Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Pengaruh Adopsi Teknologi Informasi terhadap Perilaku PNS Menggunakan Pendekatan UTAUT : Studi Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya
LAMPIRAN I
Kuesioner
Instrument Penelitian
Responden yang terhormat,
Dalam rangka menyelesaikan tugas akhir Program Magister Manajemen,
penelitiakan melakukan pengumpulandata tentang “Analisis Pengaruh Adopsi Teknologi
Informasi Tehadap Perilaku PNS dengan menggunakan Pemodelan UTAUT” Studi
penelitian ini dilakukan pada PNS yang berada di Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya. Untuk itu,
besar harapan peneliti agar responden bersedia untuk menjawabpertanyaan-pertanyaan yang
sudah tersedia di dalam angket ini. Atas kesediannya, peneliti mengucapkanterima kasih.
Hormat saya,
TIVANNY P. TANE
Petunjuk :
Berilah tanda (X ) pada jawaban yang anda anggap paling mewakili diri anda, di kolom
yang telahdisediakan. Anda diminta untuk memberikan opini atas pernyataan-pernyataan di
bawah ini.
Keterangan :
STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju; TS = Tidak Setuju; BS= Biasa Saja; S = Setuju; SS = Sangat
Setuju
Pernyataan
OPINI
S
S
Performance Expetance
Penggunaan teknologi informasi membantu proses
penyelesaian pekerjaan saya
Penggunaan
teknologi
informasi
mempercepat
informasi
meningkatkan
penyelesaian pekerjaan saya
Penggunaan
teknologi
efektivitas pekerjaan saya
S
B
S
TS
STS
Penggunaan
teknologi
informasi
meningkatkan
pengalaman dan keterampilan saya
Effort Expetance
Saya tidak melakukan kesalahan berulang bila
menggunakan teknologi informasi
Saya mengalami beberapa kesulitan dalam penggunaan
teknologi informasi
Mudah bagi saya untuk menggunakan teknologi
informasi
Belajar menggunakan teknologi informasi merupakan
hal yang mudah
Social Influence
Pihak pemerintah daerah mendukung/ menyarankan
untuk mengadopsi teknolgi informasi
Instansi lain pengguna teknologi informasi memotivasi
saya dalam menggunaan teknologi informasi
Pemerintah daerah mendukung penggunaan teknologi
informasi
Secara umum, pemerintah daerah dalam SKPD ini telah
mendukung penggunaan teknologi informasi
Behavior Intention
Saya berkeinginan untuk menggunakan teknologi
informasi dalam pekerjaan saya
Saya memprediksi bahwa menggunakan teknologi
informasi akan memudahkan pekerjaan saya
Sayaraguuntukmenggunakanteknologi informasi
karenatakutmembuatkesalahan yang
sayatidakdapatmemperbaiki
Teknologi informasiagakmenakutkanbagisaya
Use Behavior
Saya menggunakan perangkt komputer selama jam
bekerja
Saya hanya menggunakan aplikasi standart (word)
dalam pekerjaan saya
Saya sering menemukan masalah dalam menggunakan
perangkat komputer
Saya sering menggunakan akses internet
LAMPIRAN II
Uji Statistika
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
%
Valid
Excludeda
Total
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.752
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
PE1
4.4688
.59742
96
PE2
4.3854
.68625
96
PE3
4.3646
.71259
96
PE4
4.3750
.63660
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
PE1
13.1250
2.447
.635
.652
PE2
13.2083
2.251
.616
.654
PE3
13.2292
2.452
.462
.746
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
PE1
13.1250
2.447
.635
.652
PE2
13.2083
2.251
.616
.654
PE3
13.2292
2.452
.462
.746
PE4
13.2188
2.573
.496
.721
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
%
Valid
Excludeda
Total
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.730
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
EE1
3.1562
.93277
96
EE2
2.9271
.84908
96
EE3
3.3021
.95278
96
EE4
3.3854
.93324
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
EE1
9.6146
5.124
.343
.768
EE2
9.8438
5.270
.372
.746
EE3
9.4688
3.915
.695
.557
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
EE1
9.6146
5.124
.343
.768
EE2
9.8438
5.270
.372
.746
EE3
9.4688
3.915
.695
.557
EE4
9.3854
3.945
.708
.550
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
%
Valid
Excludeda
Total
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.792
4
Item Statistics
Mean
SI1
4.1458
Std. Deviation
.78108
N
96
SI2
4.0729
.71443
96
SI3
4.2500
.69585
96
SI4
4.1458
.75365
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
SI1
12.4688
2.841
.723
.675
SI2
12.5417
3.746
.397
.834
SI3
12.3646
3.076
.735
.677
SI4
12.4688
3.220
.579
.752
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.661
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
BI1
4.1042
.58901
96
BI2
3.8958
.68793
96
BI3
3.0625
.61237
96
BI4
3.0312
.62329
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
BI1
9.9896
2.200
.339
.657
BI2
10.1979
1.908
.399
.627
BI3
11.0312
1.925
.493
.558
BI4
11.0625
1.828
.547
.519
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.623
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
UB1
3.8750
.68441
96
UB2
3.6667
.77686
96
UB3
3.2604
.63652
96
UB4
3.6875
.74428
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
UB1
10.6146
2.429
.428
.535
UB2
10.8229
2.189
.443
.522
UB3
11.2292
2.621
.381
.569
UB4
10.8021
2.413
.365
.582
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized
Residual
N
96
Normal Parametersa
Mean
.0000000
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
1.58917692
Absolute
.066
Positive
.048
Negative
-.066
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
.643
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.802
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables
Variables
Entered
Removed
Method
Social Influence,
Effort
Expectance,
. Enter
Performance
Expectancea
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Intention
Model Summaryb
Model
1
R
.442a
R Square
.195
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.169
1.61488
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance,
Performance Expectance
b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Intention
ANOVAb
Sum of
Model
Squares
1
Regression
Mean
df
Square
58.235
3
19.412
Residual
239.921
92
2.608
Total
298.156
95
F
7.444
Sig.
.000a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance, Performance
Expectance
b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Intention
Coefficientsa
Standardiz
ed
Model
1
Unstandardized
Coefficient
Collinearity
Coefficients
s
Statistics
B
(Constant)
Std. Error
5.869
1.803
.205
.089
Effort Expectance
.133
Social Influence
.176
Performance
Expectance
a. Dependent Variable: Behavior
Intention
Beta
t
Sig.
Tolerance
VIF
3.255
.002
.231
2.302
.024
.871
1.148
.064
.205
2.068
.041
.891
1.122
.073
.230
2.430
.017
.975
1.025
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables
Variables
Entered
Removed
Method
Social Influence,
Effort
Expectance,
. Enter
Performance
Expectancea
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: ln_res2
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
.273a
1
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.075
.045
2.40540
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance,
Performance Expectance
ANOVAb
Sum of
Model
1
Squares
Regression
Mean
df
Square
42.964
3
14.321
Residual
532.307
92
5.786
Total
575.271
95
F
2.475
Sig.
.066a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance, Performance
Expectance
b. Dependent Variable: ln_res2
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
Model
1
B
(Constant)
Performance
Expectance
Effort Expectance
Social Influence
Std. Error
-.307
2.686
.025
.132
.187
-.183
Beta
t
-.114
.909
.020
.187
.852
.096
.208
1.956
.053
.108
-.172
-1.697
.093
a. Dependent Variable: ln_res2
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized
Residual
N
Normal Parametersa
96
Mean
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
.0000000
1.89534703
Absolute
.097
Positive
.097
Negative
-.049
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
.947
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.331
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Sig.
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables
Variables
Entered
Removed
Method
Behavior
. Enter
Intentiona
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: Use Behavior
Model Summaryb
Model
R
.239a
1
R Square
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.057
.047
1.90540
a. Predictors: (Constant), Behavior Intention
b. Dependent Variable: Use Behavior
ANOVAb
Sum of
Model
1
Squares
Regression
Mean
df
Square
20.717
1
20.717
Residual
341.272
94
3.631
Total
361.990
95
a. Predictors: (Constant), Behavior Intention
b. Dependent Variable: Use Behavior
F
5.706
Sig.
.019a
Coefficientsa
Model
1
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
(Constant)
Std. Error
10.774
1.567
.264
.110
Behavior
Intention
a. Dependent Variable: Use
Behavior
Unstandardized
Beta
t
.239
Sig.
6.874
.000
2.389
.019
Lampiran III Surat Penelitian
Kuesioner
Instrument Penelitian
Responden yang terhormat,
Dalam rangka menyelesaikan tugas akhir Program Magister Manajemen,
penelitiakan melakukan pengumpulandata tentang “Analisis Pengaruh Adopsi Teknologi
Informasi Tehadap Perilaku PNS dengan menggunakan Pemodelan UTAUT” Studi
penelitian ini dilakukan pada PNS yang berada di Kabupaten Maluku Barat Daya. Untuk itu,
besar harapan peneliti agar responden bersedia untuk menjawabpertanyaan-pertanyaan yang
sudah tersedia di dalam angket ini. Atas kesediannya, peneliti mengucapkanterima kasih.
Hormat saya,
TIVANNY P. TANE
Petunjuk :
Berilah tanda (X ) pada jawaban yang anda anggap paling mewakili diri anda, di kolom
yang telahdisediakan. Anda diminta untuk memberikan opini atas pernyataan-pernyataan di
bawah ini.
Keterangan :
STS = Sangat Tidak Setuju; TS = Tidak Setuju; BS= Biasa Saja; S = Setuju; SS = Sangat
Setuju
Pernyataan
OPINI
S
S
Performance Expetance
Penggunaan teknologi informasi membantu proses
penyelesaian pekerjaan saya
Penggunaan
teknologi
informasi
mempercepat
informasi
meningkatkan
penyelesaian pekerjaan saya
Penggunaan
teknologi
efektivitas pekerjaan saya
S
B
S
TS
STS
Penggunaan
teknologi
informasi
meningkatkan
pengalaman dan keterampilan saya
Effort Expetance
Saya tidak melakukan kesalahan berulang bila
menggunakan teknologi informasi
Saya mengalami beberapa kesulitan dalam penggunaan
teknologi informasi
Mudah bagi saya untuk menggunakan teknologi
informasi
Belajar menggunakan teknologi informasi merupakan
hal yang mudah
Social Influence
Pihak pemerintah daerah mendukung/ menyarankan
untuk mengadopsi teknolgi informasi
Instansi lain pengguna teknologi informasi memotivasi
saya dalam menggunaan teknologi informasi
Pemerintah daerah mendukung penggunaan teknologi
informasi
Secara umum, pemerintah daerah dalam SKPD ini telah
mendukung penggunaan teknologi informasi
Behavior Intention
Saya berkeinginan untuk menggunakan teknologi
informasi dalam pekerjaan saya
Saya memprediksi bahwa menggunakan teknologi
informasi akan memudahkan pekerjaan saya
Sayaraguuntukmenggunakanteknologi informasi
karenatakutmembuatkesalahan yang
sayatidakdapatmemperbaiki
Teknologi informasiagakmenakutkanbagisaya
Use Behavior
Saya menggunakan perangkt komputer selama jam
bekerja
Saya hanya menggunakan aplikasi standart (word)
dalam pekerjaan saya
Saya sering menemukan masalah dalam menggunakan
perangkat komputer
Saya sering menggunakan akses internet
LAMPIRAN II
Uji Statistika
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
%
Valid
Excludeda
Total
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.752
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
PE1
4.4688
.59742
96
PE2
4.3854
.68625
96
PE3
4.3646
.71259
96
PE4
4.3750
.63660
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
PE1
13.1250
2.447
.635
.652
PE2
13.2083
2.251
.616
.654
PE3
13.2292
2.452
.462
.746
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
PE1
13.1250
2.447
.635
.652
PE2
13.2083
2.251
.616
.654
PE3
13.2292
2.452
.462
.746
PE4
13.2188
2.573
.496
.721
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
%
Valid
Excludeda
Total
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.730
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
EE1
3.1562
.93277
96
EE2
2.9271
.84908
96
EE3
3.3021
.95278
96
EE4
3.3854
.93324
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
EE1
9.6146
5.124
.343
.768
EE2
9.8438
5.270
.372
.746
EE3
9.4688
3.915
.695
.557
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
EE1
9.6146
5.124
.343
.768
EE2
9.8438
5.270
.372
.746
EE3
9.4688
3.915
.695
.557
EE4
9.3854
3.945
.708
.550
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
%
Valid
Excludeda
Total
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.792
4
Item Statistics
Mean
SI1
4.1458
Std. Deviation
.78108
N
96
SI2
4.0729
.71443
96
SI3
4.2500
.69585
96
SI4
4.1458
.75365
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
SI1
12.4688
2.841
.723
.675
SI2
12.5417
3.746
.397
.834
SI3
12.3646
3.076
.735
.677
SI4
12.4688
3.220
.579
.752
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.661
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
BI1
4.1042
.58901
96
BI2
3.8958
.68793
96
BI3
3.0625
.61237
96
BI4
3.0312
.62329
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
BI1
9.9896
2.200
.339
.657
BI2
10.1979
1.908
.399
.627
BI3
11.0312
1.925
.493
.558
BI4
11.0625
1.828
.547
.519
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing Summary
N
Cases
Valid
Excludeda
Total
%
96
100.0
0
.0
96
100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.623
4
Item Statistics
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
UB1
3.8750
.68441
96
UB2
3.6667
.77686
96
UB3
3.2604
.63652
96
UB4
3.6875
.74428
96
Item-Total Statistics
Cronbach's
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Corrected ItemItem Deleted
Total Correlation
Alpha if Item
Deleted
UB1
10.6146
2.429
.428
.535
UB2
10.8229
2.189
.443
.522
UB3
11.2292
2.621
.381
.569
UB4
10.8021
2.413
.365
.582
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized
Residual
N
96
Normal Parametersa
Mean
.0000000
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
1.58917692
Absolute
.066
Positive
.048
Negative
-.066
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
.643
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.802
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables
Variables
Entered
Removed
Method
Social Influence,
Effort
Expectance,
. Enter
Performance
Expectancea
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Intention
Model Summaryb
Model
1
R
.442a
R Square
.195
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.169
1.61488
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance,
Performance Expectance
b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Intention
ANOVAb
Sum of
Model
Squares
1
Regression
Mean
df
Square
58.235
3
19.412
Residual
239.921
92
2.608
Total
298.156
95
F
7.444
Sig.
.000a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance, Performance
Expectance
b. Dependent Variable: Behavior Intention
Coefficientsa
Standardiz
ed
Model
1
Unstandardized
Coefficient
Collinearity
Coefficients
s
Statistics
B
(Constant)
Std. Error
5.869
1.803
.205
.089
Effort Expectance
.133
Social Influence
.176
Performance
Expectance
a. Dependent Variable: Behavior
Intention
Beta
t
Sig.
Tolerance
VIF
3.255
.002
.231
2.302
.024
.871
1.148
.064
.205
2.068
.041
.891
1.122
.073
.230
2.430
.017
.975
1.025
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables
Variables
Entered
Removed
Method
Social Influence,
Effort
Expectance,
. Enter
Performance
Expectancea
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: ln_res2
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
.273a
1
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.075
.045
2.40540
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance,
Performance Expectance
ANOVAb
Sum of
Model
1
Squares
Regression
Mean
df
Square
42.964
3
14.321
Residual
532.307
92
5.786
Total
575.271
95
F
2.475
Sig.
.066a
a. Predictors: (Constant), Social Influence, Effort Expectance, Performance
Expectance
b. Dependent Variable: ln_res2
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
Model
1
B
(Constant)
Performance
Expectance
Effort Expectance
Social Influence
Std. Error
-.307
2.686
.025
.132
.187
-.183
Beta
t
-.114
.909
.020
.187
.852
.096
.208
1.956
.053
.108
-.172
-1.697
.093
a. Dependent Variable: ln_res2
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized
Residual
N
Normal Parametersa
96
Mean
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
.0000000
1.89534703
Absolute
.097
Positive
.097
Negative
-.049
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
.947
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.331
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Sig.
Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb
Model
1
Variables
Variables
Entered
Removed
Method
Behavior
. Enter
Intentiona
a. All requested variables entered.
b. Dependent Variable: Use Behavior
Model Summaryb
Model
R
.239a
1
R Square
Adjusted R
Std. Error of the
Square
Estimate
.057
.047
1.90540
a. Predictors: (Constant), Behavior Intention
b. Dependent Variable: Use Behavior
ANOVAb
Sum of
Model
1
Squares
Regression
Mean
df
Square
20.717
1
20.717
Residual
341.272
94
3.631
Total
361.990
95
a. Predictors: (Constant), Behavior Intention
b. Dependent Variable: Use Behavior
F
5.706
Sig.
.019a
Coefficientsa
Model
1
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
(Constant)
Std. Error
10.774
1.567
.264
.110
Behavior
Intention
a. Dependent Variable: Use
Behavior
Unstandardized
Beta
t
.239
Sig.
6.874
.000
2.389
.019
Lampiran III Surat Penelitian