Pengaruh Konsentrasi PM2,5 dan Karakteristik Pekerja Terhadap Fungsi Paru pada Pekerja di Industri Penggilingan Padi Desa Tanjung Set Kecamatan Sunggal Tahun 2014
UNIVARIAT
Konsentrasi PM 2,5
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid > 2,5 mg/m 19 63.3 63.3 63.3
< 2,5 mg/m 11 36.7 36.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Umur Responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 31-40 19 63.3 63.3 63.3
20-30 11 36.7 36.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Jenis Kelamin Responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid laki-Laki 28 93.3 93.3 93.3
Perempuan 2 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Status Gizi Responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Normal 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
Normal 29 96.7 96.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Riwayat Peny Paru
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Pernah sakit 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
Tidak Pernah 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
(2)
Kebiasaan merokok
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Merokok 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
Tidak Merokok 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Kebiasaan olah raga
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Berolah Raga 12 40.0 40.0 40.0
Berolah Raga 18 60.0 60.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Masa Kerja Responden
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid > 5 Tahun 14 46.7 46.7 46.7
< 5 Tahun 16 53.3 53.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Pemakaian Alat Masker
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Pakai 18 60.0 60.0 60.0
Pakai 12 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid restruktif 18 60.0 60.0 60.0
Normal 12 40.0 40.0 100.0
(3)
BIVARIAT
Konsentrasi PM 2,5 * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Total restruktif Normal
Konsentrasi PM 2,5 > 2,5 mg/m Count 16 3 19
% within Konsentrasi PM
2,5 84.2% 15.8% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 88.9% 25.0% 63.3%
% of Total 53.3% 10.0% 63.3%
< 2,5 mg/m Count 2 9 11
% within Konsentrasi PM
2,5 18.2% 81.8% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 11.1% 75.0% 36.7%
% of Total 6.7% 30.0% 36.7%
Total Count 18 12 30
% within Konsentrasi PM
2,5 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12.656a 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 10.054 1 .002
Likelihood Ratio 13.375 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 12.234 1 .000
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
(4)
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Konsentrasi PM
2,5 (> 2,5 mg/m / < 2,5 mg/m) 24.000 3.358 171.539 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = restruktif 4.632 1.302 16.470 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = Normal .193 .066 .566
N of Valid Cases 30
Jenis Kelamin Responden * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Total restruktif Normal
Jenis Kelamin Responden
laki-Laki Count 18 10 28
% within Jenis
Kelamin Responden 64.3% 35.7% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
100.0% 83.3% 93.3%
% of Total 60.0% 33.3% 93.3%
Perempuan Count 0 2 2
% within Jenis
Kelamin Responden .0% 100.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
.0% 16.7% 6.7%
% of Total .0% 6.7% 6.7%
Total Count 18 12 30
% within Jenis
Kelamin Responden 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
(5)
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.214a 1 .073
Continuity Correctionb 1.094 1 .296
Likelihood Ratio 3.882 1 .049
Fisher's Exact Test .152 .152
Linear-by-Linear
Association 3.107 1 .078
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = Normal .357 .217 .587
N of Valid Cases 30
Umur Responden * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Total restruktif Normal
Umur Responden 31-40 Count 12 7 19
% within Umur Responden 63.2% 36.8% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 66.7% 58.3% 63.3%
% of Total 40.0% 23.3% 63.3%
20-30 Count 6 5 11
% within Umur Responden 54.5% 45.5% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 33.3% 41.7% 36.7%
% of Total 20.0% 16.7% 36.7%
Total Count 18 12 30
% within Umur Responden 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
(6)
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .215a 1 .643
Continuity Correctionb .006 1 .938
Likelihood Ratio .214 1 .643
Fisher's Exact Test .712 .466
Linear-by-Linear Association .208 1 .648
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Umur
Responden (31-40 / 20-30) 1.429 .316 6.461 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = restruktif 1.158 .611 2.195 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = Normal .811 .338 1.944
N of Valid Cases 30
Status Gizi Responden * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Total restruktif Normal
Status Gizi Responden
Tidak Normal Count 0 1 1
% within Status Gizi
Responden .0% 100.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi .0% 8.3% 3.3%
% of Total .0% 3.3% 3.3%
Normal Count 18 11 29
% within Status Gizi
Responden 62.1% 37.9% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 91.7% 96.7%
% of Total 60.0% 36.7% 96.7%
Total Count 18 12 30
% within Status Gizi
(7)
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.552a 1 .213
Continuity Correctionb .043 1 .836
Likelihood Ratio 1.885 1 .170
Fisher's Exact Test .400 .400
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.500 1 .221
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = Normal 2.636 1.655 4.200
N of Valid Cases 30
Riwayat Peny Paru * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Total restruktif Normal
Riwayat Peny Paru Pernah sakit Count 12 1 13
% within Riwayat Peny Paru 92.3% 7.7% 100.0% % within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 66.7% 8.3% 43.3%
% of Total 40.0% 3.3% 43.3%
Tidak Pernah Count 6 11 17
% within Riwayat Peny Paru 35.3% 64.7% 100.0% % within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 33.3% 91.7% 56.7%
% of Total 20.0% 36.7% 56.7%
Total Count 18 12 30
(8)
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.977a 1 .002
Continuity Correctionb 7.743 1 .005
Likelihood Ratio 11.255 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .002 .002
Linear-by-Linear Association 9.645 1 .002
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Riwayat Peny
Paru (Pernah sakit / Tidak Pernah)
22.000 2.274 212.860 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = restruktif 2.615 1.348 5.073 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = Normal .119 .018 .807
N of Valid Cases 30
Kebiasaan merokok * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Total
restruktif Normal
Kebiasaan merokok
Merokok Count 11 2 13
% within Kebiasaan merokok 84.6% 15.4% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 61.1% 16.7% 43.3%
% of Total 36.7% 6.7% 43.3%
Tidak Merokok Count 7 10 17
% within Kebiasaan merokok 41.2% 58.8% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 38.9% 83.3% 56.7%
% of Total 23.3% 33.3% 56.7%
(9)
% within Kebiasaan merokok 60.0% 40.0% 100.0% % within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.792a 1 .016
Continuity Correctionb 4.123 1 .042
Likelihood Ratio 6.183 1 .013
Fisher's Exact Test .026 .019
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.599 1 .018
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kebiasaan merokok
(Merokok / Tidak Merokok) 7.857 1.312 47.044
For cohort Fungsi paru pada pekerja
kilang padi = restruktif 2.055 1.113 3.796
For cohort Fungsi paru pada pekerja
kilang padi = Normal .262 .069 .994
N of Valid Cases 30
Kebiasaan olah raga * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Total restruktif Normal
Kebiasaan olah raga Tidak Berolah Raga Count 7 5 12
% within Kebiasaan olah
raga 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 38.9% 41.7% 40.0%
% of Total 23.3% 16.7% 40.0%
Berolah Raga Count 11 7 18
% within Kebiasaan olah
raga 61.1% 38.9% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 61.1% 58.3% 60.0%
(10)
Total Count 18 12 30 % within Kebiasaan olah
raga 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .023a 1 .879
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .023 1 .879
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .588
Linear-by-Linear Association .022 1 .881
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kebiasaan olah raga (Tidak Berolah Raga / Berolah Raga)
.891 .201 3.946
For cohort Fungsi paru pada pekerja
kilang padi = restruktif .955 .522 1.746
For cohort Fungsi paru pada pekerja
kilang padi = Normal 1.071 .442 2.597
N of Valid Cases 30
Masa Kerja Responden * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
Total
restruktif Normal
Masa Kerja Responden > 5 Tahun Count 13 1 14
% within Masa Kerja
Responden 92.9% 7.1% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 72.2% 8.3% 46.7%
% of Total 43.3% 3.3% 46.7%
< 5 Tahun Count 5 11 16
% within Masa Kerja
Responden 31.2% 68.8% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 27.8% 91.7% 53.3%
(11)
Total Count 18 12 30 % within Masa Kerja
Responden 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.808a 1 .001
Continuity Correctionb 9.381 1 .002
Likelihood Ratio 13.301 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.414 1 .001
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.60. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Masa Kerja
Responden (> 5 Tahun / < 5 Tahun) 28.600 2.890 283.063 For cohort Fungsi paru pada pekerja
kilang padi = restruktif 2.971 1.416 6.235
For cohort Fungsi paru pada pekerja
kilang padi = Normal .104 .015 .707
N of Valid Cases 30
Pemakaian Alat Masker * Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Crosstab
Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi Total
restruktif Normal
Pemakaian Alat Masker Tidak Pakai Count 15 3 18
% within Pemakaian Alat
Masker 83.3% 16.7% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 83.3% 25.0% 60.0%
% of Total 50.0% 10.0% 60.0%
Pakai Count 3 9 12
% within Pemakaian Alat
Masker 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 16.7% 75.0% 40.0%
(12)
Total Count 18 12 30 % within Pemakaian Alat
Masker 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
% within Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.208a 1 .001
Continuity Correctionb 7.922 1 .005
Likelihood Ratio 10.664 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .002 .002
Linear-by-Linear Association 9.868 1 .002
N of Valid Casesb 30
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Pemakaian Alat
Masker (Tidak Pakai / Pakai) 15.000 2.477 90.843 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = restruktif 3.333 1.224 9.075 For cohort Fungsi paru pada
pekerja kilang padi = Normal .222 .075 .657
N of Valid Cases 30
MULTIVARIAT
Logistic RegressionCase Processing Summary
Unweighted Casesa N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 30 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 30 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.
(13)
Original
Value Internal Value
restruktif 0
Normal 1
Block 0: Beginning Block
Classification Tablea,b
Observed
Predicted Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang
padi
Percentage Correct restruktif Normal
Step 0 Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
restruktif 18 0 100.0
Normal 12 0 .0
Overall Percentage 60.0
a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 0 Constant -.405 .373 1.184 1 .277 .667
Variables not in the Equation
Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables KonsentrasiK 12.656 1 .000
JK 3.214 1 .073
StatusGiziK 1.552 1 .213
RPP 9.977 1 .002
Merokok 5.792 1 .016
MasaKerjaK 11.808 1 .001
PemakaianMasker 10.208 1 .001
Overall Statistics 20.539 7 .005
(14)
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 28.816 7 .000
Block 28.816 7 .000
Model 28.816 7 .000
Step 2a Step .000 1 1.000
Block 28.816 6 .000
Model 28.816 6 .000
Step 3a Step -.573 1 .449
Block 28.244 5 .000
Model 28.244 5 .000
Step 4a Step -.510 1 .475
Block 27.734 4 .000
Model 27.734 4 .000
Step 5a Step -1.783 1 .182
Block 25.951 3 .000
Model 25.951 3 .000
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.
Model Summary Step -2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R Square
Nagelkerke R Square
1 11.564a .617 .835
2 11.564a .617 .835
3 12.137a .610 .825
4 12.647a .603 .816
5 14.429b .579 .783
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.
b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
(15)
Classification Tablea
Observed
Predicted Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang
padi
Percentage Correct restruktif Normal
Step 1 Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
restruktif 17 1 94.4
Normal 1 11 91.7
Overall Percentage 93.3
Step 2 Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
restruktif 17 1 94.4
Normal 1 11 91.7
Overall Percentage 93.3
Step 3 Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
restruktif 16 2 88.9
Normal 1 11 91.7
Overall Percentage 90.0
Step 4 Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
restruktif 16 2 88.9
Normal 1 11 91.7
Overall Percentage 90.0
Step 5 Fungsi paru pada pekerja kilang padi
restruktif 16 2 88.9
Normal 1 11 91.7
Overall Percentage 90.0
(16)
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
Step 1a KonsentrasiK 18.133 7.073E3 .000 1 .998 7.504E7
JK 35.588 2.646E4 .000 1 .999 2.857E15
StatusGiziK -2.376 4.081E4 .000 1 1.000 .093
RPP 1.362 1.810 .566 1 .452 3.904
Merokok -16.771 7.073E3 .000 1 .998 .000
MasaKerjaK 34.152 1.091E4 .000 1 .998 6.792E14
PemakaianMasker 17.621 7.073E3 .000 1 .998 4.495E7
Constant -121.003 9.468E4 .000 1 .999 .000
Step 2a KonsentrasiK 18.393 6.973E3 .000 1 .998 9.724E7
JK 35.575 2.644E4 .000 1 .999 2.819E15
RPP 1.362 1.810 .566 1 .452 3.904
Merokok -17.031 6.973E3 .000 1 .998 .000
MasaKerjaK 34.398 1.080E4 .000 1 .997 8.691E14
PemakaianMasker 17.880 6.973E3 .000 1 .998 5.825E7
Constant -126.495 4.101E4 .000 1 .998 .000
Step 3a KonsentrasiK 18.390 6.964E3 .000 1 .998 9.698E7
JK 36.523 2.621E4 .000 1 .999 7.272E15
Merokok -16.598 6.964E3 .000 1 .998 .000
MasaKerjaK 35.367 1.092E4 .000 1 .997 2.290E15
PemakaianMasker 18.390 6.964E3 .000 1 .998 9.698E7
Constant -128.537 4.111E4 .000 1 .998 .000
Step 4a KonsentrasiK 2.326 1.499 2.408 1 .121 10.238
JK 37.707 2.678E4 .000 1 .999 2.376E16
MasaKerjaK 20.764 9.945E3 .000 1 .998 1.042E9
PemakaianMasker 2.326 1.499 2.408 1 .121 10.238
Constant -85.239 3.884E4 .000 1 .998 .000
Step 5a KonsentrasiK 3.087 1.478 4.360 1 .037 21.903
MasaKerjaK 3.429 1.733 3.916 1 .048 30.846
PemakaianMasker 2.949 1.499 3.869 1 .049 19.079
Constant -14.761 5.524 7.141 1 .008 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: KonsentrasiK, JK, StatusGiziK, RPP, Merokok, MasaKerjaK, PemakaianMasker.
(17)
Model if Term Removed Variable
Model Log Likelihood
Change in -2 Log
Likelihood df Sig. of the Change
Step 1 KonsentrasiK -6.939 2.314 1 .128
JK -6.157 .750 1 .386
StatusGiziK -5.782 .000 1 1.000
RPP -6.068 .573 1 .449
Merokok -6.067 .571 1 .450
MasaKerjaK -8.706 5.848 1 .016
PemakaianMasker -6.416 1.267 1 .260
Step 2 KonsentrasiK -7.069 2.573 1 .109
JK -6.157 .750 1 .386
RPP -6.068 .573 1 .449
Merokok -6.113 .662 1 .416
MasaKerjaK -8.729 5.894 1 .015
PemakaianMasker -6.502 1.440 1 .230
Step 3 KonsentrasiK -7.468 2.800 1 .094
JK -6.656 1.176 1 .278
Merokok -6.323 .510 1 .475
MasaKerjaK -10.099 8.061 1 .005
PemakaianMasker -7.468 2.800 1 .094
Step 4 KonsentrasiK -7.795 2.942 1 .086
JK -7.215 1.783 1 .182
MasaKerjaK -10.099 7.551 1 .006
PemakaianMasker -7.795 2.942 1 .086
Step 5 KonsentrasiK -10.154 5.878 1 .015
MasaKerjaK -10.195 5.960 1 .015
(18)
Variables not in the Equatione
Score df Sig.
Step 2a Variables StatusGiziK .000 1 1.000
Step 3b Variables StatusGiziK .000 1 1.000
RPP .601 1 .438
Overall Statistics .601 2 .740
Step 4c Variables StatusGiziK .041 1 .840
RPP .433 1 .511
Merokok .281 1 .596
Overall Statistics .928 3 .819
Step 5d Variables JK 1.142 1 .285
StatusGiziK .016 1 .899
RPP .556 1 .456
Merokok .719 1 .397
Overall Statistics 2.205 4 .698
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: StatusGiziK. b. Variable(s) removed on step 3: RPP. c. Variable(s) removed on step 4: Merokok. d. Variable(s) removed on step 5: JK.
(19)
(20)
Gambar 2 Pengukuran Kadar Debu PM 2,5
Saat Proses Penggilingan Berlangsung
(21)
(22)
(1)
Model if Term Removed
Variable
Model Log Likelihood
Change in -2 Log
Likelihood df Sig. of the Change
Step 1 KonsentrasiK -6.939 2.314 1 .128
JK -6.157 .750 1 .386
StatusGiziK -5.782 .000 1 1.000
RPP -6.068 .573 1 .449
Merokok -6.067 .571 1 .450
MasaKerjaK -8.706 5.848 1 .016
PemakaianMasker -6.416 1.267 1 .260
Step 2 KonsentrasiK -7.069 2.573 1 .109
JK -6.157 .750 1 .386
RPP -6.068 .573 1 .449
Merokok -6.113 .662 1 .416
MasaKerjaK -8.729 5.894 1 .015
PemakaianMasker -6.502 1.440 1 .230
Step 3 KonsentrasiK -7.468 2.800 1 .094
JK -6.656 1.176 1 .278
Merokok -6.323 .510 1 .475
MasaKerjaK -10.099 8.061 1 .005
PemakaianMasker -7.468 2.800 1 .094
Step 4 KonsentrasiK -7.795 2.942 1 .086
JK -7.215 1.783 1 .182
MasaKerjaK -10.099 7.551 1 .006
PemakaianMasker -7.795 2.942 1 .086
Step 5 KonsentrasiK -10.154 5.878 1 .015
MasaKerjaK -10.195 5.960 1 .015
(2)
Variables not in the Equatione
Score df Sig. Step 2a Variables StatusGiziK .000 1 1.000 Step 3b Variables StatusGiziK .000 1 1.000
RPP .601 1 .438
Overall Statistics .601 2 .740
Step 4c Variables StatusGiziK .041 1 .840
RPP .433 1 .511
Merokok .281 1 .596
Overall Statistics .928 3 .819
Step 5d Variables JK 1.142 1 .285
StatusGiziK .016 1 .899
RPP .556 1 .456
Merokok .719 1 .397
Overall Statistics 2.205 4 .698
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: StatusGiziK. b. Variable(s) removed on step 3: RPP. c. Variable(s) removed on step 4: Merokok. d. Variable(s) removed on step 5: JK.
(3)
(4)
Gambar 2 Pengukuran Kadar Debu PM 2,5
Saat Proses Penggilingan Berlangsung
(5)
(6)