Case Processing Summary - Karakteristik Penderita Asma Bronkial Rawat Inap di RSUD Langsa Tahun 2009-2012
TABEL DISTRIBUSI FREKUENSI Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Umurk Penderita Asma 201 100,0% ,0% 201 100,0% Bronkial * Jenis Kelamin
Umurk Penderita Asma Bronkial * Jenis Kelamin Crosstabulation
Jenis Kelamin Total
Laki-laki Perempuan Umurk Penderita 15-22 tahun Count
8
20
28 Asma Bronkial % within Umurk Penderita Asma 28,6% 71,4% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 11,9% 14,9% 13,9% % of Total 4,0% 10,0% 13,9%
23-30 tahun Count
9
28
37 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 24,3% 75,7% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 13,4% 20,9% 18,4% % of Total 4,5% 13,9% 18,4%
31-38 tahun Count
8
36
44 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 18,2% 81,8% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 11,9% 26,9% 21,9% % of Total 4,0% 17,9% 21,9%
39-46 tahun Count
10
15
25 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 40,0% 60,0% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 14,9% 11,2% 12,4%
47-54 tahun Count
12
12
24 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 17,9% 9,0% 11,9% % of Total 6,0% 6,0% 11,9%
55-62 tahun Count
5
12
17 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 29,4% 70,6% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 7,5% 9,0% 8,5% % of Total 2,5% 6,0% 8,5%
63-70 tahun Count
6
7
13 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 46,2% 53,8% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 9,0% 5,2% 6,5% % of Total 3,0% 3,5% 6,5%
71-78 tahun Count
5
4
9 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 55,6% 44,4% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 7,5% 3,0% 4,5% % of Total 2,5% 2,0% 4,5%
79-86 tahun Count
4
4 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 100,0% ,0% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 6,0% ,0% 2,0% % of Total 2,0% ,0% 2,0%
Total Count 67 134 201 % within Umurk Penderita Asma 33,3% 66,7% 100,0% Bronkial % within Jenis Kelamin 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% % of Total 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
Suku
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent Valid Aceh 138 68,7 68,7 68,7
Jawa 55 27,4 27,4 96,0 Batak 4 2,0 2,0 98,0 Padang 3 1,5 1,5 99,5 Lain-lain 1 ,5 ,5 100,0 Total 201 100,0 100,0
Agama
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent Valid Islam 201 100,0 100,0 100,0
Pekerjaan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent Valid Pegawai Negeri 26 12,9 12,9 12,9
(Sipil,Tni,Polri,pensiunan,honorer) Pegawai Swasta 7 3,5 3,5 16,4 Wiraswasta 41 20,4 20,4 36,8 Ibu Rumah Tangga 90 44,8 44,8 81,6 Pelajar/Mahasiswa 23 11,4 11,4 93,0 Tidak Bekerja 14 7,0 7,0 100,0 Total 201 100,0 100,0
Status Perkawinan
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent Valid Kawin 164 81,6 81,6 81,6
Tidak Kawin 37 18,4 18,4 100,0 Total 201 100,0 100,0
Daerah Asal
Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent Valid Kota Langsa 117 58,2 58,2 58,2
Luar Kota Langsa 84 41,8 41,8 100,0 Total 201 100,0 100,0
Explore
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Lama Rawatan Rata-rata 201 100,0% ,0% 201 100,0%
Descriptives
Statistic Std. Error Lama Rawatan Rata-rata Mean 4,50 ,158
95% Confidence Lower Bound 4,19 Interval for Mean
Upper Bound 4,81 5% Trimmed Mean 4,42 Median 4,00 Variance 5,011 Std. Deviation 2,239 Minimum
1 Maximum
10 Range
9 Interquartile Range
3 Skewness ,584 ,172 Kurtosis -,395 ,341
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri (PAPS) 24 11,9 11,9 100,0 Total 201 100,0 100,0
Sumber Biaya
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent Valid Bukan Biaya Sendiri 175 87,1 87,1 87,1
Biaya Sendiri 26 12,9 12,9 100,0 Total 201 100,0 100,0
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Jenis Kelamin * Umur Penderita Asma Bronkial 201 100,0% ,0% 201 100,0%
Percent Valid Pulang Berobat Jalan (PBJ) 177 88,1 88,1 88,1
Crosstabs
Jenis Kelamin * Umur Penderita Asma Bronkial Crosstabulation
29,7% 46,5% 33,3%
67 Expected Count 52,7 14,3 67,0 % within Jenis Kelamin 70,1% 29,9% 100,0% % within Umur Penderita Asma Bronkial
20
47 Perempuan Count 111 23 134 Expected Count 105,3 28,7 134,0 % within Jenis Kelamin 82,8% 17,2% 100,0% % within Umur Penderita 70,3% 53,5% 66,7% Asma Bronkial % of Total 55,3% 11,4% 66,7%
Umur Penderita Asma Bronkial Total <55 >=55
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Count
Total Count 158 43 201 Expected Count 158,0 43,0 201,0 % within Jenis Kelamin 78,6% 21,4% 100,0% % within Umur Penderita 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% Asma Bronkial % of Total 78,6% 21,4% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4,275 1 ,039
b
Continuity Correction 3,554 1 ,059 Likelihood Ratio 4,127 1 ,042 Fisher's Exact Test
,046 ,031 Linear-by-Linear 4,254 1 ,039 Association N of Valid Cases 201 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14,33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Explore Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang
Case Processing Summary
Cases Keadaan Sewaktu
Valid Missing Total Pulang
N Percent N Percent N Percent Pulang Berobat Jalan 177 100,0% ,0% 177 100,0% (PBJ)
Lama Rawatan Pulang Atas
Rata-rata Permintaan Sendiri 24 100,0% ,0% 24 100,0% (PAPS)
Descriptives
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang Statistic Std. Error
Lama Rawatan Pulang Berobat Mean 4,71 ,159
Rata-rata Jalan (PBJ) 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 4,40
Upper Bound 5,03 5% Trimmed Mean 4,64 Median
4,00 Variance 4,502 Std. Deviation 2,122 Minimum
1 Maximum
10 Range
9 Interquartile Range
3 Skewness ,593 ,183 Kurtosis -,431 ,363
Pulang Atas Mean 2,92 ,507
Permintaan 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 1,87
Sendiri (PAPS) Upper Bound 3,97
5% Trimmed Mean 2,64 Median
2,00 Variance 6,167 Std. Deviation 2,483 Minimum
1 Maximum
10 Range
9 Interquartile Range
3 Skewness 1,758 ,472
Tests of Normality
Ranks
a. Grouping Variable: Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang
Mann-Whitney U 1003,500 Wilcoxon W 1303,500 Z -4,240 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,000
Lama Rawatan Rata-rat
Test Statistics a
Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri (PAPS) 24 54,31 1303,50 Total 201
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks Lama Rawatan Rata-rata Pulang Berobat Jalan (PBJ) 177 107,33 18997,50
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang
,269 24 ,000 ,757 24 ,000
,196 177 ,000 ,933 177 ,000 Pulang Atas Permintaan Sendiri (PAPS)
Pulang Berobat Jalan (PBJ)
Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Lama Rawatan Rata- rata
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test
Explore Sumber Biaya
Case Processing Summary
Cases Sumber Biaya Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Lama Rawatan Bukan Biaya Sendiri 175 100,0% ,0% 175 100,0% Rata-rata
Biaya Sendiri 26 100,0% ,0% 26 100,0%
Descriptives
Sumber Biaya
Statistic Std. Error
Lama Bukan Biaya Mean 4,57 ,169
Rawatan Sendiri 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 4,24
Rata-rata Upper Bound 4,90
5% Trimmed Mean 4,50 Median
4,00 Variance
4,970 Std. Deviation 2,229 Minimum
1 Maximum
10 Range
9 Interquartile Range
3 Skewness ,504 ,184
Kurtosis
- ,478 ,365 Biaya Sendiri Mean
4,00 ,447 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 3,08
Upper Bound 4,92 5% Trimmed Mean 3,83 Median
3,00 Variance
5,200 Std. Deviation 2,280 Minimum
1 Maximum
10 Range
9 Interquartile Range
3 Skewness 1,250 ,456
Kurtosis 1,115 ,887 a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk Sumber Biaya Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Lama Bukan Biaya Sendiri ,184 175 ,000 ,942 175 ,000 Rawatan
Biaya Sendiri ,246 26 ,000 ,862 26 ,002 Rata-rata
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
Sumber Biaya N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks Lama Rawatan Rata-rat Bukan Biaya Sendiri 175 103,39 18094,00
Biaya Sendiri 26 84,88 2207,00 Total 201
a Test Statistics
Lama Rawatan Rata-rat
Mann-Whitney U 1856,000 Wilcoxon W 2207,000 Z -1,532 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,126
a. Grouping Variable: Sumber Biaya
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang * 201 100,0% ,0% 201 100,0% Daerah Asal
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang * Daerah Asal Crosstabulation
Daerah Asal Kota Luar Kota
Langsa Langsa Total Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang Berobat Jalan Count 102 75 177 Pulang (PBJ)
% within Keadaan 57,6% 42,4% 100,0% Sewaktu Pulang % within Daerah Asal 87,2% 89,3% 88,1% % of Total 50,7% 37,3% 88,1%
Pulang Atas Count
15
9
24 Permintaan Sendiri % within Keadaan 62,5% 37,5% 100,0%
(PAPS) Sewaktu Pulang % within Daerah Asal 12,8% 10,7% 11,9% % of Total 7,5% 4,5% 11,9%
Total Count 117 84 201 % within Keadaan 58,2% 41,8% 100,0% Sewaktu Pulang % within Daerah Asal 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% % of Total 58,2% 41,8% 100,0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,206 1 ,650
b
Continuity Correction ,055 1 ,815 Likelihood Ratio ,208 1 ,648 Fisher's Exact Test
,826 ,411 Linear-by-Linear Association ,205 1 ,651 N of Valid Cases 201
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,206 1 ,650
b
Continuity Correction ,055 1 ,815 Likelihood Ratio ,208 1 ,648 Fisher's Exact Test
,826 ,411 Linear-by-Linear Association ,205 1 ,651 N of Valid Cases 201 a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,03.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang * Sumber Biaya 201 100,0% ,0% 201 100,0%
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang * Sumber Biaya Crosstabulation
Sumber Biaya Total
Bukan Biaya Biaya Sendiri Sendiri
Keadaan Sewaktu Pulang Berobat Jalan Count 157 20 177 Pulang (PBJ)
% within Keadaan 88,7% 11,3% 100,0% Sewaktu Pulang % within Sumber Biaya 89,7% 76,9% 88,1% % of Total 78,1% 10,0% 88,1%
Pulang Atas Count
18
6
24 Permintaan Sendiri % within Keadaan 75,0% 25,0% 100,0%
(PAPS) Sewaktu Pulang % within Sumber Biaya 10,3% 23,1% 11,9% % of Total 9,0% 3,0% 11,9%
Total Count 175 26 201 % within Keadaan 87,1% 12,9% 100,0% Sewaktu Pulang % within Sumber Biaya 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% % of Total 87,1% 12,9% 100,0%
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3,522 1 ,061
b
Continuity Correction 2,411 1 ,120 Likelihood Ratio 2,974 1 ,085 Fisher's Exact Test
,096 ,067 Linear-by-Linear Association 3,505 1 ,061 N of Valid Cases 201 a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,10.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table