Second Meeting

2) Second Meeting

The implementation of Word Wish Game in the second meeting of Cycle II was held on Tuesday, 02 nd June 2016. To conduct the research the researcher

followed some procedure:

a) Planning

In the second meeting, the researcher arranged everything needed during the research. They were lesson plan, observation sheet, evaluation sheet, and the material. The planning was made to avoid misconception of the action that would be done in the classroom especially during the teaching-learning process.

b) Action

In first meeting of Cycle II, the researcher was more enthusiasts to teach recount text. The researcher entered the classroom and greeted the students. Then, the researcher checked the students’ presence list. The researcher asked the students to review the material of the last meeting and seek about the students’ ability in understanding the previous meeting.

The researcher straightened some of the review in order to give a correct understanding about the lesson to the students. Furthermore, the researcher gave the evaluation paper to the students. The researcher asked the students to write the missing words based on the text by using Word Wish Game in order to help them in finishing their task. When the students finished their task, the researcher asked the students to collect their tasks to the researcher. The researcher asked for the problem faced by the students during working the task, and tried to solve the problem with the students.

At last, the researcher gave a conclusion about the lesson material, and asked the students to mark it on their mind as an input for themselves. The researcher then gave farewell to the students and left the classroom.

c) Observation

During the teaching and learning process, the researcher and the teacher- collaborator had made the observation about the students’ activities in following the teaching and learning process. The teacher-collaborator also had made the observation about the researcher’s activities during the teaching process. The researcher found that there was no more weakness of the students in teaching and learning process. Based on the English teacher-collaborator’s observation, there were

27 students (100%) do all activities. To understand the percentage of students’ activities can be seen as follows.

Presentage Frequency

Graphic 7: Percentage of the students who had been done and undone the Done Undone activities in the second meeting of Cycle II

Based on the result of the English teacher-collaborator there were 30 activities of 30 activities (100%) that the researcher had done. Clearly, the percentage can be seen in the graphic.

Graphic 8 : Percentage of the researcher’s activities that had been done and Done Undone undone the activities in the second meeting of Cycle II As well as, there was no more weakness of the researcher during the

teaching process. The researcher found the strengths and advantages in teaching and learning process, as follows.

(1) The students mastered the generic structures and language features of expository text.

(2) The researcher could pronounce the words. (3) The students could write words. (4) The students mastered expository text. (5) The students could do the procedure of Word Wish Game.

d) Reflection

After doing the action in the classroom, the researcher noted, analyzed and concluded the result of the research. Then, the researcher analyzed the students’ evaluation sheet. The result of the students’ evaluation sheet in the second meeting of Cycle II can be showed on the table bellow.

Table 3

The STUDENTS’ MASTERING VOCABULARY by Using Word Wish Game in the SECOND MEETING of the CYCLE II

MCC Level

Percentage Very Good

The students’ value classification above, it showed that there were 22 students (81.4%) who got the value classified in “ Very Good” level. There were 5 students (18.6 who got the value classified in “Good” level. There was not student (0%) who got the value classified in “Enough”, “Less” and “Fail” level. The students’ high value in the first meeting of Cycle II was 100 and the lowest value was 80.

Then, the average of the students value was 96.3. In order to make a better vision, the comparison can be seen in the graphic.

Pass Students

Not Pass Students

Students' Score Percentage

Graphic 7. The Comparison of the Students’ Ability

Based on the graphic above, it is clearly seen that there was a gap between the ‘Successful’ students and ‘Failed’ students. In Cycle II, the percentage of ‘Successful’ students were larger than ‘Failed’ students. Based on the data above, the researcher found the students’ ability in writing was 96.3 which categorized in “very good” level. Since all of the students were successful in passing Minimum Competence Criterion, the research was stopped by the researcher.