Significance of the Study

60

5.2 Implications

Concerning with the theoretical review and the result of this study, some implications are presented as below. 1 The result of this study showed that the linguistic realization among high achievers is similar from those of medium achievers. 2 The result of this study showed that the nature of interactions among high achievers is different from those of medium achievers. 3 The result of this study also implied that classroom interaction is very crucial to help students develop their cognitive skills. The more active students the more likely to be high achievers

5.3 Suggestions

Due to the previous conclusion, suggestions are stated as the following: 1 It is suggested to next researcher who interested to reveal the classroom interaction elaborated with multiple intelligences to facilitate and encourage students’ language development. 2 It is expected to lecturers and university students to pay attention the importance of classroom interaction as the benchmark for ‘successful’ lessons at least for language lecturers. 3 However, it is hard to avoid the students prefer keeping silent, it is suggested that the lecturers keep facilitating the classroom interaction in order to avoid failure of language learning. REFERENCES Allwright, D. 1984. The Importance of Interaction in Classroom Language Learning. Applied Linguistics 52:156-171 Bogdan, R.C and Biklen, S.K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods 3 rd Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Dagarin, Mateja. 2004. Classroom Interaction and Communication Strategies in Learning English As A Foreign Studies In The English Language And Literature In Slovenia. ELOPE, Volume 1, str 127-139 Dukmak, Samir. 2010. Classroom Interaction in Regular and Special Education Middle Primary Classroom in the United Arab Emmirates .British Journal of Special Education. Volume 37, Issue 1, pages 39-48 Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books. Kafanabo, J. E. 2006. An Investigation into the interaction between multiple intelligences and the performance of learners’ in open ended digital learning tasks. University of Pretoira Dissertation Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2003 Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Thomson Heinle Lazear, G.D. 1993. Teaching for Multiple Intelligences. Indiana : The Phi Delta Kapa Educational Foundation Blomington Leslie Wessman from the work of Howard Gardner, Thomas Armstrong, Linda Campbell, and David Lazear in http:www.verbal-linguisticintelligence capacities.com articlesmultiple-intelligenceshtml. Accessed on 2010 Lunenburg, C. Fred and Lunenburg, R. Melody. 2014. Applying Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom: A Fresh Look at Teaching Writing. International Journal Of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity Volume 16, Number 1 Lincoln. Y.S., Guba.E.G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Mardhatillah, Wahyu. 2013. Coherence and Cohesion in the Background Section. Bandung: Indonesia Education University. Murdoch, Y. 1999. Classroom Interaction in a Korean University English Language Class. United Kingdom: Birmingham Nurmasitah, Sita. 2010. A Study Of Classroom Interaction Characteristics In A Geography Class Conducted In English: The Case At Year Ten Of An Immersion Class In Sma N 2 Semarang. Diponegoro University: Semarang Paramita, Elsa. 2011. Different Activity Frames and Teachers’ Other Initiations as Scaffolding in The Process of Meaning Negotiation in The Classroom Interaction at The Immersion Classes of Theresiana Elementary School. Soegijapranata Catholic University: Semarang. Richards, J.Platt, J. Weber, H. 1987: Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Hong Kong: Longman, 2deg.edition Robinson, Helja Antola. 2005. The Ethnography of Empowerment: The Transformative Power of Classroom interaction. London: The Falmer Press A member of the Taylor Francis Group SPARKed. Multiple Intelligence Theory. http:www.ericfacility.netericdigestsed410226.html. Thapa Lin. 2013. Interaction in English language classrooms to enhance students’ language learning.https:neltachoutari.wordpress.com20130801interaction-in- english-language-classrooms-to-enhance-nepalese-students-language-learning Tuan, T. L and Nhu. K. T. N. 2010. Theoretical Review on Oral Interaction in EFL Classrooms. www.csanada.net: Studies in Literature and Language. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 29-48 Walsh, M. and hall, K, J. 2002. Teacher- Student Interaction and Learning. USA : Cambridge University Press. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 186-203 Yanfen, Liu Yuqin, Zhao. 2010. A Study of Teacher Talk in Interactions in English Classes : Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics Bimonthly Vol. 33 No. 2. Harbin Institute of Technology Yu, Runmei. 2008. Interaction in EFL Classes. China: Qingdao University of Science and Technology. www.ccsenet.orgjournal.html. Zipke, M. 2008. Teaching Metalinguistic Awareness and Reading Comprehension With Riddles. USA: Rhode Island _______ ABC Linguistic Intelligence Z. International Montessori Schools and Child Development Centres Brussels: Belgium ________ Verbal Linguistic: ways of knowing. Adapted by Leslie Wessman from the work of Howard Gardner, Thomas Armstrong, Linda Campbell, and David Lazear.