S BIO 1002582 Bibliography
73
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2011). Quantitative Literacy
Value Rubric. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Beaudrie, B. (2007). The Numeracy Action Plan: The Case for Quantitative
Literacy in the State of New Hampshire. New Hampshire Impact Center
Plymouth State University. Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 9, 323332.
Brakke, D. F. (2003). Addressing Societal and Workforce Needs. Washington,
Dc: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Chesbro, R. (2008). Using Interactive Science Notebooks For Inquiry-Based
Science. Reading in science methods K-8 (p. 151-157). National Science
Teachers Association.
Crosby, A.W. (1997). The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western
Society, 1250-1600. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Donovan, M.S. & Bransford, J.D. (2005). How Students Learn: Science in The
Classroom. Washington DC: The National Academies.
Frith, V. & Guston, G. (2011). Towards Understanding The Quantitative Literacy
Demands of A Firstyear Medical Curriculum. African Journal of Health
Professions Education. 3(1):19-23.
Gaquin, S. (2004). How to Score Science Notebooks. http://www.nwf.
org/pdf/Ecoschools/Entergy_Rubric%20for%20Assessing_Science%20NB.
pdf. [Online] diakses pada 24 Juli 2014.
Gilbert, J. & Kotelmann, M. (2005). Five Good Reasons to Use Science
Notebooks. NSTA Science and Children. p. 28-32.
Gronlund, N. E. (2006). Assessment Of Student Achievement (8th ed.). Boston:
Pearson.
Hargrove, T.Y. & Nesbit, C. (2003). Science Notebooks: Tools for Increasing
Achievement across the Curriculum. ERIC Digest: ED482720.
Hastings, A., Arzberger, P., Bolker, B. (2002). Quantitative Biology for the 21st
Century. San Diego: Report from a NSF funded workshops on Quantitative
Environmental and Integrative Biology.
Azhar Prajadinata, 2014
Penggunaan Buku Catatan Interaktif Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Literasi
Kuantitatif Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
74
Jafar, R. (2010). Incorporating Quantitative Reasoning and Civic Engagement in
a College Alegebra Course Through a Lesson on Interest Rates, Debt and
Student Loan. Department of Mathematics, Engineering and Computer
Science, LaGuardia Community College, C.U.N.Y.
Koentjaraningrat. (1997). Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Gramedia
73
Pustaka Utama: Jakarta
Komalasari, G. (2011).
Asesmen Teknik Nontes dalam Perspektif BK
Komprehensif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Kusrini, D. E. (2014). Teknik Menyusun Kuesioner. http://oc.its.ac.id/ambil
file.php?idp=1657. [Online] Diakses pada 10 Juli 2014
Linn, R.L. & Grondlund, N. E. (1995). Measurement And Assesment In
Teaching. Journal of Educational Measurement .
Madison, L. B. (2011). A Quantitative Literacy Assessment Rubric: Development
& Lessons Learned. National Science Foundation. United States.
Mallozi, F. & Heilbronner, N. (2013). The Effects of Using Interactive Student
Notebooks and Specific Written Feedback on Seventh Grade Students’
Science Process Skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Vol 17,
No. 3.
Marcarelli, K. (2010). Teaching Science With Interactive Notebooks. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mustafa,
H.
(2000).
Teknik Sampling. http://home.unpar.ac.id/~hasan/
SAMPLING.doc. [Online] diakses pada 22 Januari 2014.
National Research Council. (2009). A New Biology for the 21st Century: Ensuring
the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution, Washington, DC:
National Academies Press
Oluwatayo, J. A. & Fatoba, O. J. (2010). Effects of Evaluative Feedback on
Performance and Retention of Secondary School Students in Biology. Edu
Sci. 2(1): 55-59.
Putri, R. P. (2013). Penggunaan Learning Log untuk Mengidentifikasi Kebutuhan
Belajar Siswa SMA Pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi Manusia. S-1 Skripsi.
Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung FPMIPA UPI.
Riduwan. (2010). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta
Azhar Prajadinata, 2014
Penggunaan Buku Catatan Interaktif Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Literasi
Kuantitatif Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
75
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role Of Assessment In A Learning Culture.
Educational Researcher, 29,4–14.
Sikorskii, A., Melfi, V., Gilliland, D. (2011). Quantitative Literacy at Michigan
State University, 1: Development and Initial Evaluation of The Asessmen.
Numeracy. 4, (2), Art.5 32, 416-419
Speth. (2010). 1, 2, 3, 4: Infusing Quantitative Literacy into Introductory. Life
Sciences Education. (9), 323–332
Steen, L.A., Orrill, R., Cohen, P.C. (2001). Mathematics And Democrarcy: The
Case For Quantitative Literacy. Washington, Dc: National Council on
Education and the Disciplines
Teaching Curriculum Institute. (2010). Using The Interactive Student Notebook.
http://www.teachtci.com/pdf/webinar_handouts/Best_Ideas
_for_the_Notebook_Secondary.pdf. [Online]. Diakses pada 23 November
2013.
Tucson Unified Shool District. (2005). Purpose for Science Notebook.
http://www.
tusd1.org/contents/depart/science/snpurpose.asp.
[Online]
diakses pada 24 Juli 2014.
Wiggins, G. (2003). “Get Real!” Assessing for Quantitative Literacy. Washington
DC: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Wulan, A.R. (2003). Permasalahan yang Dihadapi dalam Pemberdayaan
Praktikum Biologi di SMU dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Tesis Magister.
Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung SPS UPI.
Wulan, A.R. (2007). Penggunaan Asesmen Alternatif pada Pembelajaran
Biologi.http://file.upi.edu/direktori/sps/prodi.pendidikan_ipa/197404171999
032-ana_ratnawulan/asesmen_alternatif.pdf. [Online] diakses 25 Jui 2014.
Azhar Prajadinata, 2014
Penggunaan Buku Catatan Interaktif Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Literasi
Kuantitatif Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2011). Quantitative Literacy
Value Rubric. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Beaudrie, B. (2007). The Numeracy Action Plan: The Case for Quantitative
Literacy in the State of New Hampshire. New Hampshire Impact Center
Plymouth State University. Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 9, 323332.
Brakke, D. F. (2003). Addressing Societal and Workforce Needs. Washington,
Dc: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Chesbro, R. (2008). Using Interactive Science Notebooks For Inquiry-Based
Science. Reading in science methods K-8 (p. 151-157). National Science
Teachers Association.
Crosby, A.W. (1997). The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western
Society, 1250-1600. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Donovan, M.S. & Bransford, J.D. (2005). How Students Learn: Science in The
Classroom. Washington DC: The National Academies.
Frith, V. & Guston, G. (2011). Towards Understanding The Quantitative Literacy
Demands of A Firstyear Medical Curriculum. African Journal of Health
Professions Education. 3(1):19-23.
Gaquin, S. (2004). How to Score Science Notebooks. http://www.nwf.
org/pdf/Ecoschools/Entergy_Rubric%20for%20Assessing_Science%20NB.
pdf. [Online] diakses pada 24 Juli 2014.
Gilbert, J. & Kotelmann, M. (2005). Five Good Reasons to Use Science
Notebooks. NSTA Science and Children. p. 28-32.
Gronlund, N. E. (2006). Assessment Of Student Achievement (8th ed.). Boston:
Pearson.
Hargrove, T.Y. & Nesbit, C. (2003). Science Notebooks: Tools for Increasing
Achievement across the Curriculum. ERIC Digest: ED482720.
Hastings, A., Arzberger, P., Bolker, B. (2002). Quantitative Biology for the 21st
Century. San Diego: Report from a NSF funded workshops on Quantitative
Environmental and Integrative Biology.
Azhar Prajadinata, 2014
Penggunaan Buku Catatan Interaktif Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Literasi
Kuantitatif Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
74
Jafar, R. (2010). Incorporating Quantitative Reasoning and Civic Engagement in
a College Alegebra Course Through a Lesson on Interest Rates, Debt and
Student Loan. Department of Mathematics, Engineering and Computer
Science, LaGuardia Community College, C.U.N.Y.
Koentjaraningrat. (1997). Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Gramedia
73
Pustaka Utama: Jakarta
Komalasari, G. (2011).
Asesmen Teknik Nontes dalam Perspektif BK
Komprehensif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks
Kusrini, D. E. (2014). Teknik Menyusun Kuesioner. http://oc.its.ac.id/ambil
file.php?idp=1657. [Online] Diakses pada 10 Juli 2014
Linn, R.L. & Grondlund, N. E. (1995). Measurement And Assesment In
Teaching. Journal of Educational Measurement .
Madison, L. B. (2011). A Quantitative Literacy Assessment Rubric: Development
& Lessons Learned. National Science Foundation. United States.
Mallozi, F. & Heilbronner, N. (2013). The Effects of Using Interactive Student
Notebooks and Specific Written Feedback on Seventh Grade Students’
Science Process Skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Vol 17,
No. 3.
Marcarelli, K. (2010). Teaching Science With Interactive Notebooks. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mustafa,
H.
(2000).
Teknik Sampling. http://home.unpar.ac.id/~hasan/
SAMPLING.doc. [Online] diakses pada 22 Januari 2014.
National Research Council. (2009). A New Biology for the 21st Century: Ensuring
the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution, Washington, DC:
National Academies Press
Oluwatayo, J. A. & Fatoba, O. J. (2010). Effects of Evaluative Feedback on
Performance and Retention of Secondary School Students in Biology. Edu
Sci. 2(1): 55-59.
Putri, R. P. (2013). Penggunaan Learning Log untuk Mengidentifikasi Kebutuhan
Belajar Siswa SMA Pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi Manusia. S-1 Skripsi.
Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung FPMIPA UPI.
Riduwan. (2010). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta
Azhar Prajadinata, 2014
Penggunaan Buku Catatan Interaktif Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Literasi
Kuantitatif Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu
75
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role Of Assessment In A Learning Culture.
Educational Researcher, 29,4–14.
Sikorskii, A., Melfi, V., Gilliland, D. (2011). Quantitative Literacy at Michigan
State University, 1: Development and Initial Evaluation of The Asessmen.
Numeracy. 4, (2), Art.5 32, 416-419
Speth. (2010). 1, 2, 3, 4: Infusing Quantitative Literacy into Introductory. Life
Sciences Education. (9), 323–332
Steen, L.A., Orrill, R., Cohen, P.C. (2001). Mathematics And Democrarcy: The
Case For Quantitative Literacy. Washington, Dc: National Council on
Education and the Disciplines
Teaching Curriculum Institute. (2010). Using The Interactive Student Notebook.
http://www.teachtci.com/pdf/webinar_handouts/Best_Ideas
_for_the_Notebook_Secondary.pdf. [Online]. Diakses pada 23 November
2013.
Tucson Unified Shool District. (2005). Purpose for Science Notebook.
http://www.
tusd1.org/contents/depart/science/snpurpose.asp.
[Online]
diakses pada 24 Juli 2014.
Wiggins, G. (2003). “Get Real!” Assessing for Quantitative Literacy. Washington
DC: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Wulan, A.R. (2003). Permasalahan yang Dihadapi dalam Pemberdayaan
Praktikum Biologi di SMU dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Tesis Magister.
Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung SPS UPI.
Wulan, A.R. (2007). Penggunaan Asesmen Alternatif pada Pembelajaran
Biologi.http://file.upi.edu/direktori/sps/prodi.pendidikan_ipa/197404171999
032-ana_ratnawulan/asesmen_alternatif.pdf. [Online] diakses 25 Jui 2014.
Azhar Prajadinata, 2014
Penggunaan Buku Catatan Interaktif Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Literasi
Kuantitatif Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |
perpustakaan.upi.edu