DISKRIMINASI PASAR TENAGA KERJA
Tokoh Pejuang Wanita Indonesia Raden Adjeng Kartini
Pemikiran Raden Adjeng Kartini Adanya keinginan untuk memperbaiki kondisi kaum wanita yang disebabkan kungkungan adat, antara lain :
Dunia wanita hanya sebatas tembok rumah.
Tidak bebas mendapatkan akses pendidikan.
Dipingit dan dinikahkan dengan pria yang tidak dikenal.
Fakta di Indonesia
Penduduk yang Bekerja (Februari 2012) 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000
15,441,120 30,000,000
6,876,405 25,000,000 20,000,000
11,003,698 15,000,000
25,116,020 22,938,665 10,000,000
3,983,193 5,000,000
2,518,306 9,755,566 3,295,852 3,473,057 3,541,749 3,108,946 184,125
20,465 934,988 610,650 l n a n si sa ha an na ny na uk sa ala ni
Ja in pi sio U ju ta od
TU La fe im ta er Pr en m ro
P Ta P P pe
TU TU ga Ke na Te
Pria Wanita
Penduduk yang Bekerja (Februari 2012)
JENIS KELAMIN Jenis Pekerjaan Jumlah Utama
Pria Wanita Tenaga Profesional
3.473.057 3.983.193 7.456.250 Kepemimpinan 934.988 184.125 1.119.113 Tata Usaha
3.541.749 2.518.306 6.060.055 TU Penjualan 9.755.566 11.003.698 20.759.264 TU Jasa 3.108.946 3.295.852 6.404.798 TU Pertanian 25.116.020 15.441.120 40.557.140
Produksi 22.938.665 6.876.405 29.815.070 Lainnya 610.65 20.465 631.115 Jumlah
69.479.641 43.323.164 112.802.805
Rata-rata Upah (2006) 1,600,000 1,200,000 800,000 400,000 a ri a P it An an Ind Lis
Jas Per Ban Keu Pert Pert a W am trik gku dag ustr gun ang ania i n tan an an ban ang an gan Wanita Pria
Rata-rata Upah (2006)
SEKTOR LAPANGAN PEKERJAAN PRIA WANITA
1 Pertanian, Kehutanan, Perburuan, Perikanan (Agriculture,Forestry,Hunting,Fishery) 438.149 234.586
2 Pertambangan, Penggalian (Mining and Quarrying) 1.541.241 771.415
3 Industri Pengolahan (Manufacturing Industries) 826.257 583.768
4 Listrik, gas dan air (Electricity, Gaz and Water) 1.176.160 1.338.737
5 Bangunan (Construction) 734.070 1.073.573
6 Perdagangan Besar, Rumah Makan & Hotel (Wholesale Trade,Restaurant & Hotel) 806.110 621.248
7 Angkutan, Pergudangan dan Komunikasi (Transportation,Storage & Communication) 934.761 944.419
8 Keuangan, Asuransi,Jasa Perusahaan (Financing,Insurance,Business Services) 1.422.252 1.461.926
9 Jasa Kemasyarakatan (Public Services) 1.126.559 789.557 Rata-rata 827.101 612.131
Penduduk yang Bekerja Berdasarkan Jam Kerja (Februari 2012)
40,000,000 35,000,000 8,874,959
30,000,000 10,293,078
25,000,000 24,757,499
20,000,000 17,927,986
15,000,000 7,354,950 4,827,312
6,952,926 10,000,000
8,668,913 8,397,485 5,000,000
5,718,802 2,567,256 1,658,218 794,465
1,590,396 1,379,487 1,039,073
1-9 10-14 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-59 ≥ 60 Pria Wanita
Konsep Diskriminasi
Konsep Diskriminasi
George Borjas :
Differences in EARNINGS and
among equally skilled workers
employed in the same job simply because of the worker’s race,gender, national origin, sexual
orientation, or other seemingly
irrelevant characteristics.Konsep Diskriminasi Discrimination means treating people differently and less favourably because of characteristics that are not related to
their merit or the requirements of the job.
These include race, colour, sex, religion,
political opinion, national extraction and social origin.The
Discrimination
Coefcient
The Discrimination Coefficient Lauched for the first time by Gary S. Becker
The Economics of Discrimination (1957)
The Discrimination Coefficient
Basic Concept :
Taste Discrimination
Assumption Two types of workers :
White workers : wage w
W
Black workers : wage w B
The Discrimination Coefficient
If the employer is prejudiced againts black, employer gets disutility from hiring black workers
Disutility : employer will act as if costs
for black worker w (1 + d), where d isB positive number and is called :
The Discrimination Coefficient
The Discrimination Coefficient
Suppose that w = $10 , and that d =0,5 ;
B
the employer will then act as if hiring a
black worker costs $ 15 The greater the prejudiced, the greater is
the disutility from hiring black workers,
and the greater is the discrimination coefficient d.The Discrimination Coefficient
If these black employers prefer to hire black workers, they will act as if hiring a black worker is cheaper than it actually is
Nepotism Coefficient w (1 – n ) B
Labor Market Discrimination Analysis
FIRM
Non Discriminatory Firm W = VMP
Discriminatory Firm White Firm againts Black
Black Firm againts Black Discrimination Coefficient is very High Discrimination
Coefficient is relatively Low
1. Employer
Discrimination
Skill and Labor Market Outcomes (2001) WHITE BLACK HISPANIC Male Female Male Female Male Female Highschool Graduate or
84.3
85.2
78.5
78.9
56.1
57.9 more (Percent) Bachelor’s degree or more
29.1
25.4
16.4
17.5
11.0
11.2 (Percent)
Labor Force Participation
79.9
59.9
72.1
65.2
83.8
59.3 Rate (Percent) Unemployment Rate
4.7
3.6
8.0
7.0
5.2
6.6 (Percent)
Annual Earnings (in $1,000)
49.8
29.6
33.5
26.0
30.8
22.3 Annual Earnings
55.4
37.1
38.5
30.8
34.3
28.0 (Full Time)
Fact : White Wage > Black Wage
Assumption :
White Workers and Black Workers are Perfect Subtitutes in Production .
Firms’s output depends on the total number of workers hired, regardless of
their race have the same Marginal
Product of Labor ( MP )E
Employer Discrimination
Production function:
q = f ( E + E ) W B q firm’s output
number of white workers hired E W
number of black workers hired
E B
Employment in
a non Discriminatory Firm
Employment in a non Discriminatory Firm
Both groups of workers have the same Value
of Marginal Product, a non discriminatory firms will hire whichever group is Cheaper
Suppose that w > w , a firms that doesn’t
W B discriminate will hire black workers up to the point where
- E
B w = VMP
B E
The Employment Decision of a Firm That Does Not Discriminate B w
- B
E Dollar
Employment Black workers wage is less than white wage
How many worker will be hired..?? ?
VMP E
w
B = VMP
E
Employment in
a
Discriminatory Firm
Employment in a Discriminatory Firm
The employer act as if black wage is not
w , but instead equal to w (1 + d). Where B
B d is discrimination coefficient.
The employer’s hiring decision based on a comparison w and w (1 + d)
W B
Hire only blacks if w (1 + d) < w
B W
Hire only white if w (1 + d) > w
Employment in a Discriminatory Firm
As long as black and white workers are perfect subtitutes, firms have a segregated workforce.
Employer’s who have little prejudice and
hence have small discrimination coefficient, will hire only BLACKS (called “ Black Firm” ). Employer’s who are very prejudice and have
very large discrimination coefficient, will
hire only WHITES (called “ White Firm” ).
Employment in a Discriminatory Firm
The white firm hires workers up to the point where : w = VMP
W E
Assumption : w > W W B
The white firm is paying an excessively
- E
W
high price for its workers and hires
relatively few workers ( )The Employment Decision of a Prejudiced Firm Dollar w
W White Firm
VMP E Employment
- E
W
Employment in a Discriminatory Firm
Non discriminatory firms :
- E
w = VMP B E B
If discrimination coefficient d :
Price of Black Labor w ( 1 + d )
B
Amount of Labor hired :
Employment in a Discriminatory Firm
BLACK FIRM
The number of black workers hired,
therefore, is smaller for firms that have
larger discrimination coefficient.The Employment Decision of a Prejudiced Firm
B w
- B
E 1 B E B E Dollar
Employment
VMP E Black Firm
1 d w
B
1 1 d w
B
Discrimination Coefficient
Discrimination and Profts
Discrimination and Profits Firms that discriminate lose on two counts :
The prejudiced employer could have hired
the same number of black worker at lower
wage . Because black and white workers are perfect subtitutes .1
Discriminatory black firms are hiring too E E B B few workers ( or ) they are giving up profits in order to minimize contact with black workers.
Profit and Discrimination Coefficient Dollar
Black Firm max
w d w
White Firm Max Profit
Discrimination Coefficient
Discrimination and Profits The Most Profitable Firm
Zero Discrimination
Employee Discrimination
Diskriminasi dilakukan oleh “Fellow Worker”
Misal : White worker yang bekerja pada Black Firm dengan upah w akan merasa mendapat upah w (1- d).
W W
Tidak berpengaruh terhadap “Profitability of Firms”
karena white worker dan black worker adalah perfect
subtitutes sehingga firm membayar jumlah upah yang
sama.
3. Customer
Discrimination
Customer Discrimination Dikemukakan oleh Harry J. Holzer dan Keith R.
Ihlanfeldt (1998) research di Atlanta, Boston, Detroit dan Los Angeles.
Keputusan membeli tidak ditentukan oleh Actual Price
( p ) tapi oleh The Utility-Adjusted Price p (1 + d).
Employer dapat mengatur tenaga penjualan sesuai kondisi.
Customer Discrimination
Relation between customer discrimination and percent of newly hired worked who are Black
More than 50 % More than 75 % Of the firm’s Of the firm’s
PERBEDAAN customers are customers are Black White Customer & worker bertemu
58,0 % 9,0 % 49,0 % Customer & worker tidak bertemu
46,6 % 12,2 % 34,4 %
Perbedaan
14,6 %
Customer Discrimination and NBA
Lawrence Kahn and Peter Sherer 1998) : A study of attenance records indicates that replacing a black player with an eqqually talented white player bring in about 9,000 additional fans per year.
At $50 a head (a very conservative estimate of ticket prices and concession revenues), the racial switch would increase annual team revenues by roughly $450,000
Measuring Discrimination
Measuring Discrimination Asumsi : Tenaga kerja terdiri dari
___
- M
Male, dengan average wage
W
___
- F
Female, dengan average wage
W
Diskriminasi : selisih average wage, yaitu :
___ ___ ___W W W
M F
Measuring Discrimination
Pengembangan model :
Schooling mempengaruhi pendapatan
Earning Function : Male :
- w S
M M M M
Female :
- w S
F F F F
menyatakan pendapatan pria meningkat bila M mendapatkan tambahan 1 tahun pendidikan.
Measuring Discrimination
Model Regresi :
F F F M M M F M W s s W W
___ ___ ___
Measuring The Impact of Discrimination on the Wage
Men’s Men’s Earning Earning Dollars
___
Men’s Earning
W M
Women’s Women’s Earning Earning
- Function
F w
M
Measure Discrimination : ___
___
- Woman’s
Women’s Schooling Men’s Schooling
W Earning F w
W F F
F __ __
Schooling
Global Gender Gap 2012
Global Gender Gap 2012 : Indonesia - Rank
97
93
92
90
87
81
68
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Global Gender Gap 2012 : Indonesia - Score
0.67
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.66
0.65
0.65
0.65
0.65
0.64 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Global Gender Gap Index 2012
Global Gender Gap 2012
Global Gender Gap 2012
Global Gender Gap 2012 : Indonesia
Terima kasih…