Review on Harlem THEORETICAL REVIEW

of Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama. Many came to Harlem. By 1920, central Harlem was predominantly black and by 1930 blacks lived as far south at Central Park. The expansion was fueled primarily by the influx of blacks from West Indies and Southern US. As blacks moved in, white resident left. The period of Harlem’s history has been highly romanticized since the 1920 then although it was the time when the neighborhood to become a slum and some of the storied traditions of the Harlem Renaissance were driven by poverty, crime, or other social ills. Indeed, since the arrival of blacks in Harlem, the neighborhood has suffered from the unemployment than the NY average generally more than twice as high and high mortality rates as well. The people also suffer from infectious disease and diseases of the circulatory system with a variety of contributing factors including the deep fried foods traditional to the neighborhood which may contribute to heart disease. Yet, black Harlem has always been religious, and the area is home to over 400 churches. Furthermore, it is not surprisingly, as a neighborhood with a long history of marginalization economic deprivation, Harlem has long been associated with crime. In the 1920’s, he Jewish and Italian mafia played a major role in running the white- only night clubs in the neighborhood and the speakeasies that catered to a white audience. Mobster Dutch Shultz controlled all liquor production and distribution in Harlem in 1920’s. Rather than compete with the established mobs, black gangsters concentrated on the policy racket, also called the Numbers game, or bolita in Spanish Harlem. This was gambling scheme similar to a lottery that could be played, illegally, from countless locations around Harlem. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI The popularity of playing the numbers waned with the introduction of the New York State lottery, which has higher payouts and is legal, but the practice continues on a smaller scale among those who prefer the numbers tradition or who prefer to trust their local numbers bank over the state. In 1940 statistics show about 100 murders per year in Harlem, but rape is very rare. By 1950, essentially all of the whites had left Harlem and by 1960, the black middle class had gone. At the same time, control of organized crime shifted from Jewish and Italian syndicates to local black, Puerto Rican, and Cuban groups that were somewhat less formally organized. At the time of the 1964 riots, the drug addiction rate in Harlem was ten times higher than the New York City average, and twelve times higher than the United States as a whole. Of the 30,000 drug addicts then estimated to live in New York City, 15,000 to 20,000 lived in Harlem. Property crime was pervasive, and the murder rate was six times higher than New Yorks average. Half of the children in Harlem grew up with one parent, or none, and lack of supervision contributed to juvenile delinquency; between 1953 and 1962, the crime rate among young people increased throughout New York City, but was consistently 50 higher in Harlem than in New York City as a whole. Injecting heroin grew in popularity in Harlem through the 1950s and 1960s, though the use of this drug then leveled off. In the 1980s, use of crack cocaine became widespread, which produced collateral crime as addicts stole to finance their purchasing of additional drugs, and as dealers fought for the right to sell in particular regions, or over deals gone bad. Finally, the recent history shows that Harlem began to see rapid gentrification in the late 1990s after years of false starts. This was driven by changing federal and city policies, including fierce crime-fighting and a concerted effort to develop the retail corridor on 125th Street. Starting in 1994, the Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone funneled money into new developments. Finally, wealthier New Yorkers, having gentrified every other part of Manhattan and much of Brooklyn, had nowhere else to go. The number of housing units in Harlem increased 14 between 1990 and 2000 and the rate of increase has been much more rapid in recent years. Property values in Central Harlem increased nearly 300 during the 1990s, while the rest of the City saw only a 12 increase. Even empty shells of buildings in the neighborhood were, as of 2007, routinely selling for nearly 1,000,000 each. Former U.S. President Bill Clinton has rented office space at 55 West 125th Street since completing his second term in the White House in 2001.

D. Theoretical Framework

Concerning to the analysis of main character and his conflicts in revealing the messages of the story, three theories illustrated in the previous section i.e. the theory of character and characterization, the theory of conflicts, and the theory of message are going to be the bases to answer the problem formulation. Each theory has their own contributions to this discussion and therefore they will be very helpful. The theory of the char acter and characterization, especially Murphy’s theory, is very helpful in giving description of the main character in the story. This theory enables the writer to consider the main character’s personal description, speech, thought, manner and reaction as the method in disclosing his figure. Meanwhile, the theory of conflict guides the writer to differentiate any conflicts that are undergone by the main character. By distinguishing the conflicts, the analysis will be well-arranged and will not be confusing. Finally, the last theory that is the theory of message helps the writer to consider what way used by the author to convey the message and to determine the possible messages that can be drawn from the story. This theory also eases the writer to distinguish the major and minor message. Besides the three theories, the writer assumes that the review on Harlem society also plays important role in this discussion. The function of Harlem as the setting of the story will give us clear depiction and explanation that base the main character’s attitude and enable us to understand the conflicts happen to the main character as something reasonable. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI

CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY

A. Object of the Study

The writer would like to employ a novel written by Walter Dean Myers to be the object of this study. The title of the novel is Scorpions and its first publication was in 1988. Yet, this study refers to the first Harper Trophy edition in 1990 that contains 216 pages. The novel Scorpions is categorized into a young-adult fiction that tells the story of a poor young black kid named Jamal who lives in Harlem. The story itself gets much impact from the author’s own life experience of growing up in Harlem. It explains how Myers can create good depictions of the setting. Myers is also good in creating a strong character of Jamal who is able to attract the readers’ attention because of his effort to survive for living in this black poverty society. Jamal Hicks, as recited in the novel, was asked by Randy, his brother who got in jail, to replace him in leading the gang, Scorpions. Once Jamal did not want to hang out with this gang, but Randy’s best friend, Mack convinced him by telling him that the Scorpions could make money for Randy’s appeal. Mack even gave Jamal a piece. Jamal planned to throw it away after shooting it, but he always delayed to do that since he figured out that people would not mess up with him as long as the piece was with him. Unfortunately, that piece brought him and his best friend, Tito, into a tragedy in the night when Jamal would like to give his position as the leader to Indian, one of the Scorpions. Indian and Angel messed up with PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI