The Validity of Questionnaire The Validity of Vocabulary Test

• Less than 0.30 = difficult • 0.30-0.70 = middle good item • More than 0.70-1.00 = easy Shohamy, 1985 Based on the statements above, it is clear that all the test item should base on the criteria above and the items which do not fulfill the requirements should be omitted or revised. The result of difficulty level of the vocabulary size try-out test showed that there were 9 easy items, 48 average items, and 3 difficult items in this instrument. Below is the table displaying the difficulty level of the vocabulary size try-out test. Table 5. Difficulty Level of the Vocabulary Size Try-out Test Classification Items Easy 5,8,13,25,28,49,50,53,60 15 Average 1,2,3, 6, 7, 9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,24, 26, 29, 30, 31,32,33,34,36,37,39,40,41,42,43, 44,45,46,47,48,51,52,54,55,56,57,58,59 81.67 Difficult 4,27,38 3.33 Total 60 items 100

3.9. Discrimination Power of the Test

Discrimination power refers to the extent to which the item differentiates between high and low level students on the test. A good item according to this criterion is one in which good students did well, and bad students failed Shohamy, 1985. To calculate the discrimination power DP of the test items, the following formula was used by the researcher: In which, DP: Discrimination Power U: the total of correct answer of the higher group L: the total of correct answer of the lower group N: total number of students Shohamy, 1985 The criteria are: 0.00- 0.20 = Poor 0.21- 0.40 = Satisfactory 0.41- 0.70 = Good 0.70- 1.00 = Excellent should be omitted The Discrimination Power of the vocabulary size try-out test showed that there were 33 good items, 14 satisfactory items, and 13 excellent items. The following table presents the distribution of discrimination power of this instrument. Table 6. Discrimination Power of Vocabulary Size Try-out Test Classification Items Good 1,2,6,7,8,12,13,14,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24,25,26,28,27, 30,36,37,39,40,41,45,46,49,52,57,58,60 55 Satisfactory 4, 5, 9, 15,38,42,43,44,50,51,53, 54,55,59 23,33 Excellent 3,10,11,21,27,31,32,33,34,35,36,47,48 21,67 Total 60 Items 100

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness Of Using Pictures For Teaching Vocabulary : pre experimental at the fourth grade of SDN Pamulang Permai - Pamulang

0 4 58

The teaching of vocabulary by using game, song and story techniques to young learners based on teachers’ perspectives (descriptive qualitative study at Madrasah Ibtida’iyyah Pembangunan UIN Jakarta in the 2014/2015 academic year)

0 8 0

INCREASING STUDENTS` VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH DERIVATIONAL APPROACH AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 77

THE EFFECT OF LEARNING STRATEGIES IN READING TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 10 50

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DERIVATIONAL EXERCISE IN TEACHING VOCABULARY AT THE SECOND GRADE STUDENT OF SMA YP UNILA BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 6 54

THE USE OF CROSSWORD PUZZLE ON STUDENTS’ INTERACTION IN LEARNING VOCABULARY AT SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 5 66

THE USE OF CROSSWORD PUZZLE ON STUDENTS’ INTERACTION IN LEARNING VOCABULARY AT SMPN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 10 65

DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY THROUGH STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MAN 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 15 49

THE EFFECT OF STUDENTS’ READING INTEREST AND STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 8 74

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES AND VOCABULARY SIZE OF THE FOURTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF IAIN PALANGKARAYA ACADEMIC YEAR 2013

0 0 20