PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK IBU DAN DUKUNGAN SUAMI TERHADAP PEMERIKSAAN KEHAMILAN (ANTENATAL CARE) DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS MANDALA KECAMATAN MEDAN-TEMBUNG
I Dukungan Informasional Ya Tidak
Lampiran 1 : Kuesioner Penelitian
KUESIONER
PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK IBU DAN DUKUNGAN SUAMI TERHADAP
PEMERIKSAAN KEHAMILAN (ANTENATAL CARE) DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS MANDALA KECAMATAN MEDAN-TEMBUNGI. Karakteristik Ibu
1 Umur Ibu (tahun)
2 Paritas orang
3 Umur (Tahun)
4 Pendidikan terakhir Ibu
1. SD
2. SMP/Sederajat
3. SMU/Sederajat
4. Diploma I/II/III
5. Perguruan Tinggi
5 Pekerjaan Ibu
1. PNS
2. Pegawai Swasta
3. Pedagang
4. Petani
5. Buruh
6. Tidak bekerja
6 Jumlah Pemeriksaan Kehamilan
1 Apakah suami anda membaca buku tentang perawatan kehamilan?
2 Apakah suami anda memberikan Informasi pentingnya periksa kehamilan?
3 Apakh suami anda memberi majalah/ buku mengenai perawatan kehamilan?
4 Apakah suami anda mengganjurkan ibu untuk melakukan konseling perawatan kehamilan kepada petugas kesehatan?
5 Apakah suami mengingatkan ibu untuk melakukan pemeriksaan ulang kehamilan ?
6 Apakah suami memberi informasi selama hamil minimal periksa hamil 4 kali
7 Apakah suami menganjurkan melakukan pemeriksaaan kehamilan ke tenaga kesehatan
8 Apakah suami memberikan informasi tempat untuk pemeriksaan kehamilan yang baik dan terjangkau
II Dukungan Penilaian Ya Tidak
1 Apakah suami pernah memberikan pujian kepada ibu pada saat ibu telah memeriksakaan kehamilannya?
2 Apakah ibu pernah memberikan semangat kepada ibu untuk memeriksakaan kehamilannya?
3 Apakah suami merasa senang ketika ibu memeriksakan kehamilan ?
4 Apakah suami ibu menghargai keputusan ibu dalam memilih tempat pemeriksaan kehamilan?
5 Apakah suami merasa bangga ketika ibu memeriksakan kehamilan?
6 Apakah suami ibu memberikan tanggapan yang positif ketika ibu akan memeriksakan kehamilan?
7 Apakah suami bersimpati kepada ibu saat memeriksakan kehamilannya?
8 Apakah suami memberikan perhatian yang lebih ketika ibu selesai memeriksakan kehamilannya?
III Dukungan Istrumental Ya Tidak
1 Apakah suami memberikan uang untuk memeriksakan kehamilan ibu? kehamilan?
3 Apakah suami menyediakan transportasi untuk ibu untuk pergi memeriksakan kehamilan?
4 Apakah suami mendampingi ibu pada saat memeriksakaan kehamilannya?
5 Apakah suami ikut membantu mengerjakan pekerjaan ibu di rumah agar ibu dapat memeriksakan kehamilan?
6 Apakah suami meninggalkan pekerjaan untuk mengantarkan ibu periksa hamil, jika diperlukan?
7 Apakah suami meluangkan waktu saat ibu melakukan pemeriksaan kehamilan?
8 Saya selalu diberi izin untuk melakukan pemeriksaan kehamilan
IV Dukungan Emosional Ya Tidak
1 Apakah suami ibu mendengarkan keluhan ibu tentang masalah kehamilan?
3 Apakah suami membujuk ibu apabila malas untuk periksa kehamilan?
4 Apakah suami menyenangkan hati ibu selama ibu melakukan pemeriksaan kehamilan?
5 Apakah suami ibu memotivasi untuk memeriksakan kehamilan?
6 Apakah suami menanggapi (dengan bertanya, memperhatikan) informasi yang bidan berikan?
7 Apakah suami marah ketika ibu tidak melakukan pemeriksakan kehamilan?
8 Apakah suami memperlakukan ibu dengan nyaman saat melakukan pemeriksaan kehamilan?
Lampiran 2 : Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas
Validitas dan Reliabilitas
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.942
8 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if
Item Deleted Scale Variance if
Item Deleted Corrected Item-
Total Correlation Cronbach's
Alpha if Item Deleted
Instrumental1 3.63 8.792 .831 .932 Instrumental2 3.67 8.782 .823 .932 Instrumental3 3.73 9.375 .598 .948 Instrumental4 3.83 9.109 .711 .940 Instrumental5 3.63 8.516 .939 .924 Instrumental6 3.70 8.700 .848 .931 Instrumental7 3.80 9.200 .668 .943 Instrumental8 3.63 8.516 .939 .924
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 4.23 11.495 3.390
8
161
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.841
7 Item-Total Statistics Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance if Corrected Item- Alpha if Item Item Deleted Item Deleted Total Correlation Deleted
Informasional2 3.23 4.944 .463 .839 Informasional3 3.23 4.392 .752 .793 Informasional4 3.37 4.999 .436 .843 Informasional5 3.20 4.441 .736 .796 Informasional6 3.33 4.782 .539 .827 Informasional7 3.33 4.506 .683 .804 Informasional8 3.10 4.852 .568 .823
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 3.80 6.234 2.497
7 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.934
8 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if
Item Deleted Scale Variance if
Item Deleted Corrected Item-
Total Correlation Cronbach's
Alpha if Item Deleted
Penilaian1 4.43 7.978 .790 .923 Penilaian2 4.43 7.771 .875 .917 Penilaian3 4.30 8.286 .738 .927 Penilaian4 4.37 8.033 .795 .923 Penilaian5 4.37 8.033 .795 .923 Penilaian6 4.43 8.047 .763 .925 Penilaian7 4.33 8.161 .764 .925 Penilaian8 4.33 8.506 .625 .935
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 5.00 10.483 3.238
8 Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.890
8 Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if
Item Deleted Scale Variance if
Item Deleted Corrected Item-
Total Correlation Cronbach's
Alpha if Item Deleted
Emosional1 4.47 6.189 .771 .865 Emosional2 4.33 6.644 .691 .874 Emosional3 4.50 6.466 .623 .880 Emosional4 4.57 6.392 .632 .879 Emosional5 4.37 6.723 .605 .881 Emosional6 4.53 6.257 .703 .872 Emosional7 4.53 6.326 .671 .875 Emosional8 4.63 6.378 .631 .879
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items 5.13 8.257 2.874
8
Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Univariat
Pekerjaank
21
25.3
25.3
25.3 Tinggi
62
74.7 74.7 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak bekerja
32
38.6
38.6
38.6 Bekerja
51
61.4 61.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Dasar
Frequency Table
UsiakFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
60.2 60.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Berisiko (< 20 tahun dan > 35 tahun)
33
39.8
39.8
39.8 Tidak Berisiko (20-35 tahun)
50
Paritask
77.1 77.1 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Berisiko (> 2 orang)
19
22.9
22.9
22.9 Tidak berisiko (<= 2 orang)
64
Pendidikank
Instrumental1
Instrumental4
43
51.8
51.8
51.8 Ya
40
48.2 48.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
52
62.7
62.7
62.7 Ya
31
Percent Valid Tidak
Instrumental3
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
62.7 62.7 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
31
37.3
37.3
37.3 Ya
52
Instrumental2
55.4 55.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
37
44.6
44.6
44.6 Ya
46
37.3 37.3 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Instrumental5
Instrumental8
39
47.0
47.0
47.0 Ya
44
53.0 53.0 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
1
1.2
1.2
1.2 Ya
82
Percent Valid Tidak
Instrumental7
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
69.9 69.9 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
25
30.1
30.1
30.1 Ya
58
Instrumental6
61.4 61.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
32
38.6
38.6
38.6 Ya
51
98.8 98.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
KIntsrumental
Informasional3
39
47.0
47.0
47.0 Ya
44
53.0 53.0 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
46
55.4
55.4
55.4 Ya
37
Percent Valid Tidak
Informasional2
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
60.2 60.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Kurang
33
39.8
39.8
39.8 Baik
50
Informasional1
63.9 63.9 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
30
36.1
36.1
36.1 Ya
53
44.6 44.6 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Informasional4
Informasional7
43
51.8
51.8
51.8 Ya
40
48.2 48.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
41
49.4
49.4
49.4 Ya
42
Percent Valid Tidak
Informasional6
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
38.6 38.6 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
51
61.4
61.4
61.4 Ya
32
Informasional5
62.7 62.7 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
31
37.3
37.3
37.3 Ya
52
50.6 50.6 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Informasional8
Penilaian2
32
38.6
38.6
38.6 Ya
51
61.4 61.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
44
53.0
53.0
53.0 Ya
39
Percent Valid Tidak
Penilaian1
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
77.1 77.1 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
19
22.9
22.9
22.9 Ya
64
KInformasional
43.4 43.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Kurang
47
56.6
56.6
56.6 Baik
36
47.0 47.0 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Penilaian3
Penilaian6
32
38.6
38.6
38.6 Ya
51
61.4 61.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
43
51.8
51.8
51.8 Ya
40
Percent Valid Tidak
Penilaian5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
69.9 69.9 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
25
30.1
30.1
30.1 Ya
58
Penilaian4
39.8 39.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
50
60.2
60.2
60.2 Ya
33
48.2 48.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Penilaian7
Emosional1
48
57.8
57.8
57.8 Baik
35
42.2 42.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
26
31.3
31.3
31.3 Ya
57
Percent Valid Kurang
KPenilaian
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
57.8 57.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
35
42.2
42.2
42.2 Ya
48
Penilaian8
80.7 80.7 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
16
19.3
19.3
19.3 Ya
67
68.7 68.7 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Emosional2
Emosional5
36
43.4
43.4
43.4 Ya
47
56.6 56.6 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
35
42.2
42.2
42.2 Ya
48
Percent Valid Tidak
Emosional4
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
86.7 87.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
10
12.0
12.2
12.2 Ya
72
Emosional3
49.4 49.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
42
50.6
50.6
50.6 Ya
41
57.8 57.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Emosional6
KEmosional
47
56.6
56.6
56.6 Ya
36
43.4 43.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Kurang
30
36.1
36.1
36.1 Baik
53
Percent Valid Tidak
Emosional8
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
61.4 61.4 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Percent Valid Tidak
32
38.6
38.6
38.6 Ya
51
Emosional7
51.8 51.8 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Tidak
40
48.2
48.2
48.2 Ya
43
63.9 63.9 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Antenatal
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 kali
4
4.8
4.8
4.8 2 kali
18
21.7
21.7
26.5 3 kali
4
4.8
4.8
31.3 4 kali
54
65.1
65.1
96.4 5 kali
2
2.4
2.4
98.8 6 kali
1
1.2 1.2 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
KAntenatal
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Tidak memenuhi standar
26
31.3
31.3
31.3 Memenuhi standar
57
68.7 68.7 100.0 Total 83 100.0 100.0
Lampiran 4 : Hasil Uji Bivariat Crosstabs Usiak * Antenatal
a
57.0
83.0 % within Usiak 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 26.585
1 .000 Continuity Correction
83 Expected Count
b
24.150 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 27.429 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
.000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 26.264 1 .000 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
113
26.0
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
33.0 % within Usiak 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar Usiak Tidak Berisiko (20-35 tahun) Count
21
12
33 Expected Count
10.3
22.7
Berisiko (< 20 tahun dan > 35 tahun) Count
26
5
45
50 Expected Count
15.7
34.3
50.0 % within Usiak 10.0% 90.0% 100.0%
Total Count
57
Paritask * Antenatal
Crosstab
57
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.95.
.000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 15.572 1 .000 N of Valid Cases
13.605 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 14.898 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
b
1 .000 Continuity Correction
a
Pearson Chi-Square 15.762
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Chi-Square Tests
83.0 % within Paritask 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
57.0
26.0
83 Expected Count
26
Antenatal Total
19.0 % within Paritask 68.4% 31.6% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar Paritask Tidak berisiko (<= 2 orang) Count
13
6
19 Expected Count
6.0
13.0
Berisiko (> 2 orang) Count
Total Count
13
51
64 Expected Count
20.0
44.0
64.0 % within Paritask 20.3% 79.7% 100.0%
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Pendidikank * Antenatal
Pearson Chi-Square 16.322
26.0
57.0
83.0 % within Pendidikank 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
a
57
1 .000 Continuity Correction
b
14.197 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 15.540 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
.000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 16.126 1 .000 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
83 Expected Count
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
21.0 % within Pendidikank 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar Pendidikank Dasar Count
14
7
21 Expected Count
6.6
14.4
Tinggi Count
Total Count
12
50
62 Expected Count
19.4
42.6
62.0 % within Pendidikank 19.4% 80.6% 100.0%
26
Pekerjaank * Antenatal
Pearson Chi-Square 5.967
26.0
57.0
83.0 % within Pekerjaank 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
a
57
1 .015 Continuity Correction
b
4.839 1 .028 Likelihood Ratio 6.357 1 .012 Fisher's Exact Test
.016 .012 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.895 1 .015 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
83 Expected Count
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
32.0 % within Pekerjaank 15.6% 84.4% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar Pekerjaank Tidak bekerja Count
5
27
32 Expected Count
10.0
22.0
Bekerja Count
Total Count
21
30
51 Expected Count
16.0
35.0
51.0 % within Pekerjaank 41.2% 58.8% 100.0%
26
KIntsrumental * Antenatal
Pearson Chi-Square 21.832
26.0
57.0
83.0 % within KIntsrumental 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
a
57
1 .000 Continuity Correction
b
19.631 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 22.255 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
.000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 21.569 1 .000 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
83 Expected Count
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
33.0 % within KIntsrumental 60.6% 39.4% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar KIntsrumental Kurang Count
20
13
33 Expected Count
10.3
22.7
Baik Count
Total Count
6
44
50 Expected Count
15.7
34.3
50.0 % within KIntsrumental 12.0% 88.0% 100.0%
26
KInformasional * Antenatal
Pearson Chi-Square 12.075
26.0
57.0
83.0 % within KInformasional 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
a
57
1 .001 Continuity Correction
b
10.473 1 .001 Likelihood Ratio 13.119 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
.001 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 11.930 1 .001 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.28.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
83 Expected Count
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
32.3
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar
KInformasional Kurang Count
22
25
47 Expected Count
14.7
47.0 % within KInformasional 46.8% 53.2% 100.0%
Total Count
Baik Count
4
32
36 Expected Count
11.3
24.7
36.0 % within KInformasional 11.1% 88.9% 100.0%
26
KPenilaian * Antenatal
Pearson Chi-Square 11.137
26.0
57.0
83.0 % within KPenilaian 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
a
57
1 .001 Continuity Correction
b
9.595 1 .002 Likelihood Ratio 12.113 1 .001 Fisher's Exact Test
.001 .001 Linear-by-Linear Association 11.003 1 .001 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.96.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
83 Expected Count
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
48.0 % within KPenilaian 45.8% 54.2% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar KPenilaian Kurang Count
22
26
48 Expected Count
15.0
33.0
Baik Count
Total Count
4
31
35 Expected Count
11.0
24.0
35.0 % within KPenilaian 11.4% 88.6% 100.0%
26
KEmosional * Antenatal
Pearson Chi-Square 27.277
26.0
57.0
83.0 % within KEmosional 31.3% 68.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)
Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)
a
57
1 .000 Continuity Correction
b
24.765 1 .000 Likelihood Ratio 27.572 1 .000 Fisher's Exact Test
.000 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 26.948 1 .000 N of Valid Cases
83 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
83 Expected Count
Crosstab
Antenatal Total
30.0 % within KEmosional 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
Tidak memenuhi standar Memenuhi standar KEmosional Kurang Count
20
10
30 Expected Count
9.4
20.6
Baik Count
Total Count
6
47
53 Expected Count
16.6
36.4
53.0 % within KEmosional 11.3% 88.7% 100.0%
26
Lampiran 5 : Hasil Uji Multivariat Logistic Regression Block 1: Method = Enter Model Summary
2
121
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Usiak, Paritask, Pendidikank, Pekerjaank, KIntsrumental, KInformasional, KPenilaian, KEmosional.
Usia 4.338 1.907 5.174 1 .023 76.563 Paritas -.160 1.288 .015 1 .901 .852 Pendidikan 2.631 1.313 4.015 1 .045 13.887 Pekerjaan -5.113 2.445 4.372 1 .037 .006 Intsrumental 3.525 1.636 4.645 1 .031 33.954 Informasional 3.191 1.596 3.999 1 .046 24.302 Penilaian 3.766 1.571 5.748 1 .017 43.193 Emosional 2.279 1.154 3.901 1 .048 9.764 Constant -4.545 1.652 7.568 1 .006 .011
a
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 1
Variables in the Equation
a. The cut value is .500
94.0
96.5 Overall Percentage
55
Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R
Square Nagelkerke R
3
23
Memenuhi standar Step 1 Antenatal Tidak memenuhi standar
Correct Tidak memenuhi standar
Antenatal Percentage
Observed Predicted
Classification Table a
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 9 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
.613 .862
a
Square 1 24.328
88.5 Memenuhi standar