98
ANI SUSANA, 2012
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
|
repository.upi.edu
• Followed by other Asia-Pasific and India 16, and Europe 15.
PS: It was followed by other Asia-Pasific and India with 16, and Europe, with 15.
4.1.4.4 Making compound and complex sentences
In terms of compound and complex sentences, many students had problems with them.
R1 wrote: •
Subsequently, it is clearly seen that other five regions including China, India, Africa as well as Latin America Caribbean, on the other hand,
have opposite situation compare to the previous regions. China, where they have more than 22 of population.
• It is also followed by India and other three areas where other Asia-Pacific
area has similar percentages of population at around 16. PS:
Subsequently, it is clearly seen that other five regions including China, India, Africa as well as Latin America Caribbean have opposite
situation compared to the previous regions. China has more than 22 of global population.
It is also followed by India and other three areas. Other Asia-Pacific areas have similar percentages of population, that is at around 16.
R2 wrote: •
There are some parts of the world that had global wealth percentages higher than percentages of population.
•
The parts of the world who had higher global wealth than percentages of population were North America 34 Global wealth and just 6
population, Rich Asia-Pacific 24 Global wealth and just 5 population and Europe 30 global wealth and 15 number of
population
• The other part of the world, who had a higher percentages population than
the percentages of Global Wealth were other Asia Pacific population 16 and just 4 Global wealth, Africa pop. 10 and 2 for global wealth
99
ANI SUSANA, 2012
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
|
repository.upi.edu
and latin America Caribbean 8 for population and less 5 for Global wealth.
• And there were two countries with sama situation, China and India, China
had 24 percentages of population but just had less 5 Global wealth; and India had 16 population yet had just 1 global wealth.
PS:
There are some parts of the world that had higher global wealth percentages than that of population.
The parts of the world that had higher global wealth than that of population were North America with 34 and just 6, Rich Asia-Pacific
with 24 and just 5 and Europe with 30 and 15
.
The other part of the world that had higher percentages of population than that of global wealth were other Asia Pacific with 16 and just 45,
Africa with 10 and 2 and Latin America Caribbean with 8 and less than 5.
And there were two countries with the same situation: China and India. China had 24 percentages of population but just had less than 5 of
global wealth; whereas, India had 16 of population yet had just 1 of global wealth.
R3 wrote: •
Contrary with China which have population involved almost 24 of world population achieved only approximately 3 of total wealth distribution in
the world.
PS: On the contrary, China which had almost 24 of world population
achieved only approximately 3 of total wealth distribution in the world.
R5 wrote: •
The most distinguished feature is Nort America, which is only have 5 of global population, while having approximately 36 distribution of
wealth. •
India is as bad as cindition with China, where arround 17 people compare with only 1 of wealth distribution.
PS: The most distinguished feature is Nort hAmerica, which had 5 of global
population and approximately 36 of distribution of wealth.
100
ANI SUSANA, 2012
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
|
repository.upi.edu
The condition in India was as bad as in China, having around 17 of global population compared with only 1 of wealth distribution.
R7 wrote: •
If we look at the population of the region, China has a highest population, which is about 24 of population of the world, followed by
other Asia Pasific, India, and Europe with percentages of population between 15 to 16.
PS: If we look at the population of the regions, China has the highest
population, which is about 24 of population of the world, followed by other Asia Pasific, India, and Europe with percentages of population
between 15 and 16.
R9 wrote: •
Than followed by Europe and Rich Asia-Pasific with 30 and just under 25, respectively, and the popolation was 15 and 3, respectively for
popolation percentages. PS:
Then, it was followed by Europe and Rich Asia-Pasific with 30 and just under 25, respectively; and the percentages of population were
15 and 3, respectively.
4.1.5 Synthesis
