S IPSE 1100485 Table of content
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE………………………..…….……………………………………...
i
DECLARATION……………….….….………………………………………
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…….…….………………………………………..
iii
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………...
v
TABLE OF CONTENT……….…………………………………………......
vi
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………..…..
viii
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………..……
ix
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background………………………………………………………….
1
B. Research Problems…………………………………………………..
4
C. Research Questions……………………………………………….....
4
D. Limitation of Problems……………………………………………...
4
E. Research Objectives…………………………………………………
5
F. Operational Definition………………………………………………
5
G. Significant of Research……………………………………………...
6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Evaluation in Education……………………………………………..
6
B. Porter Alignment Index……………………………………………..
7
C. Cognitive Process Dimension……………………………………….
8
D. Knowledge Dimension……………………………………………...
10
E. Indonesian National Examination…………………………………...
15
F. Cambridge International Examination………………………………
17
G. Related Research……………………………………………..……..
18
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
A. Research Method……………………………………………………
20
B. Research Subject……………………………………………………
21
C. Research Procedure ………………………………………………...
21
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
D. Research Instrument …………………..……………………………
22
E. Technique Collection Data………………………………………….
25
F. Technique Analysis Data……………………………………………
26
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
A. Findings……………………………………………………………..
32
B. Discussion…………………………………………………………...
43
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
A. Conclusion…………………………………………………………..
48
B. Recommendation……………………………………………………
49
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………..
50
APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………
53
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
2.1
The Knowledge Dimension………………………………………..
3.1
Percentage of Indonesia National Examination and Cambridge
13
International Examination…..……………………………………..
25
3.2
Technique of Collecting Data..…………………………………….
26
3.3
Categories of Content in Indonesia National Examination………...
28
3.5
Categories of Content in Cambridge International Examination......
29
3.6
Matrix of scope of contents and cognitive process dimension……..
27
3.7
Matrix of scope of contents and knowledge dimension……………
28
3.8
Matrix of scope of contents and cognitive process dimension……..
29
3.9
Matrix of scope of contents and knowledge dimension……………
30
4.1
Porter Alignment Index for Knowledge dimension and cognitive
process dimension of Indonesia National Examination and
Cambridge International Examination….…………..……………
4.2
Discrepancies by content for Indonesia National Examination and
Cambridge International Examination……………………………..
4.3
35
37
Discrepancies by cognitive process dimension for three years
Indonesia National Examination and Cambridge International
Examination………………………………………………………..
4.4
40
Discrepancies by Knowledge dimension of Indonesia National
Examination and Cambridge International Examination…………..
41
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
2.1
Example matrix to measure alignment……………..……………..
7
2.2
Position National Examination………………………………...….
16
2.3
Level Curriculum Cambridge and Assessments……......................
18
3.1
Research Procedure...……………………………………………..
24
4.1
Porter alignments for knowledge dimension and cognitive of
national examination and Cambridge international
examination………………………………………………………
4.2
Graph of discrepancies by content areas of Indonesia National
Examination and Cambridge international examination...…...…...
4.3
37
37
Proportion of Content of Cambridge International Examination
and Indonesia National Examination……………………………
38
4.4
Graph of discrepancies by cognitive process dimension………….
41
4.5
Proportion of Cognitive Process Dimension of Cambridge
International Examination and Indonesia National Examination....
42
4.6
Graph of discrepancies by knowledge dimension………………...
44
4.7
The percentage of knowledge dimension in Cambridge
International Examination and Indonesia National Examination
three years…………………………………………...…………….
4.8
Example of question contains Applying/Executing (C3) in
Indonesia National Examination 2011……………………….……
4.9
47
Example of Remembering in Indonesia National Examination and
Cambridge International Examination…………………………….
4.11
47
Example of question contains Applying/Executing (C3) in
Cambridge International Examination 2011………………………
4.10
45
48
Example of Understanding in Indonesia National Examination
and Cambridge International Examination………………………..
48
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
4.12
Example of question which contain Procedural knowledge in
Cambridge International Examination 2013..……………………..
4.13
Example of question which contain Procedural knowledge in
Indonesia National Examination 2012…………………………….
4.14
50
50
Example of question which contain Factual Knowledge in
Indonesia National Examination and Cambridge International
Examination year 2011……………………………………………
51
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
PREFACE………………………..…….……………………………………...
i
DECLARATION……………….….….………………………………………
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…….…….………………………………………..
iii
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………...
v
TABLE OF CONTENT……….…………………………………………......
vi
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………..…..
viii
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………..……
ix
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background………………………………………………………….
1
B. Research Problems…………………………………………………..
4
C. Research Questions……………………………………………….....
4
D. Limitation of Problems……………………………………………...
4
E. Research Objectives…………………………………………………
5
F. Operational Definition………………………………………………
5
G. Significant of Research……………………………………………...
6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Evaluation in Education……………………………………………..
6
B. Porter Alignment Index……………………………………………..
7
C. Cognitive Process Dimension……………………………………….
8
D. Knowledge Dimension……………………………………………...
10
E. Indonesian National Examination…………………………………...
15
F. Cambridge International Examination………………………………
17
G. Related Research……………………………………………..……..
18
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
A. Research Method……………………………………………………
20
B. Research Subject……………………………………………………
21
C. Research Procedure ………………………………………………...
21
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
D. Research Instrument …………………..……………………………
22
E. Technique Collection Data………………………………………….
25
F. Technique Analysis Data……………………………………………
26
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
A. Findings……………………………………………………………..
32
B. Discussion…………………………………………………………...
43
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
A. Conclusion…………………………………………………………..
48
B. Recommendation……………………………………………………
49
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………..
50
APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………
53
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Page
2.1
The Knowledge Dimension………………………………………..
3.1
Percentage of Indonesia National Examination and Cambridge
13
International Examination…..……………………………………..
25
3.2
Technique of Collecting Data..…………………………………….
26
3.3
Categories of Content in Indonesia National Examination………...
28
3.5
Categories of Content in Cambridge International Examination......
29
3.6
Matrix of scope of contents and cognitive process dimension……..
27
3.7
Matrix of scope of contents and knowledge dimension……………
28
3.8
Matrix of scope of contents and cognitive process dimension……..
29
3.9
Matrix of scope of contents and knowledge dimension……………
30
4.1
Porter Alignment Index for Knowledge dimension and cognitive
process dimension of Indonesia National Examination and
Cambridge International Examination….…………..……………
4.2
Discrepancies by content for Indonesia National Examination and
Cambridge International Examination……………………………..
4.3
35
37
Discrepancies by cognitive process dimension for three years
Indonesia National Examination and Cambridge International
Examination………………………………………………………..
4.4
40
Discrepancies by Knowledge dimension of Indonesia National
Examination and Cambridge International Examination…………..
41
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Page
2.1
Example matrix to measure alignment……………..……………..
7
2.2
Position National Examination………………………………...….
16
2.3
Level Curriculum Cambridge and Assessments……......................
18
3.1
Research Procedure...……………………………………………..
24
4.1
Porter alignments for knowledge dimension and cognitive of
national examination and Cambridge international
examination………………………………………………………
4.2
Graph of discrepancies by content areas of Indonesia National
Examination and Cambridge international examination...…...…...
4.3
37
37
Proportion of Content of Cambridge International Examination
and Indonesia National Examination……………………………
38
4.4
Graph of discrepancies by cognitive process dimension………….
41
4.5
Proportion of Cognitive Process Dimension of Cambridge
International Examination and Indonesia National Examination....
42
4.6
Graph of discrepancies by knowledge dimension………………...
44
4.7
The percentage of knowledge dimension in Cambridge
International Examination and Indonesia National Examination
three years…………………………………………...…………….
4.8
Example of question contains Applying/Executing (C3) in
Indonesia National Examination 2011……………………….……
4.9
47
Example of Remembering in Indonesia National Examination and
Cambridge International Examination…………………………….
4.11
47
Example of question contains Applying/Executing (C3) in
Cambridge International Examination 2011………………………
4.10
45
48
Example of Understanding in Indonesia National Examination
and Cambridge International Examination………………………..
48
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
4.12
Example of question which contain Procedural knowledge in
Cambridge International Examination 2013..……………………..
4.13
Example of question which contain Procedural knowledge in
Indonesia National Examination 2012…………………………….
4.14
50
50
Example of question which contain Factual Knowledge in
Indonesia National Examination and Cambridge International
Examination year 2011……………………………………………
51
Ahmad Fikri Dzulfikar, 2015
ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDONESIAN NATIONAL EXAMINATION AND CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL
EXAMINATION IN JUNIOR SECONDARY SCIENCE
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu