Dampak Pelatihan Pada Perilaku Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Dan Lingkungan Pertanian
DAMPAK PELATIEIAN PADA PERILAKU PENGELOWN SUMBERDAYA
ALAM DAN LlNGKUNGAN PERTANXAN, STUD1 KASUS PENGENDALIAN
HAMA TERPADU PADA BUDIDAYA PAD1
( Effect of Training to Management Behaviour of Natural Resources and Agriculture
Environment, Case Study on Integrated Pest Management in Rice Cultivation)
ABSTRACT
l;hefanner's behaviour topest control, rice field ecowem management practiced
and constraints of integratedpesl management (rPM) implementation as the effect of Field
IiifegratedPest Mamgement Training (FIPMlJ are studied d~rrit~g
on July to October 1996
in Karanmg West Java Province. Four@fi trained farmers mzd 45 untrained fanners
were inimeMewedfiom
three " k e e "i.e. J a h ' d , Ret@ngWok
and Telukjambe.
Ihe results are :lhe preckrioiy arthroM i.e qider, h w ~ i e stettigonid
,
hopper
(Conocephalus longipennis de Haan), carabid beetle (Ophionea q.)and mirid bug
(Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter) are better known by ~ainedfanners compared with
untrained farmers Systematically of pest obsemtion and more tmiaii'on objects were
obserb by trainedfanners. The trainedfanners beliew thai peshshcideused is not the otzly
w y for pest control, but there are no match with they &me that there are no effect to
pesticide *il&'on
behaviour.
Beside to apply of pesticide, the brown planthopper wtlho/ practiced by fruitzed
fanners are resistant vwiety, plant rotation cad not d i m b the predator's life. lhe
stemborer m t r o l practiced are pesticide used seeding d e b until the stemborer adult
emerg d f 2 y period finished and not dislurb the predaiiw's life, but there are no
dzfferent to rat control practiced Duriiig 5 late planting s e w n , 84 4 untrained fanners
and 76 % frcrnedfanners usedpestrstrci&
to confrd ofpesf.
T?ierice C U I W O I I andricefield ecosystem rnanagemet~tpradcedrelated with the
FIPWare ie. landprepation, water mmgenent in vegetafive phase, early mechanical
control to pathogen symptom, but there are not related wiih the practical of weed control,
fertilize and straw cutting during harvesting time. Wet s e a m land preparation have &ne
by trained fanners betier than untrained fanners. G o d land preparaiion influence to
healthy q ,
and become higher ecologicalpes! resistance. Intermitetit water management
during wgemive sfage (a week + 5 cmflood and a week dq) is betterfor plant growth and
unsuitable micro emironmeid fwp& growth The untrainedfanners haw have p q attenti011
to water management during vegetative stage.
7.W constraint of IPM implementatiw~ by farmers in Karawang are i.e.
psychologiml consbaint abolrtpesticide used; extemimproblem, f m e r ' s side job, external
presnrre, ouifanner's group @?antic. The fanners wm.der that pesticide is i t q ~ m ' v e ,
e q to obtan, and effective topest control. Im~ass&mnrronpracticed and corducfed in
pw planting s e m only is not suitable with FIPMTmethod The tum agriculture sidejob by
64 % of farmers is one of IPM implementation consfraitilfwhile they must also to mamge
their rice field During the recent fiw phiting seasori, 557.78% of farmers have extenzal
pressure by oflcials to used partcular pesticide. Finally, 55.56 % of farmers feel that
f m e r s group meeting is rare ca2d 12,22 % of fanners feel there is no farmers group
meeting.
DAMPAK PELATJHAN PADA PERIW
ALAM DAN LlNGKUNGAN PERTANXAN, STUD1 KASUS PENGENDALIAN
HAMA TERPADU PADA BUDIDAYA PAD1
( Effect of Training to Management Behaviour of Natural Resources and Agriculture
Environment, Case Study on Integrated Pest Management in Rice Cultivation)
ABSTRACT
l;hefanner's behaviour topest control, rice field ecowem management practiced
and constraints of integratedpesl management (rPM) implementation as the effect of Field
IiifegratedPest Mamgement Training (FIPMlJ are studied d~rrit~g
on July to October 1996
in Karanmg West Java Province. Four@fi trained farmers mzd 45 untrained fanners
were inimeMewedfiom
three " k e e "i.e. J a h ' d , Ret@ngWok
and Telukjambe.
Ihe results are :lhe preckrioiy arthroM i.e qider, h w ~ i e stettigonid
,
hopper
(Conocephalus longipennis de Haan), carabid beetle (Ophionea q.)and mirid bug
(Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter) are better known by ~ainedfanners compared with
untrained farmers Systematically of pest obsemtion and more tmiaii'on objects were
obserb by trainedfanners. The trainedfanners beliew thai peshshcideused is not the otzly
w y for pest control, but there are no match with they &me that there are no effect to
pesticide *il&'on
behaviour.
Beside to apply of pesticide, the brown planthopper wtlho/ practiced by fruitzed
fanners are resistant vwiety, plant rotation cad not d i m b the predator's life. lhe
stemborer m t r o l practiced are pesticide used seeding d e b until the stemborer adult
emerg d f 2 y period finished and not dislurb the predaiiw's life, but there are no
dzfferent to rat control practiced Duriiig 5 late planting s e w n , 84 4 untrained fanners
and 76 % frcrnedfanners usedpestrstrci&
to confrd ofpesf.
T?ierice C U I W O I I andricefield ecosystem rnanagemet~tpradcedrelated with the
FIPWare ie. landprepation, water mmgenent in vegetafive phase, early mechanical
control to pathogen symptom, but there are not related wiih the practical of weed control,
fertilize and straw cutting during harvesting time. Wet s e a m land preparation have &ne
by trained fanners betier than untrained fanners. G o d land preparaiion influence to
healthy q ,
and become higher ecologicalpes! resistance. Intermitetit water management
during wgemive sfage (a week + 5 cmflood and a week dq) is betterfor plant growth and
unsuitable micro emironmeid fwp& growth The untrainedfanners haw have p q attenti011
to water management during vegetative stage.
7.W constraint of IPM implementatiw~ by farmers in Karawang are i.e.
psychologiml consbaint abolrtpesticide used; extemimproblem, f m e r ' s side job, external
presnrre, ouifanner's group @?antic. The fanners wm.der that pesticide is i t q ~ m ' v e ,
e q to obtan, and effective topest control. Im~ass&mnrronpracticed and corducfed in
pw planting s e m only is not suitable with FIPMTmethod The tum agriculture sidejob by
64 % of farmers is one of IPM implementation consfraitilfwhile they must also to mamge
their rice field During the recent fiw phiting seasori, 557.78% of farmers have extenzal
pressure by oflcials to used partcular pesticide. Finally, 55.56 % of farmers feel that
f m e r s group meeting is rare ca2d 12,22 % of fanners feel there is no farmers group
meeting.
DAMPAK PELATJHAN PADA PERIW