SEMINAR ON ELT syllabus.docx
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS JURUSAN STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS FAKULTAS PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA
Course : Seminar on ELT
Code : IG 596
Chs : 2
Semester : 7
Prerequisite : Belajar Pembelajaran (IG ), Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris (IG ), Perencanaan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris (IG ). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris (IG 501)
Lecturer : Prof. Dr. Didi Suherdi, M. Ed.
1. Objectives : This subject is inteneed to provide the students with opportunities to acquire knowledge and experiemces in understanding and running, participating in, and
presenting papers in seminars, particularly on English language teaching.
2. Course Description : This subject is designed to cover knowledge of seminars inculing running seminars, understanding seminar themes, developing relevant topics, and preparing as well as presenting papers. This subject will also cover designing and developing power point presentations.
3. Learning Activities : Independent Reading Lecturing
Students Presentation Discussion
4. Media : Internet Search Engine LCD Projector Laptop Computer Projector Screen
(2)
5. Evaluation : Written and Oral Presentation Grading Policy
a. Eighty percent (80%) of attendance is compulsory for the accomplishment of this subject.
b. Grade will include scores of quizes (20%), paper writing (30%), presentation (30%), and proposal (20%)
c. Grades will be based on the final scores:
Final Score Interval Grade Mark
85 ≥ A 4.0
75 ≥ - 84 B 3.0
60 ≥ - 74 C 2.0
50 ≥ - 59 D 1.0
... - 50 E 0
SCORING RUBRICS FOR STUDENTS’ PRESENTATION
Approaching Expectations
(60-74 marks) Meeting Expectations(75-85 mark) Exceeding Expectations(85 - marks)
1. Presentation is not well organized and developed
1. Content knowledge is not well articulated 2. Theories and concepts are not discussed in
depth
3. Presentation is not clear and fluent 4. Shows no confidence in delivery, reading
from notes judiciously 5. Voice is not well-projected
6. Does not engage the attention of the audience
7. Does not respond well to questions, showing superficial understanding of the project
8. No sense of cohesion in the flow of the presentation
9. Presentation exceeds time limit and not able to complete presentation
1. Presentation is somewhat organized and developed
2. Content knowledge is good
3. Theories and concepts are discussed in relatively depth
4. Presentation is somewhat clear and fluent
5. Shows relatively good confidence in delivery, reading from notes judiciously
6. Voice is relatively well-projected
7. Engages the attention of the audience
8. Responds well to questions, showing excellent understanding of the project
9. Relatively clear sense of cohesion in the flow of the presentation
10. Presentation exceeds time limit though able to complete presentation
1. Presentation is very well organized and creatively developed
2. Content knowledge is excellent
3. Theories and concepts are discussed in depth
4. Presentation is very clear and fluent
5. Shows confidence in delivery, reading from notes judiciously
6. Voice is very well-projected
7. Engages the attention of the audience well
8. Responds very well to questions, showing excellent understanding of the project
9. Clear sense of cohesion in the flow of the presentation
10. Presentation does not exceed time limit and able to complete presentation
(3)
Sessions Topics Sources 1-2 1. Introduction to seminars
and scientific fora. 2. The basic concepts and
terms of seminars and paper presentation
Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run seminars and workshops: presentation skills for consultants, trainers, and teachers. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc.
http://freearticles.com/article/
Tools-You-Need-In- Conducting-A-Successful-And-Profitable-Seminar
3-7 Writing seminar papers Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: Sage Publications.
Dignen, B. 1998. Down to Business English for
Presentation. London: York Associates.
Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (2000). Writing Skills Narrative and Non-fiction Text Types. Putney: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd. Kirszner, L. G., and Mandell, S. R. (1989). Patterns for College Writing a rethorical reader and guide 4th Edition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
8 MID-TERM TESTS
9-14 Presenting papers Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: Sage Publications.
http://www.uwic.ac.uk/tsu/u_s tudyskills/unit06.html (How to Give a Good Seminar University of Wales Institute) http://www.comm.toronto.edu /~frank/guide/guide0.html (Giving a Talk University of Toronto)
http://c.s.cornell.edu/cv/Short Talk.htm (The Short Talk Cornell University)
(4)
15 Running seminars Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run seminars and workshops: presentation skills for consultants, trainers, and teachers. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc.
http://web.clas.ufl.rhatch/pag es/02TeachingResources/read ingwriting/05surviv.htm (Seminar Discussions & Presentations University of Florida)
16 FINAL TESTS
REFERENCES Main references:
1. Dignen, B. (1999). Down to Business English for Presentations. London: York Associates.
2. Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (2000). Writing Skills Narrative and Non-fiction Text Types. Putney: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.
3. Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run seminars and workshops: presentation skills for consultants, trainers, and teachers. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc. 4. Kirszner, L. G., and Mandell, S. R. (1989). Patterns for College Writing a
rethorical reader and guide 4th Edition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
5. Simon, L. (1988). Good Writing a guide and sourcebook for writing across the curriculum. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6. Swales, J., and Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students. A course for nonnative speakers of English 2nd Edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: Sage Publications.
Recommended references:
1. Alwasilah, A. C. (2000). Perspektif Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Indonesia dalam Konteks Persaingan Global. Bandung: CV Andira.
2. Ashton, P. (1988). Teaching higher-order thinking and content: An essential ingredient in teacher preparation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
3. Bellanca, J., and Brandt, R. (2010). 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students
(5)
4. Carson, S. H.; Peterson, J. B., Higgins, D. M. (2005). "Reliability, Validity, and Factor
Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire". Creativity Research Journal
17 (1): 37–50.
5. Emilia, E. (2010). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
6. Emilia, E. (2010). Developing critical learners: Indonesian and Australian contexts. A paper (to be) presented in the 57th TEFLIN International Conference "Revitalizing professionalism in ELT as a response to the globalized world" in Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 1-3 November 2010.
7. Freeman, D. (2010). Language, Technology, and Social Capital: Frames,
Opportunities, and Tools. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
8. Graddol, D. (2010). English, Economy, and Employability. A paper presented in
the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An
Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
9. Harris, N. S. (2010). Why Aren’t My Students Learning English: Insights and
Solutions from Neuroscience Research. A paper presented in the Inaugural
APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
10.McKnight, P. (2010). Effectiveness of Applied Foreign Languages and
Intercultural Immersion to Enhance Economic Competitiveness. A paper presented
in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An
Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
11. Meek, C. (2010). Preparing Teachers to Prepare Learners for the 21st Century. A
paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language
and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
12.Nadkarni, (2010). Creating Prosperity: Using the Internet to Revolutionize
Language Learning. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International
Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
13.Peraturan Pemerintah No. 19 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
14.Plata, S. (2010). Standards and Assessment for the 21st Century Workforce in an
L2 Nation: the Role of English Teachers in Policy-Making. A paper presented in
the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An
Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
15.Poh, T. B. (2010). Helping Students Acquire 21st Century Skills Through the Use
(6)
Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
16.Senior, R. M. (2010). Language Teaching for Tomorrow: Connectivity within and
beyond the Classroom. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC
International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
17.Suherdi, D. (2001a). Persepsi Guru mengenai Kondisi Faktor-faktor Afektif Siswa
dalam Belajar Bahasa Indonesia. Mimbar Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Jurnal
Pendidikan bahasa, seni dan pengajarannya, 1 (1), 1-10.
18.Suherdi, D. (2006b). Peran Sentral Interaksi dalam Proses Belajar-Mengajar
Bahasa. Dalam Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, Vol. 6, No. 1, tahun 2006.
19.Suherdi, D. (2008). Only 2P+2R: An Alternative Route to Successful Teacher
In-service Training. A paper presented in the 6th Asia TEFL International Conference "Globalizing Asia: The Role of ELT", in Sanur Paradise Plaza Hotel, Bali 1-3 August 2008.
20.Suherdi, D. (2009). Using Mother Languages as the Languages of Instruction in
Indonesia (Towards the Implementation Projects of Mother Languages in
Indonesian Primary Schools). Presented in SEAMEO Meeting “Development of a
Proposal to Pilot the Good Models of Using the Mother Tongue in Teaching and Learning in Pilot Areas in Indonesia A Planning Meeting”in SEAMEO QITEP in
Language in Jakarta22-23 June 2009.
21.Suherdi, D. (2009). On Bridging Students’ Learning in First Grades Using Mother
Tongue a Case of Sundanese Classrooms. Presented in Regional Meeting on the
Dissemination of Project Results and Identification of Good Functioning Models, Arnoma Hotel Bangkok, Thailand 22-24 February 2009.
22.Suherdi, D. (2010). Country Report on Planning and Developing MTB-MLE in
Indonesia. Presented in Regional Training Workshop on the Principles and Methods of Developing and Using Curricula and Teaching-Learning Materials for Non-Dominant Languages for SEAMEO MLE Trainers. SEAMEO INNOTECH,
Quezon City, Philippines August 23-September 1, 2010.
23.Suherdi, D. (2010). Towards the 21st English Teacher Education: An Altenarnative
Model. Presented in the 57th TEFLIN International Conference "Revitalizing professionalism in ELT as a response to the globalized world" in Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia 1-3 November 2010.
24.Suherdi, D. (2010). Placing Mother Tongue in Its Place: Equity for the Majority.
Presented in International Symposium on Language Planning in 21st Century:
Constraints and Challenges in Hotel Sari Pan Facific, Jakarta 2-4 November 2010.
25.Suherdi, D. (2011). Making the Best Use of RSBI: An alternative solution British
(7)
26.Suherdi, D. (2011). Pilot Project on the Use of Mother Tongue as a Bridge
Language in Primary Education in Indonesia. Presented in the End-of-Project
Conference in Royal Queen’s Park Hotel Bangkok 23-25 Februari 2011.
27.Trilling, B., and Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills, Learning for Life in Our
Times. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.Weng, C. Y. (2010). Intertextual Reading: Managing and Processing Information in
a Globalized Knowledge-Economy. A paper presented in the Inaugural
APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
Internet Sources:
1. http://freearticles.com/article/Tools-You-Need-In-Conducting-A-Successful-And-Profitable-Seminar
2. http://www.uwic.ac.uk/tsu/u_studyskills/unit06.html (How to Give a Good Seminar University of Wales Institute)
3. http://www.comm.toronto.edu/~frank/guide/guide0.html (Giving a Talk University of Toronto)
4. http://web.clas.ufl.rhatch/pages/02TeachingResources/readingwritin g/05surviv.htm (Seminar Discussions & Presentations University of Florida)
5. http://c.s.cornell.edu/cv/ShortTalk.htm (The Short Talk Cornell University)
COURSE UNITS
Session
s Topics
Specific
Objectives ActivitiesLearning Evaluation Sources 1 Introduction
to seminars
Be able to understand the nature of seminars and scientific fora
Lecture (2
hours) Class elicitation
Main reference no. 3 Internet Source No. 1
2 Basic
Concepts and Terms
Be able to understand basic concepts of seminars and scientific fora
Lecture (2 hours)
(8)
3 Understand -ing
seminar themes
Be able to understand seminar themes Workshop (2 hours) Quiz Main reference no. 7 Recom-mended Reference No. 5, 7-12, 13-16, 28 Recom-mended Reference No. 1-5, 17-26, Recom-mended Reference No. 23-27 4 Developing relevant topics
Be able to develop relevant topics Workshop (2 Hours) Seminar Leaflet and Brochure Review 5 Developing paper outlines
Be able to analyze segments of classroom discourse analysis Workshop
(2 hours) Written outlines
6 Writing paper drafts
Be able to analyze segments of classroom discourse analysis Workshop (2 hours) Paper drafts
7 Editing and finalizing papers
Be able to edit and finalize papers Workshop (2 hours) Seminar Paper
8 MID-TERM TEST
9 Designing paper presentatio ns
Be able to design paper presentataion Workshop (2 hours) Presentatio n design Main Reference s No. 1 and 3 Internet Sources No. 2-5 10 Develop power point presentatio n
Be able to develop effective power point Workshop (2 hours) Power point slides 11 Rehearsing presentatio ns
Be able to rehearse presentations
Workshop
(2 hours) Peer ratings
12 Paper
presentatio n (1)
Be able to present a paper effectively Workshop (2 hours) Perfrorman ce assessment 13 Paper presentatio n (2)
Be able to present a paper effectively Workshop (2 hours) Perfrorman ce assessment 14 Paper presentatio n (3)
Be able to present a paper effectively Workshop (2 hours) Perfrorman ce assessment
(9)
productive seminars
plan a seminar
(2 hours) proposal references No, 3
(1)
15 Running seminars Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run seminars and workshops: presentation skills for consultants, trainers, and teachers. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc.
http://web.clas.ufl.rhatch/pag es/02TeachingResources/read ingwriting/05surviv.htm (Seminar Discussions & Presentations University of Florida)
16 FINAL TESTS
REFERENCES Main references:
1. Dignen, B. (1999). Down to Business English for Presentations. London: York Associates.
2. Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (2000). Writing Skills Narrative and Non-fiction Text Types. Putney: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.
3. Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run seminars and workshops: presentation skills for consultants, trainers, and teachers. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc. 4. Kirszner, L. G., and Mandell, S. R. (1989). Patterns for College Writing a
rethorical reader and guide 4th Edition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
5. Simon, L. (1988). Good Writing a guide and sourcebook for writing across the curriculum. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6. Swales, J., and Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students. A course for nonnative speakers of English 2nd Edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: Sage Publications.
Recommended references:
1. Alwasilah, A. C. (2000). Perspektif Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Indonesia dalam Konteks Persaingan Global. Bandung: CV Andira.
2. Ashton, P. (1988). Teaching higher-order thinking and content: An essential ingredient in teacher preparation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
3. Bellanca, J., and Brandt, R. (2010). 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
(2)
4. Carson, S. H.; Peterson, J. B., Higgins, D. M. (2005). "Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire". Creativity Research Journal 17 (1): 37–50.
5. Emilia, E. (2010). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
6. Emilia, E. (2010). Developing critical learners: Indonesian and Australian contexts. A paper (to be) presented in the 57th TEFLIN International Conference "Revitalizing professionalism in ELT as a response to the globalized world" in Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 1-3 November 2010.
7. Freeman, D. (2010). Language, Technology, and Social Capital: Frames, Opportunities, and Tools. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
8. Graddol, D. (2010). English, Economy, and Employability. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
9. Harris, N. S. (2010). Why Aren’t My Students Learning English: Insights and Solutions from Neuroscience Research. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
10.McKnight, P. (2010). Effectiveness of Applied Foreign Languages and Intercultural Immersion to Enhance Economic Competitiveness. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
11. Meek, C. (2010). Preparing Teachers to Prepare Learners for the 21st Century. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
12.Nadkarni, (2010). Creating Prosperity: Using the Internet to Revolutionize Language Learning. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
13.Peraturan Pemerintah No. 19 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 14.Plata, S. (2010). Standards and Assessment for the 21st Century Workforce in an
L2 Nation: the Role of English Teachers in Policy-Making. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
15.Poh, T. B. (2010). Helping Students Acquire 21st Century Skills Through the Use of Q-Matrix. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International
(3)
Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
16.Senior, R. M. (2010). Language Teaching for Tomorrow: Connectivity within and beyond the Classroom. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
17.Suherdi, D. (2001a). Persepsi Guru mengenai Kondisi Faktor-faktor Afektif Siswa dalam Belajar Bahasa Indonesia. Mimbar Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Jurnal Pendidikan bahasa, seni dan pengajarannya, 1 (1), 1-10.
18.Suherdi, D. (2006b). Peran Sentral Interaksi dalam Proses Belajar-Mengajar Bahasa. Dalam Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, Vol. 6, No. 1, tahun 2006.
19.Suherdi, D. (2008). Only 2P+2R: An Alternative Route to Successful Teacher In-service Training. A paper presented in the 6th Asia TEFL International Conference "Globalizing Asia: The Role of ELT", in Sanur Paradise Plaza Hotel, Bali 1-3 August 2008.
20.Suherdi, D. (2009). Using Mother Languages as the Languages of Instruction in Indonesia (Towards the Implementation Projects of Mother Languages in Indonesian Primary Schools). Presented in SEAMEO Meeting “Development of a Proposal to Pilot the Good Models of Using the Mother Tongue in Teaching and Learning in Pilot Areas in Indonesia A Planning Meeting” in SEAMEO QITEP in Language in Jakarta 22-23 June 2009.
21.Suherdi, D. (2009). On Bridging Students’ Learning in First Grades Using Mother Tongue a Case of Sundanese Classrooms. Presented in Regional Meeting on the Dissemination of Project Results and Identification of Good Functioning Models, Arnoma Hotel Bangkok, Thailand 22-24 February 2009.
22.Suherdi, D. (2010). Country Report on Planning and Developing MTB-MLE in Indonesia. Presented in Regional Training Workshop on the Principles and Methods of Developing and Using Curricula and Teaching-Learning Materials for Non-Dominant Languages for SEAMEO MLE Trainers. SEAMEO INNOTECH, Quezon City, Philippines August 23-September 1, 2010.
23.Suherdi, D. (2010). Towards the 21st English Teacher Education: An Altenarnative Model. Presented in the 57th TEFLIN International Conference "Revitalizing professionalism in ELT as a response to the globalized world" in Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 1-3 November 2010.
24.Suherdi, D. (2010). Placing Mother Tongue in Its Place: Equity for the Majority. Presented in International Symposium on Language Planning in 21st Century:
Constraints and Challenges in Hotel Sari Pan Facific, Jakarta 2-4 November 2010.
25.Suherdi, D. (2011). Making the Best Use of RSBI: An alternative solution British Council Symposium on RSBI/SBI in Century Park Hotel Jakarta 9-10 Maret 2011.
(4)
26.Suherdi, D. (2011). Pilot Project on the Use of Mother Tongue as a Bridge Language in Primary Education in Indonesia. Presented in the End-of-Project Conference in Royal Queen’s Park Hotel Bangkok 23-25 Februari 2011.
27.Trilling, B., and Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills, Learning for Life in Our Times. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.Weng, C. Y. (2010). Intertextual Reading: Managing and Processing Information in a Globalized Knowledge-Economy. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.
Internet Sources:
1. http://freearticles.com/article/Tools-You-Need-In-Conducting-A-Successful-And-Profitable-Seminar
2. http://www.uwic.ac.uk/tsu/u_studyskills/unit06.html (How to Give a Good Seminar University of Wales Institute)
3. http://www.comm.toronto.edu/~frank/guide/guide0.html (Giving a Talk University of Toronto)
4. http://web.clas.ufl.rhatch/pages/02TeachingResources/readingwritin g/05surviv.htm (Seminar Discussions & Presentations University of Florida)
5. http://c.s.cornell.edu/cv/ShortTalk.htm (The Short Talk Cornell University)
COURSE UNITS
Session
s Topics
Specific
Objectives ActivitiesLearning Evaluation Sources 1 Introduction
to seminars
Be able to understand the nature of seminars and scientific fora
Lecture (2
hours) Class
elicitation
Main reference no. 3 Internet Source No. 1
2 Basic
Concepts and Terms
Be able to understand basic concepts of seminars and scientific fora
Lecture (2 hours)
(5)
3 Understand -ing
seminar themes
Be able to understand seminar themes Workshop (2 hours) Quiz Main reference no. 7 Recom-mended Reference No. 5, 7-12, 13-16, 28 Recom-mended Reference No. 1-5, 17-26, Recom-mended Reference No. 23-27 4 Developing relevant topics
Be able to develop relevant topics Workshop (2 Hours) Seminar Leaflet and Brochure Review 5 Developing paper outlines
Be able to analyze segments of classroom discourse analysis Workshop
(2 hours) Written outlines
6 Writing
paper drafts
Be able to analyze segments of classroom discourse analysis Workshop (2 hours) Paper drafts
7 Editing and finalizing papers
Be able to edit and finalize papers Workshop (2 hours) Seminar Paper
8 MID-TERM TEST
9 Designing
paper presentatio ns
Be able to design paper presentataion Workshop (2 hours) Presentatio n design Main Reference s No. 1 and 3 Internet Sources No. 2-5 10 Develop power point presentatio n
Be able to develop effective power point Workshop (2 hours) Power point slides 11 Rehearsing presentatio ns
Be able to rehearse presentations
Workshop
(2 hours) Peer ratings
12 Paper
presentatio n (1)
Be able to present a paper effectively Workshop (2 hours) Perfrorman ce assessment 13 Paper presentatio n (2)
Be able to present a paper effectively Workshop (2 hours) Perfrorman ce assessment 14 Paper presentatio n (3)
Be able to present a paper effectively Workshop (2 hours) Perfrorman ce assessment
(6)
productive seminars
plan a seminar
(2 hours) proposal references No, 3