Instrument of the Research Content Validity

After the coefficient between raters was found, the coefficient reliability analyzed based on the standard of reliability by Slameto 1998 bellows: a. A very low reliability : ranges from 0.00 to 0.19 b. A low reliability : ranges from 0.20 to 0.39 c. An average reliability : ranges from 0.40 to 0.59 d. A high reliability : ranges from 0.60 to 0.79 e. A very high reliability: ranges from 0.80 to 0.100 Statistical computation was used to measure the inter-rater reliability in this research. In this research, the researcher used the oral rating sheet from Harris 1974 see appendix II. There are five aspects to be tested based on Harris, they are pronunciation, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and grammar. After using oral rating sheet from Harris the scores of each point are multiplied by four. Therefore, the highest score is 100. For example: If the students get 5, so 5 X 4 = 20 4, so 4 X 4 = 16 3, so 3 X 4 = 12 2, so 2 X 4 = 8 1, so 1 X 4 = 4 For instance: A student got 4 in Pronunciation, 3 in Vocabulary, and 3 in Fluency, 4 in comprehension and 3 in grammar. Therefore, the student’s total score will be: Pronunciation 4 X 4 = 16 Vocabulary 4 X 4 = 12 Fluency 3 X 4 = 12 Comprehension 4 X 4 = 16 Grammar 3 X 4 = 12 Total 68 It means he or she got 68 for speaking. The score of speaking based on five components can be compared in the percentage as follows: Grammar 20 Vocabulary 20 Fluency 20 Pronunciation 20 Comprehension 20 Total = 100 Table 3.1. Table of Rating Sheet Score S’s Codes Pronoun. 1-20 Fluen. 1-20 Gram. 1-20 Voc. 1-20 Compr. 1-20 Total 1-100 A B C

b. Questionnaire

The last instrument that was used in collecting the data is questionnaire. This questionnaire was used to know students’ perception and satisfaction about the effect of information transfer task for their speaking class. The questionnaire consisted of 30 questions related to the teaching learning process of the speaking class and students’ satisfaction about the technique that was applied

Dokumen yang terkait

Improvingstudents’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text Through Jigsaw Technique (A Classroomaction Researchin The Second Grade Students Of Smp Ash-Sholihin Kebon Jeruk)

0 11 99

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH CHART AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMKN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 4 167

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH CHART AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMKN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

2 6 47

Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement through Reciprocal Teaching Technique at the Second Year of SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung (A Classroom Action Research)

0 5 59

Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement through Reciprocal Teaching Technique at the Second Year of SMPN 21 Bandar Lampung (A Classroom Action Research)

0 3 59

Teaching Speaking Trough Contextual Teaching Learning At Second Grade Student Of SMPN 01 Tanjung Raja North Lampung ( A Classroom Action Research)

0 4 12

Teaching Speaking Trough Contextual Teaching Learning At Second Grade Student Of SMPN 01 Tanjung Raja North Lampung ( A Classroom Action Research)

0 3 49

The Use of Diary Writing to Improve Eight Grade Students' Writing Skill at SMPN 3 Malang

0 16 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH TASK- BASED LEARNING (A Classroom Action Research on the Second Grade Students of SMK Wiworotomo Purwokerto in Academic Year of 20132014)

0 0 12