Index of /enm/images/dokumen

THE HARD FACTS
• The Indonesian Music Industry began in 1955 with the birth of
LOKANANTA in Solo
• The first product came into market in 1958 through RRI
• The industry established trade association, ASIRI in 1977
• The industry reached its peak in late 1980’s, with sales exceeding
12,000,000 units per month
• The promise of an industry encased with glamour, fame and fortune,
has created a continuous growth of outstanding talents
• The Indonesian Music Industry became legitimate in 1988 by bilateral
agreement with US and European Community

THE GROWING PAINS
• The consistent decline of sales starting 1996 mainly due to the piracy
• The protection of IPR is not rooted in the Indonesian culture
• In Indonesia the violation of IPR is still considered a minor crime
• The birth of new media has significantly knocked out the music
industry

LEGITIMATE vs PIRATED


• 1996 – 2006, sale of LEGAL products in units decreased by almost 70%

• 1996 – 2006, sale of PIRATED products in units increased by 1,572%

COMPARISON OF DIST RIBUT ION - LEGIT IMAT E vs PIRAT ED
(UNIT S)

600,000,000
500,000,000

300,000,000
200,000,000
100,000,000

08
*
20

07
*

20

- O 06
kt
20
0

Ja
n

20

05
20

04
20

03
20


02
20

01
20

00
20

99
19

98
19

97
19

96


7

-

19

UNIT

400,000,000

YEAR

PRODUK LEGAL

PRODUK BAJAKAN

LEGITIMATE SALES (by product type)

1996:

2006:

Tapes
98.99%
71.04%

CD
0.95%
18%

VCD
0.05%
10.95%

CD
0.16%
0.48%

VCD
n/a

94.49%

PIRATED SALES (by product type)

1996:
2006:

Tapes
99.84%
5.03%

DISTRIBUTION OF LEGITIM ATE PRODUCTS
(UNITS PER PRODUCT TYPE)

80,000,000

UNIT

60,000,000


40,000,000

20,000,000

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003


YEAR

2004

2005

2006

Jan - 2007* 2008*
Okt
KASET
2007
CD

VCD

DIST RIBUT ION OF PIRAT ED PRODUCT S
(IN UNIT S PER PRODUCT T YPE)

600,000,000


500,000,000

UNIT

400,000,000

300,000,000

200,000,000

100,000,000

1996

1997

1998

1999


2000

2001

2002

2003

YEAR

2004

2005

2006

Jan - 2007* 2008*
Okt
2007


VCD

CD

KASET

DVD

LOSS TO NATIONAL INCOME DUE TO PIRACY

Tapes

CD

1996:

99.68%

0.32%

2006:

2.09%

0.64%

VCD

Rp.

n/a

14.4 bio

97.27%

974 bio

YEAR

20
07
*
20
08
*

1,400,000,000,000
1,300,000,000,000
1,200,000,000,000
1,100,000,000,000
1,000,000,000,000
900,000,000,000
800,000,000,000
700,000,000,000
600,000,000,000
500,000,000,000
400,000,000,000
300,000,000,000
200,000,000,000
100,000,000,000
-

19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
Ja 2
n 00
-O 6
kt
20
07

RUPIA

ESTIMATE LOSS TO NATIONAL INCOME DUE TO PIRATED PRODUCTS

LOSS TO MUSIC INDUSTRY INCOME DUE TO PIRACY

Tapes

CD

1996:

99.44%

0.56%

2006:

3.27%

1.04%

VCD

Rp.

n/a

231 bio

95.69%

13.3 tri

ESTIMATE LOSS TO INDUSTRY DUE TO PIRATED PRODUCTS

20,000,000,000,000
18,000,000,000,000
16,000,000,000,000

12,000,000,000,000
10,000,000,000,000
8,000,000,000,000
6,000,000,000,000
4,000,000,000,000
2,000,000,000,000

YEAR

2008*

2007*

Jan - Okt 2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

-

1996

RUPIA

14,000,000,000,000

COMPARISON OF LEGITIMATE LOCAL vs INTERNATIONAL
PRODUCTS SALES (in units)

Local

International

Total Units

1996:

84.69%

15.31%

77.552.008

2006:

82.56%

17.44%

23.736.355

COMPARISON OF LEGITIMATE LOCAL & INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTS

100%
90%

85%

80%

83%
75%
69%

70%

70%

73%
68%

66%

72%

86%

73%

64%

PERSE

60%
50%
40%
31%
30%
20%

36%

34%
30%

25%

32%

27%

28%

27%
17%

15%

14%

10%
0%
1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

YEAR

2003

2004

2005

LOKAL

2006

Jan Okt
2007

INTERNASIONAL

LAWS AND REGULATIONS
• Copyright

Regulation No. 19, 2002, compatible with Bern
Convention (rewritten copyright regulation will enter into
force in 2008)

• Optical Disc regulation
• Statement from the Council of Indonesian Moslem Ulamas
(MUI) in 2003 declaring pirated products as “haram”

PREVENTIVE ACTIONS
• Permanent teacher at the Center of Criminal Research at the National
Police Headquarters as of 2002
• Regular seminars on Intellectual Property Rights, conducted internally
and even with other bodies
• Public Service Ad regarding Anti-Piracy on radio and television
• Public campaign and rallies, including artists, on anti-piracy in 2003
• Introduction and socializing of the anti-piracy logo on all recorded
products

REPRESIVE ACTIONS

• Consistent anti-piracy raids in cooperation with the National Police
• Destruction of products collected at the above raids

DRAWBACKS

• No concrete follow up from the appropriate law enforcement agencies,
resulting in only 20% of the cases being brought to court
• No common perception amongst law enforcement agencies (police,
attorneys and judges) on the conclusion of cases

CONCLUSION
The need for political WILL and ACTION from the
government to combat Piracy