Challenges. First Regional Community Forum 90

112 THAILAND rely on existing administrative structures and budget. TAO can authorize local rules that do not conflict with existing laws. • Benefit distribution: benefits should be proportionately distributed to contributors. Currently, none of the benefit sharing mechanisms differentiates local users who participate in CF activities from outsiders who have access to the forest without making any contributions. Furthermore, lack of conflict negotiation and mechanisms to reduce conflict causes CF debates, especially over resource benefit distribution, creating a never-ending process. Throughout Thailand’s CF evolution, there is constant debate over who should have rights to claim access to and responsibility over the forestland. • Cost-benefit incongruence: investment from local institutions i.e. allocating budgets to cover CF management expenses e.g., wages, office supplies, and construction materials does not generate monetary returns or if it does so, the returns are considered very limited. • Community understanding and roles: local people often do not clearly understand their roles as users, contributors, and planners in CF management. They usually perceive their roles as recipients of top-down decision making and therefore only put assigned projects into practice – they cooperate but not actually participate. Although mostly the registered CFs are clear about their roles. • Property rights regimes: complicated PRRs of forest resources require triangulated dimensions of rules and regulations. Protection of timbers is necessary but not sufficient to maintain forest diversity as long as all users have access to NTFP’s. • Ecological sustainability: forest health indication. The majority of CF activities focus on increasing forested areas and improvement of local livelihoods. A limited number of studies examine forest health and ecosystem resilience. In fact, CFs can possibly be developed as an ecological connector between local community forests and protected forests. If CFs are promoted beyond community subsistence forests, they can positively contribute to sustainable forests. Over 71 plant species 36 families, mostly in Dipterocarpaceae were recorded of which 28 species were identified bird food plants at Khoa Noi-Na Pang community forest a dry Dipterocarp forest with, to some extent, mixed deciduous forest covers an area of approximately 88 ha, Phu Waing, Khon Kaen. These plants can introduce wildlife e.g., birds into the area to make the forest more livable and ecologically diverse. Admittedly, though, there is no clear monitoring and evaluation to ensure CF will be managed sustainably.

6. Challenges.

• Ensuring sufficient and consistent governmental financial support: is the government going to allocate sufficient funds to organize and promote CFs? Does RFD have sufficient workforce to carry on with CF registration and implementation? • Making quality control mechanisms effective to ensure CF programs provide equitable benefits to the majority of participants. • Establishing conflict reduction mechanisms among users, within agencies, and between local groups. Wichawutipong 113 References Asia Forest Network. 2005. Community Forest Management Trends in Southeast Asia [On-line]. Available: http:www.asiaforestnetwork.orgcfm.htm. Access data: August 3, 2005. European Commission and United Nations Development Program. 2002. Small Grants Program for Operations to Promote Tropical Forests: Country Guideline Paper—Thailand 2002-2005. A formal national consultative workshop held at RECOFTC on 11 April 2002, Bangkok, Thailand. McCay, B.J. and Acheson, J.M. 1987. Human ecology of the commons. In B.J. McCay and J.M. Acheson eds., the question of the commons pp 1-34. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. Office of Community Forest Promotion, Royal Forest Department. 2005. Community Forest Statistics [On-line]. Available: http:www.forest.go.th. Access date: August 3, 2005. Pagdee, Adcharaporn. Open Access: a threat to community forest management, the case from Dong Keng Community Forest, Khon Kaen, Thailand. A manuscript accepted for USSEE Conference 2005 July 20-23, 2005, Tocoma, Washington, U.S.A. Pagdee, A., Homchuen, S., and Khamcha, D. 2005. Diversity of Bird Food Plants in Dry Dipterocarp Forest: Khoa noi-Napang Community Forest, Phu Wiang, Khon Kaen. Poster presented at the First Field Ecology Symposium: Forest Ecology and Restoration, January 28-30, 2005. King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok. Srikosamatara, S., Brokcelman, W., Pattanavibool, A., Milne, J., and Round, D. 2004. Thailand Environment Monitor Series 2004—Biodiversity Conservation. Center for Conservation Biology, Mihidol University, Thailand. 114 THAILAND Pulhin, Amaro Bacalla 85 PHILIPPINES COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT 2005 1 Juan M. Pulhin i , Marcial C. Amaro, Jr. ii and Domingo Bacalla iii

1. The Evolution of CBFM