Conclusions CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

C. Recommendations

The findings of this study benefitted the research participants, as English teachers, in forming a habit in doing reflection which would enable them to self- actualize themselves both in their teaching profession and in their life. Regarding to this, English teachers might implement a habit in doing reflection of their teaching to self-assess and improve their teaching practice. By having a reflective habit formation, they would have sharper goals in their life and be able to self- actualize themselves. On the other hand, the audience might use the description and interpretation of the lived experience in this study to get information and to understand the development and implementation of an Android-based English language learning application. Furthermore, the findings of this study might help the policy makers in Indonesia to empower English teachers in the development and integration of an Android-based English language learning application. An Android-based English language learning application becomes one of the tools to provide better learning opportunities which extend beyond the classroom and accommodate learners’ various learning styles. Additionally, future researchers might examine the perceptions of the English teachers who developed an Android-based English language learning application. Future studies focusing on the students who utilized the application might be useful as well. A study on the impacts of an Android-based English language learning application implementation on students’ learning motivation might be conducted. In addition, future researchers might conduct the same research which focuses on students’ lived experience in learning with an Android-based PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI English language learning application developed by their teachers. They could reveal how the students’ give meaning to the phenomenon. BIBLIOGRAPHY Al-Fahad, F. 2009. Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. Volume 8, issue 2. Ali, A. 2013. A framework for measuring the usability issues and criteria of mobile learning applications. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, Ontario. Alvesson, M., Skoldberg, K. 2011. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications Inc. Amer, M. A. 2010. Idiomobile for learners of English: A study of learners usage of a mobile learning application for learning idioms and collocations. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Arnold, P., L. 2015. Rural high school faculty perspectives on bring your own device implementation: a phenomenological study. Dissertation, Liberty University, Virginia. Auza, D. 2013. 5 free language learning apps for the culture-obsessed traveler. Retrieved from http:www.thecultureist.com20131108free-language- learning-apps . Bajcsy, R. 2002. Technologies and learning Visions 2020: Transforming education and training through advanced technologies. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Beres, D. L. 2010. Mobile-Assisted Language Learning from the Student Perspective: Encouraging Effective Language Learning. Academic Podcasting and Mobile Assisted Language Learning: Applications and Outcomes: Applications and Outcomes, 93. Bibby, S. 2011. Do students wish to ’go mobile’: An investigation into student use of PCs and cell phones. [IJCALLT]. International Journal of Computer- Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 12, 43–54. Bingimlas, K., Hanrahan, M. 2010. The relationship between teachers belief and their practice: How the literature can inform science education reformers and researchers. In F. M. C. Tasar, G Ed., Contemporary Science Education Research: International perspectives pp. 415-422: Pegem Akademi. Bismoko, J. 2015. Lectures notes on research in English education. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University. Borg, M. 2001. Teachers beliefs. ELT journal, 552, 186-188. 119 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI Bradley, B. 2005. Psychology and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of language learning and teaching. 4 th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents. Brown, T. H. 2005. Towards a model for m-learning in Africa. International Journal on E-Learning, 43, 299-315. Chan, N. N., Walker-Gleaves, A., Remedios, R. 2013. Ubiquitous learning: the lived experience of students learning with smartphones. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of MITs Learning International Network Consortium LINC 2013. Chen, X. 2013. Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning Technology, 171, 20-36. Covey, S. R. 2004. The 7 habits of highly effective families 6th ed.: New York Free Press. Creswell, John W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2 nd ed. California: Sage Publication Ltd. Creswell, John W. 2007. Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2 nd ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational research. 4 th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Darlington, Y., Scott, D. 2002. Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. New South Wales: Allen Unwin. David, S. 2015. Maslow: The 12 characteristics of a self-actualized person. Retrieved rom https:www.psychologytoday.comblogtheory-and- sychopathology201308the-theory-self-actualization Dean, B. 2005. Persistence. Retrieved from http:www.coachingtowardhappiness.comAHCvol2num22.htm . Dewey, J. 1966. Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press. Drummond, J., J. 2000. Time, history, and tradition. In J. Drummond, J L. Embree Eds., The many faces of time Vol. 41: Springer- Science+Business Media. Dudeney, G., Hockly, N. 2007. How to teach English with technology. UK: Pearson Education Limited. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI