APPENDIX 1 Students English Score in Daily Test Science Class of Senior High School 6 Padang
APPENDIX 1
Students English Score in Daily Test Science Class of Senior High School 6
Padang
NO
X IPA 1
X IPA 2
X IPA 3
X IPA 4
1
44
49
50
71
X IPA
5
49
2
49
49
55
73
46
3
45
46
50
73
50
4
50
40
57
74
56
5
54
49
48
77
50
6
49
47
54
74
49
7
41
54
50
69
44
8
45
50
58
70
47
9
42
47
48
63
49
10
39
49
49
65
54
11
43
45
46
67
50
12
50
50
49
68
49
13
54
54
58
69
47
14
47
49
62
74
45
15
44
43
50
61
49
16
46
45
52
68
54
17
44
55
50
63
56
18
42
47
55
70
57
19
45
56
54
72
55
20
40
60
50
65
48
21
47
56
49
68
58
22
41
63
56
63
59
23
46
51
50
82
60
24
49
50
53
76
25
55
48
49
76
26
53
54
57
75
27
47
64
77
28
56
54
75
29
47
50
61
30
55
63
74
31
47
75
APPENDIX 2
Test Normality and Homogeneity Population
VAR000
02
1
2
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
.142
.172
df
Sig.
31
26
.111
.047
VAR000
3
.238
30
.000
01
4
.127
31
.200*
5
.222
23
.005
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
Sig.
.954
.963
31
26
.207
.457
.904
.961
.931
30
31
23
.010
.305
.117
Test of Homogeneity of Variance
Levene
df1
Statistic
Based on Mean
Based on Median
VAR0000 Based on Median and
1
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed
mean
df
df2
Sig.
.303
.266
4
4
136
136
.875
.899
.266
4 130.396
.899
.307
4
.873
136
APPENDIX 3
Post-test Scores of Experimental Class (class X IPA3) in Term of Content,
Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics
Name
of
NO Student
s
1
AAS
2
APM
3
AKR
4
AAK
5
DPJ
6
DS
7
DAP
8
DHH
9
EM
10
GRD
11
HM
12
KN
13
MA
14
MSP
15
MS
16
MI
17
NJ
18
NY
19
RO
20
RN
21
SN
Aspects
Content
Total
Vocabular
y
18
Lang.
use
18
Mechani
c
4
Score
25
Organizatio
n
19
24
17
17
19
4
81
17
16
17
17
4
71
20
18
18
17
3
76
23
17
16
20
3
79
25
17
16
20
4
82
24
18
17
21
4
84
26
17
18
21
4
86
24
18
17
20
4
83
24
19
19
20
3
85
22
18
18
20
4
82
23
17
16
21
4
81
24
18
17
19
4
82
26
17
16
21
4
84
22
18
18
20
4
82
26
20
18
17
4
85
26
17
18
20
4
85
23
19
19
18
4
83
21
17
15
17
3
73
20
17
16
18
4
75
21
18
18
16
3
76
84
22
21
17
15
18
3
74
25
18
19
20
4
86
26
10
18
20
4
78
25
22
17
18
18
3
78
26
22
16
17
20
3
78
27
23
17
18
19
3
80
28
19
18
18
15
4
74
29
25
18
19
20
4
86
30
18
18
17
17
4
74
Mean
SUM
22.9
687
18.03
521
17.36
521
18.9
567
3.7
111
80.23
2407
Min
Max
18
26
16
20
15
19
15
21
3
4
67
90
23
24
SFP
UDA
WD
APENDIX 4
Post-test scores of Control Class (class X IPA1) in Term of Content,
Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics
Name
of
NO Student
s
1
AAS
2
APM
3
AKR
4
AAK
5
DPJ
6
DS
7
DAP
8
DHH
9
EM
10
GRD
11
HM
12
KN
13
MA
14
MSP
15
MS
16
MI
17
NJ
18
NY
19
RO
20
RN
21
SN
Aspects
Content
Total
Vocabular
y
18
Lang.
use
17
Mechani
c
3
Score
19
Organizatio
n
18
18
16
17
15
2
68
19
14
13
14
2
62
20
18
19
19
2
78
13
18
14
10
2
57
22
16
17
18
3
76
24
19
18
18
3
82
19
18
18
18
2
75
18
17
18
16
2
71
18
15
16
18
2
69
18
19
19
18
2
76
20
17
18
16
2
73
14
12
13
13
2
54
19
18
17
17
2
73
23
19
17
18
2
79
19
18
16
14
2
69
19
17
17
18
2
73
20
16
18
17
2
73
18
17
16
16
2
69
21
17
18
16
2
74
18
18
17
17
2
72
75
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
SFP
UDA
WD
RRE
RRT
YU
IPU
IU
17
18
18
17
2
72
18
17
16
16
2
69
24
20
19
19
3
80
22
20
19
18
2
81
20
19
18
17
2
76
17
17
16
17
2
69
18
17
17
16
2
70
21
19
18
17
2
77
WE
Mean
SUM
24
17
18
16
3
78
19.33
580
17.2
516
17.1
513
16.53
496
2.16
65
72.33
2170
Min
Max
13
24
12
20
13
19
10
19
2
3
54
80
APPENDIX 5
Analysis of SPSS for Post-Test of Experiment and Control Class
VAR000
02
VAR000 1.00
01
2.00
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
N
Percent
N
Percent
31 100.0%
30 100.0%
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
Total
N
Percent
31 100.0%
30 100.0%
Descriptives
VAR00002
Statistic
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
1.00
VAR0000
1
80.55
Lower
Bound
78.82
Upper
Bound
82.28
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
80.59
82.00
22.189
4.711
71
90
19
8
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
2.00
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Std.
Error
.846
-.271
-.733
72.50
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
70.02
74.98
72.83
73.00
.421
.821
1.212
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtosis
VAR000
02
M-Estimators
Huber's MTukey's
a
Estimator
Biweightb
.427
1.702
.833
Hampel's MEstimatorc
81.13
81.16
VAR000 1.00
01
2.00
73.05
73.52
a. The weighting constant is 1.339.
b. The weighting constant is 4.685.
c. The weighting constants are 1.700, 3.400, and 8.500
d. The weighting constant is 1.340*pi.
VAR000
02
44.052
6.637
54
85
31
7
-.916
Andrews'
Waved
80.89
73.17
81.16
73.55
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
df
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
.167
VAR000 1
01
2
.154
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
30
30
.032
.066
.910
.928
Test of Homogeneity of Variance
Levene
df1
Statistic
Based on Mean
.866
1
VAR000 Based on Median
.770
1
01
Based on Median and
.770
1
with adjusted df
30
30
df2
.015
.044
Sig.
58
58
.356
.384
47.782
.384
Based on trimmed
mean
.756
1
58
.388
Appendix 6
Indicators of Writing Based on Jacob’s Theory
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: Knowledgeable; 30-27
substantive; thorough development of thesis;
relevant to assigned topic.
Good to average: Some knowledge of subject; 26-22
adequate range; limited development of thesis;
mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail.
Content
Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject; little 21-17
substance; inadequate development of topic.
Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject; 16-13
non substantive; not pertinent; or not enough to
evaluate.
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: Fluent expression; ideas 20-18
clearly stated/supported; succinct; well organized;
logical sequ ; cohesive.
Organization
Good to average: somewhat choppy; loosely 17-14
organized but main ideas stand out; limited
support; logical but incomplete sequencing.
Fair to poor: non-fluent; ideas confused or 13-10
disconnected; lacks logical sequencing and
development.
Very poor: does not communicate;
organization; or not enough to evaluate.
no 9-7
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: sophisticated range; 20-18
effective word/idiom choice and usage; word
form mastery; appropriate register.
Vocabulary
Good to average: adequate range; occasional 17-14
errors of word / idiom form, choice, usage but
meaning not obscured.
Fair to poor: limited range; frequent errors of 13-10
word/form choice, usage; meaning confused or
obscured.
Very poor: essentially translation; title knowledge 9-7
of English vocabulary, idioms, word form, or not
enough to evaluate
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: effective complex 25-22
constructions; few errors of agreement, tense,
number, word order/function, articles, pronouns,
prepositions.
LanguageUse
Good to average: effective but simple construction; 21-18
minor problems in complex constructions; several
errors of agreement, tense, number, word
order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but
meaning seldom obscured.
Fair to poor: major problems in simple / complex 17-11
constructions; frequent errors of negation,
agreement, tense, number, word order/function,
articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments,
run-ons, deletions; meaning confused or obscured.
Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence 10-5
constructions rules; dominated by errors; does not
communicate; or not enough to evaluate.
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of 5
conventions few errors of spelling, punctuations,
capitalizations, paragraphing.
Good to average: occasional errors of spelling, 4
punctuation, and capitalization, paragraphing, but
meaning not obscured.
Mechanics
Fair to Poor: Frequent errors of spelling, 3
punctuations, capitalizations, paragraphing; poor
handwriting, meaning confused or obscured.
Very poor: no mastery of conventions dominated
by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, 2
paragraphing; handwriting illegible; or not enough
to evaluate.
APPENDIX 7
T Table
APPENDIX 8
The Mean Score and Standard Deviation of Experimental Class
Score
F1x
x12
f 1 x12
F1
(x1)
71
1
5041
71
5041
73
1
5329
73
5329
74
3
5476
222
16428
75
1
5625
75
5625
76
2
5776
152
11552
78
3
6084
234
18252
79
1
6241
79
6241
80
1
6400
80
6400
81
2
6561
162
13112
82
4
6724
328
26896
83
2
6889
166
13778
84
3
7056
252
21168
85
3
7225
255
21675
86
3
7396
258
22188
ΣX12 =
∑F1=
30
87823
∑F1X1=
2407
= F X193695
1
X1
F X
F
1
1
1
=
2407
30
=80.23
(ΣF1X1)2 = 2407 = 5793649
2
S
2
1
n 1 F1 x 12 ( F1 X1 ) 2
n 1 (n1 1)
2
1
S12
=
S12
=
30 .193695 5793649
30 30 1
17201
870
S12 = 19.77
S1
S1
= 19 .77
= 4.44
=
5810850 5793649
30 .( 29 )
APPENDIX 9
The Mean Score and Standard Deviation of Control Class
Score
f2x2
f 2 x 22
x 22
F2
(x2)
54
1
2916
54
2916
57
1
3249
57
3249
62
1
3844
62
3844
68
1
4624
68
4624
69
5
4761
345
23805
70
1
4900
70
4900
71
1
5041
71
5041
72
2
5184
144
10368
73
4
5329
292
21316
74
1
5476
74
5476
75
2
5625
150
11250
76
3
5776
228
17328
77
1
5929
77
5929
78
2
6084
156
12168
79
1
6241
79
6241
80
1
6400
80
6400
81
1
6561
81
6561
82
1
6724
82
6724
F
2
=
30
X2
F X
F
2
2
ΣX22 =
94664
2
=
2170
= 72.33
30
F X
2
2170
2=
F
2
= 2
X
2
158140
(ΣF2X2)2= 2170 = 4708900
2
S 22
n 2 F2 x 22 ( F2 X 2 ) 2
S 22 =
n 2 (n 2 1)
30 * 158140 4708900
30 30 1
S 22 = 44744200 4708900
30 (29 )
S 22 = 35300
870
S 22 = 40.75
S 22 =
40.57
S 2 = 6.37
APPENDIX 10
Analysis of Post Test Scores
In Experiment and Control Class
X1 X 2
Formula of T- Test was t
s
1
1
n1 n 2
Where:
S2
X 1 = 80.23
n1 = 30
S1= 4.44
S12 = 19.77
X 2 = 72.33
n 2 = 30
S2= 6.37
S 22 = 40.37
1) s1 (n2 1) s 2
2
(n
1
n n
1
2
2
2
S 2 = (30-1) 19.77 + (30-1) 40.37
30+(30-2)
S 2 = (29) 19.77+ (29) 40.37
60-2
S 2 = 573.33 + 1170.73
58
S 2 = 1744.06
58
S2 = 30.07
S = 30 .07
S = 5.48
t
X1 X 2
1
1
S
n1 n2
80 .23 72 .33
1
1
30 30
548
7. 9
2
30
548
7.9
tCalculate
548 0.24
7 .9
548 0.24
7.9
1.31
6.03
df n1 n 2 2
(30 30 2) 58
α = 0.05
t- table = t (1- α ) (df)
= t (1-0,05) (58)
= t (0,95) (58)
t- Calculate = 6.03
t- Table
= 2.000
t- Calculate
> t- table
6.03
>
2.000
APPENDIX 11
DOCUMENTATION
Students English Score in Daily Test Science Class of Senior High School 6
Padang
NO
X IPA 1
X IPA 2
X IPA 3
X IPA 4
1
44
49
50
71
X IPA
5
49
2
49
49
55
73
46
3
45
46
50
73
50
4
50
40
57
74
56
5
54
49
48
77
50
6
49
47
54
74
49
7
41
54
50
69
44
8
45
50
58
70
47
9
42
47
48
63
49
10
39
49
49
65
54
11
43
45
46
67
50
12
50
50
49
68
49
13
54
54
58
69
47
14
47
49
62
74
45
15
44
43
50
61
49
16
46
45
52
68
54
17
44
55
50
63
56
18
42
47
55
70
57
19
45
56
54
72
55
20
40
60
50
65
48
21
47
56
49
68
58
22
41
63
56
63
59
23
46
51
50
82
60
24
49
50
53
76
25
55
48
49
76
26
53
54
57
75
27
47
64
77
28
56
54
75
29
47
50
61
30
55
63
74
31
47
75
APPENDIX 2
Test Normality and Homogeneity Population
VAR000
02
1
2
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
.142
.172
df
Sig.
31
26
.111
.047
VAR000
3
.238
30
.000
01
4
.127
31
.200*
5
.222
23
.005
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
Sig.
.954
.963
31
26
.207
.457
.904
.961
.931
30
31
23
.010
.305
.117
Test of Homogeneity of Variance
Levene
df1
Statistic
Based on Mean
Based on Median
VAR0000 Based on Median and
1
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed
mean
df
df2
Sig.
.303
.266
4
4
136
136
.875
.899
.266
4 130.396
.899
.307
4
.873
136
APPENDIX 3
Post-test Scores of Experimental Class (class X IPA3) in Term of Content,
Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics
Name
of
NO Student
s
1
AAS
2
APM
3
AKR
4
AAK
5
DPJ
6
DS
7
DAP
8
DHH
9
EM
10
GRD
11
HM
12
KN
13
MA
14
MSP
15
MS
16
MI
17
NJ
18
NY
19
RO
20
RN
21
SN
Aspects
Content
Total
Vocabular
y
18
Lang.
use
18
Mechani
c
4
Score
25
Organizatio
n
19
24
17
17
19
4
81
17
16
17
17
4
71
20
18
18
17
3
76
23
17
16
20
3
79
25
17
16
20
4
82
24
18
17
21
4
84
26
17
18
21
4
86
24
18
17
20
4
83
24
19
19
20
3
85
22
18
18
20
4
82
23
17
16
21
4
81
24
18
17
19
4
82
26
17
16
21
4
84
22
18
18
20
4
82
26
20
18
17
4
85
26
17
18
20
4
85
23
19
19
18
4
83
21
17
15
17
3
73
20
17
16
18
4
75
21
18
18
16
3
76
84
22
21
17
15
18
3
74
25
18
19
20
4
86
26
10
18
20
4
78
25
22
17
18
18
3
78
26
22
16
17
20
3
78
27
23
17
18
19
3
80
28
19
18
18
15
4
74
29
25
18
19
20
4
86
30
18
18
17
17
4
74
Mean
SUM
22.9
687
18.03
521
17.36
521
18.9
567
3.7
111
80.23
2407
Min
Max
18
26
16
20
15
19
15
21
3
4
67
90
23
24
SFP
UDA
WD
APENDIX 4
Post-test scores of Control Class (class X IPA1) in Term of Content,
Organization, Vocabulary, Language Use, and Mechanics
Name
of
NO Student
s
1
AAS
2
APM
3
AKR
4
AAK
5
DPJ
6
DS
7
DAP
8
DHH
9
EM
10
GRD
11
HM
12
KN
13
MA
14
MSP
15
MS
16
MI
17
NJ
18
NY
19
RO
20
RN
21
SN
Aspects
Content
Total
Vocabular
y
18
Lang.
use
17
Mechani
c
3
Score
19
Organizatio
n
18
18
16
17
15
2
68
19
14
13
14
2
62
20
18
19
19
2
78
13
18
14
10
2
57
22
16
17
18
3
76
24
19
18
18
3
82
19
18
18
18
2
75
18
17
18
16
2
71
18
15
16
18
2
69
18
19
19
18
2
76
20
17
18
16
2
73
14
12
13
13
2
54
19
18
17
17
2
73
23
19
17
18
2
79
19
18
16
14
2
69
19
17
17
18
2
73
20
16
18
17
2
73
18
17
16
16
2
69
21
17
18
16
2
74
18
18
17
17
2
72
75
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
SFP
UDA
WD
RRE
RRT
YU
IPU
IU
17
18
18
17
2
72
18
17
16
16
2
69
24
20
19
19
3
80
22
20
19
18
2
81
20
19
18
17
2
76
17
17
16
17
2
69
18
17
17
16
2
70
21
19
18
17
2
77
WE
Mean
SUM
24
17
18
16
3
78
19.33
580
17.2
516
17.1
513
16.53
496
2.16
65
72.33
2170
Min
Max
13
24
12
20
13
19
10
19
2
3
54
80
APPENDIX 5
Analysis of SPSS for Post-Test of Experiment and Control Class
VAR000
02
VAR000 1.00
01
2.00
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
Missing
N
Percent
N
Percent
31 100.0%
30 100.0%
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
Total
N
Percent
31 100.0%
30 100.0%
Descriptives
VAR00002
Statistic
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
1.00
VAR0000
1
80.55
Lower
Bound
78.82
Upper
Bound
82.28
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
80.59
82.00
22.189
4.711
71
90
19
8
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
2.00
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Std.
Error
.846
-.271
-.733
72.50
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
70.02
74.98
72.83
73.00
.421
.821
1.212
Variance
Std. Deviation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtosis
VAR000
02
M-Estimators
Huber's MTukey's
a
Estimator
Biweightb
.427
1.702
.833
Hampel's MEstimatorc
81.13
81.16
VAR000 1.00
01
2.00
73.05
73.52
a. The weighting constant is 1.339.
b. The weighting constant is 4.685.
c. The weighting constants are 1.700, 3.400, and 8.500
d. The weighting constant is 1.340*pi.
VAR000
02
44.052
6.637
54
85
31
7
-.916
Andrews'
Waved
80.89
73.17
81.16
73.55
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
df
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
.167
VAR000 1
01
2
.154
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
30
30
.032
.066
.910
.928
Test of Homogeneity of Variance
Levene
df1
Statistic
Based on Mean
.866
1
VAR000 Based on Median
.770
1
01
Based on Median and
.770
1
with adjusted df
30
30
df2
.015
.044
Sig.
58
58
.356
.384
47.782
.384
Based on trimmed
mean
.756
1
58
.388
Appendix 6
Indicators of Writing Based on Jacob’s Theory
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: Knowledgeable; 30-27
substantive; thorough development of thesis;
relevant to assigned topic.
Good to average: Some knowledge of subject; 26-22
adequate range; limited development of thesis;
mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail.
Content
Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject; little 21-17
substance; inadequate development of topic.
Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject; 16-13
non substantive; not pertinent; or not enough to
evaluate.
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: Fluent expression; ideas 20-18
clearly stated/supported; succinct; well organized;
logical sequ ; cohesive.
Organization
Good to average: somewhat choppy; loosely 17-14
organized but main ideas stand out; limited
support; logical but incomplete sequencing.
Fair to poor: non-fluent; ideas confused or 13-10
disconnected; lacks logical sequencing and
development.
Very poor: does not communicate;
organization; or not enough to evaluate.
no 9-7
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: sophisticated range; 20-18
effective word/idiom choice and usage; word
form mastery; appropriate register.
Vocabulary
Good to average: adequate range; occasional 17-14
errors of word / idiom form, choice, usage but
meaning not obscured.
Fair to poor: limited range; frequent errors of 13-10
word/form choice, usage; meaning confused or
obscured.
Very poor: essentially translation; title knowledge 9-7
of English vocabulary, idioms, word form, or not
enough to evaluate
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: effective complex 25-22
constructions; few errors of agreement, tense,
number, word order/function, articles, pronouns,
prepositions.
LanguageUse
Good to average: effective but simple construction; 21-18
minor problems in complex constructions; several
errors of agreement, tense, number, word
order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but
meaning seldom obscured.
Fair to poor: major problems in simple / complex 17-11
constructions; frequent errors of negation,
agreement, tense, number, word order/function,
articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments,
run-ons, deletions; meaning confused or obscured.
Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence 10-5
constructions rules; dominated by errors; does not
communicate; or not enough to evaluate.
Criteria of Each Item
Score
Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of 5
conventions few errors of spelling, punctuations,
capitalizations, paragraphing.
Good to average: occasional errors of spelling, 4
punctuation, and capitalization, paragraphing, but
meaning not obscured.
Mechanics
Fair to Poor: Frequent errors of spelling, 3
punctuations, capitalizations, paragraphing; poor
handwriting, meaning confused or obscured.
Very poor: no mastery of conventions dominated
by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, 2
paragraphing; handwriting illegible; or not enough
to evaluate.
APPENDIX 7
T Table
APPENDIX 8
The Mean Score and Standard Deviation of Experimental Class
Score
F1x
x12
f 1 x12
F1
(x1)
71
1
5041
71
5041
73
1
5329
73
5329
74
3
5476
222
16428
75
1
5625
75
5625
76
2
5776
152
11552
78
3
6084
234
18252
79
1
6241
79
6241
80
1
6400
80
6400
81
2
6561
162
13112
82
4
6724
328
26896
83
2
6889
166
13778
84
3
7056
252
21168
85
3
7225
255
21675
86
3
7396
258
22188
ΣX12 =
∑F1=
30
87823
∑F1X1=
2407
= F X193695
1
X1
F X
F
1
1
1
=
2407
30
=80.23
(ΣF1X1)2 = 2407 = 5793649
2
S
2
1
n 1 F1 x 12 ( F1 X1 ) 2
n 1 (n1 1)
2
1
S12
=
S12
=
30 .193695 5793649
30 30 1
17201
870
S12 = 19.77
S1
S1
= 19 .77
= 4.44
=
5810850 5793649
30 .( 29 )
APPENDIX 9
The Mean Score and Standard Deviation of Control Class
Score
f2x2
f 2 x 22
x 22
F2
(x2)
54
1
2916
54
2916
57
1
3249
57
3249
62
1
3844
62
3844
68
1
4624
68
4624
69
5
4761
345
23805
70
1
4900
70
4900
71
1
5041
71
5041
72
2
5184
144
10368
73
4
5329
292
21316
74
1
5476
74
5476
75
2
5625
150
11250
76
3
5776
228
17328
77
1
5929
77
5929
78
2
6084
156
12168
79
1
6241
79
6241
80
1
6400
80
6400
81
1
6561
81
6561
82
1
6724
82
6724
F
2
=
30
X2
F X
F
2
2
ΣX22 =
94664
2
=
2170
= 72.33
30
F X
2
2170
2=
F
2
= 2
X
2
158140
(ΣF2X2)2= 2170 = 4708900
2
S 22
n 2 F2 x 22 ( F2 X 2 ) 2
S 22 =
n 2 (n 2 1)
30 * 158140 4708900
30 30 1
S 22 = 44744200 4708900
30 (29 )
S 22 = 35300
870
S 22 = 40.75
S 22 =
40.57
S 2 = 6.37
APPENDIX 10
Analysis of Post Test Scores
In Experiment and Control Class
X1 X 2
Formula of T- Test was t
s
1
1
n1 n 2
Where:
S2
X 1 = 80.23
n1 = 30
S1= 4.44
S12 = 19.77
X 2 = 72.33
n 2 = 30
S2= 6.37
S 22 = 40.37
1) s1 (n2 1) s 2
2
(n
1
n n
1
2
2
2
S 2 = (30-1) 19.77 + (30-1) 40.37
30+(30-2)
S 2 = (29) 19.77+ (29) 40.37
60-2
S 2 = 573.33 + 1170.73
58
S 2 = 1744.06
58
S2 = 30.07
S = 30 .07
S = 5.48
t
X1 X 2
1
1
S
n1 n2
80 .23 72 .33
1
1
30 30
548
7. 9
2
30
548
7.9
tCalculate
548 0.24
7 .9
548 0.24
7.9
1.31
6.03
df n1 n 2 2
(30 30 2) 58
α = 0.05
t- table = t (1- α ) (df)
= t (1-0,05) (58)
= t (0,95) (58)
t- Calculate = 6.03
t- Table
= 2.000
t- Calculate
> t- table
6.03
>
2.000
APPENDIX 11
DOCUMENTATION