Results Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:A:Animal Reproduction Science:Vol63.Issue1-2.Oct2000:

3. Results

3.1. Effect of EcoRI microinjected into the pronucleus on embryo surÕiÕal To determine the optimal amount of the enzyme for the co-injection, we injected EcoRI alone in varying amounts ranging from 10 y9 Urnucleus to 10 y5 rnucleus, and examined the survival rate of the embryos. The buffer used for dissolving DNA was injected as the control. Table 1 shows the number of embryos that survived and developed in vitro afte rmicroinjection of various amounts of EcoRI into the pronucleus Ž . of zygotes. A sufficiently high proportion 71 of the eggs given the injection of the buffer alone developed into the morularblastocyst stage in vitro. Approximately 70 of the embryos given the injection of 10 y9 Urnucleus developed into the morularblasto- cyst stage. Injection of 10 y6 Urnucleus of EcoRI resulted in a remarkable reduction in the viability of the injected eggs, though 12 of the injected embryos developed to the Ž . y5 four-cell stage data not shown . The concentrations more than 10 Urnucleus did not result in any viable embryos. Injections of amounts of 5 = 10 y8 and 10 y7 Urnucleus, resulted in survival rates of 60.6 and 48.5 of the embryos, respectively. There was a good linear correlation between the amount of the enzyme injected and the mean survival rate of the injected eggs. We used 5 = 10 y8 Urnucleus in the subsequent series of experiments in which the enzyme was co-injected with DNA because this concentra- Ž . tion gave reasonable survival rate 60.6 before drastic reduction. 3.2. Effects of the co-injection of DNA constructs with the restriction endonuclease on the integration rate of foreign genes The results of co-injecting DNA constructs with restriction endonuclease are shown in Table 2. In this series, each of the two gene constructs was dissolved in the injection Table 1 In vitro development of mouse zygotes that were given pronuclear injections of various amounts of EcoRI Ž . Treatment No. of No. of No. of developed embryos a trials eggs used Morulae Blastocyst Total Ž . Ž . Ž . Non-injection 9 294 7 2.3 275 93.5 282 95.9 b Ž . Ž . Ž . Injection of buffer 2 107 15 14.0 61 57.0 76 71.0 y9 Ž . Ž . Ž . Amounts of injected 10 2 63 8 12.7 36 57.1 44 69.8 y8 Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . enzyme Ur2 plr nucleus 10 3 170 12 7.1 108 63.5 120 70.6 y8 Ž . Ž . Ž . 5=10 2 61 8 13.8 29 50.0 37 60.6 y7 Ž . Ž . Ž . 10 3 134 14 10.4 51 38.1 65 48.5 y7 Ž . Ž . Ž . 5=10 2 75 4 5.4 30 40.5 34 45.9 y6 Ž . Ž . Ž . 10 2 45 6 13.3 5 11.1 11 24.4 y6 Ž . Ž . Ž . 5=10 2 47 0 0 2 4.3 2 4.3 y5 c Ž . Ž . Ž . 10 1 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 a The embryos did not develop beyond morula. b Ž . 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0 , 1 mM EDTA. c Ž . Host genome DNA 3 pg in the nucleus is expected to be completely digested. B.B. Seo et al. r Animal Reproduction Science 63 2000 113 – 122 118 Table 2 Effects of the co-injection of foreign genes with or without EcoRI into the pronucleus of mouse zygotes on transgenesis in single embryos and pups born Each value of gene injections with or without the enzyme includes the results of two or three trials. Injected foreign genes Gene with EcoRI Gene alone Overall efficiency mWAPrhGH Human Agrb-globin mWAPrhGH Human Agrb-globin Gene with EcoRI Gene alone a Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . No. of transgenic embryos 6r36 16.7 4r21 19.0 2r21 9.5 3r23 13.0 10r57 17.5 5r44 11.4 b Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . No. of transgenic pups 0r5 0 2r5 40.0 0r6 0 0r5 0 2r10 20.0 0r11 0 c c Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Ž . Overall of transgenesis 6r41 14.6 6r26 23.1 2r27 7.4 3r28 10.7 12r67 17.9 5r55 9.1 a Ž . DNA extracted from the single late–stage embryo was digested with DpnI and Bal31, and was analyzed by PCR Soe et al., 1997 . b DNA extracted from tail tip of pups born was analyzed by PCR. c Ž 2 . 0.1- P - 0.2 x test . Ž . Ž y8 . buffer 1 mgrml containing EcoRI equivalent to 5 = 10 Urnucleus and injected into a zygote pronucleus. The human Agrb-globin fusion gene has the ClalrSal l restriction ends, but does not have EcoRI site within its construct. The embryos that survived the injection were cultured in vitro until they developed into the morular blastocyst stage. Fig. 1 shows representative photographs of the agarose-gel elec- trophoresis of PCR products of DNA extracted from transgenic single embryos follow- ing the co-injection of DNA with EcoRI. The embryos that integrated the foreign gene Ž . were identified by the Dpnl–Bal31 digestion method described by Seo et al. 1997 , while the transgenic pups were identified by the standard PCR method. Co-injection of Fig. 1. Representative agarose–gel electrophoretograms of PCR products using the DNA extracted from the single blastocysts as the templates after a combined digestion with DpnI endonuclease and Bal31 exonuclease Ž . see Materials and Methods . Arrows indicate the positions of PCR products amplified by the specific primers. mWAPrhGH and human A grb-globin indicate the gene constructs that injected to the pronucleus of zygotes, alone or with EcoRI. M, molecular weight markers. The same PCR products were detected by analysis of Ž . DNAs extracted from pups born data not shown . the genes with EcoRI appeared to have resulted in the elevation of the rate of integration in the embryos examined: the overall efficiency of the embryos that integrated the foreign genes was 17.5 for the co-injection group and 11.4 for the DNA alone group. Seven of 12 recipients with the transfer of the injected embryos gave birth to 21 pups. The overall efficiency of transgenesis in pups with the co-injection was 20.0, while no transgenic pups were born when DNA was injected alone. The overall efficiency of the integration of foreign DNA in the embryos and live-born pups obtained by the present co-injection procedures was 17.9 compared with 9.1 obtained by the injection of DNA alone. When the DNA injection with or without EcoRI was compared regarding overall efficiency of transgenesis, the co-injection group was better than the control group, although the difference between the two groups, was not statistically Ž Ž 2 .. significant 0.1 - P - 0.2 x test .

4. Discussion