SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS PELAKSANA KEGIATAN U
SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS
PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI
(SKK Migas)
OVERVIEW KEGIATAN INDUSTRI HULU MIGAS
Gas
SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS
PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI
(SKK Migas)
TAHAPAN PROYEK FASILITAS PRODUKSI
PROJECT :
- A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product,
service, or result. (PMBOK)
- A temporary organization that is created for the purpose of
delivering one or more business product according to an agreed
Business Case. (PRINCE2)
- A finite endeavor - having specific start and completion dates undertaken to meet particular goals and objectives, usually to
brings about beneficial change or added value. (wikipedia)
THE THREE PROJECT INTERESTS
SKK Migas
KKKS
Kontraktor
Untuk mendukung proses pengambilan keputusan
secara sistematik dan terukur apakah kegiatan kegiatan
Proyek dapat dilanjutkan ke tahapan berikutnya, atau
harus dilakukan peninjauan ulang, atau Proyek
dinyatakan tidak layak untuk diteruskan
Feasibility Study
none
Conceptual
Study
Studi Konseptual
(Pra-POD)
Design
Engineering
FEED
Construction /
EPCI
Konstruksi
(EPCI)
Operation
Pemeliharaan
dan Modifikasi
Tahapan Proyek
Tahapan Proyek
Appraise
Select
Define
FEL-0
FEL-1
FEL-1
FEL-2
FEL-3
Identify
Appraise
Select
Optimize
Define
Phase-1
Phase-2
Identify & Assess Opportunity
Generate & Select
Alternative(s)
Appraisal Design
Pre-Project
Pra-POD
Execute
Operate
Execute
Operate
Phase-3
Phase-4
Phase-5
Develop Preferred Alternative
Execute
Operate & Evaluate
Basic Engineering
EPSC
FEED
Comm &
StartUp
Konstruksi
Operations
OPERASI
Key Criteria for Distinctive Investment Performance
Choose the Right Project
Develop the
Project Right
Deliver the Project Right
*
APPRAISE
SELECT
DEFINE
EXECUTE
OPERATE
Operational
Excellence
Risked Portfolio
Management
Excellence in Project
Management
Konseptual
Source: Eka Satria, bp, FKT 2005
FEED
Konstruksi
OPERASI
Influence vs Cost
Konseptual
Source: Eka Satria, bp, FKT 2005
FEED
Konstruksi
OPERASI
Eng Progress vs Cost Estimate
Copyright © 2009 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved
6 (Six) Key Project Performance :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
QUALITY
COST
SCOPE
TIME / SCHEDULE
RISK
BENEFITS
Plan of Development (POD)
Buku POD terdiri dari :
BAB 1
BAB 2
BAB 3
BAB 4
BAB 5
BAB 6
BAB 7
BAB 8
BAB 9
BAB 10
BAB 11
BAB 12
BAB 13
BAB 14
Executive Summary
Geological Findings and Reviews
Reservoir Descriptions
Reserve & Production Forecast
Drilling & Completion
Production Facilities
Field Development Scenario
Health Safety and Environment & Corporate Social Responsibility
Abandonment & Site Restoration Plan
Project Schedule & Organization
Local Content
Commercial
Conclusion
Attachments (Technical Supporting Data, Minutes of Meetings, Cost
Estimation, Spreadsheet Economic)
MARKET
Contoh: Studi PRE-POD
Pemilihan Konsep Skenario Pengembangan Lapangan yg Optimal
Overall Development
Scenario
Pre - FEED
Tahapan Studi Konseptual (Pre-POD atau Pre-FEED)
• Pre POD adalah kegiatan studi konseptual untuk menggali dan mempertimbangkan :
–
–
–
–
–
berbagai skenario pengurasan
lokasi dan metoda pengeboran sumur produksi
konfigurasi dan jenis Fasilitas Produksi, disesuaikan dengan perkiraan jumlah & jenis cadangan
Hasil analisa pasar
termasuk di dalam aktivitas Pre-POD adalah kegiatan survei seismic, studi GGR, pengeboran, dan
survei lokasi (geoteknik dan geofisika),
• Pre-FEED adalah kegiatan Proyek Fasilitas Produksi pada tahap studi konseptual
dimana dilakukan :
– proses identifikasi dan seleksi konsep, jenis, dan konfigurasi Fasilitas Produksi yang paling sesuai
– Pada tahap ini juga dilakukan kegiatan awal survei lokasi (geoteknikal dan geofisikal) untuk
mendapatkan gambaran umum karakteristik pada wilayah kerja yang akan dikembangkan.
• Kegiatan ini diutamakan untuk mendapatkan pilihan konsep pengembangan
lapangan yang akan tertuang di dalam dokumen Plan of Development (POD),
suatu dokumen tentang rencana jangka panjang pengembangan suatu lapangan.
PRE-FEED SAMPLE
41
Relative location to existing and new facilities
New Field / New KKKS
XYZ FIELD
KKKS-1
Plant-1 onshore – 72 Km
KKKS-2
Plant-2 FPU export line – 16 Km (future)
Plant-3 treatment plant – 70 Km
KKKS-3
XYZ FIELD
Plant-4 Terminal – 69 Km
Plant-5 offshore – 43 Km
Plant-6 offshore – 41 Km
Plant-7 – 39 Km
Plant-8 – 80 Km
Water Depth: 400 - 500 m
Lapangan XYZ Gas Sample Composition
Lean gas
No H2S
Little CO2
Screening Methodology
44
Concept Screening Methodology
3 wells – 250 MMSCFD
Vertical type
Well type
None
Offshore
processing
Offshore
structure
Final
treatment
location
None -Subsea
tie-back
New
onshore
plant
Minim.Off.
Treatment
SWP
Existing
plant
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
New
onshore
plant
Cluster type
Existing
plant
None
FPU
Minim.Off.
Treatment
None -Subsea
tie-back
New
offshore
New
onshore
plant
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
TLP
Existing
Plant
SWP
New
onshore
plant
TLP
Existing
plant
FPU
New
offshore
Use of Existing Infrastructure
46
Project Location vs Existing Infrastructure
onshore
gas pipeline
Plant-1 complex
Plant-4 complex
4
4 4
25 km
70 km
+ 5 km
onshore
Custome
Export
Manifold
gas pipeline
70 km + 10 km
onshore
offshore
Plant-6 complex
Plant-7 complex
Plant-5 complex
Plant-8 complex
69 km
39 km
to Existing
41 km
80 km
43 km
Plant-2 complex
16 km
XYZ 3 wells - Gas production range [250 MMSCFD]
future
Offshore Existing Infrastructure
48
Total Site Visit - Objectives
PLANT-8
PLANT-6
80 Km
•
•
Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi
Complex)
Peciko Offshore Facilities
PLANT-5
•
Senipah Facilities
•
Sapi Facilities
•
PLANT-7
New Area near Senipah
39 Km
43 Km
41 Km
LAP XYZ
Main Findings from Evaluation Study
Plant-5 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• Study to tie-in future production from other KKKS (100 MMScfd) or existing (250 MMscfd)
fields into Plan-5 concluded that it is not recommended due to major back pressure with high
impact on current production.
• Seven wellhead unmanned platforms + 1 future currently operated at low pressure (12-15
bar) to try to maximize production.
• Production is sent to Plant-4 Terminal in multiphase via 4X24” pipelines.
• For these reasons, other KKKS and existing production will be sent directly on-shore to
Plant-4 via a dedicated sea-line.
Plant-6 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• Only 1X26” trunk line going to the on-shore compression facilities from existing off-shore
field.
• Possible backpressure and Production Losses
• Several wells and three compression stations operated by KKKS-3.
• Compression capacity fully booked for existing fields
• Use strongly discouraged by KKKS-3 as Facilities are in a swampy area (logistic issues,
pipeline laying difficulties and highly expensive civil works for any new facility).
Main Findings from Evaluation Study
Plant-7 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
•
•
•
•
Oil field
Old facilities (1974) / Possible integrity issues
No Spare Capacity (design capacity 18 MMSCFD)
System Working at Low Pressure
Plant-8 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• Oil field
• No Spare Capacity (design capacity 200 MMSCFD)
• System Working at Low Pressure
Onshore Existing Infrastructure
Total Site Visit - Objectives
PLANT-8
PLANT-6
PLANT-1
70 Km + 10 km onshore
PLANT-4
•
•
Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi
Complex)
Peciko Offshore Facilities
PLANT-5
•
Senipah Facilities
•
Sapi Facilities
•
PLANT-7
New Area near Senipah
69 Km
LAP XYZ
Main Findings from Evaluation Study
Plant-1 Onshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• No Spare Capacity (design capacity 150 MMSCFD)
• System Working at Low Pressure
Plant-4 Onshore Facilities :
Base on study of Plant-4 Terminal – Overview, Plant-4 - Process Area,
Plant-4 Terminal – Production Profile & Spare Capacities, Subsea tieback to Plant-4 Facilities is possible with the following limitation :
Spare capacity will be available in 2016
Spare capacity available only on HP System (870 Psig) otherwise
Compression will be needed
Utilities System to be fully assessed (electrical power available, while water,
air instrument, control room, MCC building, civil works for new equipments to
be assessed)
However, a cost-benefit analysis is to be performed to fully assess this
option.
Project Location vs Existing Infrastructure Options
X
onshore
Plant-1 complex
gas pipeline
Gas capacity 150 mmscfd
Spare gas cap. 25 mmscfd
Plant-4 complex
HP Gas cap. 3 x 350 MMSCFD
Spare HP gas cap.
400 mmscfd from 2016
4 4
25 km
4
70 km
+ 5 km
onshore
Customer
Export
Manifold
gas pipeline
70 km + 10 km
onshore
X
Plant-7 complex
Gas capacity 18 mmscfd
No Spare gas capacity
Plant-5 complex
Wellhead Platforms
Trunkline cap 685
MMscfd (@HP) & 370
MMscfd (@MP)
Spare gas capacity
Major back pressure &
production losses
X
offshore
Plant-6 complex
X
Gas capacity 200 mmscfd
No spare gas cap
Potential Backpressure &
production losses
X
Plant-8 complex
Gas capacity 200 mmscfd
No spare gas cap.
Works in LP system
69 km
41 km
39 km
80 km
future
X
Plant-12 complex
40 km
XYZ 3 wells - Gas production range [250 MMSCFD]
16 km
Gas cap. 700 mmscfd
No spare gas cap
Available in Q3/2016
to Existing
Offshore Processing
56
Main findings from evaluation study
Option 1 : No Offshore Treatment
Subsea tie-back to shore : NOT RECOMMENDED
Lower gas recovery caused by higher abandonment reservoir pressure
Potential Flow assurance issues due to multiphase transport (i.e hydrate management, slug volumes,
etc.)
Less reliability of the system
System productivity dependent on less efficient well
Expandability issues
Dependance on other Operator existing facilities
Technical Challenges due to long distance from shore (long control umbilical)
Main findings from evaluation study
Option 2 : Minimum Offshore Treatment : separation and compression
Option 3 : Full Offshore Treatment : separation, compression,
dehydration, condensate stabilization, hydrate inhibition
Minimum offshore process: NOT RECOMMENDED
The minimum offshore treatment is not economically competitive with
respect to the full offshore treatment
The minimum offshore treatment requires both offshore and onshore
processing facilities, thus increasing related operational and safety issues
(two processing facilities to be managed)
The full offshore treatment is preferred because it allows to
minimize potential flow assurance issues (i.e. hydrates, slugs,
corrosion, potential frequent pigging)
58
Offshore Structure
59
Offshore Platform Types
Larger lake- and sea-based offshore platforms and drilling rigs are some of the largest
moveable man-made structures in the world. There are several types of oil platforms
and rigs:
1, 2) conventional fixed platforms; 3) compliant tower; 4, 5) vertically moored tension leg
and mini-tension leg platform; 6) Spar ; 7,8) Semi-submersibles ; 9) Floating production,
storage, and offloading facility; 10) sub-sea completion and tie-back to host facility
Main findings from evaluation study
TLP: NOT RECOMMENDED
Not cost effective due to a low number of surface wells reachable
from TLP
Long time to market
Low expansion capacity (mini-TLP)
Concepts still to be evaluated
Concept Dropped
5 wells – 300 MMSCFD
Vertical type
Well type
Offshore
processing
Minim.Off.
Treatment
None
Offshore
structure
None -Subsea
tie-back
Final
treatment
location
New
onshore
plant
Existing
Plant
SWP
Cluster type
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
New
onshore
plant
None
FPU
Existing
plant
Minim.Off.
Treatment
None -Subsea
tie-back
New
offshore
New
onshore
plant
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
TLP
Existing
Plant
SWP
New
onshore
plant
TLP
Existing
plant
FPU
New
offshore
Development Scenarios
•
Results of the pre-feasibility study and of the peer reviews recommended to
further evaluate in the concept selection phase the following main
development scenarios:
– Shallow Water Platform (in about 120 m water depth) with full offshore
treatment and export to an existing onshore pipeline
– FPU in about 300-500 m water depth with full offshore treatment and
export to an existing onshore pipeline
Options under evaluation: Shallow water platform (SWP)
To Customer
PLANT-4
70 km
Shallow Water
Platform (120m wd)
LEGEND
Stand alone SWP
multiphase
Treated gas
Existing pipeline
Subsea development
Full treatment unit (FPU or Platform)
New onshore plant
Existing plant (onshore / offshore)
XYZ Field
Gas pipeline to Existing pipeline
network
• Subsea Production System
(Wellhead, Flowline, Manifold,
Umbilical)
• Processing Facilities (Receiving &
Separation, Gas compression &
treatment, Condensate Treatment,
Gas & Condensate Transfer, Utility)
Subsea Layouts - SWP
Options under evaluation: Floating Production Unit (FPU)
To Customer
PLANT-4
70 km
FPU
(about 300 m WD)
LEGEND
Stand alone FPU
multiphase
Treated gas
Existing pipeline
Subsea development
Full treatment unit (FPU or Platform)
New onshore plant
Existing plant (onshore / offshore)
Gas pipeline to Existing pipeline
network
XYZ Field
• Subsea Production System
(Wellhead, Flowline, Manifold,
Umbilical)
• Processing Facilities (Receiving &
Separation, Gas compression &
treatment, Condensate Treatment,
Gas & Condensate Transfer, Utility)
Subsea Layouts - FPU
Development options preliminary comparison
Characteristic
Flowline system
SWP
FPU
Longer infield flowline system
Subsea layout less exposed to geohazards
•Larger deck area and load capacity permit
easier expansion;
•Allows storage of liquids
Expandability
HSE
•Risks for personnel working offshore for long
periods during hook up and commissioning
activities (moreover possible SIMOPs)
Requires heavy decommissioning activities
•Residual value
•Leasing scheme possible
Contractual scheme
Schedule
•SSIV system less effective (long distance from
FPU)
•Flexible risers less protected from ship impact
than SWP risers
•Complex riser base for export line due to
diameter limit on flexible riser (16” ID)
Subsea system
Decommissioning
•More complex riser system (need of dynamic
sections for risers and umbilicals)
In case of modular deck system, this requires
long hook up and commissioning activities
Operability/ piggability
•Pigging of export line requires support vessel
and subsea pig launcher because of complex
riser base
Constructability
•Possible availability of existing FPU for
reconversion
Pros
Cons
Shore Approach Options
PLANT-8
Total Site Visit - Objectives
PLANT-6
SHORE-1
•
Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi
Complex)
SHORE-2
PLANT-4
•
PLANT-7
Peciko Offshore Facilities
PLANT-5
•
Senipah Facilities
•
Sapi Facilities
•
New Area near Senipah
90 Km
70 Km
PLANT-2
XYZ FIELD
Shore-1 Approach – Preliminary Evaluation
PRO’S
No necessity of land acquisition
Low environmental impact (no need
to create a new ROW)
Low populated area
CON’S
Longer sea-line route
Possible off-shore crossings
Shore Approach Shore-2 – Preliminary Evaluation
PRO’S
CON’S
Easy connection directly to 42”
pipeline
No necessity to interface with other
operators for the shore approach
works
Relatively low populated area
Short sea-line route
Necessity of land acquisition
Longer on-shore line route
Higher environmental impact (need
to create a new ROW)
Necessity of off-shore crossing
existing lines
Possible local community issues
Deep vs Shallow Water
Offshore vs Onshore Process
Wet vs Dry Tree
Contoh Studi Konseptual
12/10/2013
Contoh Studi Pre-FEED:
Pemilihan Skenario Pemilihan ROW Pipa yg Optimal
PT. Siak
Seraya
PT. Surya Dumai
Industri
Recreation
Forest
PT. Surya Dumai
Agrindo
Limited Production Forest
Community
Forest
Community
Forest
PT. Arara Abadi
PT. Arara
Abadi
Limited Production Forest
PT. Titian Tata Pelita
PT. Darma Wungu
Guna
SAKAI
VILLAGE
PT. Darmali
Jaya
Lestari
PT. Tumpuan
PT.
Murini
Wood
Indah
Industry
PT. Rimba
Rokan
Limited
Lestari
Production
Forest
Contoh Studi Konseptual
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
The result of Pre-FEED work and G&G Survey will be used as basis
for FEED work i.e. :
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Concept Studies
1.1 Pipeline Design Documents
1.2 Top Side Facilities Engineering Document
1.3 Corrosion and Material Studies
1.4 Hydraulic Studies
1.5 Miscellaneous
Geophysical Survey (Platform Location and Pipeline Route)
Geotechnical Survey (Platform Location and Pipeline Route)
Third Party Reports
Metocean Data
AMDAL Studies
Contoh Studi Konseptual
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
Organization Chart
Contoh Studi Konseptual
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
Manpower Loading
FEED
Tahapan Rekayasa Desain (FEED)
•
Kegiatan pada tahap rekayasa desain (biasa disebut FEED; Front End Engineering
Design) adalah kegiatan rekayasa (definition engineering) terhadap Fasilitas
Produksi untuk suatu Proyek tertentu yang disesuaikan dengan rencana jangka
panjang yang tertuang pada dokumen POD :
− Fit for purpose design dengan mempertimbangkan Safety, Life Cycle Cost,
Reliability, Availability dan Maintainability
− Estimasi biaya Konstruksi Proyek
− Estimasi jadwal pelaksanaan Konstruksi Proyek
− Strategi Pengadaan, LLI (Long Lead Items), targer TKDN (Tingkat Kandungan
Dalam Negeri)
− Dokumen Lelang kontraktor Pelaksana EPC
− Update Risk Register, potensi resiko pelaksanaan EPCI dan rencana
antisipasinya
•
Kegiatan survei lokasi (geoteknik dan geofisika) yang lebih spesifik dapat dilakukan
secara paralel dengan proses evaluasi POD, dimana data yang dihasilkan
merupakan faktor penting untuk pelaksanaan rekayasa desain.
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
“tage : P e-FEED Opti izatio “tudies a d o espo di g
development of Project Basis of Design; Scope Groups includes (scope
further detailed in CTRs) :
•
•
•
•
Facilities Optimization (Mainly Process Studies)
Facilities Operability Study
Pipeline Flow Assurance (Mainly Process Studies)
HAZID and Development of Overall Risk Register (Project
Risk/HSE/Process Safety)
• Operations Philosophy, Operations Reference Plan for field life
(shutdown, maintenance, inspections, etc)
• Preparation of Project Basis of Design
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
“tage : The pu pose this do u e t is to o tai a detailed p oposal fo the P eFEED Opti izatio “tudies a d FEED/Basi E gi ee i g fo the platfo s a d
pipeline.
The deliverables from this contract will form the basis for the EPC/EPCI bid
package. FEED/Basic Engineering scope which includes :
• Multidiscipline; Process, Process Safety, Piping/PDMS, Structural/Architecture, Electrical,
Instrumentation, Telecom, Corrosion, Mechanical/Rotating, Procurement, PMT and Cost
Estimation.
• Assist in preparation of EPCI Tender Documents
• Preparation of RFQ for LLI, vendor review (max. 5 bids each). COMPANY intends to
procure the Long Lead Items. Orders will be novated to the EPCI CONTRACTOR
• Liaise with 3rd party design agency who will verify FEED Package
• Constructability Engineering
• Cost Estimate (+/- (10 – 15) %)
• Preparation of EPCI Schedule – Level 2
• Safety Design Reviews
• Provide RFQ for specific materials. Contractor shall consider future expansion with
potential to bring in gas from adjacent field
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
FEED ENGINEERING DESIGN WORK FLOW
The key deliverables and activities throughout the lifecycle of a
typical / generic FEED project is broken divided into 6 (six) phase :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy
Commencement of FEED Design
Initial FEED Development and Hazard Identification
Initial Design Review and Audit
FEED Design Approval
Final Reviews and FEED Report Compilation
Phase 1 : Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy
Preparation for commencement of detail engineering. To evaluate FEED deliverables to ensure
engineering is sufficiently mature for detail design to progress in a controlled and minimal change
environment. To confirm Engineering Execution Plan.
No.
Activities / Deliverables
Description
1
Engineering Execution Plan & Engineering
Organization Chart
Create Engineering Execution Plan complete with key supporting documents /information.
2
Preparation / Validation of Conceptual Study
Report / BoD
Confirm maturity of Conceptual Design report, identify any areas of concern and ensure these are
captured on the Technical Risk Register.
3
Project Baseline Standard
Establish which codes, standards and specifications are to be utilized, e.g. Corporate, project, client, and
confirm procedure. Include in Engineering Execution Plan and/or Discipline Job Design Specifications.
4
Engineering Audit Schedule
Create formal schedule to identify when technical integrity audits, design reviews, HAZID, HAZOP, etc are
to be carried out. Align to Level 3 Engineering Plan and include in Engineering Execution Plan.
5
Technical Risk Register
Create formal Technical Risk Register identifying all possible risks associated with the engineering design.
6
Integrated Engineering Systems
Agree engineering design tools to be used and confirm that system, hardware, software and support is
available, include PDMS, survey methods, dimensional control, techniques, etc.
7
QRA (Quantitative Risk Assessment) & FRA
(Fire Risk Assessment) Strategy
Establish status of QRA, FRA, and Emergency Escape & Rescue Assessment (EERA) information and
confirm methodology for timely delivery into engineering design process.
8
Discipline Job Design Specification
Define the key project specific design parameters and operational constraints that are applicable to the
appropriate discipline for the detailed design of the project. To identify key individuals, roles and
responsibilities, design tools, key codes and standards, etc.
9
Level 3 Engineering Plan
Agree work breakdown structure, develop CTRs and create level 3 integrated engineering plan covering
all disciplines. To be included in Engineering Execution Plan.
10
Confirm CE Compliance Strategy
Review and confirm strategy for CE Compliance. Ensure discipline Lead Engineers are aware of their
responsibilities and appropriate resources / measures are in place.
11
Prepare Interface Register
Develop interface register to ensure all interfaces are identified and managed.
Phase 2 : Commencement of FEED Design
To formally kick off the Engineering Design Process in accordance with the project execution plan and
ensure that key engineering strategies / philosophies are in place.
No.
Activities / Deliverables
Description
1
Safety Critical Systems / Elements and
Performance Standards
Confirm safety critical systems / elements and set appropriate performance standards,
i.e. functionality, reliability and survivability.
2
Document Distribution Matrix
Create formal documents distribution matrix to ensure all disciplines & departments
receive all necessary design information in a timely manner.
3
Structure Integrity Interface
Ensure structural integrity interfaces are identified & visible to project, e.g. Technical
Authorities, Independent Verification Bodies, etc.
4
Material Selection Report
Report defining the requirements and specifications of necessary material.
5
Hazard Management Plan
Create Hazard Management Plan identifying all key hazards, technical safety activities
and the approach to managing Major Accident Hazards in the design.
6
Piping Specifications
Develop / confirm baseline piping specifications.
7
PDMS Catalogues
Ensure PDMS catalogues are populated and available for all affected discipline.
8
CMSS Philosophy
The purpose of this task is to define and prepare the assurance activities to be
undertaken aligned with the project categorization.
Phase 3 : Initial Design Development and Hazard Identification
To develop initial design deliverables to Inter Discipline Review (IDC) stage and identify key hazard
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Key
Discipline
Description
1
HAZID
Perform hazard identification studies, as identified on Engineering Audit Schedule /
Technical Safety Events Schedule.
Technical
Safety
2
Environmental
Impact Identification
Formal assessment of environmental aspects associated with a modification or a
change, and to propose prevention or mitigating measures.
Technical
Safety
3
PFD IDC
Issue P o ess Flo Diag a s PFD s o fo
4
Shutdown &
Blowdown
Philosophy
Explains the measures to shutdown safely and control blowdown and how this will be
achieved.
Process
5
P&ID s IDC
Issue Piping & Instrumentation Diag a
(IDC).
Process
6
Plot Plans / Layouts
IDC
Issue equipment Plot Plans / Layouts on formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).
7
HIPPS Review
Initial review to establish requirements for a High Integrity Pressure Protection
System
8
Dropped Object
Study
Identify and assess the potential risks to drilling, production, process equipment, and
manned areas from dropped or swinging objects. Where the consequence of a
dropped object is considered significant, to propose prevention/mitigating measures.
9
Mechanical Handling
Strategy
Develop Mechanical Handling Strategy including general approach / constraints,
platform crane limits, installation philosophy, operation and maintenance, etc.
al I te -Discipline Review (IDC).
P&ID s o fo
al Inter-Discipline Review
Process
Piping &
Layouts
Instruments
Technical
Safety
Mechanical
and Structural
Phase 3 : Initial Design Development and Hazard Identification
(continued)
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Description
Key
Discipline
10
Particular Material
Appraisal (PMA)
Where required, i.e. he e Co po ate PMA s a e ot suita le, de elop e PMA s.
11
Cause & Effects IDC
Issue Cause & Effects for formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).
12
Hazardous Area Layouts
IDC
Issue Hazardous Area Layouts for formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).
Technical Safety
13
Fire Risk Assessment
(FRA)
Determine Fire & Explosion scenarios and identifies requirements for prevention, control and
mitigation measures.
Technical Safety
14
Blast Design Philosophy
Develop philosophy that assesses potential explosion hazards and identifies appropriate blast loadings
to be applied to the engineering design process, e.g. Vessels, pipe supports, structural steel, etc.
Technical Safety
15
TR Impairment Study
Assessment of the vulnerability of a Temporary Refuge and demonstration of its capability to sustain
life for a specified duration when under attack by fire, explosion and toxic gases.
Technical Safety
16
Equipment List & Data
Sheets
Create master project equipment list identifying all major items of tagged equipment, e.g. vessels,
pumps, motors, generators, hydrocyclones, chemical injection packages, electrical switichgear, control
panels, etc.
17
Emergency Escape &
Rescue Assessment
(EERA)
To identify requirements for emergency escape & rescue, e.g. lifeboats, escape routes, plant layout,
etc.
18
PFP / AFP Philosophy
Develop philosophy that identifies requirements for Passive Fire Protection (PFP) and/or Active Fire
Protection (AFP)
Technical Safety
19
Power System Analysis
Check power system capacities for increase power requirements for new equipment (Brownfiled).
Electrical
20
Preliminary Weight
Report
Prepare preliminary Weight Report
Structural
PED Focal Point
Process and
Instruments
Mechanical
Technical Safety
Phase 4 : Initial Design Review and Audit
To confirm that the initial design development is robust
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Key
Discipline
Description
1
Hazardous Area
Review
Formal Engineering discipline review of hazardous area layouts to confirm
requirements for the correct selection and location of equipment.
Technical Safety
2
P&ID Review
Fo
Process, Piping,
Technical Safety,
Instruments
3
Plot Plan / Layout /
3-D Model Review
Formal Engineering review of Plot plans / Layouts. The review shall ensure that the
layout design complies with the required technical, safety, operability and
maintainability standards. Makes sure the layout is cost effective, ensures the
constructability of the work and agrees the layout basis on which the detailed design
can proceed.
Piping and
Layouts,
Structural,
Mechanical,
Electrical,
Technical Safety,
Process
4
Cause & Effect
review
Formal review of Cause & Effects diagrams to confirm design basis and alignment
with Hazard Management Plan.
Instruments,
Process,
Technical Safety
5
Technical Audit
Obtain confirmation, by sampling of project documentation, that the engineering of
the project is to the required standard and the free from errors.
al E gi ee i g dis ipli e e ie of P&ID s to o fi
desig
asis.
Independent
Phase 5 : FEED Design Approval
To F eeze the P o ess desig , a d de elop depe de t desig & p o u e e t a ti ities
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Description
Key
Discipline
1
Final Design review
Demonstration that all of the design and review activities relevant to achieving design integrity have
been performed.
Technical Safety
2
PUWER Assessments
Conduct initial PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations) assessment typically by
review of PDMS model and/or vendor / equipment supplier information received to date.
Technical Safety,
Mechanical
3
HAZOP
Hazard and Operability Studies, a systemic multi-discipline study based on the applications of
guidewords to identify causes of potential hazards and operability constraints in a facility.
Process, Technical
Safety
4
Best Available
Techniques (BAT)
Report
The Final report which analyses the major environmental issues that have been considered as part of
the process to select the final option from the various alternatives considered. Thus preventing, or
eliminating, or where the alternatives are not practicable, to then limit or reduce environmental
impacts associated with the selected option.
Technical Safety
Affected
disciplines +
Construction /
Implementation
Group
5
Constructability
Review
Conduct formal Constructability Reviews to ensure safe and efficient installation of plant & equipment.
6
P&ID AFD
Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Process and Instrumentation Diagrams.
7
Cause & Effects AFD
Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Cause & Effects
8
Process Data Sheets
AFD
Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Process Data Sheets
Process
9
HP / LP Interface
Listing
Identify all HP / LP Interface on formal register and ensure that all have been addressed satisfactorily
via HAZOP and/or individual reviews.
Process
10
HOLDs Register
Develop register to record & manage post AFD design HOLDs
Process
Instruments
Engineering
Manager
Phase 5 : FEED Design Approval (continued)
Description
Key
Discipline
SIL Assessment
Conduct assessment to determine target Safety Integrity Level (SIL). Note : Where the
target SIL is 3, then it is likely that a High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems
(HIPPS) will be required. If the value is found to be 1 or 2, then a HIPPS will not be
required.
Instruments
12
HIPPS Study
Conduct study to formally identify the performance requirements of the High
Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS) and demonstrate that it is robust.
Should include dynamic study for a range of transient conditions.
13
Qualitative Risk
Assessment (QRA)
Multi-disciplinary study of hazards, the likelihood of their occurrence and potential
consequences in terms of harm to people and the environment.
14
HIPPS Reliability
Study
Conduct study to formally demonstrate that the High Integrity Pressure Protection
Systems (HIPPS) complies with the reliability & availability criteria for the Project, e.g.
as stipulated in the performance standard.
Instruments
15
Flow Assurance
Conduct flow assurance studies to demonstrate the process design under a range of
flow condition, i.e. start-up to 100%
Process
16
EDAS (Engineering
Delivery Assurance
System) Stage Gate
Reviews
Demonstrate adherence to the EDAS Task Performance Criteria appropriate for
Project Category
Engineering
Manager
17
Technical Peer
Review
Demonstrate adherence to the EDAS Task Performance Criteria appropriate for the
Project Category and to ensure that engineering personnel are aware of EDAS
requirements and adequately explain how those requirements are being fulfilled.
Engineering
Manager
No.
11
Activities /
Deliverables
Process
Technical
Safety
Phase 6 : Final Reviews and FEED Report Compilation
To ensure all final design deliverables are completed and that client and statutory obligations are
satisfactorily resolved.
No.
1
Activities /
Deliverables
FEED Report
Description
Collate all disciplines inputs and finalize study report
Contoh FEED Deliverable
Key
Discipline
Project
Management
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
Manpower Loading
Contoh Studi FEED
Organization Chart FEED Project
Contoh Studi FEED
Multidiscipline Engineering
Contoh Studi FEED
Code & Standard
Contoh Studi FEED
Code & Standard
Contoh Studi FEED
Code & Standard
Contoh Studi FEED
Software yang digunakan
Contoh Studi FEED (kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
3D Model
Contracting Strategy - Sample
Contracting Strategy – Sample
XYZ DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Jackets
Topsides
Management, Project Definition,
Contract Preparation
COMPANY
PT. SURVEY CONTRACTOR
Survey
PT. ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR)
Basic Engineering
PO 001
STRUCTURAL STEEL
Detail Engineering
Procurement / Supply
EPC2
EPC1
EPC3
PO 002
VALVES
Construction
PO 003
PRESSURE VESSEL - SS
Pre-Commissioning
PO 004
PRESSURE VESSEL - CS
Tie-ins & Modification to existing
platform
Transportation & Installation
Pipelines
EPC4
Hook Up
Commissioning
Start-Up
COMPANY COMMISSIONING TEAM / CONTRACTORS & Supplier Assistance
COMPANY START-UP TEAM
PO - Scope of Work
PO 001 – Structural Steel
PO 002 - Valves
Supply of:
Tubular cans with various diameters from 26” to 68.5” with
various thicknesses from 1.0” to 2.0”
Rolled and welded tubular with various diameters from 10.750” to
66” with various thicknesses from 0.375” to 1.0”
Plates with various thicknesses from 12 mm to 50 mm
Rolled structural shapes
Supply of:
Manual Ball VALVES, Butterfly VALVES, Globe VALVES and
Check VALVES from 6” up to 20” size, Rating 150#, 600# and 900#
Actuated VALVES from 6” up to 20” size, Rating 150#, 600# and
900#
Design codes ASME, Body material: Duplex Stainless Steel UNS
S31803 and Carbon steel.
Material designation:
For tubular cans: API 2H
Rolled and welded tubular: API 5L
Plates: A36
Rolled structural shapes: API 2B
PO 003 – Press. Vessel SS
Supply of:
One (1) Test Separator, Carbon Steel material with Stainless Steel
Clad, fitted with internals
Three (3) Vent KO Drums, Stainless Steel material, fitted with
internals
PO 004 – Press. Vessel CS
Supply of:
Three (3) Close Drain Drums, Carbon Steel material, internally
coated, cathodic protection installed inside
Three (3) Open Drain Drums, Carbon Steel material, internally
coated, cathodic protection installed inside
EPC – Scope of Work
EPC1 - Jackets
2(two) tripod WHP and 1 (one)
four legs CPP jackets and
appurtenance.
Each tripod jacket weight approx.
800 Metric tons and four legs
jacket weight approx. 1250
Metric tons.
Detailed engineering, site
survey and interface
management.
Main structural steel free
issued by COMPANY.
Procurement of all the
remaining steel, anodes, piles,
conductor pipes.
Construction of the two (2)
tripod jackets and one (1) four
leg jacket.
Load out and sea fastening of
the three (3) jackets and
associated piles and
conductor pipes
EPC2 - Topsides
2 (two) integrated topsides for WHP and 1 (one)
CPP
WHP Topsides each weighs approx. 750 Metric
tons and CPP topside weight approx.. 1350
Metric tons plus modifications to existing
platforms facilities.
Detailed engineering, site survey and
interface management.
Main structural steel free issued by
COMPANY.
Ma ual a d a tuated al es a o e 6 f ee
issued by COMPANY.
Procurement and supply of the main
components of the topsides and the entire
equipment for the telecommunication
system.
Construction and pre-commissioning of the
three (3) topsides and of the entire
telecommunication system.
Load out and sea fastening of the three (3)
topsides
Mobilization of Marine Spread(s) for hook up
HOOK up following installation of topsides by
EPC4.
Assistance to COMPANY during
commissioning and start-up.
Tie-ins and modifications works to the
existing platforms facilities, including
telemetry, control, safety systems and by
pass line.
EPC3 - Pipelines
Pipelines:
6 pipeli e app o . 6k
- 1 x 16 pipeli e (approx. 8km)
pipeline (approx. 4km)
EPC4 - Transportation and Installation
Transportation and installation of 2 (two)
integrated topsides for WHP and 1 (one)
CPP.
Water depth ranging from 50m to 75m.
Detailed engineering, site
survey and interface
management.
Procurement of all materials
including line pipes, anodes,
and coating materials.
Coating and transportation of
line pipe.
Mobilization/demobilization of
marine spread(s).
I stallatio of 6 a d
pipeline.
Diving works for all subsea
installations and connections.
Pre-commissioning of the
entire pipeline network.
Detailed engineering and interface
management.
Mobilization/demobilization of marine
spread(s).
Transportation of the jackets,
topsides, vent booms and telecom
masts and appurtenance to the
offshore location.
Installation of the jackets, topsides,
vent booms, and telecom masts and
appurtenance.
EPC Potential Bidder
Potential Bidder for Jackets and Topsides:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
McDermot (Batam Yard)
SMOE (Batam Yard)
Nisconi (Batam Yard)
Saipem (Karimun Yard)
Gunanusa (West Java Yard)
Bakrie Construction (West Java Yard)
Meindo (Handil Yard)
Etc.
Potential Bidder for Transportation and Installation:
No.
Barge Name
Scope
Owner
1
Sapura 3000
All scope
Sapura Acergy
2
DB 27
All scope
Mc Dermott
3
DB 30
All scope
Mc Dermott
4
Castoro 8
All scope
Saipem
5
PJW 3000
All scope
Swiber
6
LTS 3000
All scope
TL Offshore
7
Kuroshio One
All scope
Nisconi
8
Lanjiang
All scope
COOEC
9
Etc …
Tender Schedule
Start
Prequalification
Contract
Award
Contract
2 Feb ‘11
7 Mar ‘11
36 weeks
25 Jan ‘11
2 Feb ‘11
7 Mar ‘11
36 weeks
25 Oct ‘10
25 Jan ‘11
31 Jan ‘11
3 Mar ‘11
60 weeks
25 Oct ‘10
25 Jan ‘11
31 Jan ‘11
3 Mar ‘11
60 weeks
Contract
Award
Contract
3 May ‘11
10 Jun ‘11
20 months
25 Apr ‘11
3 May ‘11
9 Jun ‘11
24 months
22 Dec ‘10
15 Apr ‘11
25 Apr ‘11
1 Jun ‘11
24 mon ths
23 Dec ‘11
15 Apr ‘11
25 Apr ‘11
1 Jun ‘11
22 months
Issue CFT to
Stage 1
Stage 2
Issue RTA
Qualified Tenderers
Tender Opening
Tender Opening
to BPMIGAS
PO
Issue Media
Announcement
PO 001
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
29 Oct ‘10
25 Jan ‘11
PO 002
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
25 Oct ‘10
PO 003
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
PO 004
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
EPSC
Issue Media
Announcement
Start
Prequalification
EPC1
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
14 Dec ‘10
25 Apr ‘11
EPC2
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
13 Dec ‘10
EPC3
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
EPC4
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
Issue CFT to
Qualified Tenderers
Stage 1
Stage 2
Issue RTA
Tender Opening
Tender Opening
to BPMIGAS
Duration
Duration
EPCI
(Engineering, Procurement,
Construction, Installation)
• Kegiatan pada tahap Konstruksi adalah kegiatan pembangunan
Konstruksi fisik dari Fasilitas Produksi.
• Tahapan ini bisa dilaksanakan secara terintegrasi (biasa disebut EPC –
engineering, procurement, construction), atau dengan beberapa
Kontrak Pelaksana.
• Tahap ini diakhiri dengan kegiatan pengujian, Commissioning, dan
Start-up untuk kemudian diserahterimakan dari penanggung jawab tim
Proyek kepada penangung jawab tim operasi Kontraktor KKS.
Contractor General Obligation
The Contractor shall design, execute and complete the works in
accordance with the contract and shall remedy any defect in works. When
completed, the works shall be fit for purposes for which the works are
intended as defined in or reasonably to be inferred from the contract
The Co t a to shall p o ide the pla t, ate ials a d Co t a to s
do u e ts spe ified i the o t a a d all Co t a to s pe so el, goods,
consumables and other thing and services, whether of a temporary or
permanent nature, required in and for this design, execution completion
and remedying of defect of damage
The Works shall include any work which is necessary to satisfy the
requirements of Good Engineering and Construction Practices and the
Specification
All other work which (although not mentioned in the contract) is
necessary for stability or for the completion, or safe and proper operation
of the works
The Contractor shall be responsible for the adequacy, stability and safety
of all offsoe site operations of all methods of construction and all the
works
The Contractor shall, whenever required by the company, submit details
of the arrangements and methods which the contractor proposes to
adopt for the execution of the works. No significant alteration to these
arrangement and methods shall be made without this having previously
been notified to and approved by the company (acting reasonably)
ISI KONTRAK EPCI - contoh
DAFTAR ISI
Dokumen Tandatangan Kontrak
1.0 Kontrak
2.0 Pekerjaan
3.0 Pemberitahuan
4.0 Jangka Waktu dan Pemutusan
5.0 Penghentian Sementara Pekerjaan
6.0 Kompensasi
7.0 Penagihan dan Pembayaran
8.0 Tanggungjawab Kontraktor dan Perusahaan
9.0 Jaminan
10.0 Manajemen /Pemeriksaan Mutu
11.0 Asuransi
12.0 Ganti Kerugian
13.0 Pemenuhan Jadwal Kontrak/Ganti Rugi Keterlambatan
Pengiriman
14.0 Kandungan Lokal
15.0 Nilai Kontrak
16.0 Jaminan Pelaksanaan
17.0 Hukum Yang Mengatur
18.0 Penyelesaian Sengketa
19.0 Pajak dan Bea
20.0 Pemenuhan Hukum Yang Berlaku
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contract Signature Document
1.0 The Contract
2.0 The Work
3.0 Notices
4.0 Term and Termination
5.0 Temporary Suspension of the Work
6.0 Compensation
7.0 Invoicing and Payment
8.0 Contractor and Company Responsibilities
9.0 Warranty
10.0 Quality Management/Inspection
11.0 Insurance
12.0 Indemnification
13.0 Contract Schedule Compliance/Late Delivery Charges
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
Local Content
Contract Value
Securities
Governing Law
Settlement of Disputes
Taxes and Duties
Compliance with Applicable Law
ISI KONTRAK EPCI - contoh
DAFTAR ISI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
21.0 Kesehatan, Keselamatan dan Lingkungan (“KKL”)
21.0 Health, Safety and Environment (“HSE”)
22.0 Keadaan Kahar
22.0 Force Majeure
23.0 Etika Bisnis dan Pembayaran kepada Pejabat
23.0 Business Ethics and Payments to Officials
24.0 Catatan dan Audit
24.0 Records and Audits
25.0 Alas Hak /Kepemilikan atas Pengembangan-pengembangan
Kontraktor
26.0 Pengalihan dan Sub-kontrak
25.0 Title/Ownership of Contractor Developments
27.0 Kerahasiaan, Publisitas dan Pengungkapan
27.0 Confidentiality, Publicity and Disclosure
28.0 Dokumen-dokumen Yang Bertentangan
28.0 Conflicting Documents
29.0 Kewajiban-kewajiban Yang Berlanjut
29.0 Continuing Obligations
30.0 Keterpisahan
30.0 Severability
31.0 Pengesampingan
31.0 Waiver
32.0 Keseluruhan Kontrak dan Perubahan Kontrak
32.0 Entire Contract and Contract Modification
33.0 Bahasa
33.0 Language
34.0 Data Yang Disediakan Perusahaan
34.0 Company Supplied Data
35.0 Operasi-operasi di Lepas Pantai
35.0 Offshore Operations
36.0 Pembatasan Tangungjawab
36.0 Limitation of Liability
37.0 Bagian-bagian
37.0 Counterparts
26.0 Assignment and Subcontracting
ISI KONTRAK EPCI - contoh
LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN
EXHIBITS
Lampiran A Rincian Khusus Kontrak
Exhibit A
Contract-Specific Details
Lampiran B Penjelasan Proyek
Exhibit B
Project Description
Lampiran C Lingkup Pekerjaan
Exhibit C
Scope of Work
Lampiran D Penyelesaian Pekerjaan
Exhibit D
Completion of Work
Lampiran E Kompensasi
Exhibit E
Compensation
Lampiran F Ketentuan-ketentuan Administrasi dan Umum
Exhibit F
Administration and General Requirements
Lampiran G Data Yang Disediakan Perusahaan
Exhibit G
Company Supplied Data
Lampiran H Jadwal Kontrak
Exhibit H
Contract Schedule
Lampiran I Perubahan
Exhibit I
Changes
Lampiran J Bahan Yang Disediakan Perusahaan
Exhibit J
Company Furnished Material
Lampiran K Formulir Perjanjian Ganti Kerugian Perusahaan Induk/
Korporasi
Exhibit K
Form of Parent Company / Corporate Indemnity
Agreement
Lampiran F Bentuk Jaminan Pelaksanaan
Exhibit L
Form of Performance Bond
Lampiran M Ketentuan-ketentuan Kesehatan, Keselamatan dan
Lingkungan
Exhibit M
Health, Safety & Environmental Requirements
Lampiran N Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Bisnis Perusahaan
Exhibit N
Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Lampiran O Rincian-rincian Armada Kontraktor
Exhibit O
Contractor’s Spread Details
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
1. GENERAL
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Introduction
Nomenclature
Facilities
Contract Objective and Work
Schedule
Responsibilities
Conformance of the Work
Co t a to s E e utio Pla
Structure of Scope of Work
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2. SCOPE OF WORK
2.1 WBS-01-01-00-00 Management and Administration Activities
2.1.1 Project Management
2.1.2 Interface Management
2.1.3 Quality Management
2.1.4 HSE Management
2.1.5 Engineering Management
2.1.6 Procurement & Material Management
2.1.7 Construction and Commissioning Management
2.1.8 Marine Activities Management
2.1.9 As-Built Management
2.1.10 Information Management
2.1.11 Regulations, Certificates & Permits
2.1.12 Project Control
2.1.13 Supporting Service
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2.2 WBS-01-02-00-00 Engineering Activities
2.2.1 General Engineering Activities
2.2.2 Detailed Engineering Activities
2.3 WBS-01-03-00-00 Procurement and Material Management
2.4 WBS-01-04-00-00 Manufacturing and Fabrication
2.4.1 Subsea Structure Fabrication
2.4.2 Subsea Tie-In Spool Fabrication
2.4.3 Coatings and Anodes
2.4.4 Contractor Representing, Inspection and Testing
2.4.5 Load Out, Seafastening and Transportation
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2.5 WBS-01-05-00-00 Installation
2.5.1 General Installation Requirements
2.5.2 Mobilization
2.5.3 Surveys and Positioning
2.5.4 Seabed Preparation
2.5.5 Pipeline/Cable Crossings
2.5.6 Electro/Hydraulic (E/H) Flying Leads Instalation
2.5.7 Subsea Structures
2.5.8 Tie-In Spool Metrology and Installation
2.5.9 Pipeline System Pre-commissioning
2.5.10 Subsea Production System Function Testing
2.5.11 Mechanical Completion and Handover
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2.6 WBS-01-06-00-00 As Built Activities and Final Documentation
2.6.1 As-built Scope of Work
2.6.2 As-built Procedures
2.6.3 As-built Register
2.6.4 Schedule
2.6.5 Vendor Data
2.6.6 As-built Survey
2.6.7 Final Documentation
Source : IFP Training
Cycle in EPCI
FEED
Tender by KKKS
E
P C I
Detailed
Engineering
- Specification
- Calculation
- Data Sheet
- Drawing
- MTO
Vendor A
Vendor ....
Procurement
Construction
Installation
- Procure MTO
- Expediting
- A i al Mat l & E pt
Vendor X
- Procesure, Construction Eng & Shop
Drawing
-Advance Constructability
- Resources : Manpower& Equipment
- Procedure, Installation Engineering, Inst
Drawing
- Installation Vessel
- Installation Requirement & Aid
-Data sheet
-Vendor Data
-Vendor Engineering
Source : JGC
DETAILED ENGINEERING
Source : Amec
Deliverable Detailed Engineering (Semua Discipline : Process, Safety, Mechanical, Electrical,
Instrument, Piping, Structure, Pipeline) adalah pendetailan lebih lanjut dari Deliverable
FEED baik Design Calculation, Specification, Data Sheet dan Drawing yang telah dilakukan
validasi :
• data pre-engineering survey,
• verifikasi dengan Operation & Maintenance,
• review constructibility termasuk instalasi,
• verifikasi data vendor
• Interface
dan status dokumen akhir adalah AFC (Approved for Construction)
PROCUREMENT
CONSTRUCTION
- Ready for Commissioning Certificate
- Mechanical Completion (All Subsys tem)
- Operational Test Certificate
- Ready for Start Up Certificate
- Handover State
- Oil/ Gas in
-Ready for Start Up
- Provisional Acceptance Certificate
- Final Acceptance Cerificate
The Top 10 Mistakes in Project Management :
1.
2.
3.
4.
Project Scope is too big
The Schedule is too ambitious
The P oje t does t follo a sta da d PM Methodolog
Communication breakdowns between the Project Manager
and The Team
5. Risk Assessment process was skimped
6. The Team Members are not productive
7. Resources have been over-allocated
8. Not cracking down hard enough on productivity leaks
9. Incomplete data
10. Not sa i g NO
TERIMA KASIH
PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI
(SKK Migas)
OVERVIEW KEGIATAN INDUSTRI HULU MIGAS
Gas
SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS
PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI
(SKK Migas)
TAHAPAN PROYEK FASILITAS PRODUKSI
PROJECT :
- A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product,
service, or result. (PMBOK)
- A temporary organization that is created for the purpose of
delivering one or more business product according to an agreed
Business Case. (PRINCE2)
- A finite endeavor - having specific start and completion dates undertaken to meet particular goals and objectives, usually to
brings about beneficial change or added value. (wikipedia)
THE THREE PROJECT INTERESTS
SKK Migas
KKKS
Kontraktor
Untuk mendukung proses pengambilan keputusan
secara sistematik dan terukur apakah kegiatan kegiatan
Proyek dapat dilanjutkan ke tahapan berikutnya, atau
harus dilakukan peninjauan ulang, atau Proyek
dinyatakan tidak layak untuk diteruskan
Feasibility Study
none
Conceptual
Study
Studi Konseptual
(Pra-POD)
Design
Engineering
FEED
Construction /
EPCI
Konstruksi
(EPCI)
Operation
Pemeliharaan
dan Modifikasi
Tahapan Proyek
Tahapan Proyek
Appraise
Select
Define
FEL-0
FEL-1
FEL-1
FEL-2
FEL-3
Identify
Appraise
Select
Optimize
Define
Phase-1
Phase-2
Identify & Assess Opportunity
Generate & Select
Alternative(s)
Appraisal Design
Pre-Project
Pra-POD
Execute
Operate
Execute
Operate
Phase-3
Phase-4
Phase-5
Develop Preferred Alternative
Execute
Operate & Evaluate
Basic Engineering
EPSC
FEED
Comm &
StartUp
Konstruksi
Operations
OPERASI
Key Criteria for Distinctive Investment Performance
Choose the Right Project
Develop the
Project Right
Deliver the Project Right
*
APPRAISE
SELECT
DEFINE
EXECUTE
OPERATE
Operational
Excellence
Risked Portfolio
Management
Excellence in Project
Management
Konseptual
Source: Eka Satria, bp, FKT 2005
FEED
Konstruksi
OPERASI
Influence vs Cost
Konseptual
Source: Eka Satria, bp, FKT 2005
FEED
Konstruksi
OPERASI
Eng Progress vs Cost Estimate
Copyright © 2009 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved
6 (Six) Key Project Performance :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
QUALITY
COST
SCOPE
TIME / SCHEDULE
RISK
BENEFITS
Plan of Development (POD)
Buku POD terdiri dari :
BAB 1
BAB 2
BAB 3
BAB 4
BAB 5
BAB 6
BAB 7
BAB 8
BAB 9
BAB 10
BAB 11
BAB 12
BAB 13
BAB 14
Executive Summary
Geological Findings and Reviews
Reservoir Descriptions
Reserve & Production Forecast
Drilling & Completion
Production Facilities
Field Development Scenario
Health Safety and Environment & Corporate Social Responsibility
Abandonment & Site Restoration Plan
Project Schedule & Organization
Local Content
Commercial
Conclusion
Attachments (Technical Supporting Data, Minutes of Meetings, Cost
Estimation, Spreadsheet Economic)
MARKET
Contoh: Studi PRE-POD
Pemilihan Konsep Skenario Pengembangan Lapangan yg Optimal
Overall Development
Scenario
Pre - FEED
Tahapan Studi Konseptual (Pre-POD atau Pre-FEED)
• Pre POD adalah kegiatan studi konseptual untuk menggali dan mempertimbangkan :
–
–
–
–
–
berbagai skenario pengurasan
lokasi dan metoda pengeboran sumur produksi
konfigurasi dan jenis Fasilitas Produksi, disesuaikan dengan perkiraan jumlah & jenis cadangan
Hasil analisa pasar
termasuk di dalam aktivitas Pre-POD adalah kegiatan survei seismic, studi GGR, pengeboran, dan
survei lokasi (geoteknik dan geofisika),
• Pre-FEED adalah kegiatan Proyek Fasilitas Produksi pada tahap studi konseptual
dimana dilakukan :
– proses identifikasi dan seleksi konsep, jenis, dan konfigurasi Fasilitas Produksi yang paling sesuai
– Pada tahap ini juga dilakukan kegiatan awal survei lokasi (geoteknikal dan geofisikal) untuk
mendapatkan gambaran umum karakteristik pada wilayah kerja yang akan dikembangkan.
• Kegiatan ini diutamakan untuk mendapatkan pilihan konsep pengembangan
lapangan yang akan tertuang di dalam dokumen Plan of Development (POD),
suatu dokumen tentang rencana jangka panjang pengembangan suatu lapangan.
PRE-FEED SAMPLE
41
Relative location to existing and new facilities
New Field / New KKKS
XYZ FIELD
KKKS-1
Plant-1 onshore – 72 Km
KKKS-2
Plant-2 FPU export line – 16 Km (future)
Plant-3 treatment plant – 70 Km
KKKS-3
XYZ FIELD
Plant-4 Terminal – 69 Km
Plant-5 offshore – 43 Km
Plant-6 offshore – 41 Km
Plant-7 – 39 Km
Plant-8 – 80 Km
Water Depth: 400 - 500 m
Lapangan XYZ Gas Sample Composition
Lean gas
No H2S
Little CO2
Screening Methodology
44
Concept Screening Methodology
3 wells – 250 MMSCFD
Vertical type
Well type
None
Offshore
processing
Offshore
structure
Final
treatment
location
None -Subsea
tie-back
New
onshore
plant
Minim.Off.
Treatment
SWP
Existing
plant
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
New
onshore
plant
Cluster type
Existing
plant
None
FPU
Minim.Off.
Treatment
None -Subsea
tie-back
New
offshore
New
onshore
plant
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
TLP
Existing
Plant
SWP
New
onshore
plant
TLP
Existing
plant
FPU
New
offshore
Use of Existing Infrastructure
46
Project Location vs Existing Infrastructure
onshore
gas pipeline
Plant-1 complex
Plant-4 complex
4
4 4
25 km
70 km
+ 5 km
onshore
Custome
Export
Manifold
gas pipeline
70 km + 10 km
onshore
offshore
Plant-6 complex
Plant-7 complex
Plant-5 complex
Plant-8 complex
69 km
39 km
to Existing
41 km
80 km
43 km
Plant-2 complex
16 km
XYZ 3 wells - Gas production range [250 MMSCFD]
future
Offshore Existing Infrastructure
48
Total Site Visit - Objectives
PLANT-8
PLANT-6
80 Km
•
•
Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi
Complex)
Peciko Offshore Facilities
PLANT-5
•
Senipah Facilities
•
Sapi Facilities
•
PLANT-7
New Area near Senipah
39 Km
43 Km
41 Km
LAP XYZ
Main Findings from Evaluation Study
Plant-5 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• Study to tie-in future production from other KKKS (100 MMScfd) or existing (250 MMscfd)
fields into Plan-5 concluded that it is not recommended due to major back pressure with high
impact on current production.
• Seven wellhead unmanned platforms + 1 future currently operated at low pressure (12-15
bar) to try to maximize production.
• Production is sent to Plant-4 Terminal in multiphase via 4X24” pipelines.
• For these reasons, other KKKS and existing production will be sent directly on-shore to
Plant-4 via a dedicated sea-line.
Plant-6 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• Only 1X26” trunk line going to the on-shore compression facilities from existing off-shore
field.
• Possible backpressure and Production Losses
• Several wells and three compression stations operated by KKKS-3.
• Compression capacity fully booked for existing fields
• Use strongly discouraged by KKKS-3 as Facilities are in a swampy area (logistic issues,
pipeline laying difficulties and highly expensive civil works for any new facility).
Main Findings from Evaluation Study
Plant-7 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
•
•
•
•
Oil field
Old facilities (1974) / Possible integrity issues
No Spare Capacity (design capacity 18 MMSCFD)
System Working at Low Pressure
Plant-8 Offshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• Oil field
• No Spare Capacity (design capacity 200 MMSCFD)
• System Working at Low Pressure
Onshore Existing Infrastructure
Total Site Visit - Objectives
PLANT-8
PLANT-6
PLANT-1
70 Km + 10 km onshore
PLANT-4
•
•
Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi
Complex)
Peciko Offshore Facilities
PLANT-5
•
Senipah Facilities
•
Sapi Facilities
•
PLANT-7
New Area near Senipah
69 Km
LAP XYZ
Main Findings from Evaluation Study
Plant-1 Onshore Facilities – NOT RECOMMENDED
• No Spare Capacity (design capacity 150 MMSCFD)
• System Working at Low Pressure
Plant-4 Onshore Facilities :
Base on study of Plant-4 Terminal – Overview, Plant-4 - Process Area,
Plant-4 Terminal – Production Profile & Spare Capacities, Subsea tieback to Plant-4 Facilities is possible with the following limitation :
Spare capacity will be available in 2016
Spare capacity available only on HP System (870 Psig) otherwise
Compression will be needed
Utilities System to be fully assessed (electrical power available, while water,
air instrument, control room, MCC building, civil works for new equipments to
be assessed)
However, a cost-benefit analysis is to be performed to fully assess this
option.
Project Location vs Existing Infrastructure Options
X
onshore
Plant-1 complex
gas pipeline
Gas capacity 150 mmscfd
Spare gas cap. 25 mmscfd
Plant-4 complex
HP Gas cap. 3 x 350 MMSCFD
Spare HP gas cap.
400 mmscfd from 2016
4 4
25 km
4
70 km
+ 5 km
onshore
Customer
Export
Manifold
gas pipeline
70 km + 10 km
onshore
X
Plant-7 complex
Gas capacity 18 mmscfd
No Spare gas capacity
Plant-5 complex
Wellhead Platforms
Trunkline cap 685
MMscfd (@HP) & 370
MMscfd (@MP)
Spare gas capacity
Major back pressure &
production losses
X
offshore
Plant-6 complex
X
Gas capacity 200 mmscfd
No spare gas cap
Potential Backpressure &
production losses
X
Plant-8 complex
Gas capacity 200 mmscfd
No spare gas cap.
Works in LP system
69 km
41 km
39 km
80 km
future
X
Plant-12 complex
40 km
XYZ 3 wells - Gas production range [250 MMSCFD]
16 km
Gas cap. 700 mmscfd
No spare gas cap
Available in Q3/2016
to Existing
Offshore Processing
56
Main findings from evaluation study
Option 1 : No Offshore Treatment
Subsea tie-back to shore : NOT RECOMMENDED
Lower gas recovery caused by higher abandonment reservoir pressure
Potential Flow assurance issues due to multiphase transport (i.e hydrate management, slug volumes,
etc.)
Less reliability of the system
System productivity dependent on less efficient well
Expandability issues
Dependance on other Operator existing facilities
Technical Challenges due to long distance from shore (long control umbilical)
Main findings from evaluation study
Option 2 : Minimum Offshore Treatment : separation and compression
Option 3 : Full Offshore Treatment : separation, compression,
dehydration, condensate stabilization, hydrate inhibition
Minimum offshore process: NOT RECOMMENDED
The minimum offshore treatment is not economically competitive with
respect to the full offshore treatment
The minimum offshore treatment requires both offshore and onshore
processing facilities, thus increasing related operational and safety issues
(two processing facilities to be managed)
The full offshore treatment is preferred because it allows to
minimize potential flow assurance issues (i.e. hydrates, slugs,
corrosion, potential frequent pigging)
58
Offshore Structure
59
Offshore Platform Types
Larger lake- and sea-based offshore platforms and drilling rigs are some of the largest
moveable man-made structures in the world. There are several types of oil platforms
and rigs:
1, 2) conventional fixed platforms; 3) compliant tower; 4, 5) vertically moored tension leg
and mini-tension leg platform; 6) Spar ; 7,8) Semi-submersibles ; 9) Floating production,
storage, and offloading facility; 10) sub-sea completion and tie-back to host facility
Main findings from evaluation study
TLP: NOT RECOMMENDED
Not cost effective due to a low number of surface wells reachable
from TLP
Long time to market
Low expansion capacity (mini-TLP)
Concepts still to be evaluated
Concept Dropped
5 wells – 300 MMSCFD
Vertical type
Well type
Offshore
processing
Minim.Off.
Treatment
None
Offshore
structure
None -Subsea
tie-back
Final
treatment
location
New
onshore
plant
Existing
Plant
SWP
Cluster type
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
New
onshore
plant
None
FPU
Existing
plant
Minim.Off.
Treatment
None -Subsea
tie-back
New
offshore
New
onshore
plant
Full Off.
Treat.
SWP
TLP
Existing
Plant
SWP
New
onshore
plant
TLP
Existing
plant
FPU
New
offshore
Development Scenarios
•
Results of the pre-feasibility study and of the peer reviews recommended to
further evaluate in the concept selection phase the following main
development scenarios:
– Shallow Water Platform (in about 120 m water depth) with full offshore
treatment and export to an existing onshore pipeline
– FPU in about 300-500 m water depth with full offshore treatment and
export to an existing onshore pipeline
Options under evaluation: Shallow water platform (SWP)
To Customer
PLANT-4
70 km
Shallow Water
Platform (120m wd)
LEGEND
Stand alone SWP
multiphase
Treated gas
Existing pipeline
Subsea development
Full treatment unit (FPU or Platform)
New onshore plant
Existing plant (onshore / offshore)
XYZ Field
Gas pipeline to Existing pipeline
network
• Subsea Production System
(Wellhead, Flowline, Manifold,
Umbilical)
• Processing Facilities (Receiving &
Separation, Gas compression &
treatment, Condensate Treatment,
Gas & Condensate Transfer, Utility)
Subsea Layouts - SWP
Options under evaluation: Floating Production Unit (FPU)
To Customer
PLANT-4
70 km
FPU
(about 300 m WD)
LEGEND
Stand alone FPU
multiphase
Treated gas
Existing pipeline
Subsea development
Full treatment unit (FPU or Platform)
New onshore plant
Existing plant (onshore / offshore)
Gas pipeline to Existing pipeline
network
XYZ Field
• Subsea Production System
(Wellhead, Flowline, Manifold,
Umbilical)
• Processing Facilities (Receiving &
Separation, Gas compression &
treatment, Condensate Treatment,
Gas & Condensate Transfer, Utility)
Subsea Layouts - FPU
Development options preliminary comparison
Characteristic
Flowline system
SWP
FPU
Longer infield flowline system
Subsea layout less exposed to geohazards
•Larger deck area and load capacity permit
easier expansion;
•Allows storage of liquids
Expandability
HSE
•Risks for personnel working offshore for long
periods during hook up and commissioning
activities (moreover possible SIMOPs)
Requires heavy decommissioning activities
•Residual value
•Leasing scheme possible
Contractual scheme
Schedule
•SSIV system less effective (long distance from
FPU)
•Flexible risers less protected from ship impact
than SWP risers
•Complex riser base for export line due to
diameter limit on flexible riser (16” ID)
Subsea system
Decommissioning
•More complex riser system (need of dynamic
sections for risers and umbilicals)
In case of modular deck system, this requires
long hook up and commissioning activities
Operability/ piggability
•Pigging of export line requires support vessel
and subsea pig launcher because of complex
riser base
Constructability
•Possible availability of existing FPU for
reconversion
Pros
Cons
Shore Approach Options
PLANT-8
Total Site Visit - Objectives
PLANT-6
SHORE-1
•
Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi
Complex)
SHORE-2
PLANT-4
•
PLANT-7
Peciko Offshore Facilities
PLANT-5
•
Senipah Facilities
•
Sapi Facilities
•
New Area near Senipah
90 Km
70 Km
PLANT-2
XYZ FIELD
Shore-1 Approach – Preliminary Evaluation
PRO’S
No necessity of land acquisition
Low environmental impact (no need
to create a new ROW)
Low populated area
CON’S
Longer sea-line route
Possible off-shore crossings
Shore Approach Shore-2 – Preliminary Evaluation
PRO’S
CON’S
Easy connection directly to 42”
pipeline
No necessity to interface with other
operators for the shore approach
works
Relatively low populated area
Short sea-line route
Necessity of land acquisition
Longer on-shore line route
Higher environmental impact (need
to create a new ROW)
Necessity of off-shore crossing
existing lines
Possible local community issues
Deep vs Shallow Water
Offshore vs Onshore Process
Wet vs Dry Tree
Contoh Studi Konseptual
12/10/2013
Contoh Studi Pre-FEED:
Pemilihan Skenario Pemilihan ROW Pipa yg Optimal
PT. Siak
Seraya
PT. Surya Dumai
Industri
Recreation
Forest
PT. Surya Dumai
Agrindo
Limited Production Forest
Community
Forest
Community
Forest
PT. Arara Abadi
PT. Arara
Abadi
Limited Production Forest
PT. Titian Tata Pelita
PT. Darma Wungu
Guna
SAKAI
VILLAGE
PT. Darmali
Jaya
Lestari
PT. Tumpuan
PT.
Murini
Wood
Indah
Industry
PT. Rimba
Rokan
Limited
Lestari
Production
Forest
Contoh Studi Konseptual
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
The result of Pre-FEED work and G&G Survey will be used as basis
for FEED work i.e. :
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Concept Studies
1.1 Pipeline Design Documents
1.2 Top Side Facilities Engineering Document
1.3 Corrosion and Material Studies
1.4 Hydraulic Studies
1.5 Miscellaneous
Geophysical Survey (Platform Location and Pipeline Route)
Geotechnical Survey (Platform Location and Pipeline Route)
Third Party Reports
Metocean Data
AMDAL Studies
Contoh Studi Konseptual
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
Organization Chart
Contoh Studi Konseptual
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
Manpower Loading
FEED
Tahapan Rekayasa Desain (FEED)
•
Kegiatan pada tahap rekayasa desain (biasa disebut FEED; Front End Engineering
Design) adalah kegiatan rekayasa (definition engineering) terhadap Fasilitas
Produksi untuk suatu Proyek tertentu yang disesuaikan dengan rencana jangka
panjang yang tertuang pada dokumen POD :
− Fit for purpose design dengan mempertimbangkan Safety, Life Cycle Cost,
Reliability, Availability dan Maintainability
− Estimasi biaya Konstruksi Proyek
− Estimasi jadwal pelaksanaan Konstruksi Proyek
− Strategi Pengadaan, LLI (Long Lead Items), targer TKDN (Tingkat Kandungan
Dalam Negeri)
− Dokumen Lelang kontraktor Pelaksana EPC
− Update Risk Register, potensi resiko pelaksanaan EPCI dan rencana
antisipasinya
•
Kegiatan survei lokasi (geoteknik dan geofisika) yang lebih spesifik dapat dilakukan
secara paralel dengan proses evaluasi POD, dimana data yang dihasilkan
merupakan faktor penting untuk pelaksanaan rekayasa desain.
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
“tage : P e-FEED Opti izatio “tudies a d o espo di g
development of Project Basis of Design; Scope Groups includes (scope
further detailed in CTRs) :
•
•
•
•
Facilities Optimization (Mainly Process Studies)
Facilities Operability Study
Pipeline Flow Assurance (Mainly Process Studies)
HAZID and Development of Overall Risk Register (Project
Risk/HSE/Process Safety)
• Operations Philosophy, Operations Reference Plan for field life
(shutdown, maintenance, inspections, etc)
• Preparation of Project Basis of Design
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
“tage : The pu pose this do u e t is to o tai a detailed p oposal fo the P eFEED Opti izatio “tudies a d FEED/Basi E gi ee i g fo the platfo s a d
pipeline.
The deliverables from this contract will form the basis for the EPC/EPCI bid
package. FEED/Basic Engineering scope which includes :
• Multidiscipline; Process, Process Safety, Piping/PDMS, Structural/Architecture, Electrical,
Instrumentation, Telecom, Corrosion, Mechanical/Rotating, Procurement, PMT and Cost
Estimation.
• Assist in preparation of EPCI Tender Documents
• Preparation of RFQ for LLI, vendor review (max. 5 bids each). COMPANY intends to
procure the Long Lead Items. Orders will be novated to the EPCI CONTRACTOR
• Liaise with 3rd party design agency who will verify FEED Package
• Constructability Engineering
• Cost Estimate (+/- (10 – 15) %)
• Preparation of EPCI Schedule – Level 2
• Safety Design Reviews
• Provide RFQ for specific materials. Contractor shall consider future expansion with
potential to bring in gas from adjacent field
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
FEED ENGINEERING DESIGN WORK FLOW
The key deliverables and activities throughout the lifecycle of a
typical / generic FEED project is broken divided into 6 (six) phase :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy
Commencement of FEED Design
Initial FEED Development and Hazard Identification
Initial Design Review and Audit
FEED Design Approval
Final Reviews and FEED Report Compilation
Phase 1 : Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy
Preparation for commencement of detail engineering. To evaluate FEED deliverables to ensure
engineering is sufficiently mature for detail design to progress in a controlled and minimal change
environment. To confirm Engineering Execution Plan.
No.
Activities / Deliverables
Description
1
Engineering Execution Plan & Engineering
Organization Chart
Create Engineering Execution Plan complete with key supporting documents /information.
2
Preparation / Validation of Conceptual Study
Report / BoD
Confirm maturity of Conceptual Design report, identify any areas of concern and ensure these are
captured on the Technical Risk Register.
3
Project Baseline Standard
Establish which codes, standards and specifications are to be utilized, e.g. Corporate, project, client, and
confirm procedure. Include in Engineering Execution Plan and/or Discipline Job Design Specifications.
4
Engineering Audit Schedule
Create formal schedule to identify when technical integrity audits, design reviews, HAZID, HAZOP, etc are
to be carried out. Align to Level 3 Engineering Plan and include in Engineering Execution Plan.
5
Technical Risk Register
Create formal Technical Risk Register identifying all possible risks associated with the engineering design.
6
Integrated Engineering Systems
Agree engineering design tools to be used and confirm that system, hardware, software and support is
available, include PDMS, survey methods, dimensional control, techniques, etc.
7
QRA (Quantitative Risk Assessment) & FRA
(Fire Risk Assessment) Strategy
Establish status of QRA, FRA, and Emergency Escape & Rescue Assessment (EERA) information and
confirm methodology for timely delivery into engineering design process.
8
Discipline Job Design Specification
Define the key project specific design parameters and operational constraints that are applicable to the
appropriate discipline for the detailed design of the project. To identify key individuals, roles and
responsibilities, design tools, key codes and standards, etc.
9
Level 3 Engineering Plan
Agree work breakdown structure, develop CTRs and create level 3 integrated engineering plan covering
all disciplines. To be included in Engineering Execution Plan.
10
Confirm CE Compliance Strategy
Review and confirm strategy for CE Compliance. Ensure discipline Lead Engineers are aware of their
responsibilities and appropriate resources / measures are in place.
11
Prepare Interface Register
Develop interface register to ensure all interfaces are identified and managed.
Phase 2 : Commencement of FEED Design
To formally kick off the Engineering Design Process in accordance with the project execution plan and
ensure that key engineering strategies / philosophies are in place.
No.
Activities / Deliverables
Description
1
Safety Critical Systems / Elements and
Performance Standards
Confirm safety critical systems / elements and set appropriate performance standards,
i.e. functionality, reliability and survivability.
2
Document Distribution Matrix
Create formal documents distribution matrix to ensure all disciplines & departments
receive all necessary design information in a timely manner.
3
Structure Integrity Interface
Ensure structural integrity interfaces are identified & visible to project, e.g. Technical
Authorities, Independent Verification Bodies, etc.
4
Material Selection Report
Report defining the requirements and specifications of necessary material.
5
Hazard Management Plan
Create Hazard Management Plan identifying all key hazards, technical safety activities
and the approach to managing Major Accident Hazards in the design.
6
Piping Specifications
Develop / confirm baseline piping specifications.
7
PDMS Catalogues
Ensure PDMS catalogues are populated and available for all affected discipline.
8
CMSS Philosophy
The purpose of this task is to define and prepare the assurance activities to be
undertaken aligned with the project categorization.
Phase 3 : Initial Design Development and Hazard Identification
To develop initial design deliverables to Inter Discipline Review (IDC) stage and identify key hazard
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Key
Discipline
Description
1
HAZID
Perform hazard identification studies, as identified on Engineering Audit Schedule /
Technical Safety Events Schedule.
Technical
Safety
2
Environmental
Impact Identification
Formal assessment of environmental aspects associated with a modification or a
change, and to propose prevention or mitigating measures.
Technical
Safety
3
PFD IDC
Issue P o ess Flo Diag a s PFD s o fo
4
Shutdown &
Blowdown
Philosophy
Explains the measures to shutdown safely and control blowdown and how this will be
achieved.
Process
5
P&ID s IDC
Issue Piping & Instrumentation Diag a
(IDC).
Process
6
Plot Plans / Layouts
IDC
Issue equipment Plot Plans / Layouts on formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).
7
HIPPS Review
Initial review to establish requirements for a High Integrity Pressure Protection
System
8
Dropped Object
Study
Identify and assess the potential risks to drilling, production, process equipment, and
manned areas from dropped or swinging objects. Where the consequence of a
dropped object is considered significant, to propose prevention/mitigating measures.
9
Mechanical Handling
Strategy
Develop Mechanical Handling Strategy including general approach / constraints,
platform crane limits, installation philosophy, operation and maintenance, etc.
al I te -Discipline Review (IDC).
P&ID s o fo
al Inter-Discipline Review
Process
Piping &
Layouts
Instruments
Technical
Safety
Mechanical
and Structural
Phase 3 : Initial Design Development and Hazard Identification
(continued)
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Description
Key
Discipline
10
Particular Material
Appraisal (PMA)
Where required, i.e. he e Co po ate PMA s a e ot suita le, de elop e PMA s.
11
Cause & Effects IDC
Issue Cause & Effects for formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).
12
Hazardous Area Layouts
IDC
Issue Hazardous Area Layouts for formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).
Technical Safety
13
Fire Risk Assessment
(FRA)
Determine Fire & Explosion scenarios and identifies requirements for prevention, control and
mitigation measures.
Technical Safety
14
Blast Design Philosophy
Develop philosophy that assesses potential explosion hazards and identifies appropriate blast loadings
to be applied to the engineering design process, e.g. Vessels, pipe supports, structural steel, etc.
Technical Safety
15
TR Impairment Study
Assessment of the vulnerability of a Temporary Refuge and demonstration of its capability to sustain
life for a specified duration when under attack by fire, explosion and toxic gases.
Technical Safety
16
Equipment List & Data
Sheets
Create master project equipment list identifying all major items of tagged equipment, e.g. vessels,
pumps, motors, generators, hydrocyclones, chemical injection packages, electrical switichgear, control
panels, etc.
17
Emergency Escape &
Rescue Assessment
(EERA)
To identify requirements for emergency escape & rescue, e.g. lifeboats, escape routes, plant layout,
etc.
18
PFP / AFP Philosophy
Develop philosophy that identifies requirements for Passive Fire Protection (PFP) and/or Active Fire
Protection (AFP)
Technical Safety
19
Power System Analysis
Check power system capacities for increase power requirements for new equipment (Brownfiled).
Electrical
20
Preliminary Weight
Report
Prepare preliminary Weight Report
Structural
PED Focal Point
Process and
Instruments
Mechanical
Technical Safety
Phase 4 : Initial Design Review and Audit
To confirm that the initial design development is robust
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Key
Discipline
Description
1
Hazardous Area
Review
Formal Engineering discipline review of hazardous area layouts to confirm
requirements for the correct selection and location of equipment.
Technical Safety
2
P&ID Review
Fo
Process, Piping,
Technical Safety,
Instruments
3
Plot Plan / Layout /
3-D Model Review
Formal Engineering review of Plot plans / Layouts. The review shall ensure that the
layout design complies with the required technical, safety, operability and
maintainability standards. Makes sure the layout is cost effective, ensures the
constructability of the work and agrees the layout basis on which the detailed design
can proceed.
Piping and
Layouts,
Structural,
Mechanical,
Electrical,
Technical Safety,
Process
4
Cause & Effect
review
Formal review of Cause & Effects diagrams to confirm design basis and alignment
with Hazard Management Plan.
Instruments,
Process,
Technical Safety
5
Technical Audit
Obtain confirmation, by sampling of project documentation, that the engineering of
the project is to the required standard and the free from errors.
al E gi ee i g dis ipli e e ie of P&ID s to o fi
desig
asis.
Independent
Phase 5 : FEED Design Approval
To F eeze the P o ess desig , a d de elop depe de t desig & p o u e e t a ti ities
No.
Activities /
Deliverables
Description
Key
Discipline
1
Final Design review
Demonstration that all of the design and review activities relevant to achieving design integrity have
been performed.
Technical Safety
2
PUWER Assessments
Conduct initial PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations) assessment typically by
review of PDMS model and/or vendor / equipment supplier information received to date.
Technical Safety,
Mechanical
3
HAZOP
Hazard and Operability Studies, a systemic multi-discipline study based on the applications of
guidewords to identify causes of potential hazards and operability constraints in a facility.
Process, Technical
Safety
4
Best Available
Techniques (BAT)
Report
The Final report which analyses the major environmental issues that have been considered as part of
the process to select the final option from the various alternatives considered. Thus preventing, or
eliminating, or where the alternatives are not practicable, to then limit or reduce environmental
impacts associated with the selected option.
Technical Safety
Affected
disciplines +
Construction /
Implementation
Group
5
Constructability
Review
Conduct formal Constructability Reviews to ensure safe and efficient installation of plant & equipment.
6
P&ID AFD
Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Process and Instrumentation Diagrams.
7
Cause & Effects AFD
Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Cause & Effects
8
Process Data Sheets
AFD
Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Process Data Sheets
Process
9
HP / LP Interface
Listing
Identify all HP / LP Interface on formal register and ensure that all have been addressed satisfactorily
via HAZOP and/or individual reviews.
Process
10
HOLDs Register
Develop register to record & manage post AFD design HOLDs
Process
Instruments
Engineering
Manager
Phase 5 : FEED Design Approval (continued)
Description
Key
Discipline
SIL Assessment
Conduct assessment to determine target Safety Integrity Level (SIL). Note : Where the
target SIL is 3, then it is likely that a High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems
(HIPPS) will be required. If the value is found to be 1 or 2, then a HIPPS will not be
required.
Instruments
12
HIPPS Study
Conduct study to formally identify the performance requirements of the High
Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS) and demonstrate that it is robust.
Should include dynamic study for a range of transient conditions.
13
Qualitative Risk
Assessment (QRA)
Multi-disciplinary study of hazards, the likelihood of their occurrence and potential
consequences in terms of harm to people and the environment.
14
HIPPS Reliability
Study
Conduct study to formally demonstrate that the High Integrity Pressure Protection
Systems (HIPPS) complies with the reliability & availability criteria for the Project, e.g.
as stipulated in the performance standard.
Instruments
15
Flow Assurance
Conduct flow assurance studies to demonstrate the process design under a range of
flow condition, i.e. start-up to 100%
Process
16
EDAS (Engineering
Delivery Assurance
System) Stage Gate
Reviews
Demonstrate adherence to the EDAS Task Performance Criteria appropriate for
Project Category
Engineering
Manager
17
Technical Peer
Review
Demonstrate adherence to the EDAS Task Performance Criteria appropriate for the
Project Category and to ensure that engineering personnel are aware of EDAS
requirements and adequately explain how those requirements are being fulfilled.
Engineering
Manager
No.
11
Activities /
Deliverables
Process
Technical
Safety
Phase 6 : Final Reviews and FEED Report Compilation
To ensure all final design deliverables are completed and that client and statutory obligations are
satisfactorily resolved.
No.
1
Activities /
Deliverables
FEED Report
Description
Collate all disciplines inputs and finalize study report
Contoh FEED Deliverable
Key
Discipline
Project
Management
Contoh Studi FEED
(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
Manpower Loading
Contoh Studi FEED
Organization Chart FEED Project
Contoh Studi FEED
Multidiscipline Engineering
Contoh Studi FEED
Code & Standard
Contoh Studi FEED
Code & Standard
Contoh Studi FEED
Code & Standard
Contoh Studi FEED
Software yang digunakan
Contoh Studi FEED (kontrak dengan Engineering Company )
3D Model
Contracting Strategy - Sample
Contracting Strategy – Sample
XYZ DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Jackets
Topsides
Management, Project Definition,
Contract Preparation
COMPANY
PT. SURVEY CONTRACTOR
Survey
PT. ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR)
Basic Engineering
PO 001
STRUCTURAL STEEL
Detail Engineering
Procurement / Supply
EPC2
EPC1
EPC3
PO 002
VALVES
Construction
PO 003
PRESSURE VESSEL - SS
Pre-Commissioning
PO 004
PRESSURE VESSEL - CS
Tie-ins & Modification to existing
platform
Transportation & Installation
Pipelines
EPC4
Hook Up
Commissioning
Start-Up
COMPANY COMMISSIONING TEAM / CONTRACTORS & Supplier Assistance
COMPANY START-UP TEAM
PO - Scope of Work
PO 001 – Structural Steel
PO 002 - Valves
Supply of:
Tubular cans with various diameters from 26” to 68.5” with
various thicknesses from 1.0” to 2.0”
Rolled and welded tubular with various diameters from 10.750” to
66” with various thicknesses from 0.375” to 1.0”
Plates with various thicknesses from 12 mm to 50 mm
Rolled structural shapes
Supply of:
Manual Ball VALVES, Butterfly VALVES, Globe VALVES and
Check VALVES from 6” up to 20” size, Rating 150#, 600# and 900#
Actuated VALVES from 6” up to 20” size, Rating 150#, 600# and
900#
Design codes ASME, Body material: Duplex Stainless Steel UNS
S31803 and Carbon steel.
Material designation:
For tubular cans: API 2H
Rolled and welded tubular: API 5L
Plates: A36
Rolled structural shapes: API 2B
PO 003 – Press. Vessel SS
Supply of:
One (1) Test Separator, Carbon Steel material with Stainless Steel
Clad, fitted with internals
Three (3) Vent KO Drums, Stainless Steel material, fitted with
internals
PO 004 – Press. Vessel CS
Supply of:
Three (3) Close Drain Drums, Carbon Steel material, internally
coated, cathodic protection installed inside
Three (3) Open Drain Drums, Carbon Steel material, internally
coated, cathodic protection installed inside
EPC – Scope of Work
EPC1 - Jackets
2(two) tripod WHP and 1 (one)
four legs CPP jackets and
appurtenance.
Each tripod jacket weight approx.
800 Metric tons and four legs
jacket weight approx. 1250
Metric tons.
Detailed engineering, site
survey and interface
management.
Main structural steel free
issued by COMPANY.
Procurement of all the
remaining steel, anodes, piles,
conductor pipes.
Construction of the two (2)
tripod jackets and one (1) four
leg jacket.
Load out and sea fastening of
the three (3) jackets and
associated piles and
conductor pipes
EPC2 - Topsides
2 (two) integrated topsides for WHP and 1 (one)
CPP
WHP Topsides each weighs approx. 750 Metric
tons and CPP topside weight approx.. 1350
Metric tons plus modifications to existing
platforms facilities.
Detailed engineering, site survey and
interface management.
Main structural steel free issued by
COMPANY.
Ma ual a d a tuated al es a o e 6 f ee
issued by COMPANY.
Procurement and supply of the main
components of the topsides and the entire
equipment for the telecommunication
system.
Construction and pre-commissioning of the
three (3) topsides and of the entire
telecommunication system.
Load out and sea fastening of the three (3)
topsides
Mobilization of Marine Spread(s) for hook up
HOOK up following installation of topsides by
EPC4.
Assistance to COMPANY during
commissioning and start-up.
Tie-ins and modifications works to the
existing platforms facilities, including
telemetry, control, safety systems and by
pass line.
EPC3 - Pipelines
Pipelines:
6 pipeli e app o . 6k
- 1 x 16 pipeli e (approx. 8km)
pipeline (approx. 4km)
EPC4 - Transportation and Installation
Transportation and installation of 2 (two)
integrated topsides for WHP and 1 (one)
CPP.
Water depth ranging from 50m to 75m.
Detailed engineering, site
survey and interface
management.
Procurement of all materials
including line pipes, anodes,
and coating materials.
Coating and transportation of
line pipe.
Mobilization/demobilization of
marine spread(s).
I stallatio of 6 a d
pipeline.
Diving works for all subsea
installations and connections.
Pre-commissioning of the
entire pipeline network.
Detailed engineering and interface
management.
Mobilization/demobilization of marine
spread(s).
Transportation of the jackets,
topsides, vent booms and telecom
masts and appurtenance to the
offshore location.
Installation of the jackets, topsides,
vent booms, and telecom masts and
appurtenance.
EPC Potential Bidder
Potential Bidder for Jackets and Topsides:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
McDermot (Batam Yard)
SMOE (Batam Yard)
Nisconi (Batam Yard)
Saipem (Karimun Yard)
Gunanusa (West Java Yard)
Bakrie Construction (West Java Yard)
Meindo (Handil Yard)
Etc.
Potential Bidder for Transportation and Installation:
No.
Barge Name
Scope
Owner
1
Sapura 3000
All scope
Sapura Acergy
2
DB 27
All scope
Mc Dermott
3
DB 30
All scope
Mc Dermott
4
Castoro 8
All scope
Saipem
5
PJW 3000
All scope
Swiber
6
LTS 3000
All scope
TL Offshore
7
Kuroshio One
All scope
Nisconi
8
Lanjiang
All scope
COOEC
9
Etc …
Tender Schedule
Start
Prequalification
Contract
Award
Contract
2 Feb ‘11
7 Mar ‘11
36 weeks
25 Jan ‘11
2 Feb ‘11
7 Mar ‘11
36 weeks
25 Oct ‘10
25 Jan ‘11
31 Jan ‘11
3 Mar ‘11
60 weeks
25 Oct ‘10
25 Jan ‘11
31 Jan ‘11
3 Mar ‘11
60 weeks
Contract
Award
Contract
3 May ‘11
10 Jun ‘11
20 months
25 Apr ‘11
3 May ‘11
9 Jun ‘11
24 months
22 Dec ‘10
15 Apr ‘11
25 Apr ‘11
1 Jun ‘11
24 mon ths
23 Dec ‘11
15 Apr ‘11
25 Apr ‘11
1 Jun ‘11
22 months
Issue CFT to
Stage 1
Stage 2
Issue RTA
Qualified Tenderers
Tender Opening
Tender Opening
to BPMIGAS
PO
Issue Media
Announcement
PO 001
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
29 Oct ‘10
25 Jan ‘11
PO 002
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
25 Oct ‘10
PO 003
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
PO 004
21 Sep ‘10
28 Sep ‘10
7 Oct ‘10
EPSC
Issue Media
Announcement
Start
Prequalification
EPC1
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
14 Dec ‘10
25 Apr ‘11
EPC2
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
13 Dec ‘10
EPC3
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
EPC4
28 Sep ‘10
15 Oct ‘10
4 Nov ‘10
Issue CFT to
Qualified Tenderers
Stage 1
Stage 2
Issue RTA
Tender Opening
Tender Opening
to BPMIGAS
Duration
Duration
EPCI
(Engineering, Procurement,
Construction, Installation)
• Kegiatan pada tahap Konstruksi adalah kegiatan pembangunan
Konstruksi fisik dari Fasilitas Produksi.
• Tahapan ini bisa dilaksanakan secara terintegrasi (biasa disebut EPC –
engineering, procurement, construction), atau dengan beberapa
Kontrak Pelaksana.
• Tahap ini diakhiri dengan kegiatan pengujian, Commissioning, dan
Start-up untuk kemudian diserahterimakan dari penanggung jawab tim
Proyek kepada penangung jawab tim operasi Kontraktor KKS.
Contractor General Obligation
The Contractor shall design, execute and complete the works in
accordance with the contract and shall remedy any defect in works. When
completed, the works shall be fit for purposes for which the works are
intended as defined in or reasonably to be inferred from the contract
The Co t a to shall p o ide the pla t, ate ials a d Co t a to s
do u e ts spe ified i the o t a a d all Co t a to s pe so el, goods,
consumables and other thing and services, whether of a temporary or
permanent nature, required in and for this design, execution completion
and remedying of defect of damage
The Works shall include any work which is necessary to satisfy the
requirements of Good Engineering and Construction Practices and the
Specification
All other work which (although not mentioned in the contract) is
necessary for stability or for the completion, or safe and proper operation
of the works
The Contractor shall be responsible for the adequacy, stability and safety
of all offsoe site operations of all methods of construction and all the
works
The Contractor shall, whenever required by the company, submit details
of the arrangements and methods which the contractor proposes to
adopt for the execution of the works. No significant alteration to these
arrangement and methods shall be made without this having previously
been notified to and approved by the company (acting reasonably)
ISI KONTRAK EPCI - contoh
DAFTAR ISI
Dokumen Tandatangan Kontrak
1.0 Kontrak
2.0 Pekerjaan
3.0 Pemberitahuan
4.0 Jangka Waktu dan Pemutusan
5.0 Penghentian Sementara Pekerjaan
6.0 Kompensasi
7.0 Penagihan dan Pembayaran
8.0 Tanggungjawab Kontraktor dan Perusahaan
9.0 Jaminan
10.0 Manajemen /Pemeriksaan Mutu
11.0 Asuransi
12.0 Ganti Kerugian
13.0 Pemenuhan Jadwal Kontrak/Ganti Rugi Keterlambatan
Pengiriman
14.0 Kandungan Lokal
15.0 Nilai Kontrak
16.0 Jaminan Pelaksanaan
17.0 Hukum Yang Mengatur
18.0 Penyelesaian Sengketa
19.0 Pajak dan Bea
20.0 Pemenuhan Hukum Yang Berlaku
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contract Signature Document
1.0 The Contract
2.0 The Work
3.0 Notices
4.0 Term and Termination
5.0 Temporary Suspension of the Work
6.0 Compensation
7.0 Invoicing and Payment
8.0 Contractor and Company Responsibilities
9.0 Warranty
10.0 Quality Management/Inspection
11.0 Insurance
12.0 Indemnification
13.0 Contract Schedule Compliance/Late Delivery Charges
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
Local Content
Contract Value
Securities
Governing Law
Settlement of Disputes
Taxes and Duties
Compliance with Applicable Law
ISI KONTRAK EPCI - contoh
DAFTAR ISI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
21.0 Kesehatan, Keselamatan dan Lingkungan (“KKL”)
21.0 Health, Safety and Environment (“HSE”)
22.0 Keadaan Kahar
22.0 Force Majeure
23.0 Etika Bisnis dan Pembayaran kepada Pejabat
23.0 Business Ethics and Payments to Officials
24.0 Catatan dan Audit
24.0 Records and Audits
25.0 Alas Hak /Kepemilikan atas Pengembangan-pengembangan
Kontraktor
26.0 Pengalihan dan Sub-kontrak
25.0 Title/Ownership of Contractor Developments
27.0 Kerahasiaan, Publisitas dan Pengungkapan
27.0 Confidentiality, Publicity and Disclosure
28.0 Dokumen-dokumen Yang Bertentangan
28.0 Conflicting Documents
29.0 Kewajiban-kewajiban Yang Berlanjut
29.0 Continuing Obligations
30.0 Keterpisahan
30.0 Severability
31.0 Pengesampingan
31.0 Waiver
32.0 Keseluruhan Kontrak dan Perubahan Kontrak
32.0 Entire Contract and Contract Modification
33.0 Bahasa
33.0 Language
34.0 Data Yang Disediakan Perusahaan
34.0 Company Supplied Data
35.0 Operasi-operasi di Lepas Pantai
35.0 Offshore Operations
36.0 Pembatasan Tangungjawab
36.0 Limitation of Liability
37.0 Bagian-bagian
37.0 Counterparts
26.0 Assignment and Subcontracting
ISI KONTRAK EPCI - contoh
LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN
EXHIBITS
Lampiran A Rincian Khusus Kontrak
Exhibit A
Contract-Specific Details
Lampiran B Penjelasan Proyek
Exhibit B
Project Description
Lampiran C Lingkup Pekerjaan
Exhibit C
Scope of Work
Lampiran D Penyelesaian Pekerjaan
Exhibit D
Completion of Work
Lampiran E Kompensasi
Exhibit E
Compensation
Lampiran F Ketentuan-ketentuan Administrasi dan Umum
Exhibit F
Administration and General Requirements
Lampiran G Data Yang Disediakan Perusahaan
Exhibit G
Company Supplied Data
Lampiran H Jadwal Kontrak
Exhibit H
Contract Schedule
Lampiran I Perubahan
Exhibit I
Changes
Lampiran J Bahan Yang Disediakan Perusahaan
Exhibit J
Company Furnished Material
Lampiran K Formulir Perjanjian Ganti Kerugian Perusahaan Induk/
Korporasi
Exhibit K
Form of Parent Company / Corporate Indemnity
Agreement
Lampiran F Bentuk Jaminan Pelaksanaan
Exhibit L
Form of Performance Bond
Lampiran M Ketentuan-ketentuan Kesehatan, Keselamatan dan
Lingkungan
Exhibit M
Health, Safety & Environmental Requirements
Lampiran N Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Bisnis Perusahaan
Exhibit N
Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Lampiran O Rincian-rincian Armada Kontraktor
Exhibit O
Contractor’s Spread Details
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
1. GENERAL
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Introduction
Nomenclature
Facilities
Contract Objective and Work
Schedule
Responsibilities
Conformance of the Work
Co t a to s E e utio Pla
Structure of Scope of Work
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2. SCOPE OF WORK
2.1 WBS-01-01-00-00 Management and Administration Activities
2.1.1 Project Management
2.1.2 Interface Management
2.1.3 Quality Management
2.1.4 HSE Management
2.1.5 Engineering Management
2.1.6 Procurement & Material Management
2.1.7 Construction and Commissioning Management
2.1.8 Marine Activities Management
2.1.9 As-Built Management
2.1.10 Information Management
2.1.11 Regulations, Certificates & Permits
2.1.12 Project Control
2.1.13 Supporting Service
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2.2 WBS-01-02-00-00 Engineering Activities
2.2.1 General Engineering Activities
2.2.2 Detailed Engineering Activities
2.3 WBS-01-03-00-00 Procurement and Material Management
2.4 WBS-01-04-00-00 Manufacturing and Fabrication
2.4.1 Subsea Structure Fabrication
2.4.2 Subsea Tie-In Spool Fabrication
2.4.3 Coatings and Anodes
2.4.4 Contractor Representing, Inspection and Testing
2.4.5 Load Out, Seafastening and Transportation
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2.5 WBS-01-05-00-00 Installation
2.5.1 General Installation Requirements
2.5.2 Mobilization
2.5.3 Surveys and Positioning
2.5.4 Seabed Preparation
2.5.5 Pipeline/Cable Crossings
2.5.6 Electro/Hydraulic (E/H) Flying Leads Instalation
2.5.7 Subsea Structures
2.5.8 Tie-In Spool Metrology and Installation
2.5.9 Pipeline System Pre-commissioning
2.5.10 Subsea Production System Function Testing
2.5.11 Mechanical Completion and Handover
Exhibit Scope of Work – contoh :
2.6 WBS-01-06-00-00 As Built Activities and Final Documentation
2.6.1 As-built Scope of Work
2.6.2 As-built Procedures
2.6.3 As-built Register
2.6.4 Schedule
2.6.5 Vendor Data
2.6.6 As-built Survey
2.6.7 Final Documentation
Source : IFP Training
Cycle in EPCI
FEED
Tender by KKKS
E
P C I
Detailed
Engineering
- Specification
- Calculation
- Data Sheet
- Drawing
- MTO
Vendor A
Vendor ....
Procurement
Construction
Installation
- Procure MTO
- Expediting
- A i al Mat l & E pt
Vendor X
- Procesure, Construction Eng & Shop
Drawing
-Advance Constructability
- Resources : Manpower& Equipment
- Procedure, Installation Engineering, Inst
Drawing
- Installation Vessel
- Installation Requirement & Aid
-Data sheet
-Vendor Data
-Vendor Engineering
Source : JGC
DETAILED ENGINEERING
Source : Amec
Deliverable Detailed Engineering (Semua Discipline : Process, Safety, Mechanical, Electrical,
Instrument, Piping, Structure, Pipeline) adalah pendetailan lebih lanjut dari Deliverable
FEED baik Design Calculation, Specification, Data Sheet dan Drawing yang telah dilakukan
validasi :
• data pre-engineering survey,
• verifikasi dengan Operation & Maintenance,
• review constructibility termasuk instalasi,
• verifikasi data vendor
• Interface
dan status dokumen akhir adalah AFC (Approved for Construction)
PROCUREMENT
CONSTRUCTION
- Ready for Commissioning Certificate
- Mechanical Completion (All Subsys tem)
- Operational Test Certificate
- Ready for Start Up Certificate
- Handover State
- Oil/ Gas in
-Ready for Start Up
- Provisional Acceptance Certificate
- Final Acceptance Cerificate
The Top 10 Mistakes in Project Management :
1.
2.
3.
4.
Project Scope is too big
The Schedule is too ambitious
The P oje t does t follo a sta da d PM Methodolog
Communication breakdowns between the Project Manager
and The Team
5. Risk Assessment process was skimped
6. The Team Members are not productive
7. Resources have been over-allocated
8. Not cracking down hard enough on productivity leaks
9. Incomplete data
10. Not sa i g NO
TERIMA KASIH