-MS.

For the quantitative analysis of pesticide residues from stock solution of 1000 mg/L containing 19 organochlorine pesticides a set of intermediate solutions has been prepared having the following concentrations: 0.05; 0.1 and 0.25 mg/L. After injection into GC-MS autosampler the calibration curves for organochlorine insecticides were obtained.

Qualitative and quantitative determination of insecticides in water and plant samples is performed by GC-MS technique in the similar conditions as for soil sample analyses.

New Trends in Pesticide Residues Control and Their Impact on Soil Quality and Food Safety 113

Nr. crt. Organochloride insecticide

Retention time (minute)

Specific ions

1. HCB

2. Lindan ( لا -HCH) 10.41 181, 219

9. α - endosulfan

10. β - endosulfan

11. Endosulfansulfat

12. pp’- DDD

13. pp’- DDT

14. pp’- DDE

Table 6. Retention times and specific mass for ions detected

Methods of organochlorine insecticides analyses in SOIL

from PLANTS Extraction Purification

from WATER

Extraction

Cleaning

Extraction Cleaning

For both extraction Static extraction methods the same - in a mixture of purification method acetone-hexane was used with

water being a

for plant 1:1.

with

silicagel 60, having

simple

samples Dynamic

petroleum

particle size of 63 – 200

matrix, there with

the liquid- extraction

ether or

µm.

is no need the acetone/

liquid - a mixture of

hexane 5:1

The recovery rate of

cleaning of

water 1:2.

cleaning acetone,

in water as

first extraction

organic

is enough. petroleum ether, procedure is between

solvent.

extract.

methylene 40-60%, and in the chloride 1:1:1.

dynamic extraction is between 70-90%.

Table 7. Multiresidual analysis methods for organochlorine analyses in soil water and plants

114 Pesticides – Recent Trends in Pesticide Residue Assay

4.2. Organochlorine pesticide residues in soil and water

4.2.1. Transfer and translocation

A study was performed in Arges River area, Romania, regarding the presence, persistency and accumulation of these organochlorine insecticides in surface water samples, underground water samples (drills), soil samples (0 – 10 cm; 10 – 20 cm; 40 – 60 cm) and vegetable plants (cabbage-fruit and tomatoes – for endosulfane).

Water samples extraction is done by direct contact with dichloromethane, after drying the sample with sodium sulfate hydricum. Cleaning was done on celite column with hexane.

In underground water samples very small concentration levels have been detected, below those which might affect the human health, as one can see in the following tables:

Sample Lindan

P1 0.050 0.041 0.053 0.039 P2 0.054 0.033

Table 8. Organochlorine concentration levels in surface water (µg/L)

P1 0.005 0.006 0.002 0.010 P2 0.007 0.008

Table 9. Organochlorine concentration levels in undergroundwater (µg/L)

Layer depth Sample

alfa-endosulfan DDT (cm)

Lindan

Aldrin

0.120 P1

40 - 60

nd

nd

nd

nd

0.127 P2

40 - 60

nd

nd

nd

nd

New Trends in Pesticide Residues Control and Their Impact on Soil Quality and Food Safety 115

Layer depth Sample

DDT (cm)

nd - nedetectabil Table 10. Organochlorine concentration levels in soil (mg/kg)

4.3. The accumulation of studied insecticides in vegetables as effect of treatments with endosulfane on soil and plants

In order to follow the persistency and accumulation of endosulfane residues in cabbage and tomatoes controlled treatments with Thionex 3I CE have been applied in concentration of 0.2 mg/kg for cabbage and tomatoes, 20 days before harvesting.

At each sampling period a number of 5 units of cabbage-fruit and 1 kg of tomatoes were taken. For each sampling period 3 samples were analysed, and average values are presented in the tables below.

Residue în mg/kg Days after treatment (no.)

Residue în mg/kg

(average values)

(average values)

Table 11. Degradation dynamics of endosulfane insecticide in cabbage and tomatoes Treatments were applied to soil with Chinese cabbage and radish crops, in small plants

phase, protected crops, in dose of 1.8 mg/kg (ppm) (lower dose) and 18 mg/kg (ppm) (upper dose). A chromatogram of a mixture of organo-chlorinated insecticides including endosulfan and its isomers has been registered.

Determination of endosulfane and its congeners content was done at harvest in leaves and root for radish, in fruit for cabbage and in soil.

116 Pesticides – Recent Trends in Pesticide Residue Assay

Residue mg/kg

Year Doze (ppb)

α- endosulfan

β- endosulfan Endosulfan-sulfat

Residue mg/kg

Year (ppb)

β- endosulfan Endosulfan-sulfat 1800

α- endosulfan

Residue mg/kg

Doze Endosulfan- (ppb)

α- endosulfan

β- endosulfan

* =1800 ppb- lower doze; ** = 18000 ppb- upper doze Table 12. Concentration of endosulfane in cabbage and radish

Reffering to endosulfane accumulation at smaller dose there are no differences between the

3 congeners, both in leaves and in root. In case of upper dose it might be remarked the difference between the accumulation level in root comparing to the level from leaves.

The biggest amounts were detected in case of endosulfane-sulfate congener.

Dose

Residue mg/kg

Year (ppb)

Endosulfan-sulfat 2003 1800 (low)

α- endosulfan

β- endosulfan

Residue mg/kg

Year (ppb)

Endosulfan-sulfat 2003 18000 (high)

α- endosulfan

β- endosulfan

Table 13. Persistency of endosulfane residue in soil cultivated with cabbage and radish Accumulation level of endosulfane insecticide in the cabbage soil crop was surveyed only at

lower dose, while for radish crop only at higher dose. The results show for cabbage crop the presence in quantifiable levels of all 3 congeners.

New Trends in Pesticide Residues Control and Their Impact on Soil Quality and Food Safety 117

These results indicate the necessity of a very good control on long persistency pesticide use. The most frequent cases of environmental factors pollution are are caused by ignorance, negligence and improper use of pesticides.

The results show that the accumulation of these pollutants in soil, plants and underground waters is influenced by chemical structure of compound, and physico-chemical properties of soil as well.

The monitoring of organochlorine insecticide residues in soil and water was carried out in samples from the same area. The distribution of organochlorine insecticide residues in the four soil layers is different, in the upper layer being more than 80% from total toxic content, while for the last layer the toxic values are below detection limit.

Determination made for persistency and accumulation level in different vegetables of organochlorine insecticide residues of endosulfane type indicate preferential accumulation in root and less in leaves.