Daya Terima Cookies Tepung Rimpang Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) dan Tepung Ikan Patin (Pangansius hypopthalmus) Serta Kandungan Gizinya
Lampiran 1 : FORMAT UJI ORGANOLEPTIK SKALA HEDONIK
Nama Panelis : .........................................................................................................
Umur
: .........................................................................................................
Pekerjaan
: .........................................................................................................
Alamat
: .........................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................
Tanggal
: .........................................................................................................
Produk
: Cookies
Petunjuk Pengisian
Ujilah sampel dibawah ini dengan baik sesuai dengan nomor kode sampel,
dan nyatakanlah pendapat Anda tentang apa yang dirasakan oleh alat indera.
Kemudian beri skala kode dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut :
Untuk uji organoleptik rasa memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat enak
:5
Cukup enak
Enak
:4
Kurang enak : 2
Tidak Enak
:1
Untuk uji organoleptik warna memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat suka
:5
Cukup suka
Suka
:4
Kurang suka : 2
Tidak suka
:3
:3
:1
Untuk uji organoleptik aroma memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat harum
:5
Cukup harum : 3
Harum
:4
Kurang harum : 2
103
Universitas Sumatera Utara
104
Tidak harum : 1
Untuk uji organoleptik tekstur atau kerenyahan memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat renyah
:5
Cukup renyah : 3
Renyah
:4
Kurang renyah : 2
Tidak renyah : 1
Berilah skala kode pada tabel dibawah ini sesuai kode sampel yang
Anda konsumsi dengan baik :
Uji Organoleptik
Kode Sampel
Rasa
Aroma
Warna
Tekstur
C1
C2
C3
C4
Panelis,
……………………..
Universitas Sumatera Utara
103
LAMPIRAN 2
TABEL : REKAPITULASI HASIL ANALISIS UJI HEDONIK COOKIES
UJI ORGANOLEPTIK (UJI HEDONIK)
N
Nama
Umur L/P
Warna
Aroma
Rasa
O Panelis
C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3
REMAJA ( 13 – 20 tahun )
1. Dwi
18
P
5
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
2. Kevin
18
L
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
3. Andri
15
L
4
5
4
3
4
5
4
4
4
5
5
4. Intan
19
P
3
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
5. Michael
19
L
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
6. Nuraini
15
P
5
4
4
3
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
7. Weni
15
P
4
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
8. Ferdi
18
L
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
4
9. Rian
16
L
4
5
4
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
10. Glenn
18
L
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
11. Taufik
19
L
5
4
4
3
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
12. Yanriko
19
L
4
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
13. Wenty
18
P
5
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
14. Yohana
18
P
4
4
3
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
15. Intan
15
P
2
4
4
3
4
5
2
4
3
5
2
DEWASA ( 21 – 45 tahun )
16. Dian
23
L
3
4
4
4
4
5
3
5
4
5
2
17. Trisna
22
P
2
4
4
3
4
5
3
4
3
5
2
18. Yantie
35
P
4
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
19. Putri
21
P
5
4
4
3
4
5
2
4
3
5
2
Tekstur
C2 C3
C4
C1
C4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
2
5
3
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
3
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
Universitas Sumatera Utara
104
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Melisa
Herwita
Indra
Rikardo
Budi
William
Bella
Marini
Resa
Tina P.
Zulfan
∑ ��
� �
22
40
41
21
22
22
21
22
22
47
45
P
P
L
L
L
L
P
P
P
P
L
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
120
5
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
126
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
113
4
3
4
4
5
4
4
3
3
3
4
102
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
121
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
137
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
110
4
3
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
5
114
5
3
4
5
4
4
5
3
3
3
4
115
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
145
4
3
4
4
2
3
4
2
2
3
2
102
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
85
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
126
5
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
124
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
121
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
120
4.00 4.20 3.77 3.40 4.03 4.57 3.67 3.80 3.83 4.83 3.40 2.83 4.20 4.13 4.03 4.00
Universitas Sumatera Utara
105
LAMPIRAN 3
General Linear Model Indikator Warna
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Warna C1
Warna C2
Warna C3
WarnaC4
Std.
Deviation
4.00
4.20
3.77
3.40
N
.743
.407
.504
.621
30
30
30
30
Multivariate Testsb
Effect
Value
warna Pillai's Trace
Wilks' Lambda
Hotelling's Trace
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
.613
14.263a
3.000
27.000
.000
.387
14.263
a
3.000
27.000
.000
1.585
14.263a
3.000
27.000
.000
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's Largest
1.585 14.263a
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: warna
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
warna
Error
(warna)
Mean
Square
df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
10.625
3
3.542
11.573
.000
Greenhouse-Geisser
10.625
2.416
4.398
11.573
.000
Huynh-Feldt
10.625
2.651
4.008
11.573
.000
Lower-bound
Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
10.625 1.000
26.625
87
26.625 70.062
26.625 76.883
26.625 29.000
10.625
.306
.380
.346
.918
11.573
.002
Universitas Sumatera Utara
106
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Source
warna
Type III Sum
of Squares
warna
Linear
7.482
1
7.482
17.978
.000
Quadratic
2.408
1
2.408
6.753
.015
Cubic
Error(warna) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
.735
12.068
10.342
4.215
1
29
29
29
.735
.416
.357
.145
5.057
.032
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares
Intercept
Error
1771.008
12.742
Df
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1771.008 4030.810
.439
.000
Estimated Marginal Means
Estimates
95% Confidence Interval
warna
1
2
3
4
Mean
4.000
4.200
3.767
3.400
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
.136
.074
.092
.113
3.723
4.048
3.578
3.168
4.277
4.352
3.955
3.632
Universitas Sumatera Utara
107
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
(I)
(J)
Mean
Std.
warna warna Difference (I-J) Error
1
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
2
-.200
.155
.206
-.516
.116
3
.233
.164
.165
-.102
.569
*
4
.600
.170
.001
.252
2
1
.200
.155
.206
-.116
*
3
.433
.092
.000
.245
4
.800*
.130
.000
.533
3
1
-.233
.164
.165
-.569
2
-.433*
.092
.000
-.622
*
4
.367
.131
.009
.098
*
4
1
-.600
.170
.001
-.948
*
2
-.800
.130
.000
-1.067
*
3
-.367
.131
.009
-.635
Based on estimated marginal means
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference
(equivalent to no adjustments).
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
.948
.516
.622
1.067
.102
-.245
.635
-.252
-.533
-.098
Multivariate Tests
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
Pillai's trace
.613 14.263a
3.000
27.000
.000
a
Wilks' lambda
.387 14.263
3.000
27.000
.000
a
Hotelling's trace
1.585 14.263
3.000
27.000
.000
a
Roy's largest root
1.585 14.263
3.000
27.000
.000
Each F tests the multivariate effect of warna. These tests are based on the
linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal
means.
a. Exact statistic
Universitas Sumatera Utara
108
LAMPIRAN 4
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Aroma C1
Aroma C2
Aroma C3
Aroma C4
Std.
Deviation
4.03
4.70
3.67
3.80
N
.556
.651
.606
.664
30
30
30
30
Multivariate Testsb
Effect
aroma
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
a
3.000
27.000
.000
Pillai's Trace
.728
24.047
Wilks' Lambda
.272
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
2.672
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's Largest
2.672
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept
Within Subjects Design: aroma
a
3.000
27.000
.000
Hotelling's Trace
24.047
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
aroma
Mean
Square
df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
18.967
3
6.322 18.945
.000
Greenhouse-Geisser
18.967
2.038
9.306 18.945
.000
Huynh-Feldt
18.967
2.194
8.647 18.945
.000
18.967 1.000
29.033
87
29.033 59.103
29.033 63.612
29.033 29.000
18.967 18.945
.334
.491
.456
1.001
.000
Lower-bound
Error(aroma) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
Universitas Sumatera Utara
109
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Source
aroma
Type III Sum
of Squares
aroma
Linear
4.507
1
4.507
20.127
.000
Quadratic
2.133
1
2.133
7.864
.009
Cubic
Error(aroma) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
12.327
6.493
7.867
14.673
1
29
29
29
12.327
.224
.271
.506
24.362
.000
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares
Intercept
Error
1968.300
15.700
Df
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1968.300 3635.713
.541
.000
Estimates
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval
aroma
1
2
3
4
Mean
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
4.033
4.700
3.667
3.800
.102
.119
.111
.121
3.826
4.457
3.440
3.552
4.241
4.943
3.893
4.048
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference (Iaroma aroma
J)
Std. Error
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Universitas Sumatera Utara
110
1
2
-.667*
.088
.000
-.846
-.488
3
.367*
.148
.019
.065
.669
4
.233
.124
.070
-.020
.487
*
2
1
.667
.088
.000
.488
.846
*
3
1.033
.182
.000
.660
1.407
*
4
.900
.130
.000
.634
1.166
*
3
1
-.367
.148
.019
-.669
-.065
*
2
-1.033
.182
.000
-1.407
-.660
4
-.133
.196
.502
-.534
.268
4
1
-.233
.124
.070
-.487
.020
*
2
-.900
.130
.000
-1.166
-.634
3
.133
.196
.502
-.268
.534
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent
to no adjustments).
Multivariate Tests
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
Pillai's trace
.728
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Wilks' lambda
.272
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Hotelling's trace
2.672
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's largest root
2.672
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Each F tests the multivariate effect of aroma. These tests are based on the
linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal
means.
a. Exact statistic
Universitas Sumatera Utara
111
LAMPIRAN 5
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Rasa C1
Rasa C2
Rasa C3
Rasa C4
Std.
Deviation
3.83
4.73
3.40
2.83
N
.747
.583
1.070
.791
30
30
30
30
Multivariate Testsb
Effect
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
Pillai's Trace
.867
58.662a
3.000
27.000
.000
Wilks' Lambda
.133
58.662a
3.000
27.000
.000
6.518
58.662
a
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's Largest
6.518
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept
Within Subjects Design: rasa
58.662a
3.000
27.000
.000
rasa
Hotelling's Trace
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
Rasa
Mean
Square
Df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
57.800
3
19.267
41.697
.000
Greenhouse-Geisser
57.800
1.844
31.338
41.697
.000
Huynh-Feldt
57.800
1.964
29.430
41.697
.000
57.800 1.000
40.200
87
40.200 53.488
40.200 56.955
40.200 29.000
57.800
.462
.752
.706
1.386
41.697
.000
Lower-bound
Error(rasa) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
112
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
rasa
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Rasa
Linear
28.167
1
28.167
63.649
.000
Quadratic
16.133
1
16.133
121.000
.000
Cubic
Error(rasa) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
13.500
12.833
3.867
23.500
1
29
29
29
13.500
.443
.133
.810
16.660
.000
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
Intercept
Error
Df
1642.800
37.200
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1642.800 1280.677
1.283
.000
Estimates
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval
rasa
Mean
1
2
3
4
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
3.833
4.733
3.400
2.833
.136
.106
.195
.145
3.555
4.516
3.000
2.538
4.112
4.951
3.800
3.129
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
(I)
rasa
1
(J)
rasa
Mean
Difference (IJ)
Std. Error
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
*
.182
.000
-1.271
-.529
3
.433*
.141
.005
.144
.722
4
1.000*
.152
.000
.690
1.310
2
-.900
Universitas Sumatera Utara
113
1
.900*
.182
.000
.529
1.271
*
3
1.333
.246
.000
.830
1.837
*
4
1.900
.188
.000
1.516
2.284
*
3
1
-.433
.141
.005
-.722
-.144
2
-1.333*
.246
.000
-1.837
-.830
*
4
.567
.114
.000
.333
.800
4
1
-1.000*
.152
.000
-1.310
-.690
*
2
-1.900
.188
.000
-2.284
-1.516
3
-.567*
.114
.000
-.800
-.333
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent
to no adjustments).
2
Universitas Sumatera Utara
115
LAMPIRAN 6
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviation
N
Tekstur C1
4.10
.481
30
Tekstur C2
4.03
.414
30
Tekstur C3
3.93
.254
30
Tekstur C4
3.90
.305
30
Multivariate Testsb
Hypothesis
df
Error df Sig.
Effect
Value
F
tekstur Pillai's Trace
.185
2.039a 3.000
27.000
.132
3.000
27.000
.132
3.000
27.000
.132
Roy's Largest
.227
2.039a 3.000
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: tekstur
27.000
.132
Mean
Square
F
Wilks' Lambda
.815
Hotelling's Trace .227
a
a
2.039
2.039
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
tekstur
df
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
.758
3
.253 2.590 .058
Greenhouse-Geisser
.758 2.599
.292 2.590 .067
Huynh-Feldt
.758 2.878
.264 2.590 .061
.758 1.000
8.492
87
8.492 75.379
8.492 83.459
.758 2.590 .118
.098
.113
.102
Lower-bound
Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Universitas Sumatera Utara
116
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
tekstur
Mean
Square
df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
.758
3
.253 2.590 .058
Greenhouse-Geisser
.758 2.599
.292 2.590 .067
Huynh-Feldt
.758 2.878
.264 2.590 .061
Lower-bound
Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
.758
8.492
8.492
8.492
8.492
1.000
87
75.379
83.459
29.000
.758 2.590 .118
.098
.113
.102
.293
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Source
tekstur
Type III Sum
of Squares
Tekstur
Linear
.735
1
.735
6.242
.018
Quadratic
.008
1
.008
.088
.769
Cubic
Error(tekstur) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
.015
3.415
2.742
2.335
1
29
29
29
.015
.118
.095
.081
.186
.669
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Source
Intercept
Error
Type III Sum
of Squares
1912.008
7.742
df
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1912.008 7162.313
.267
.000
Universitas Sumatera Utara
117
Estimated Marginal Means
tekstur
Estimates
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval
tekstur
Mean
1
2
3
4
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
4.100
4.033
3.933
3.900
.088
.076
.046
.056
3.921
3.879
3.839
3.786
4.279
4.188
4.028
4.014
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference (Itekstur tekstur
J)
Std. Error
1
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
2
.067
.095
.489
-.128
.261
3
.167
.084
.057
-.006
.339
4
.200*
.088
.031
.019
.381
2
1
-.067
.095
.489
-.261
.128
3
.100
.074
.184
-.050
.250
4
.133
.079
.103
-.029
.295
3
1
-.167
.084
.057
-.339
.006
2
-.100
.074
.184
-.250
.050
4
.033
.058
.573
-.086
.153
*
4
1
-.200
.088
.031
-.381
-.019
2
-.133
.079
.103
-.295
.029
3
-.033
.058
.573
-.153
.086
Based on estimated marginal means
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent
to no adjustments).
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
118
LAMPIRAN 7
DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
Gambar : Tanaman Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) 7 bulan usia tanam.
Gambar : Rimpang Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) setelah pencucian.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
119
Gambar : Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius hypopthalmus).
Gambar : Lembaran Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Pada Proses Pengeringan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
120
Gambar : Lembaran Kering Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Setelah Pengeringan.
Gambar : Bentukan Padatan Kering Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius
hypopthalmus) Sebelum Penepungan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
121
LAMPIRAN 8
PERHITUNGAN NILAI GIZI COOKIES
Berpedoman pada pendapat Tarwotjo (1998), kira-kira satu kali makan
jajan, seseorang cukup 1-2 potong yang mengandung 150 - 200 kalori. Cookies
C2 yang merupakan cookies ideal dengan tingkat kesukaan terbaik dapat
diketahui sumbangan energi cookies didasarkan pada Tabel 4.8 berikut:
Tabel 4.8. Hasil Uji Proksimat Tepung Rimpang Bunga Tasbih
(Canna edulis Ker.) dan Cookies
Parameter
Sampel Satuan Karbohidrat Protein Lemak
Serat
Abu
Air
4,6
3,4
3,4
3,2
Kasar
Tepung
%(b/b)
75,3
Cookies 1 %(b/b)
54,3
Cookies 2 %(b/b)
54,8
Sumber: BARISTAN, 2016.
3,61
13,4
14,1
0,15
24,3
24,5
3,62
5,49
4,34
Berat cookies = 5 gr/keping gr.HA = 5 gr x 54,8% = 2,74 gr; gr.Lipid = 5 gr x
24,5% = 1,225 gr; gr.Protein = 5 gr x 14,1% = 0,705 gr.
Nilai Energi
= (4 kkal x gr.HA) + (9 kkal x gr.Lipid) + (4 kkal x gr.Protein)
Nilai Energi
= (4 kkal x 2,74) + (9 kkal x 1,225) + (4 kkal x 0,705)
= 10,96 kkal + 11,025 kkal + 2,82 kkal
= 24,805 kkal = 25 kkal per keping
Asupan serat WHO : 19 – 30 gr/orang/hari.
Serat cookies = 5 gram x 4,34% = 0,217 gram per keping.
Asupan cookies normal mengarah pada pemenuhan 150-200 kkal maka banyak
keping cookies yang dikonsumsi = 8 keping cookies.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
122
LAMPIRAN 9
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviation
N
Std. Error
Mean
Pair 1 Cookies 1
24.3725
4
21.39007
10.69503
Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2
Cookies 1
24.4350
24.4350
24.3725
4
4
4
21.85298
21.85298
21.39007
10.92649
10.92649
10.69503
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair 1 Cookies 1 & Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2 & Cookies 1
Correlation
4
4
Sig.
.999
.999
.001
.001
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Mean
Pair 1 Cookies 1 - Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2 - Cookies 1
Std.
Deviation
-.06250
.06250
Std. Error
Mean
.83404
.83404
.41702
.41702
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Lower
Upper
Pair 1 Cookies 1 - Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2 - Cookies 1
-1.38965
-1.26465
1.26465
1.38965
t
-.150
.150
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
3
3
Universitas Sumatera Utara
.890
.890
123
Universitas Sumatera Utara
124
Universitas Sumatera Utara
125
Universitas Sumatera Utara
126
Universitas Sumatera Utara
127
Universitas Sumatera Utara
128
Universitas Sumatera Utara
129
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Nama Panelis : .........................................................................................................
Umur
: .........................................................................................................
Pekerjaan
: .........................................................................................................
Alamat
: .........................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................
Tanggal
: .........................................................................................................
Produk
: Cookies
Petunjuk Pengisian
Ujilah sampel dibawah ini dengan baik sesuai dengan nomor kode sampel,
dan nyatakanlah pendapat Anda tentang apa yang dirasakan oleh alat indera.
Kemudian beri skala kode dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut :
Untuk uji organoleptik rasa memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat enak
:5
Cukup enak
Enak
:4
Kurang enak : 2
Tidak Enak
:1
Untuk uji organoleptik warna memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat suka
:5
Cukup suka
Suka
:4
Kurang suka : 2
Tidak suka
:3
:3
:1
Untuk uji organoleptik aroma memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat harum
:5
Cukup harum : 3
Harum
:4
Kurang harum : 2
103
Universitas Sumatera Utara
104
Tidak harum : 1
Untuk uji organoleptik tekstur atau kerenyahan memakai skala hedonik :
Sangat renyah
:5
Cukup renyah : 3
Renyah
:4
Kurang renyah : 2
Tidak renyah : 1
Berilah skala kode pada tabel dibawah ini sesuai kode sampel yang
Anda konsumsi dengan baik :
Uji Organoleptik
Kode Sampel
Rasa
Aroma
Warna
Tekstur
C1
C2
C3
C4
Panelis,
……………………..
Universitas Sumatera Utara
103
LAMPIRAN 2
TABEL : REKAPITULASI HASIL ANALISIS UJI HEDONIK COOKIES
UJI ORGANOLEPTIK (UJI HEDONIK)
N
Nama
Umur L/P
Warna
Aroma
Rasa
O Panelis
C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3 C4 C1 C2 C3
REMAJA ( 13 – 20 tahun )
1. Dwi
18
P
5
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
2. Kevin
18
L
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
3. Andri
15
L
4
5
4
3
4
5
4
4
4
5
5
4. Intan
19
P
3
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
5. Michael
19
L
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
6. Nuraini
15
P
5
4
4
3
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
7. Weni
15
P
4
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
8. Ferdi
18
L
4
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
4
9. Rian
16
L
4
5
4
2
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
10. Glenn
18
L
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
4
11. Taufik
19
L
5
4
4
3
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
12. Yanriko
19
L
4
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
13. Wenty
18
P
5
4
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
4
14. Yohana
18
P
4
4
3
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
15. Intan
15
P
2
4
4
3
4
5
2
4
3
5
2
DEWASA ( 21 – 45 tahun )
16. Dian
23
L
3
4
4
4
4
5
3
5
4
5
2
17. Trisna
22
P
2
4
4
3
4
5
3
4
3
5
2
18. Yantie
35
P
4
4
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
5
3
19. Putri
21
P
5
4
4
3
4
5
2
4
3
5
2
Tekstur
C2 C3
C4
C1
C4
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
4
2
5
3
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
5
4
5
5
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
3
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
Universitas Sumatera Utara
104
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Melisa
Herwita
Indra
Rikardo
Budi
William
Bella
Marini
Resa
Tina P.
Zulfan
∑ ��
� �
22
40
41
21
22
22
21
22
22
47
45
P
P
L
L
L
L
P
P
P
P
L
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
120
5
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
126
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
113
4
3
4
4
5
4
4
3
3
3
4
102
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
121
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
137
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
110
4
3
4
4
5
5
4
4
4
3
5
114
5
3
4
5
4
4
5
3
3
3
4
115
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
145
4
3
4
4
2
3
4
2
2
3
2
102
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
85
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
126
5
4
4
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
124
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
121
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
120
4.00 4.20 3.77 3.40 4.03 4.57 3.67 3.80 3.83 4.83 3.40 2.83 4.20 4.13 4.03 4.00
Universitas Sumatera Utara
105
LAMPIRAN 3
General Linear Model Indikator Warna
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Warna C1
Warna C2
Warna C3
WarnaC4
Std.
Deviation
4.00
4.20
3.77
3.40
N
.743
.407
.504
.621
30
30
30
30
Multivariate Testsb
Effect
Value
warna Pillai's Trace
Wilks' Lambda
Hotelling's Trace
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
.613
14.263a
3.000
27.000
.000
.387
14.263
a
3.000
27.000
.000
1.585
14.263a
3.000
27.000
.000
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's Largest
1.585 14.263a
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: warna
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
warna
Error
(warna)
Mean
Square
df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
10.625
3
3.542
11.573
.000
Greenhouse-Geisser
10.625
2.416
4.398
11.573
.000
Huynh-Feldt
10.625
2.651
4.008
11.573
.000
Lower-bound
Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
10.625 1.000
26.625
87
26.625 70.062
26.625 76.883
26.625 29.000
10.625
.306
.380
.346
.918
11.573
.002
Universitas Sumatera Utara
106
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Source
warna
Type III Sum
of Squares
warna
Linear
7.482
1
7.482
17.978
.000
Quadratic
2.408
1
2.408
6.753
.015
Cubic
Error(warna) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
.735
12.068
10.342
4.215
1
29
29
29
.735
.416
.357
.145
5.057
.032
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares
Intercept
Error
1771.008
12.742
Df
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1771.008 4030.810
.439
.000
Estimated Marginal Means
Estimates
95% Confidence Interval
warna
1
2
3
4
Mean
4.000
4.200
3.767
3.400
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
.136
.074
.092
.113
3.723
4.048
3.578
3.168
4.277
4.352
3.955
3.632
Universitas Sumatera Utara
107
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
(I)
(J)
Mean
Std.
warna warna Difference (I-J) Error
1
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
2
-.200
.155
.206
-.516
.116
3
.233
.164
.165
-.102
.569
*
4
.600
.170
.001
.252
2
1
.200
.155
.206
-.116
*
3
.433
.092
.000
.245
4
.800*
.130
.000
.533
3
1
-.233
.164
.165
-.569
2
-.433*
.092
.000
-.622
*
4
.367
.131
.009
.098
*
4
1
-.600
.170
.001
-.948
*
2
-.800
.130
.000
-1.067
*
3
-.367
.131
.009
-.635
Based on estimated marginal means
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference
(equivalent to no adjustments).
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
.948
.516
.622
1.067
.102
-.245
.635
-.252
-.533
-.098
Multivariate Tests
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
Pillai's trace
.613 14.263a
3.000
27.000
.000
a
Wilks' lambda
.387 14.263
3.000
27.000
.000
a
Hotelling's trace
1.585 14.263
3.000
27.000
.000
a
Roy's largest root
1.585 14.263
3.000
27.000
.000
Each F tests the multivariate effect of warna. These tests are based on the
linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal
means.
a. Exact statistic
Universitas Sumatera Utara
108
LAMPIRAN 4
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Aroma C1
Aroma C2
Aroma C3
Aroma C4
Std.
Deviation
4.03
4.70
3.67
3.80
N
.556
.651
.606
.664
30
30
30
30
Multivariate Testsb
Effect
aroma
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
a
3.000
27.000
.000
Pillai's Trace
.728
24.047
Wilks' Lambda
.272
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
2.672
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's Largest
2.672
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept
Within Subjects Design: aroma
a
3.000
27.000
.000
Hotelling's Trace
24.047
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
aroma
Mean
Square
df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
18.967
3
6.322 18.945
.000
Greenhouse-Geisser
18.967
2.038
9.306 18.945
.000
Huynh-Feldt
18.967
2.194
8.647 18.945
.000
18.967 1.000
29.033
87
29.033 59.103
29.033 63.612
29.033 29.000
18.967 18.945
.334
.491
.456
1.001
.000
Lower-bound
Error(aroma) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
Universitas Sumatera Utara
109
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Source
aroma
Type III Sum
of Squares
aroma
Linear
4.507
1
4.507
20.127
.000
Quadratic
2.133
1
2.133
7.864
.009
Cubic
Error(aroma) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
12.327
6.493
7.867
14.673
1
29
29
29
12.327
.224
.271
.506
24.362
.000
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares
Intercept
Error
1968.300
15.700
Df
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1968.300 3635.713
.541
.000
Estimates
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval
aroma
1
2
3
4
Mean
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
4.033
4.700
3.667
3.800
.102
.119
.111
.121
3.826
4.457
3.440
3.552
4.241
4.943
3.893
4.048
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference (Iaroma aroma
J)
Std. Error
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Universitas Sumatera Utara
110
1
2
-.667*
.088
.000
-.846
-.488
3
.367*
.148
.019
.065
.669
4
.233
.124
.070
-.020
.487
*
2
1
.667
.088
.000
.488
.846
*
3
1.033
.182
.000
.660
1.407
*
4
.900
.130
.000
.634
1.166
*
3
1
-.367
.148
.019
-.669
-.065
*
2
-1.033
.182
.000
-1.407
-.660
4
-.133
.196
.502
-.534
.268
4
1
-.233
.124
.070
-.487
.020
*
2
-.900
.130
.000
-1.166
-.634
3
.133
.196
.502
-.268
.534
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent
to no adjustments).
Multivariate Tests
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
Pillai's trace
.728
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Wilks' lambda
.272
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Hotelling's trace
2.672
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's largest root
2.672
24.047a
3.000
27.000
.000
Each F tests the multivariate effect of aroma. These tests are based on the
linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal
means.
a. Exact statistic
Universitas Sumatera Utara
111
LAMPIRAN 5
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Rasa C1
Rasa C2
Rasa C3
Rasa C4
Std.
Deviation
3.83
4.73
3.40
2.83
N
.747
.583
1.070
.791
30
30
30
30
Multivariate Testsb
Effect
Value
F
Hypothesis df Error df
Sig.
Pillai's Trace
.867
58.662a
3.000
27.000
.000
Wilks' Lambda
.133
58.662a
3.000
27.000
.000
6.518
58.662
a
3.000
27.000
.000
Roy's Largest
6.518
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept
Within Subjects Design: rasa
58.662a
3.000
27.000
.000
rasa
Hotelling's Trace
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
Rasa
Mean
Square
Df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
57.800
3
19.267
41.697
.000
Greenhouse-Geisser
57.800
1.844
31.338
41.697
.000
Huynh-Feldt
57.800
1.964
29.430
41.697
.000
57.800 1.000
40.200
87
40.200 53.488
40.200 56.955
40.200 29.000
57.800
.462
.752
.706
1.386
41.697
.000
Lower-bound
Error(rasa) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Universitas Sumatera Utara
112
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
rasa
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Rasa
Linear
28.167
1
28.167
63.649
.000
Quadratic
16.133
1
16.133
121.000
.000
Cubic
Error(rasa) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
13.500
12.833
3.867
23.500
1
29
29
29
13.500
.443
.133
.810
16.660
.000
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
Intercept
Error
Df
1642.800
37.200
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1642.800 1280.677
1.283
.000
Estimates
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval
rasa
Mean
1
2
3
4
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
3.833
4.733
3.400
2.833
.136
.106
.195
.145
3.555
4.516
3.000
2.538
4.112
4.951
3.800
3.129
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
(I)
rasa
1
(J)
rasa
Mean
Difference (IJ)
Std. Error
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
*
.182
.000
-1.271
-.529
3
.433*
.141
.005
.144
.722
4
1.000*
.152
.000
.690
1.310
2
-.900
Universitas Sumatera Utara
113
1
.900*
.182
.000
.529
1.271
*
3
1.333
.246
.000
.830
1.837
*
4
1.900
.188
.000
1.516
2.284
*
3
1
-.433
.141
.005
-.722
-.144
2
-1.333*
.246
.000
-1.837
-.830
*
4
.567
.114
.000
.333
.800
4
1
-1.000*
.152
.000
-1.310
-.690
*
2
-1.900
.188
.000
-2.284
-1.516
3
-.567*
.114
.000
-.800
-.333
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent
to no adjustments).
2
Universitas Sumatera Utara
115
LAMPIRAN 6
Descriptive Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviation
N
Tekstur C1
4.10
.481
30
Tekstur C2
4.03
.414
30
Tekstur C3
3.93
.254
30
Tekstur C4
3.90
.305
30
Multivariate Testsb
Hypothesis
df
Error df Sig.
Effect
Value
F
tekstur Pillai's Trace
.185
2.039a 3.000
27.000
.132
3.000
27.000
.132
3.000
27.000
.132
Roy's Largest
.227
2.039a 3.000
Root
a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept Within Subjects Design: tekstur
27.000
.132
Mean
Square
F
Wilks' Lambda
.815
Hotelling's Trace .227
a
a
2.039
2.039
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
tekstur
df
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
.758
3
.253 2.590 .058
Greenhouse-Geisser
.758 2.599
.292 2.590 .067
Huynh-Feldt
.758 2.878
.264 2.590 .061
.758 1.000
8.492
87
8.492 75.379
8.492 83.459
.758 2.590 .118
.098
.113
.102
Lower-bound
Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Universitas Sumatera Utara
116
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Type III Sum
of Squares
Source
tekstur
Mean
Square
df
F
Sig.
Sphericity Assumed
.758
3
.253 2.590 .058
Greenhouse-Geisser
.758 2.599
.292 2.590 .067
Huynh-Feldt
.758 2.878
.264 2.590 .061
Lower-bound
Error(tekstur) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
.758
8.492
8.492
8.492
8.492
1.000
87
75.379
83.459
29.000
.758 2.590 .118
.098
.113
.102
.293
Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts
Measure:MEASURE_1
Source
tekstur
Type III Sum
of Squares
Tekstur
Linear
.735
1
.735
6.242
.018
Quadratic
.008
1
.008
.088
.769
Cubic
Error(tekstur) Linear
Quadratic
Cubic
.015
3.415
2.742
2.335
1
29
29
29
.015
.118
.095
.081
.186
.669
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure:MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable:Average
Source
Intercept
Error
Type III Sum
of Squares
1912.008
7.742
df
Mean Square
1
29
F
Sig.
1912.008 7162.313
.267
.000
Universitas Sumatera Utara
117
Estimated Marginal Means
tekstur
Estimates
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval
tekstur
Mean
1
2
3
4
Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
4.100
4.033
3.933
3.900
.088
.076
.046
.056
3.921
3.879
3.839
3.786
4.279
4.188
4.028
4.014
Pairwise Comparisons
Measure:MEASURE_1
95% Confidence Interval for
Differencea
a
Mean
(I)
(J)
Difference (Itekstur tekstur
J)
Std. Error
1
Sig.a
Lower Bound Upper Bound
2
.067
.095
.489
-.128
.261
3
.167
.084
.057
-.006
.339
4
.200*
.088
.031
.019
.381
2
1
-.067
.095
.489
-.261
.128
3
.100
.074
.184
-.050
.250
4
.133
.079
.103
-.029
.295
3
1
-.167
.084
.057
-.339
.006
2
-.100
.074
.184
-.250
.050
4
.033
.058
.573
-.086
.153
*
4
1
-.200
.088
.031
-.381
-.019
2
-.133
.079
.103
-.295
.029
3
-.033
.058
.573
-.153
.086
Based on estimated marginal means
a. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Least Significant Difference (equivalent
to no adjustments).
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
118
LAMPIRAN 7
DOKUMENTASI PENELITIAN
Gambar : Tanaman Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) 7 bulan usia tanam.
Gambar : Rimpang Bunga Tasbih (Canna edulis Ker.) setelah pencucian.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
119
Gambar : Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius hypopthalmus).
Gambar : Lembaran Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Pada Proses Pengeringan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
120
Gambar : Lembaran Kering Rimpang Bunga Tasbih Setelah Pengeringan.
Gambar : Bentukan Padatan Kering Daging Ikan Patin (Pangansius
hypopthalmus) Sebelum Penepungan.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
121
LAMPIRAN 8
PERHITUNGAN NILAI GIZI COOKIES
Berpedoman pada pendapat Tarwotjo (1998), kira-kira satu kali makan
jajan, seseorang cukup 1-2 potong yang mengandung 150 - 200 kalori. Cookies
C2 yang merupakan cookies ideal dengan tingkat kesukaan terbaik dapat
diketahui sumbangan energi cookies didasarkan pada Tabel 4.8 berikut:
Tabel 4.8. Hasil Uji Proksimat Tepung Rimpang Bunga Tasbih
(Canna edulis Ker.) dan Cookies
Parameter
Sampel Satuan Karbohidrat Protein Lemak
Serat
Abu
Air
4,6
3,4
3,4
3,2
Kasar
Tepung
%(b/b)
75,3
Cookies 1 %(b/b)
54,3
Cookies 2 %(b/b)
54,8
Sumber: BARISTAN, 2016.
3,61
13,4
14,1
0,15
24,3
24,5
3,62
5,49
4,34
Berat cookies = 5 gr/keping gr.HA = 5 gr x 54,8% = 2,74 gr; gr.Lipid = 5 gr x
24,5% = 1,225 gr; gr.Protein = 5 gr x 14,1% = 0,705 gr.
Nilai Energi
= (4 kkal x gr.HA) + (9 kkal x gr.Lipid) + (4 kkal x gr.Protein)
Nilai Energi
= (4 kkal x 2,74) + (9 kkal x 1,225) + (4 kkal x 0,705)
= 10,96 kkal + 11,025 kkal + 2,82 kkal
= 24,805 kkal = 25 kkal per keping
Asupan serat WHO : 19 – 30 gr/orang/hari.
Serat cookies = 5 gram x 4,34% = 0,217 gram per keping.
Asupan cookies normal mengarah pada pemenuhan 150-200 kkal maka banyak
keping cookies yang dikonsumsi = 8 keping cookies.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
122
LAMPIRAN 9
T-Test
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
Std.
Deviation
N
Std. Error
Mean
Pair 1 Cookies 1
24.3725
4
21.39007
10.69503
Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2
Cookies 1
24.4350
24.4350
24.3725
4
4
4
21.85298
21.85298
21.39007
10.92649
10.92649
10.69503
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair 1 Cookies 1 & Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2 & Cookies 1
Correlation
4
4
Sig.
.999
.999
.001
.001
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Mean
Pair 1 Cookies 1 - Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2 - Cookies 1
Std.
Deviation
-.06250
.06250
Std. Error
Mean
.83404
.83404
.41702
.41702
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Lower
Upper
Pair 1 Cookies 1 - Cookies 2
Pair 2 Cookies 2 - Cookies 1
-1.38965
-1.26465
1.26465
1.38965
t
-.150
.150
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
3
3
Universitas Sumatera Utara
.890
.890
123
Universitas Sumatera Utara
124
Universitas Sumatera Utara
125
Universitas Sumatera Utara
126
Universitas Sumatera Utara
127
Universitas Sumatera Utara
128
Universitas Sumatera Utara
129
Universitas Sumatera Utara