Reliability Item Difficulty Discriminating Power

This formula was used for validating each score, and the result was consulted to critical value for r-product moment. When the obtain coefficient of correlation was higher than the critical value for r-product moment, it meant that a scoring is valid at 5 alpha level of significances. The result was being consulted with r product moment, r x y r was valid.

3.5.3 Reliability

The reliability is the stability of the test scores. Tuckman 1978:160 states that “test reliability meant that a test was consistent”. Reliability shows whether the instrument is reliable and can be used as the device of collect the data. A test is reliable to the extent that it measures consistently, from one time to another. To conduct the reliability, I used the Kuder-Richarson Reliability. Tuckman 1978:160 states that “this formula known as K-R formula 21 was shown below and was equivalent to the average of all possible split-half reliability coefficients”. Where : R 11 : Kuder- Richardson reliability coefficient K : number of item in the test M : mean score on the test Vt : test variance measure of variability Arikunto, 2006:189                   KVt M K M k k r 1 1 11 First, what I have to find is the variance of the test-symbolized s 2 . The formula used to find s 2 is as follows: Where Vt : variance N : the number of the score  y : the score of the students 2  y : the quadrate of the students‟ total scores Arikunto, 2006:184 The test is considered being reliable if the r xy r table for α = 5.

3.5.4 Item Difficulty

Item tests have good difficulty level if it is not too easy or too difficult for the students examiners, so they can answer the item. Therefore, every item should be analyzed first before it is used in the test. The formula: JS b P  Where: P = the facility value index of difficulty B = number of students who answered the item test correctly JS = the total number of students The criteria used here are:   N N y y V t     2 2 Difficulty level Category 00 , 1 70 , 70 . 30 , 30 , 00 ,       P P P Difficult Medium Easy

3.5.5 Discriminating Power

The discriminating power is a measurement of the effectiveness of an item in discriminating between high and low scores of the whole test. The higher the value of the discriminating power is the more effective an item will be. It is also essential to determine the discriminating power of the items since it can determine between the more and the less able students. There were many steps to calculate the index of discrimination as follows: 1 The results of the scores of the try out test were arranged by well organizing the students‟ result from the highest to the lowest score. 2 All students who take the test were divided in two groups namely upper and the lower groups by taking 50 from the highest score as the upper group, and 50 from the lowest score as the lower group. 3 The formula is as follows: JB BB JA BA D   Arikunto, 2002:309 Where: D : the discriminating index BA : the number of students in the upper group who answered the item correctly BB : the number of students in the lower group who answered the item correctly JA : the number of all students in the upper group JB : the number of all students in the lower group The criteria used here were: Interval Criteria 20 , ,   D 40 , 20 ,   D 70 , 40 ,   D 00 , 1 70 ,   D Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent

3.5.6 Pre test

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study on the Eighth Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement of Recount Texts at SMPN 1 Banyuwangi in the 2014/2015

0 5 4

The Effect of Using Directed Reading Thinking Activity Strategy on the Tenth Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement at SMA Negeri 1 Yosowilangun

1 8 124

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

The Effectiveness of Pictures in Text in Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eight Grade Students of MTsN 13 Jakarta).

0 18 178

The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning in Improving Students’ Abililty in Reading Descriptive Text (A Pre-Experimental Study of the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Pelita Harapan, South Jakarta).

0 6 103

The Effectiveness of Using Jigsaw Technique to Develop Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text; A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 63 Jakarta Selatan

0 6 139

The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text A Quasi Experimental Study at the Second Grade of SMA Mathla’ul Huda Parung Panjang-Bogor.

0 5 126

Improving reading comprehension using Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA)

0 0 110

The Effect of Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method on Students’ Reading Comprehension for State Islamic Senior High School

0 0 9