Analysis of Cohesive Devices and Transitivity on The Third Part of Barack Obama's Speech in Indonesia.
iii Maranatha Christian University
ABSTRACT
Dalam skripsi ini, saya akan membahas representasi self dan other dalam sebuah teks pidato dari Presiden Amerika Serikat, Barack Obama. Teks pidato ini disampaikan ketika beliau mengunjungi Indonesia pada tanggal 10 November 2010. Teks ini mencakup tiga bagian utama, yaitu: human progress – development, democracy, and religion. Skripsi ini hanya membahas secara detail mengenai
bagian ketiga dari teks pidato tersebut, yaitu tentang religion karena keterbatasan waktu yang diberikan.
Pada dasarnya, bagian ketiga dari teks ini mencakup tentang permasalahan secara global yang berkaitan dengan masalah agama. Akan tetapi, bagian ini juga menyoroti tentang terorisme yang dalam teks ini ditemukan sebagai oposisi dari pihak-pihak yang berusaha membangun perdamaian dunia. Barack Obama dengan tegas menyatakan bahwa teroris tidak ada kaitannya sama sekali dengan agama, dan bukan merupakan forum pembela kedamaian dari agama manapun termasuk Islam. Dalam teksnya, Barack Obama mencoba untuk membangun citra yang baik dengan menjungjung tinggi perdamaian di berbagai belahan dunia termasuk negara-negara Islam yang dia sebutkan dalam teks ini.
Dalam analisis teks ini, saya menggunakan pendekatan Functional
(2)
iv Maranatha Christian University
cohesive devices yaitu: reference, pengulangan kata, sinonim dan meronymy, dan
juga tiga proses utama: material proses, mental proses dan relational proses dalam transitivity.
Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa melalui analisis cohesive devices, pihak yang direpresentasikan sebagai self dan other dapat ditentukan. Kemudian dengan analisis lexical cohesion, hubungan yang terjalin antara Barack Obama dengan audiensi dapat terlihat sebagaimana hal ini juga secara tidak langsung dapat mendukung representasi Barack Obama sebagai the self. Selain itu, melalui analisis transitivity, karakteristik dari seluruh partisipan yang mendukung representasi masing-masing ditemukan secara spesifik.
(3)
i Maranatha Christian University
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... i
ABSTRACT ... iii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Background of the Study ... 1
Statement of the Problem ... 4
Purpose of the Study ... 4
Methods of Research ... 4
Organization of the Thesis ... 5
CHAPTER TWO: THEORIES OF COHESIVE DEVICES AND TRANSITIVITY 2.1 Definition of Text Analysis ... 6
2.2 Theory of Cohesive Devices ... 6
2.2.1 Grammatical Cohesion ... 7
2.2.2 Lexical Cohesion ... 10
2.3 Theory of Transitivity ... 12
2.3.1 Types of Circumtances ... 12
2.3.2 Types of Processes ... 14
CHAPTER THREE: ANALYSIS OF COHESIVE DEVICES AND TRANSITIVITY ON THE THIRD PART OF BARACK OBAMA’S SPEECH IN INDONESIA ... 22
CHAPTER FOUR: CONCLUSION ... 50
BIBLIOGRAPHY ... 55
APPENDICES: The third part of Barack Obama’s speech ... 57
(4)
ii Maranatha Christian University
Reference chains ... 65
Lexical cohesion chains ... 72
Material clauses ... 75
Mental clauses ... 80
(5)
57
APPENDIX 1
Th
e Third Part of Barack Obama’s S
peech in Indonesia
The clauses are:
1. Religion is the final topic 2. that I want to address today.
3. and – like democracy and development – it is fundamental to the Indonesian story.
4. Like the other Asian nations that I am visiting on this trip, 5. Indonesia is steeped in spirituality– a place
6. where people worship God in many different ways.
7. Along with this rich diversity, it is also home to the world’s largest Muslim population – a truth
8. that I came to know as a boy
9. when I heard the call to prayer across Jakarta.
10. Just as individuals are not defined solely by their faith, 11. Indonesia is defined by more than its Muslim population. 12. But we also know
(6)
58
13. that relations between the United States and Muslim communities have frayed over many years.
14. As President, I have made it a priority to begin to repair these relations.
15. As a part of that effort, I went to Cairo last June,
16. and called for a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world –
17. one that creates a path for us to move beyond our differences. 18. I said then,
19. and I will repeat now,
20. that no single speech can eradicate years of mistrust. 21. But I believed then,
22. and I believe today, 23. that we have a choice.
24. We can choose to be defined by our differences, 25. and give in to a future of suspicion and mistrust.
26. Or we can choose to do the hard work of forging common ground, 27. and commit ourselves to the steady pursuit of progress.
28. And I can promise you –
29. no matter what setbacks may come,
30. the United States is committed to human progress. 31. That is
(7)
59 33. That is
34. what we have done. 35. That is
36. what we will do.
37. We know well the issues
38. that have caused tensions for many years – issues 39. that I addressed in Cairo.
40. In the 17 months that have passed 41. we have made some progress,
42. but much more work remains to be done.
43. Innocent civilians in America, Indonesia, and across the world are still targeted by violent extremists.
44. I have made it clear
45. that America is not at war with Islam 46. and never will be
47. Instead, all of us must defeat al Qaeda and its affiliates,
48. who have no claim to be leaders of any religion – certainly not a great, world religion like Islam.
49. But those who want to build 50. must not cede ground to terrorists 51. who seek to destroy.
(8)
60
53. Indeed, here in Indonesia, you have made progress in rooting out terrorists and combating violent extremism.
54. In Afghanistan, we continue to work with a coalition of nations to build the capacity of the Afghan government to secure its future. 55. Our shared interest is in building peace in a war-torn land – 56. a peace that provides no safe-haven for violent extremists, 57. and that provides hope for the Afghan people.
58. Meanwhile, we have made progress on one of our core commitments — our effort to end the war in Iraq.
59. 100,000 American troops have left Iraq.
60. Iraqis have taken full responsibility for their security. 61. And we will continue to support Iraq
62. as it forms an inclusive government 63. and we bring all of our troops home.
64. In the Middle East, we have faced false starts and setbacks, 65. but we have been persistent in our pursuit of peace.
66. Israelis and Palestinians restarted direct talks, 67. but enormous obstacles remain.
68. There should be no illusions
69. that peace and security will come easy. 70. But let there be no doubt:
71. we will spare no effort in working for the outcome 72. that is just,
(9)
61
73. and that is in the interest of all the parties involved: two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.
74. The stakes are high in resolving these issues, 75. and the others I have spoken about today. 76. For our world has grown smaller
77. and while those forces have unleashed opportunity, 78. that connect us
79. they also empower those 80. who seek to derail progress.
81. One bomb in a marketplace can obliterate the bustle of daily commerce.
82. One whispered rumor can obscure the truth, 83. and set off violence between communities 84. that once lived in peace.
85. In an age of rapid change and colliding cultures, what we share as human beings can be lost.
86. But I believe
87. that the history of both America and Indonesia gives us hope.
88. It’s a story written into our national mottos. E pluribus unum – out of many, one. Bhinneka Tunggal Ika – unity in diversity.
89. We are two nations,
90. which have travelled different paths. 91. Yet our nations show
(10)
62
92. that hundreds of millions who hold different beliefs 93. can be united in freedom under one flag.
94. And we are now building on that shared humanity
95. – through the young people who will study in each other’s schools; 96. through the entrepreneurs forging ties that can lead to prosperity; and
through our embrace of fundamental democratic values and human aspirations.
97. Earlier today, I visited the Istiqlal mosque – a place of worship 98. that was still under construction
99. when I lived in Jakarta.
100. I admired its soaring minaret, imposing dome, and welcoming space. 101. But its name and history also speak to
102. what makes Indonesia great. 103. Istiqlal means independence,
104. and its construction was in part a testament to the nation’s struggle for freedom.
105. Moreover, this house of worship for many thousands of Muslims was designed by a Christian architect.
106. Such is Indonesia’s spirit.
107. Such is the message of Indonesia’s inclusive philosophy, Pancasila. 108. Across an archipelago, people choose to worship God as they please. 109. that contains some of God’s most beautiful creations, islands rising
(11)
63 110. Islam flourishes,
111. but so do other faiths.
112. Development is strengthened by an emerging democracy. 113. Ancient traditions endure,
114. even as a rising power is on the move. 115. That is not to say
116. that Indonesia is without imperfections. 117. No country is.
118. But here can be found the ability to bridge divides of race and region and religion – that ability to see yourself in all individuals.
119. As a child of a different race coming from a distant country, I found this spirit in the greeting
120. that I received upon moving here: Selamat Datang.
121. As a Christian visiting a mosque on this visit, I found it in the words of a leader
122. who was asked about my visit 123. and said,
124. “Muslims are also allowed in churches. 125. We are all God’s followers.
126. That spark of the divine lies within each of us. 127. We cannot give in to doubt or cynicism or despair. 128. The stories of Indonesia and America tell us 129. that history is on the side of human progress;
(12)
64
130. that unity is more powerful than division;
131. and that the people of this world can live together in peace.
132. May our two nations work together, with faith and determination, to share these truths with all mankind.
(13)
65
APPENDIX 2
Reference Chains
Barrack Obama Clauses:
2. I 4. I 8. I
A boy 9. I
14. President
I 15. I 18. I 19. I 21. I
(14)
66 22. I
28. I 39. I 44. I 86. I 97. I 99. I 100. I
119. A child (of..)
I 120. I
121. A Christian
I
122. My (visit)
Indonesia Clauses:
5. Indonesia
(15)
67 7. It
A home (to…) 11. Indonesia 43. Indonesia 53. Indonesia
You
87. Indonesia 101. Indonesia 116. Indonesia 118. Indonesia
Yourself
Individuals 128. Indonesia
US and Indonesia Clauses:
12. We
(16)
68 24. We
Our
26. We
27. Ourselves
37. We
43. Innocent civilians America and Indonesia
47. All of us
49. Those
76. Our
78. Us
85. We
87. Us
(17)
69 89. We
91. Our
94. We
96. Our
125. We
God’s followers
126. Each of us
127. We
128. Us
132. Our
US and Muslims
(18)
70 16. United States and Muslims
17. Us
Our
Barack Obama and US 32. We
34. We 36. We 37. We 41. We 54. We 58. We
Our
61. We 63. We
Our
(19)
71 65. We
Our
71. We
Violent Extremists 43. Violent extremists
47. Al Qaeda and its affiliates
48. Leaders (of any religion)
50. Terrorists 53. Terrorists
Violent extremism 56. Violent extremists
79. They
(20)
72
APPENDIX 3
Lexical Cohesion chains Clauses:
Indonesia 5. Indonesia
9. Jakarta (meronymy)
11. Indonesia (rep) 43. Indonesia 51. Indonesia 53. Indonesia 87. Indonesia
99. Jakarta (meronymy) 106. Indonesia‘s spirit
(21)
73 116. Indonesia
128. Indonesia Religion
1. Religion
10. Faith (synonymy)
47. Religion (rep) 48. Religion
92. Beliefs (synonymy)
111. Faiths
118. Religion
132. Faith US/America 13. US
16. US (repetition) 30. US
(22)
74 45. America
52. America 87. America 128. America Violent extremists 43. Violent extremists
47. Al Qaeda and its affiliates (meronymy)
50. Terrorists (synonymy) 53. Terrorists
Violent extremism (repetition) 56. Violent extremists
Peace
55. Peace
56. Peace (repetition) 65. Peace
69. Peace 73. Peace 84. Peace 108. Peace 131. Peace
(23)
75
Appendix 4
Material clauses:
Clause Actor Process Goal/Scope Circ.
4 I am visiting like the other Asian
nations on this trip
5 Indonesia Steep in spirituality
6 People worship God in many different
ways
10 Their faith Define solely
as individuals, 11 More than its
Muslim population
Define Indonesia
13 The relation between the United States and Muslim communities
have frayed Over many years
14 (as President) I
have made a priority to begin to repair the relation
15 I went (to) Cairo
Last June 16 (I) called (for) a new beginning
between the United States and Muslims around the world
17 One Creates a path for us to move
beyond our
(24)
76 20 No single
speech
can eradicate
years of
mistrust
24 We can choose
(to be defined)
by our differences
25 (we) give in to a future of
suspicion and mistrust
26 We can choose
(to do)
the hard work of forging
common ground
27 (we) commit Ourselves to the steady pursuit of progress
29 Setbacks may come
34 We have done
(committed to human progress)
36 We will do
38 (the issues) have caused Tensions for many years
40 That have passed in the 17 month
41 We have made some progress
43 Violent extremists
target innocent civilians
In America,
Indonesia, and across the world 44
(45)
I have made It clear
(that America is not at war with Islam) 47 All of us must defeat Al Qaeda and
its affiliates
50 must not
cede
Ground to terrorists
51 Who seek (to
destroy)
53 You have made progress in
rooting out terrorist and combating violent extremism
in Indonesia
54 We continue (to
work)
with a coalition of nations
in Afghanistan 56 A peace provides no safe-heaven for violent
(25)
77
57 That provides Hope for the Afghan
people 58 We have made progress on one
of our core commitments, (our effort to end war)
in Iraq
59 100.000 American troops
have left Iraq
60 Iraqis have taken full
responsibility
for their security
61 We will
continue (to support)
Iraq
63 We bring all of our troops home
64 We have faced false starts and setbacks
in the Middle East 66 Israelis and
Palestinians
restarted direct talks
69 Peace and security
will come easy
71 We will spare no effort (in working)
for the outcome 77 Those forces have
unleashed
opportunity
78 That connect us
79 They empower those
80 Who seek (to
derail progress)
81 One bomb can
obliterate
the bustle of daily commerce
82 One
whispered rumor
can obscure the truth
83 set off violence between
communities
84 That once lived in peace
85 We can lose what we share
as human
beings
in an age of rapid change and colliding cultures
87 The history of both America
(26)
78 and Indonesia
90 (we) have
travelled
different paths 91 Our nations show
93 (hundreds of millions)
can unite in freedom under
one flag
94 We are building
(on that shared humanity)
Now
95 The young people
will study in each other’s
school 96 The
entrepreneurs forging ties
can lead to prosperity
97 I visited the Istiqlal mosque
99 I lived in Jakarta
101 Its name and history
speak (to)
102 What makes Indonesia great
105 A Christian architect
designed this house of worship
for many thousands of Muslims
109 People choose (to worship God)
as they please
across an
archipelago 110 Islam flourishes
111 Other faiths do 112 An emerging
democracy
strengthens development 113 Ancient
traditions
endure
118 I found the ability to
bridge divides of race and region and religion
Here
119 I found this spirit in the greeting
120 I received Selamat Datang upon moving here
121 (as a
Christian) I
found it in the words of a
leader
124 allow Muslims in churches
127 We cannot give
in
to doubt or cynicism or despair
(27)
79 131 The people of
this world
can live together
in peace
132 Our two
nations
work together
with faith and determination
(28)
80
APPENDIX 5
Mental clauses:
Clause Senser Process Type of sensing Phenomenon Circ.
Per Cog Des Emo
2 I want (to
address)
today
8 I came (to
know)
home to the
world’s largest Muslim
population
as a boy
9 I heard the call to
prayer
across Jakarta
12-(13)
we also know
(that the
relation between
United States and Muslim communities have frayed over many years)
21 I believed then
22-(23)
I believe (that we have a
choice)
today
37 we know well the issues
49-(50)
those want to build
(must not cede ground to terrorists)
86-(87)
I believe (that the
history of both America and Indonesia gives us hope)
(29)
81
100 I admired its soaring
minaret, imposing dome, and welcoming space.
Per. : Perspective Cog. : Cognitive Des. : Desiderative Emo. : Emotive
(30)
82
APPENDIX 6
Relational clauses:
Clause Carrier/Token Process Attribute/Value
1 religion is the final topic
3 it is fundamental to the Indonesian story
7 it is also home to the world’s largest
Muslim population
23 We have a choice
30 The United
States
is committed to human progress
31 that is
32 Who we are
33 that is
35 that is
42 Much more
work
remains to be done
45 America is not at war with Islam
46 never will
be 48 (al Qaeda and its
affiliates)
have no claim
to be leaders of any religion-certainly not great, world religion like Islam 52 this is not a task for America alone
55 Our shared
interest
is in building peace in a war-torn land
62 It forms an inclusive government
65 We have been persistent in our pursuit of peace 67 Enormous
obstacles
remain
68 there should be no illusions
70 there be no doubt
(31)
83
73 that is is in the interest of all the parties involved: two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security
74 The stakes are high in resolving these issues 76 Our world has grown smaller
88 It is a story written into our national mottos
89 We are two nations
92 that hundreds of millions
who hold different beliefs
98 That was still under construction
103 Istiqlal means independence
104 Its construction was in part a testament to the nation’s struggle for freedom.
106 Such is Indonesia’s spirit
107 Such is the message of Indonesia’s inclusive philosophy, Pancasila
109 that contains some of God’s most beautiful creations, islands rising above an ocean named for peace
114 A rising power is on the move
115 That is not to say
116 Indonesia is without imperfections 117 No country is
125 We are All God’s followers
126 That spark of the divine
lies Within each of us
129 That history is On the side of human progress 130 That unity is More powerful than division
(32)
1 Maranatha Christian University
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
It is undeniable that language holds an important role in communication. Language which is written or spoken can communicate more than what we acquire explicitly. People sometimes acquire the text given explicitly because it is expressed literally and unambiguously in a well-formed sequence of words. However, there would be something implicit behind the text given, something that must be inferred from the sentence, and it is implicit in meaning and context of the utterance (Kirsh).
In modern linguistics, a text can be both written and spoken. The text itself includes any types of utterances such as a television interview, a conversation, and many more. It is true that a text is everything that is meaningful in a particular situation: “By text, then, we understand a continuous process of semantic choice” (Halliday 137). We can show the certain meanings and aspects which cannot be understood only by syntactic analysis of sentences, and show the impacts of the grammatical choices that the speaker makes to convey meaning within his utterances.
(33)
2 Maranatha Christian University Discourse analysis is the study of language in use, dealing with both text and context (Laura 17). It clearly emphasizes that the most important thing in doing a discourse analysis is not only to know what is in the text but also to discover what is not in the text. By discovering this matter, we can know exactly what the writer aims to convey or what the speaker really means.
One of the texts that can be analyzed by using instruments of Discourse Analysis is a speech. I am interested in a speech because it does not only offer some interesting matters to analyze but include the speaker’s personal opinions about them. Thus, for this thesis, I choose to analyze Barack Obama’s speech in his visit to Jakarta, in November 10, 2010. He addresses three main topics in his speech: human progress – development, democracy, and religion. However, I am focusing only on the third part for I think religion is the biggest issue connected with the context at that time, as Barack Obama is on his way to repair the relation between the US and the Muslim World (Doyle).
By applying instruments of Discourse Analysis to Barack Obama’s speech as the text to analyze and the context in which the text occurs, I would like to show what the speaker means behind the text. Furthermore, by looking at both the text and context, I would like to show how the speaker represents the self and other in the speech. In addition, considering that Indonesia has a big Muslim population, Barack Obama’s visit is considered nothing more than to realize one of his efforts in repairing the relationship between the US and the Muslim World.
Having been interested in that issue, I decided that my topic is Analysis of Cohesive Devices and Transitivity analysis on the third part of Barack Obama’s
(34)
3 Maranatha Christian University speech in Indonesia. Cohesive devices which are divided into grammatical and lexical cohesion are some of the instruments that can be used in a discourse analysis. As Halliday and Hasan believe that the function of cohesion is to relate one part of a text to another part of the same text (Halliday and Hasan 1976), it helps the reader or the listener to get closer with its interpretation. Even by doing so, I assume that the analysis has not been completed yet because cohesion is only a part in dealing with representation of the text. For that reason, I use another method named transitivity to help me go further in analyzing this topic.
As transitivity is concerned with the clause exploring in its “who=does=what=to=whom, who/what=is=what/who, when, where, why, or how function” (Gerot and Wignell 52), it helps us to find out how people and things are represented in the speech. Since the three semantic categories -circumstances, processes, and participants- can “explain in a general way, how phenomena of the real world are represented as linguistic structures,” (Gerot and Wignell 52), transitivity helps us in the process of getting to know both positive and negative representation in details.
By this thesis, I hope that people who read this can be encouraged to think critically in understanding a text so that people will find out that it is true that someone cannot have the final truth of his or her interpretation about a text just by taking the text given for granted without any efforts to go further beyond the text.
(35)
4 Maranatha Christian University 1.2 Statement of the Problem
In this thesis, I would like to discuss the following problems: 1. How does Barack Obama represent the self?
2. How does Barack Obama represent the other?
3. What are the linguistic instruments used to reveal the representations?
1.3 Purpose of the Study
1. To find out how Barack Obama represents the self. 2. To find out how Barack Obama represents the other.
3. To find out the linguistic instruments used to reveal the representation.
1.4 Method of Research
I began the research with browsing Barack Obama’s full speech for my linguistic material from the Internet. Then, I found some theories which are both from the Internet and some books for analyzing the chosen text. The books used for analyzing the data are Making Sense of Functional Grammar and An
Introduction to Functional Grammar. Then I browsed for some further
explanation related to the topic discussed on the Internet. Finally, I started doing the analysis and writing the research report.
(36)
5 Maranatha Christian University 1.5 Organization of the Thesis
I divide the thesis into four chapters. The first chapter is the Introduction which consists of five parts, Background of the Study, Statement of the Problems, Purpose of the Study, Method of Research, and Organization of the Thesis. Chapter Two contains the theoretical framework which is the elaboration of some theories and approaches used in analyzing the text. Chapter Three contains the analysis of the text, and the last chapter is the Conclusion of the analysis. Then, I provide the Bibliography and Appendix at the end of the thesis.
(37)
50 Maranatha Christian University
CHAPTER FOUR
CONCLUSION
In this chapter, I would like to draw some conclusions about my findings. Firstly, I would like to discuss how Barack Obama, as the speaker, represents the self in the text. Secondly, I would also like to discuss how the other is represented in the text. Thirdly, I would like to explain how the linguistic instruments reveal the representation of the self and the other.
From the analysis of Grammatical Cohesion, I can find the particiants in the text. After tracking all participants mentioned, I find five main participants who are mentioned in the whole speech. They are Barack Obama, Barack Obama and the United States, the United States and Indonesia, Indonesia and violent extremists. Through reference analysis, it is found out which participants are considered as the self and the other. As the reference they is only used to refer to violent extremists, I conclude that violent extremists, specifically Al Qaeda and its affiliates, are considered as the other while the rest of the participants: Barack Obama, Barack Obama and the United States, the United States and Indonesia and Indonesia are considered as the self because in the text, they are replaced with reference I and we.
(38)
51 Maranatha Christian University The representation of the self and the other are revealed from the two major linguistic instruments which are lexical cohesion and transitivity. Lexical cohesion helps to reveal the speaker’s main concern so we can see how they relate to the self-other representation while transitivity analysis helps to reveal how the participants are represented in the text.
Based on the lexical cohesion analysis, I focus on repetition, synonymy and meronymy. I find that the most repeated word is peace. This indicates that
peace becomes Barack Obama’s main concerns. The finding that the speaker’s concern is something positive supports Barack Obama’s representation as the self. However, it is also revealed that Barack Obama actually does not put emphasis on religion as his final topic as he mentions in the beginning of his speech. Instead, it turns out that peace is the main concern among all concerns he mentions through the speech. I also find synonymy in the word religion which is faith and belief. Synonymy analysis helps me reveal the importance of certain words mentioned in the text. In addition, I also find the meronymy of violent extremists which are Al Qaeda and its affiliates. The meronymy analysis helps me reveal the specification of certain words or participants mentioned in the text. By getting to know the specific explanation, the hearers are given further information about who the violent extremists are.
Based on transitivity analysis, I find out how each participant is represented in the text. Starting from the self-representation, Barack Obama is represented positively as the powerful actor, a decision maker, a respectful actor and also a great thinker as he is able to give encouragement to the audience.
(39)
52 Maranatha Christian University Barack Obama and United States are represented positively as the powerful, selective and consistent actors. United States and Indonesia are represented positively as the actor who does technical actions and great thinkers as they are able to give suggestions and recognize global events happen. Furthermore, Indonesia is represented as the actor who does actions but is less powerful than other participants. However, the violent extremists are represented negatively as active actors in doing negative actions. Thus, they are represented as negative other.
Having analyzed Barack Obama’s speech through cohesive devices and transitivity, I do believe that these two elements are essential in revealing the representation of the self and the other. However, the most important part in cohesive devices that helps reveal the representation is reference analysis. In my opinion, reference analysis is the first step in doing representation analysis. By doing so, we can determine where the participants belong to, the self or the other. Besides, we can see how the use of reference can reveal the relation built between the speaker and the hearer. We can see from the reference analysis, Barack Obama always uses the reference I to refer to himself as a President, thus, I conclude that Barack Obama uses his power to make a distance between the hearer and him. This can also affect the self-other representation.
Transitivity analysis also gives many contributions in revealing how the self and the other are represented. However, from the seven processes in transitivity, I only analyze the three major processes applied in the text: material process, mental process and relational process. From the three processes, I find
(40)
53 Maranatha Christian University not only whether the representation is positive or negative but more than that, specifically about how each participant is represented in the text. From the material process, we can see whether the participant is active doing some positive or negative actions. From the mental process, we can see which participants are represented as great sensers or thinkers. In addition, as the relational process deals with facts, it also helps us see whether the facts support the positive or the negative representation of the self and the other.
From the three major processes that I discuss in transitivity, I think material process is the most influential process to get to know how each participant is represented in the text. In material process, the verbs chosen give us description about the exact doings that the participants do, whether it is positive or negative doings. Thus, it is easier to see the self-other representation through the material process.
Furthermore, transitivity analysis is also effective and useful because it does not stop in the conclusion that the self is represented positively while the other is represented negatively. Instead, transitivity gives us the specific description about each participant before coming to the conclusion whether they are considered as the positive self or negative other. As we can see in transitivity analysis, Barack Obama is considered positive because of his positive actions and thoughts. However, further than that, it is also revealed the characteristics of Barack Obama which are powerful and decisive that supports his positive representation as the self.
(41)
54 Maranatha Christian University Actually, an analysis of a text, especially a speech can be developed and improved by other linguistic instruments in functional grammar such as: mood and theme rheme analysis. By doing so, we can reveal more and find out any possibilities that support our analysis. Mood analysis helps us in revealing the speaker’s intention in which the speaker can either give or demand information. Through the mood analysis, how the speaker build interpersonal relation with the hearer can be found. Theme rheme analysis helps us see the main concern or topic discussed in the text. Besides, it also helps us find out marked themes which indicates the most important part that we should pay attention to. Analysis of theme can show the flow of information in the text. By having a complete analysis using Functional Grammar approach, the text can be throughly analyzed. The linguistic instruments mentioned can be applied not only in analyzing a speech, but also in analyzing any kind of texts such as article, personal comment on newspaper, etc.
(42)
55 Maranatha Christian University
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Primary Text
United States President Barack Obama’s Full Speech from the University of Indonesia. The Jakarta Globe, 2010. Web. 20 Feb 2011.
References
Alba-Juez, Laura. “Perspective on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice.” (2009): n. pag. Web. 1 Des 2011.
Baker, M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge, 1992. Print.
Doyle, L. “President Barack Obama will try to win over Muslims on trip to Egypt.” The Telegraph (2009). Web. 25 Feb 2011.
Gerot, L., and Peter Wignell. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Antipodean Educational Enterprises, 1994. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K, and M.I.M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional
(43)
56 Maranatha Christian University Halliday, M.A.K. Language as social semiotics. London: Edward Arnold, 1978. Print.
Toolan, Michael. Language in Literature. London: Arnold, 1998. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K, and Hasan. Cohesion in English. United States of America: Longman Inc., 1976. Print.
Kirsh, David. “Implicit and Explicit Presentation” Academia.edu (2003): n.pag. Web. 23 May 2011.
Louwerse, M.M & Graeser, A.C. “Coherence in discourse.” (2005): n. pag. Web. 12 Maret 2011.
(1)
51 Maranatha Christian University The representation of the self and the other are revealed from the two major linguistic instruments which are lexical cohesion and transitivity. Lexical cohesion helps to reveal the speaker’s main concern so we can see how they relate to the self-other representation while transitivity analysis helps to reveal how the participants are represented in the text.
Based on the lexical cohesion analysis, I focus on repetition, synonymy and meronymy. I find that the most repeated word is peace. This indicates that peace becomes Barack Obama’s main concerns. The finding that the speaker’s concern is something positive supports Barack Obama’s representation as the self. However, it is also revealed that Barack Obama actually does not put emphasis on religion as his final topic as he mentions in the beginning of his speech. Instead, it turns out that peace is the main concern among all concerns he mentions through the speech. I also find synonymy in the word religion which is faith and belief. Synonymy analysis helps me reveal the importance of certain words mentioned in the text. In addition, I also find the meronymy of violent extremists which are Al Qaeda and its affiliates. The meronymy analysis helps me reveal the specification of certain words or participants mentioned in the text. By getting to know the specific explanation, the hearers are given further information about who the violent extremists are.
Based on transitivity analysis, I find out how each participant is represented in the text. Starting from the self-representation, Barack Obama is represented positively as the powerful actor, a decision maker, a respectful actor and also a great thinker as he is able to give encouragement to the audience.
(2)
52 Maranatha Christian University Barack Obama and United States are represented positively as the powerful, selective and consistent actors. United States and Indonesia are represented positively as the actor who does technical actions and great thinkers as they are able to give suggestions and recognize global events happen. Furthermore, Indonesia is represented as the actor who does actions but is less powerful than other participants. However, the violent extremists are represented negatively as active actors in doing negative actions. Thus, they are represented as negative other.
Having analyzed Barack Obama’s speech through cohesive devices and
transitivity, I do believe that these two elements are essential in revealing the representation of the self and the other. However, the most important part in cohesive devices that helps reveal the representation is reference analysis. In my opinion, reference analysis is the first step in doing representation analysis. By doing so, we can determine where the participants belong to, the self or the other. Besides, we can see how the use of reference can reveal the relation built between the speaker and the hearer. We can see from the reference analysis, Barack Obama always uses the reference I to refer to himself as a President, thus, I conclude that Barack Obama uses his power to make a distance between the hearer and him. This can also affect the self-other representation.
Transitivity analysis also gives many contributions in revealing how the self and the other are represented. However, from the seven processes in transitivity, I only analyze the three major processes applied in the text: material process, mental process and relational process. From the three processes, I find
(3)
53 Maranatha Christian University not only whether the representation is positive or negative but more than that, specifically about how each participant is represented in the text. From the material process, we can see whether the participant is active doing some positive or negative actions. From the mental process, we can see which participants are represented as great sensers or thinkers. In addition, as the relational process deals with facts, it also helps us see whether the facts support the positive or the negative representation of the self and the other.
From the three major processes that I discuss in transitivity, I think material process is the most influential process to get to know how each participant is represented in the text. In material process, the verbs chosen give us description about the exact doings that the participants do, whether it is positive or negative doings. Thus, it is easier to see the self-other representation through the material process.
Furthermore, transitivity analysis is also effective and useful because it does not stop in the conclusion that the self is represented positively while the other is represented negatively. Instead, transitivity gives us the specific description about each participant before coming to the conclusion whether they are considered as the positive self or negative other. As we can see in transitivity analysis, Barack Obama is considered positive because of his positive actions and thoughts. However, further than that, it is also revealed the characteristics of Barack Obama which are powerful and decisive that supports his positive representation as the self.
(4)
54 Maranatha Christian University Actually, an analysis of a text, especially a speech can be developed and improved by other linguistic instruments in functional grammar such as: mood and theme rheme analysis. By doing so, we can reveal more and find out any possibilities that support our analysis. Mood analysis helps us in revealing the
speaker’s intention in which the speaker can either give or demand information. Through the mood analysis, how the speaker build interpersonal relation with the hearer can be found. Theme rheme analysis helps us see the main concern or topic discussed in the text. Besides, it also helps us find out marked themes which indicates the most important part that we should pay attention to. Analysis of theme can show the flow of information in the text. By having a complete analysis using Functional Grammar approach, the text can be throughly analyzed. The linguistic instruments mentioned can be applied not only in analyzing a speech, but also in analyzing any kind of texts such as article, personal comment on newspaper, etc.
(5)
55 Maranatha Christian University
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Primary Text
United States President Barack Obama’s Full Speech from the University of
Indonesia. The Jakarta Globe, 2010. Web. 20 Feb 2011.
References
Alba-Juez, Laura. “Perspective on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice.” (2009): n. pag. Web. 1 Des 2011.
Baker, M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge, 1992. Print.
Doyle, L. “President Barack Obama will try to win over Muslims on trip to Egypt.” The Telegraph (2009). Web. 25 Feb 2011.
Gerot, L., and Peter Wignell. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Antipodean Educational Enterprises, 1994. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K, and M.I.M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. Great Britain: Arnold, 2004. Print.
(6)
56 Maranatha Christian University Halliday, M.A.K. Language as social semiotics. London: Edward Arnold, 1978. Print.
Toolan, Michael. Language in Literature. London: Arnold, 1998. Print.
Halliday, M.A.K, and Hasan. Cohesion in English. United States of America: Longman Inc., 1976. Print.
Kirsh, David. “Implicit and Explicit Presentation” Academia.edu (2003): n.pag. Web. 23 May 2011.
Louwerse, M.M & Graeser, A.C. “Coherence in discourse.” (2005): n. pag. Web.