The Problem Formulation Design Simulation of Filing Sequence and Solidification Time for Cast Metal Matrix Composite by Low Pressure Die Casting.

Copyright © 2011 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 5, N. 2 Special Issue on Heat Transfer 362 value of the forced convection 4.364. This increase is all the more important when the Grashof number is raised, Nguyen and Galanis [3], Boufendi and Afrid [4]. When the wall is of finite thickness, thermal conductivity is not remainder without influence. Its importance in the azimuth and axial directions justified by important variations in gradients of the temperature was well highlighted in work of Newell and Bergles [5], Baughn [6], Ouzzane and Galanis [7],[8]. The influence of the variation of the physical properties with the temperature was introduced into the numerical work of Shome and Jensen [9] and Shome [10]. Recently, Boufendi and Afrid [11] take account of the whole of these effects, the thermal dependent properties and the conduction in the solid, and solve numerically the problem in 3D, for the case of a uniform volumetric heating within the solid thickness, a incompressible laminar fluid flow with a parabolic profile and a constant temperature at the entry of the pipe. Their results, which are in perfect agreement with those of an experimental study of Abid and al. [12], show clearly the non-uniformity of the heat flux at the interface fluid-wall, the reduction of about 70 of the viscosity of the fluid at fluid at. the exit and a Nusselt number who reaches at the exit of the pipe a value from 8 to 10 times higher than the asymptotic forced convection value, 4.364. In accordance with these developments and in particular with those used the method of the volumetric heating, this investigation examines the influence of the parietal conduction on the dynamic and thermal fields of the system. Four materials of different thermal conductivities were selected: Inconel, tantalum, steel and aluminum. In this model the variation of the conductivity of the solid involves a change of the characteristic difference temperature which has a direct influence on the number of Grashof based on this difference. This last will thus have a value appropriate to each studied case while the other parameters of control, geometrical and dynamic, as well as the generation of volumetric heat, are maintained fixed.

II. The Problem Formulation

Fig. 1 illustrates the geometry of the problem. size. It is a horizontal duct of length L=1m, inner and outer diameters, respectively D i =0.96cm and D o =1cm of which the thickness is the seat of an internal generation of uniform heat produced by Joule effect, with a rate of 4 10 7 Wm 3 . At the entry of the pipe, arise a distilled water laminar flow of parabolic profile with a mean velocity equal to1.710 -2 ms and a constant temperature of 15°C. The external surface of the tube, of emissivity 9 . = ε , is subjected to convective and radiative losses with the ambient air. The viscosity and the thermal conductivity of the fluid are functions of the temperature while the thermal depending of the density is expressed according to the Boussinesq approximation. Fig. 1. Geometry and dimensions: 1 i D ∗ = , 1 04 o D . ∗ = and 104 17 L . ∗ = We are thus in the presence of a conjugate heat transfer problem modeled by the dimensionless conservation equations and the initial and boundary conditions: At t ∗ = : r z V V V T θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ = = = = 1 At t ∗ : Mass conservation equation: 1 1 z r V V r V r r r r r θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + = ∂ ∂ ∂ 2 Radial momentum conservation equation: 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 r r r r z r rr r rz V r V V V V r r r r V Gr P V V cos T z r r Re r r r r Re r z θ θ θ θθ θ θ τ τ θ τ τ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + − = − + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ + + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ − + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ⎣ ⎦ 3 Angular momentum conservation equation: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 r r z r z V r V V V V t r r r V V Gr P V V sin T z r r Re r r r r Re z θ θ θ θ θ θ θ θθ θ θ θ θ τ τ θ τ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + = − − + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ + + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ + ∂ ⎢ ⎥ + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ⎣ ⎦ 4 ∗ o D ∗ r ∗ z ∗ i D ∗ L θ Copyright © 2011 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 5, N. 2 Special Issue on Heat Transfer 363 Axial momentum conservation equation: 1 1 1 1 1 z r z z z z rz z zz V r V V V V r r r r P V V z z r Re r r r z θ θ θ τ τ τ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + = − + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ + + + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎣ ⎦ 5 Energy conservation equation: 1 1 1 1 1 r z r z T r V T r r r V T V T r z r q r r G Re Pr q q r z θ θ θ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ ∂ + + ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + = ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎡ ⎤ + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ = − ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ + + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ∂ ⎣ ⎦ 6 The viscous stress components are: 2 r rr V r τ µ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ = ∂ , 1 2 r V V r r θ θθ τ µ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎡ ⎤ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ = + ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ 2 z zz V z τ µ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ = ∂ , z r zr rz V V r z τ τ µ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎡ ⎤ ∂ ∂ = = + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ 1 z z z V V z r θ θ θ τ τ µ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎡ ⎤ ∂ ∂ = = + ⎢ ⎥ ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ 7 1 r r r V V r r r r θ θ θ τ τ µ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎡ ⎤ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ = = + ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ and the heat fluxes are: r T q K r ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ = − ∂ , K T q r θ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ = − ∂ , z T q K z ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∂ = − ∂ 8 The boundary conditions are: - At the inlet of the duct z ∗ = : In the fluid domain: r V V T θ ∗ ∗ ∗ = = = , 2 2 1 4 z V r ∗ ∗ = − 9 In the solid domain: r z V V V T θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ = = = = 10 - At the outlet of the duct 104 17 z . ∗ = : Fluid domain: r z V V V T K z z z z z θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = = = = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ 11 Solid domain: r z T V V V K z z θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎛ ⎞ ∂ ∂ = = = = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ∂ ∂ ⎝ ⎠ 12 - At the duct axis, the dynamical condition is applied. - At the duct outer wall 0 5208 r . ∗ = : r z r c i V V V h h D T K T K r θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ⎧ = = = ⎪ + ⎨ ∂ − = ⎪ ∂ ⎩ 13 with 2 2 r h T T T T ε σ ∞ ∞ = + + and c h for air is locally approximated from the correlation of Churchill and Chu [13] valid for all Pr and Ra numbers in the range 6 9 10 10 Ra − ≤ ≤ : [ ] 2 8 29 1 6 9 16 0 6 0 387 1 0 559 c i air air air h D K . . Ra . Pr = ⎡ ⎤ ⎛ ⎞ = + + ⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥ ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ with 3 o o air air Ra g T R , , z T D β θ ν α ∞ ⎡ ⎤ = − ⎣ ⎦ . The air thermophysical properties are evaluated at the local film temperature: 2 film o T T R , , z T θ ∞ ⎡ ⎤ = + ⎣ ⎦ . In this study the aspect ratio LD i is equal to 104.17, and the Re, Pr and Gr numbers are calculated with the physical properties of the water evaluated at the entrance reference temperature 288 T K = : 143 2836 Re . = , 8 082 Pr . = . The functions T µ ∗ ∗ and K T , ∗ ∗ clarified in [11], are obtained by fittings of the tabulated values cited in [14] and the solid dimensionless viscosity s µ ∗ is infinite, valued to 30 10 . The local Nusselt number at the interface solid-fluid is: 0 5 0 5 i r . b h , z D Nu , z K K T r T . , , z T z θ θ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ = ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ = = ⎡ ⎤ ∂ ∂ ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ − ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ 14 Copyright © 2011 Praise Worthy Prize S.r.l. - All rights reserved International Review of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 5, N. 2 Special Issue on Heat Transfer 364 where the dimensionless bulk fluid temperature is: 1 2 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 b V r , , z T r , , z r dr d T z V r , , z r dr d π π θ θ θ θ θ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ = ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ 15 The local axial mean peripheral Nu number is: 2 1 2 Nu z Nu , z d π θ θ π ∗ ∗ = ∫ 16 and the average Nu number for the whole interface is: 104 17 1 104 17 . Nu Nu z dz . ∗ ∗ = ∫ 17

III. The Numerical Resolution