68 coherence becomes an essential concept to consider and whose students have been
equipped  with  the  concept  of  coherence  showed  the  variety  of  relevant  and interconnected data of this research.
Lastly,  the  setting  of  this  research  is  concerned  with  the  accessibility  in conducting  this  research,  as  what  it  is  believed  by  Holliday  2002  that  a
researcher  should  have  an  access  to  take  any  necessary  role  in  order  to  collect data. In that case, the fact that I was an alumnus of ELESP facilitated me to obtain
permission  from  the  study  program  to  conduct  this  research  as  well  as  to  access the needed data effortlessly. Another fact was I have already had a good relation
with  the lecturer in  the  class since  I became one  of the students at  ELESP. This fact helped me a lot in accessing the data in his writing class.
The  lecturer  was  also  one  of  the  alumni  in  the  Graduate  Program  in English  Language  Studies  of  Sanata  Dharma  University  Yogyakarta,  henceforth
called ELS, who has the same thesis advisor as mine. Therefore, having the same educational  background,  I,  in  fact,  could  obtain  permission  to  conduct  my
research in  his  class easily. Moreover,  I  could also  fearlessly share the problems that  I  encountered  during  the  data  collection  process  done  in  his  classroom  and
significantly obtained the solutions to overcome the problems.
C. Types of Data and Data Sources
Considering  types  of  data  and  data  sources,  this  section  explains  some essential points adapted  from Holliday 2002. They  were types and  information
about where the research data was obtained. In line with the methodology of this PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69 research, the data to analyze were in the form of documents, which become one of
three main sources of data in a qualitative research Merriam, 2002; Patton, 2002. Particularly, the documents to analyze in this research were argumentative essays
written by the students. According to Creswell 2003, the selection of documents as  the  data  to  analyze  was  believed  to  provide  some  benefits  for  me  as  a
researcher. Firstly, the documents enable a researcher to obtain the language and words  that  participants  have.  Secondly,  the  documents  could  be  accessed  at  a
particular  time  that  is  convenient  to  a  researcher.  Thirdly,  regarded  as  written evidence, the documents would not make a researcher spend his time to transcribe
them. Based  on  the  classroom  syllabus  Iswandari,  2013  as  well  as  the  essays
written  by  the  students,  the  essays  were  categorized  into  one  type  of  exposition essays, namely analytical exposition. The information concerning with the type of
the essay, covering its purposes and components, was further clarified in Chapter II. Then, the  essays to  analyze were  gathered from  the fifth-semester students  in
class D of Academic Essay Writing at  ELESP in the academic  year 2012  2013. How the essays were selected as the research data would be clarified further in the
subsequent paragraphs. In  determining  the  essays  to  analyze,  this  research  followed  the  steps  of
sampling as shown in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1 Steps in Sampling Ary, Jacobs,  Razavieh, 2002: 164
target population  accessible population  sample  findings
70 In  this  research,  the  target  populations,  which  are
“the large group to which the researcher wishes to generalize the results of the study” Ary et al, 2010: 149, of
were  argumentative  essays  written  by  the  fifth  semester  students  in  Academic Essay  Writing  classes  at  ELESP.  Then,  in  this  research,  the  accessible
populations, which are “the population of subjects accessible to the researcher for
drawing  a  sample”  Ary  et  al,  2010:  149,  were  twenty-seven  argumentative essays,  regarded  as  the  first  writing  project,  in  Class  D  of  Academic  Essay
Writing. This  research  also  needed  to  determine  the  samples  of  the  research  after
stating  the  target  and  the  accessible  populations.  In  this  research,  twenty argumentative  essays  written  by  twenty  students  in  class  D  of  Academic  Essay
Writing  became  the  samples  to  analyze.  Generally,  the  samples  could  be categorized into probability sampling, in which each participant of the population
has a known probability to be selected as a sample Ary et al, 2010. Particularly,  the  selection  of  the  samples  in  this  research  could  be
categorized  into  simple  random  sampling,  in  which “all  members  of  the
population have an equal and independent chance of being included in the random sample” Ary et al, 2010: 150. In that case, the first twenty argumentative essays
sent to my E-mail  account were analyzed. The further clarification on the use of the E-mail account in collecting
the students’ essay could be read in the research instrument part.
Certainly, the findings drawn from the selected samples would become an overall picture of the target population in the research. Its underlying reason was
71 that the selected samples shared the same fundamental characteristics as the target
populations.  Firstly,  both  the  argumentative  essays  in  the  selected  samples  and those in the target population were all written by the fifth semester students, who
have  been  equipped  with  the  concept  of  coherence,  at  ELESP  in  the  academic year  20122013.  Secondly,  all  lecturers  teaching  Academic  Essay  Writing  class
used  the  same  syllabus  Iswandari,  2013  consisting  of  overview,  models  of argumentative  essays  as  well  as  schedule  and  learning  activities  in  writing  the
essay.  This  possibly  indicated  that  the  argumentative  essays  written  by  the students in the selected samples followed the same general instructions printed on
the syllabus as those written by the students in other writing classes.
D. Data Collection Technique