Annisa Rizqi G2A009172 Bab8
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. United Nations Population Division. World population prospects: The
2002 Revision. New York: United Nations; 2003.
2. Departemen Kesehatan R.I. Mengenai masalah mental lanjut usia. [cited
2012 Oktober 2]; Available from: http://www.depkes.go.id/index.php.
3. BAPPENAS. Proyeksi Penduduk Indonesia (Indonesia Population
Projection) 2005 - 2025. Jakarta: BAPPENAS; 2008.
4. Sensus Penduduk 2010 Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; c2009 [updated
2011
November
11;
cited
2012
Oktober
2];
Available
from:
http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=336&wid=0. .
5. KP3A. Penduduk Lanjut Usia. 2009 [cited 2012 Desember 02]; Available
from:
http://www.menegpp.go.id/aplikasidata/index.php?option=com_docman&
Itemid=114.
6. Dewi IK. Musik tradisional Bali dan musik klasik barat meningkatkan
sekresi saliva penderita xerostomia: Universitas Udayana; 2011.
7. Hasibuan S. Keluhan Mulut Kering Ditinjau dari Faktor Penyebab,
Manifestasi dan Penanggulangannya. 2002 [cited 2012 September 19];
Available from: http://library.usu.ac.id/.
8. Turner MD, Ship JA. Dry Mouth and Its Effects on the Oral Health of
Elderly People. The Journal of The American Dental Association.
2007;138:15s-6s.
9. Anggarini VR. Hubungan Penggunaan Obat Antidepresan Terhadap
Terjadinya Xerostomia pada Pasien Poli Psikiatri RSUD Dr. Ahmad
Mochtar Bukittinggi. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2010.
40
41
10. Lukisari C, Kusharjanti. Xerostomia salah satu manifestasi oral diabetik.
2011 [cited 2012 September 17]; Available from: www.scribd.com.
11. Humprey SP, Williamson RT. A Review of Saliva Normal Composition,
Flow and Function. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(2):162-9.
12. Eugene NM, Robert LF. Salivary gland disorders. New York: Springer
Berlin Heidenberg; 2007.
13. Makkinen KK. History safety and dental properties of xylitol. 2010 [cited
2013 Januari 2013]; Available from: http://www.xylitolorg.com.
14. Yuliarsi Y, Lestari S. Efek Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol dan
Sorbitol Terhadap Plak Gigi dan Ginggivitis: JITEKGI FKGUPDM 2003.
15. Martín-Piedra M, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Herrera D, Gómez-Moreno G.
Effectiveness of a recent topical sialogogue in the management of
druginduced xerostomia. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3(4):e268-73.
16. Farsi NM. Signs of oral dryness in relation to salivary flow rate, pH,
buffering capacity and dry mouth complaints. BMC oral health. 2007;7:15.
17. Walsh LJ. Lifestyle Impacts on Oral Health. Queensland (Australia):
Knowledge Books and Software; 2005.
18. Pratama S. Pengaruh Pemberian Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol
terhadap Laju Aliran Saliva pada Anak Usia 10-12 Tahun di Pesantren AlHamidiyah Depok Tahun 2008. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2008.
19. Despopoulos A, Sibernagl S. Atlas Berwarna dan Teks Fisiologi. Jakarta:
Hipokrates; 2000.
20. Sherwood L. Fisiologi Manusia dari Sel ke Sistem. 2 ed. Jakarta: EGC;
2001.
42
21. McIntyre JM. Dental Caries-The Major Cause of Tooth Damage. 2 ed.
Queensland (Australia): Knowledge Books and Software; 2005.
22. Alam MB, Hossain MS, Chodhury NS, Mazumder MEH, Haque ME,
Islam A. In vitro and in vivo Antioxidant and Toxicity Evaluation of
Different Fractions of Oxalis corniculata Linn. Journal of Pharmacology
and Toxicology 6. 2011:337-48.
23. Gupta A, J.B E, H S. Hyposalivation in Elderly Patients. Journal of The
Canadian Dental Association. 2006;72(9):841-6.
24. Sultana N, Sham ME. Xerostomia: An overview. International Journal of
Dental Clinics. 2011;3(2):58-61.
25. Wrigley. Diagnosis of Dry Mouth: Symptoms, Signs, Causes. 2012 [cited
2013
Januari
22];
Available
from:
http://www.drymouth.info/practitioner/about.asp.
26. Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Xerostomia: prevalence, diagnosis, and
management. Compend Contin Educ Dent. [Review]. 2009 JulAug;30(6):326-8, 31-2; quiz 33-4.
27. Rad M, Kakoie S, Brojeni FN, Pourdamghan N. Effect of Long-term
Smoking on Whole-mouth Salivary Flow Rate and Oral Health. Journal of
Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2010;4(4):110-4.
28. Navazesh M, Kumar SKS. Measuring salivary flow : Challenges and
opportunities. The Journal of The American Dental Association.
2008;139:35S-40S.
29. Susan Z. Determining and Managing Salivary Gland Function in Cancer
Patients: A Fact Sheet for Dental Professionals. Oral Health Care for
Cancer Patients [serial on the Internet]. 2010.
43
30. Pierini C. Xylitol: A sweet Alternative. Vitamin Research Product; 2012
[cited
2013
Februari
09];
Available
from:
http://www.vrp.com/xylitol/xylitol-a-sweet-alternative-unique-sweetenersupports-oral-health.
31. Shellman S. Xylitol: Our Sweet Salvation? : The SPECTRUM; 2003
[cited
2013
Januari
19];
Available
from:
http://www.laleva.cc/food/xylitol.html.
32. Dry
Mouth
(xerostomia).
2009;
Available
from:
http://www.orahealth.com/pages/dry-mouth-xerostomia.
33. Hasegawa H, Uozumi T, Ono K. Physiological Evaluation of Music Effect
for The Mental Workload. 2004 [cited 2012 November 29]; Available
from: http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/.
34. Borgnakke WS, Taylor GW, Anderson PF, Shannon MC. Dry Mouth
(Xerostomia): Diagnosis, Causes, Complications and Treatment. 2011.
35. Dewi PF. Pengaruh Konsumsi Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol
Terhadap Pembentukan Plak Gigi. Semarang (Indonesia): Universitas
Diponegoro; 2008.
36. Sarwono J. Statistik Itu Mudah: Panduan Lengkap untuk Belajar
Komputasi Statistik Menggunakan SPSS 16. Yogyakarta: Penerbit
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta; 2009.
37. Nogourani MK, Isfahan RK, Beheshti MH. The effect of chewing gum’s
flavor on salivary flow rate and pH. Dental Reearch Journal.
2011;8(5):S71.
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearence
Lampiran 2. Ijin penelitian
Lampiran 3. Informed consent
Lampiran 4. Hasil analisis
1.
Karakteristik subjek penelitian berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan usia
jenis kelamin
Frequency
Valid
Laki-laki
Percent
3
perempuan
14
Total
17
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
17,6
17,6
17,6
82,4
82,4
100,0
100,0
100,0
usia
Frequency
Valid
2.
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
60-74
10
29,4
29,4
75-90
29,4
22
64,7
64,7
94,1
>90
2
5,9
5,9
100,0
Total
34
100,0
100,0
Karakteristik subjek penelitian pada kelompok kontrol
Descriptive Statistics
17
17
Minimum
24
22
Maximum
35
34
Mean
28,41
27,24
Std.
Deviation
3,641
3,580
17
17
,10
,10
,60
,55
,3176
,3412
,16099
,12404
17
17
0
0
0
0
,00
,00
,000
,000
17
17
-5
0
4
0
-1,18
,00
2,531
,000
17
-,30
,30
,0235
,19615
N
Pre skor XI
Post skor XI
Pre laju aliran saliva
Post laju aliran saliva
Pre skor VAS
Post skor VAS
Selisih skor XI
Selisih skor VAS
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Valid N (listwise)
17
3.
Karakteristik subjek penelitian pada kelompok perlakuan
Descriptive Statistics
N
Maximum
43
Mean
32,59
Std.
Deviation
3,392
Pre skor XI
17
Post skor XI
17
23
39
26,88
3,806
Pre laju aliran saliva
17
17
17
,10
,15
0
,30
,50
80
,1706
,3088
8,24
,06628
,10787
23,515
17
17
17
0
-8
-80
50
-4
0
2,94
-5,71
-5,29
12,127
1,160
19,403
17
,05
,25
,1382
,06502
Post laju aliran saliva
Pre skor VAS
Post skor VAS
Selisih skor XI
Selisih skor VAS
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Valid N (listwise)
4.
Minimum
28
17
Uji normalitas data kelompok kontrol
Tests of Normalityb,c,d
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Pre XI
Post XI
Statistic
,142
,121
Df
17
17
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
,200*
,200*
Statistic
,913
,957
,101
Pre laju aliran
,191
17
saliva
Post laju aliran
,212
17
saliva
Selisih skor XI
,117
17
Selisih laju alian
,181
17
saliva
*. This is lower bound of the true significance.
17
17
Sig.
,112
,573
,931
17
,230
,041
,939
17
,304
,200*
,961
17
,647
,141
,917
17
,130
a. Liliefors Significance Correction
b. pre skor VAS is constant. It has been omitted.
c. pre skor VAS is constant. It has been omitted.
d. selisih skor VAS is constant. It has been omitted.
Df
5.
Uji normalitas data kelompok perlakuan
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
,216
,311
Pre XI
Df
Post XI
Pre laju aliran
,210
saliva
Post laju aliran
,238
saliva
Pre skor VAS
,519
Post skor VAS
,537
Selisih skor XI
,188
Selisih skor VAS
,490
Selisih laju alian
,192
saliva
a. Liliefors Significance Correction
6.
Shapiro-Wilk
17
17
Sig.
,033
,000
Statistic
,814
,739
17
,044
17
Df
17
17
Sig.
,003
,000
,869
17
,021
,011
,909
17
,095
17
17
,000
,000
,399
,262
17
17
,000
,000
17
17
,111
,000
,925
,307
17
17
,183
,000
17
,095
,917
17
,129
Uji beda antara kelompok kontrol dan perlakuan
a. Independent t-test
Independent Samples Test
Levene’s
Test for
Equality of
Variances
Selisih
skor
XI
Selisih
laju
aliran
saliva
Equal
variances
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
Equal
variances
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
t-test for Equality of Means
Sig. (2tailed)
Mean
Difference
Lower
Upper
F
Sig.
t
9,632
,004
6,708
32
,000
4,529
,675
3,154
5,905
6,708
22,439
,000
4,529
,675
3,131
5,928
-2,289
32
,029
-,11471
,05012
-,21679
-,01262
-2,289
19,475
,033
-,11471
,05012
-,21943
-,00998
18,093
,000
Df
95% Confidence
Interval of The
Difference
Std.
Error
Differen
ce
b. Uji Mann Whitney
Test Statistics
b
Selisih skor
VAS
Mann-Whitney U
127,500
Wilcoxon W
280,500
Z
-1,435
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,151
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed
a
,563
Sig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties
b. Grouping Variable: kelompok
7.
Uji normalitas data skor XI, skor VAS, dan laju aliran saliva kelompok
kontrol dan perlakuan
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
,191
34
Sig.
,003
Statistic
,930
34
,000
,517
34
Lilliefors Significance Correction
,000
Selisih skor XI
Selisih laju alian
saliva
Selisih skor VAS
a.
8.
Df
Shapiro-Wilk
,225
Df
34
Sig.
,032
,871
34
,001
,195
34
,000
Hubungan penurunan keluhan xerostomia dan laju aliran saliva
Uji korelasi Spearman
Correlations
selisih laju
aliran saliva
Spearman’s rho
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Selisih skor XI
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
selisih skor XI
1,000
-,349*
.
,043
34
34
-,349*
1,000
,043
.
34
34
Correlations
selisih laju
aliran saliva
Spearman’s rho
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Selisih skor VAS
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
selisih skor VAS
1,000
-,043
.
,811
34
34
-,043
1,000
,811
.
34
34
Lampiran 5. Kuesioner XI dan VAS
Lampiran 6. Formulir data sampel
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi penelitian
Lampiran 8. Biodata mahasiswa
Identitas
Nama
: Annisa Rizqi
NIM
: G2A009172
Tempat/tanggal lahir
: Pati, 9 Mei 1991
Jenis kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jl. Gergaji IV No.1114A Semarang
Nomor Telepon
:-
Nomor HP
: 085727787729
e-mail
: anicehopes@gmail.com
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD
: SD Pati Kidul 01
Lulus tahun: 2000
2. SMP
: SMP N 3 Pati
Lulus tahun: 2006
3. SMA
: SMA N 1 Pati
Lulus tahun: 2009
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2009
Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. Asisten Farmakologi FK Undip
Tahun 2012 s/d 2013
2. Sie logistik Scientific Fair FK Undip
Tahun 2011
Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah
1. Anis Rahmawati, Annisa Rizqi, Atika Nurmalitasari, Bagus Indra Cahya:
Pengaruh Pemberian Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol terhadap
Penurunan Keluhan Mulut Kering (Xerostomia) pada Pasien Paskaterapi
Radiasi Kepala Leher dan Usia Tua. (didanai Dikti)
1. United Nations Population Division. World population prospects: The
2002 Revision. New York: United Nations; 2003.
2. Departemen Kesehatan R.I. Mengenai masalah mental lanjut usia. [cited
2012 Oktober 2]; Available from: http://www.depkes.go.id/index.php.
3. BAPPENAS. Proyeksi Penduduk Indonesia (Indonesia Population
Projection) 2005 - 2025. Jakarta: BAPPENAS; 2008.
4. Sensus Penduduk 2010 Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; c2009 [updated
2011
November
11;
cited
2012
Oktober
2];
Available
from:
http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=336&wid=0. .
5. KP3A. Penduduk Lanjut Usia. 2009 [cited 2012 Desember 02]; Available
from:
http://www.menegpp.go.id/aplikasidata/index.php?option=com_docman&
Itemid=114.
6. Dewi IK. Musik tradisional Bali dan musik klasik barat meningkatkan
sekresi saliva penderita xerostomia: Universitas Udayana; 2011.
7. Hasibuan S. Keluhan Mulut Kering Ditinjau dari Faktor Penyebab,
Manifestasi dan Penanggulangannya. 2002 [cited 2012 September 19];
Available from: http://library.usu.ac.id/.
8. Turner MD, Ship JA. Dry Mouth and Its Effects on the Oral Health of
Elderly People. The Journal of The American Dental Association.
2007;138:15s-6s.
9. Anggarini VR. Hubungan Penggunaan Obat Antidepresan Terhadap
Terjadinya Xerostomia pada Pasien Poli Psikiatri RSUD Dr. Ahmad
Mochtar Bukittinggi. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara; 2010.
40
41
10. Lukisari C, Kusharjanti. Xerostomia salah satu manifestasi oral diabetik.
2011 [cited 2012 September 17]; Available from: www.scribd.com.
11. Humprey SP, Williamson RT. A Review of Saliva Normal Composition,
Flow and Function. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(2):162-9.
12. Eugene NM, Robert LF. Salivary gland disorders. New York: Springer
Berlin Heidenberg; 2007.
13. Makkinen KK. History safety and dental properties of xylitol. 2010 [cited
2013 Januari 2013]; Available from: http://www.xylitolorg.com.
14. Yuliarsi Y, Lestari S. Efek Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol dan
Sorbitol Terhadap Plak Gigi dan Ginggivitis: JITEKGI FKGUPDM 2003.
15. Martín-Piedra M, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Herrera D, Gómez-Moreno G.
Effectiveness of a recent topical sialogogue in the management of
druginduced xerostomia. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3(4):e268-73.
16. Farsi NM. Signs of oral dryness in relation to salivary flow rate, pH,
buffering capacity and dry mouth complaints. BMC oral health. 2007;7:15.
17. Walsh LJ. Lifestyle Impacts on Oral Health. Queensland (Australia):
Knowledge Books and Software; 2005.
18. Pratama S. Pengaruh Pemberian Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol
terhadap Laju Aliran Saliva pada Anak Usia 10-12 Tahun di Pesantren AlHamidiyah Depok Tahun 2008. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2008.
19. Despopoulos A, Sibernagl S. Atlas Berwarna dan Teks Fisiologi. Jakarta:
Hipokrates; 2000.
20. Sherwood L. Fisiologi Manusia dari Sel ke Sistem. 2 ed. Jakarta: EGC;
2001.
42
21. McIntyre JM. Dental Caries-The Major Cause of Tooth Damage. 2 ed.
Queensland (Australia): Knowledge Books and Software; 2005.
22. Alam MB, Hossain MS, Chodhury NS, Mazumder MEH, Haque ME,
Islam A. In vitro and in vivo Antioxidant and Toxicity Evaluation of
Different Fractions of Oxalis corniculata Linn. Journal of Pharmacology
and Toxicology 6. 2011:337-48.
23. Gupta A, J.B E, H S. Hyposalivation in Elderly Patients. Journal of The
Canadian Dental Association. 2006;72(9):841-6.
24. Sultana N, Sham ME. Xerostomia: An overview. International Journal of
Dental Clinics. 2011;3(2):58-61.
25. Wrigley. Diagnosis of Dry Mouth: Symptoms, Signs, Causes. 2012 [cited
2013
Januari
22];
Available
from:
http://www.drymouth.info/practitioner/about.asp.
26. Navazesh M, Kumar SK. Xerostomia: prevalence, diagnosis, and
management. Compend Contin Educ Dent. [Review]. 2009 JulAug;30(6):326-8, 31-2; quiz 33-4.
27. Rad M, Kakoie S, Brojeni FN, Pourdamghan N. Effect of Long-term
Smoking on Whole-mouth Salivary Flow Rate and Oral Health. Journal of
Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2010;4(4):110-4.
28. Navazesh M, Kumar SKS. Measuring salivary flow : Challenges and
opportunities. The Journal of The American Dental Association.
2008;139:35S-40S.
29. Susan Z. Determining and Managing Salivary Gland Function in Cancer
Patients: A Fact Sheet for Dental Professionals. Oral Health Care for
Cancer Patients [serial on the Internet]. 2010.
43
30. Pierini C. Xylitol: A sweet Alternative. Vitamin Research Product; 2012
[cited
2013
Februari
09];
Available
from:
http://www.vrp.com/xylitol/xylitol-a-sweet-alternative-unique-sweetenersupports-oral-health.
31. Shellman S. Xylitol: Our Sweet Salvation? : The SPECTRUM; 2003
[cited
2013
Januari
19];
Available
from:
http://www.laleva.cc/food/xylitol.html.
32. Dry
Mouth
(xerostomia).
2009;
Available
from:
http://www.orahealth.com/pages/dry-mouth-xerostomia.
33. Hasegawa H, Uozumi T, Ono K. Physiological Evaluation of Music Effect
for The Mental Workload. 2004 [cited 2012 November 29]; Available
from: http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/.
34. Borgnakke WS, Taylor GW, Anderson PF, Shannon MC. Dry Mouth
(Xerostomia): Diagnosis, Causes, Complications and Treatment. 2011.
35. Dewi PF. Pengaruh Konsumsi Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol
Terhadap Pembentukan Plak Gigi. Semarang (Indonesia): Universitas
Diponegoro; 2008.
36. Sarwono J. Statistik Itu Mudah: Panduan Lengkap untuk Belajar
Komputasi Statistik Menggunakan SPSS 16. Yogyakarta: Penerbit
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta; 2009.
37. Nogourani MK, Isfahan RK, Beheshti MH. The effect of chewing gum’s
flavor on salivary flow rate and pH. Dental Reearch Journal.
2011;8(5):S71.
LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearence
Lampiran 2. Ijin penelitian
Lampiran 3. Informed consent
Lampiran 4. Hasil analisis
1.
Karakteristik subjek penelitian berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan usia
jenis kelamin
Frequency
Valid
Laki-laki
Percent
3
perempuan
14
Total
17
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
17,6
17,6
17,6
82,4
82,4
100,0
100,0
100,0
usia
Frequency
Valid
2.
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
60-74
10
29,4
29,4
75-90
29,4
22
64,7
64,7
94,1
>90
2
5,9
5,9
100,0
Total
34
100,0
100,0
Karakteristik subjek penelitian pada kelompok kontrol
Descriptive Statistics
17
17
Minimum
24
22
Maximum
35
34
Mean
28,41
27,24
Std.
Deviation
3,641
3,580
17
17
,10
,10
,60
,55
,3176
,3412
,16099
,12404
17
17
0
0
0
0
,00
,00
,000
,000
17
17
-5
0
4
0
-1,18
,00
2,531
,000
17
-,30
,30
,0235
,19615
N
Pre skor XI
Post skor XI
Pre laju aliran saliva
Post laju aliran saliva
Pre skor VAS
Post skor VAS
Selisih skor XI
Selisih skor VAS
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Valid N (listwise)
17
3.
Karakteristik subjek penelitian pada kelompok perlakuan
Descriptive Statistics
N
Maximum
43
Mean
32,59
Std.
Deviation
3,392
Pre skor XI
17
Post skor XI
17
23
39
26,88
3,806
Pre laju aliran saliva
17
17
17
,10
,15
0
,30
,50
80
,1706
,3088
8,24
,06628
,10787
23,515
17
17
17
0
-8
-80
50
-4
0
2,94
-5,71
-5,29
12,127
1,160
19,403
17
,05
,25
,1382
,06502
Post laju aliran saliva
Pre skor VAS
Post skor VAS
Selisih skor XI
Selisih skor VAS
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Valid N (listwise)
4.
Minimum
28
17
Uji normalitas data kelompok kontrol
Tests of Normalityb,c,d
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Pre XI
Post XI
Statistic
,142
,121
Df
17
17
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
,200*
,200*
Statistic
,913
,957
,101
Pre laju aliran
,191
17
saliva
Post laju aliran
,212
17
saliva
Selisih skor XI
,117
17
Selisih laju alian
,181
17
saliva
*. This is lower bound of the true significance.
17
17
Sig.
,112
,573
,931
17
,230
,041
,939
17
,304
,200*
,961
17
,647
,141
,917
17
,130
a. Liliefors Significance Correction
b. pre skor VAS is constant. It has been omitted.
c. pre skor VAS is constant. It has been omitted.
d. selisih skor VAS is constant. It has been omitted.
Df
5.
Uji normalitas data kelompok perlakuan
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
,216
,311
Pre XI
Df
Post XI
Pre laju aliran
,210
saliva
Post laju aliran
,238
saliva
Pre skor VAS
,519
Post skor VAS
,537
Selisih skor XI
,188
Selisih skor VAS
,490
Selisih laju alian
,192
saliva
a. Liliefors Significance Correction
6.
Shapiro-Wilk
17
17
Sig.
,033
,000
Statistic
,814
,739
17
,044
17
Df
17
17
Sig.
,003
,000
,869
17
,021
,011
,909
17
,095
17
17
,000
,000
,399
,262
17
17
,000
,000
17
17
,111
,000
,925
,307
17
17
,183
,000
17
,095
,917
17
,129
Uji beda antara kelompok kontrol dan perlakuan
a. Independent t-test
Independent Samples Test
Levene’s
Test for
Equality of
Variances
Selisih
skor
XI
Selisih
laju
aliran
saliva
Equal
variances
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
Equal
variances
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
t-test for Equality of Means
Sig. (2tailed)
Mean
Difference
Lower
Upper
F
Sig.
t
9,632
,004
6,708
32
,000
4,529
,675
3,154
5,905
6,708
22,439
,000
4,529
,675
3,131
5,928
-2,289
32
,029
-,11471
,05012
-,21679
-,01262
-2,289
19,475
,033
-,11471
,05012
-,21943
-,00998
18,093
,000
Df
95% Confidence
Interval of The
Difference
Std.
Error
Differen
ce
b. Uji Mann Whitney
Test Statistics
b
Selisih skor
VAS
Mann-Whitney U
127,500
Wilcoxon W
280,500
Z
-1,435
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,151
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed
a
,563
Sig.)]
a. Not corrected for ties
b. Grouping Variable: kelompok
7.
Uji normalitas data skor XI, skor VAS, dan laju aliran saliva kelompok
kontrol dan perlakuan
Tests of Normality
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
,191
34
Sig.
,003
Statistic
,930
34
,000
,517
34
Lilliefors Significance Correction
,000
Selisih skor XI
Selisih laju alian
saliva
Selisih skor VAS
a.
8.
Df
Shapiro-Wilk
,225
Df
34
Sig.
,032
,871
34
,001
,195
34
,000
Hubungan penurunan keluhan xerostomia dan laju aliran saliva
Uji korelasi Spearman
Correlations
selisih laju
aliran saliva
Spearman’s rho
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Selisih skor XI
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
selisih skor XI
1,000
-,349*
.
,043
34
34
-,349*
1,000
,043
.
34
34
Correlations
selisih laju
aliran saliva
Spearman’s rho
Selisih laju aliran
saliva
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Selisih skor VAS
Correlation Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
selisih skor VAS
1,000
-,043
.
,811
34
34
-,043
1,000
,811
.
34
34
Lampiran 5. Kuesioner XI dan VAS
Lampiran 6. Formulir data sampel
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi penelitian
Lampiran 8. Biodata mahasiswa
Identitas
Nama
: Annisa Rizqi
NIM
: G2A009172
Tempat/tanggal lahir
: Pati, 9 Mei 1991
Jenis kelamin
: Perempuan
Alamat
: Jl. Gergaji IV No.1114A Semarang
Nomor Telepon
:-
Nomor HP
: 085727787729
: anicehopes@gmail.com
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD
: SD Pati Kidul 01
Lulus tahun: 2000
2. SMP
: SMP N 3 Pati
Lulus tahun: 2006
3. SMA
: SMA N 1 Pati
Lulus tahun: 2009
4. FK UNDIP : Masuk tahun : 2009
Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. Asisten Farmakologi FK Undip
Tahun 2012 s/d 2013
2. Sie logistik Scientific Fair FK Undip
Tahun 2011
Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah
1. Anis Rahmawati, Annisa Rizqi, Atika Nurmalitasari, Bagus Indra Cahya:
Pengaruh Pemberian Permen Karet yang Mengandung Xylitol terhadap
Penurunan Keluhan Mulut Kering (Xerostomia) pada Pasien Paskaterapi
Radiasi Kepala Leher dan Usia Tua. (didanai Dikti)