Validity Trying Out the Research Instruments

2006 – 2010. In order out before it was actu order to find out its va Besides measu level and discrimina classifying the test int to find out the signific

3.5.1 Validity

Arikunto 200 to measure. In order t was tried out and t correlation formula. T Where: r : correlation coeffi x : item which its va The criteria of der to get the requirement of a good test, the tes ctually administered. Then its results then we validity and reliability. asuring validity and reliability of the instru ination power are also calculated. Difficulty into easy or difficult, while discrimination pow ificance of test items Arikunto 2003. 2003 state that a test is valid if it measures wh r to find out the validity of the achievement te the result was computed with Pearson Pr . The formula is. efficient y : item which its va validity is assessed N : the number of pa Ar of validity were shown in the table. test was first tried were calculated in trument, difficulty lty level is about ower is calculated hat it is supposed t test, the test item Product Moment validity is assessed participants Arikunto 2003:72 Table 3.2 r Coefficient Correlation Validity Raw Score Interpretation 0.8 – 1.0 Very high 0.6 – 0.8 High 0.4 – 0.6 Moderate 0.2 – 0.4 Low 0.0 – 0.2 Very Low Arikunto, 2003 The result of statistical computation on test shows that there were 22 vocabulary items and 21 reading comprehension items that were valid and could be used as the research instrument. See appendix A.1 Table 3.3 The Result of Vocabulary Validity Test Item Number Raw Score Interpretation 46, 49, 50 0.000 – 0.200 Very Low 9, 10, 15, 20, 24, 25, 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 47, 48 0.200 – 0.400 Low 6, 38, 44 0.400 – 0.600 Moderate - 0.600 – 0.800 High - 0.800 – 1.000 Very High Table 3.4 The Result of reading Comprehension Validity Test Item Number Raw Score Interpretation 11, 26, 29, 33 0.000 – 0.200 Very Low 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 28, 32, 34, 0.200 – 0.400 Low 27 0.400 – 0.600 Moderate - 0.600 – 0.800 High - 0.800 – 1.000 Very High In this correlation research, the items of research instrument must be equal between two variables. So, one item from vocabulary test must not be used. The lowest validity score in vocabulary mastery instrument was discarded.

3.5.2 Reliability

Dokumen yang terkait

An Analysis On High School Students’ Ability To Master Passive Voice A Study Case : The Second Year Students At SMK Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar

1 73 52

The Correlation Between Students’ Mastery In Vocabulary And Their Reading Comprehension Skill Of Descriptive Text

1 10 77

The influences of 'morning program on vocabulary' on students' reading ability (a pre-experimental study at the second grade of Senior High School, Ceger, Tangerang)

4 7 65

The Correlation between students mastery of vocabulary and their reading ability: a case study at the grade students of SMP YMJ Ciputat

1 14 62

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS` VOCABULARY MASTERY AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE THIRD GRADE OF SMPN 1 TEGINENENG

4 38 68

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION : A Study In Second Grade Of Junior High School.

0 0 35

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION: A Study In Second Grade Of Junior High School.

0 0 35

CORRELATION BETWEEN EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, VOCABULARY MASTERY AND READING COMPREHENSION (A Correlational Study between Emotional Intelligence, Vocabulary Mastery, and Reading Comprehension of the First Grade Students of SMA N 1 Surakarta in the Academic

0 0 15

View of The Correlation between Students’ Vocabulary Mastery and Their Reading of Narrative Text Ability

0 0 10

A STUDY ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ENGLISH NATIONAL EXAMINATION SCORE AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (A Correlational Research at the First Grade Students of Senior High School 1 Rembang in Academic Year

0 0 14