and text receiver P2. Besides, context is also an abstract representation of state of affairs in someone’s mind constructive from both immediate situation
and previous situation Widdowson, 2007:19. This means that when text producer communicates with his text receiver, the theme of conversation may
be related to their current situation, or even may be independently separated from their current situation from their previous situation.
The reason why the writer uses this concept of context is the writer tries to maintain the coherence and relevance between explicature and implicature.
In order to gain deeper analysis in implicature level, the writer should relate the explicit meaning which usually contain of linguistic features from the data
with the context or the situation which becomes the background why the data are made. After finding the context, the writer then analyse the explicature
meaning together with context in order to get the coherent result with the real situation.
2. 3. Concept of Identity
In the third layer, the writer uses the concept of identity in analysing the data. The concept of identity here is taken in the means to determine the
linguistic features which may be able to form the identity of the candidates within this research. According to Bamberg et all 2010:1 identity is not
merely the definition in traditional way i.e. what the definition of identity is, but rather ‘as a negotiation among social member’s subjects within the social
context and as a form of objectivity and a sense of self’. It means that identity is a kind of social construction which is addressed by each social member’s
subject towards the other members. This process does not apart from ‘how the
process of constructing meaningful units’ occurs. He also added that this analysis will include the circumstances which surround the social member’s
subject. This circumstances or situation can be defined as the context of what has been said, how the situation was said, and why the situation may have been
said which may occur in any time and any places. According to Bamberg et all 2010:1 there are still some
dilemmas when someone wants to construct an identity. He stated that there are three dilemmas in revolving this situation. The first is agency and control. This
term is ‘resulting the question whether it is the person, the I-as-subject, who constructs the world is or whether the me-as-undergoer is constructed by the
way world is’. This has meaning that the perspective of the subject and his partnertext receiver are both able to determine the identity construction within
the social context. The second dilemma which Bamberg et all come up with is difference
and sameness between me and others. This term is ‘posing the question how we can draw up a sense of self as differentiated andor as integrated within
self-other relation- and how in concrete context we navigate in between these two’ Bamberg et all, 2010:2. This has meaning that the way a text producer
creates his identity is depending on how he can differentiate himself with other individual and how he can relates to the concrete circumstances he lives in.
The next dilemma is constancy and change. According to Bamberg et all 2010: 2 this term is ‘posing the question how we can claim to be the same in
the face of constant change and how we can claim to have changed in the face
