Hubungan Tipe Wajah Dan Ukuran Lebarlengkung Gigi Pada Mahasiswa Suku Tamil India-Malaysia FKG USU

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Purwanegara MK. 1994. Analisa Fotometri Profil Wajah Oklusi Normal Mahasiswa
Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Hasanuddin. Kumpulan Makalah KPPIKG X.
FKG UI. Jakarta: 301-306.
2. Proffit WR. 2000. Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby Company. St. Louis. 249250.
3. Prasad M, Kannampallil ST, Talapaneni AK,George SA, Shetty SK. Evaluation of
arch width variations among differentskeletal patterns in South Indian population. J
Nat Sc Biol Med2013;4:94-102.
4. Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung CH. Relationship between dental archwidth and
vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. Eur JOrthod 2008;30:288‑94.
5. Hong JC, Michael W, Damien S. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with
different vertical facial patterns: A 3‑dimensional computed tomography study. Am
J Orthod 2008;133:10.
6. Maina MB. Craniofacial forms among three dominant ethnic groups of Gmbe State.
Int J Morphol 2012; 30 (1): 211-212.
7. Fernando LM, Vigorito JW. Photometric analysis applied in determining facial
type. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011;17(5):71-5.
8. Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1980;66(3):346-55.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

9. Herzberg BL. Facial esthetic in relation to orthodontic treatment. Angle
Orthod.1952;22(1):3-22.
10. Naini

FB,

Gill

DS. Facial

aesthetics,

1:

concepts

and

canons. Dent

Update. 2008;35:102–104.
11. Lee RT. Arch width and form: A review. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop
1999;115:305‑13.
12. Jain M, Dhakar N. Arch forms: An overview. Univ Res J Dent 2013;3:16-21.
13. Bayome M, Sameshima GT, Kim Y, Nojima K, Baek SH, Kook YA.Comparison of
arch forms between Egyptian and North American white populations. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 245‑52.
14. Kumari M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in
extraction vs. Non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Journal of the College of
Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2010, 20(1): 17-21.
15. Nabila A, Fida M. Clinical applicability of variations in arch dimensions and arch
forms among various vertical facial patterns. Journal of the College of Physicians
and Surgeons Pakistan 2011, 21(11): 685-690.
16. Ribeiro JS, Ambrosio AR, Santos-Pinto A, Shimizu IA, Shimizu RH. Evaluation of
transverse changes in the dental arches according to growth pattern: a longitudinal
study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(1):66-73.
17. Kageyama T, Dominguez-Rodriguez GC, Vigorito JW, DeguchiT. A morphological
study of the relationship between arch dimensions and craniofacial structures in

Universitas Sumatera Utara

adolescents with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions and various facial types.Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:368-75.
18. Khera AK, Singh GK, Sharma VP, Singh A. Relationship between dental arch
dimension and vertical facial morphology in Class I subjects. J Ind Orthod Soc
2012; 46(4): 316-324.
19. Shafique A. Arch form analyses: a comparison of two different methods. Pakistan
Oral & Dent Journal2011: 347-51 (31).
20. Martins LF, Vigorito JW. Photometric analysis applied in determining facial type.
Dental Press J Orthod 2012; 17(5):71-5.
nd

21. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2 ed. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2007: 65-8, 128-9.
22. Franco

FCM,

Araujo

TM,

Vogel

CJ,

Quintão

CCA.

Brachycephalic,

dolichocephalic and mesocephalic: Is it appropriate to describe the face using skull
patterns? Dental Press J Orthod2013;18(3):159-63.
23. Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry From Basics to Video Imaging. Alabama:
Quintessence Publishing Co, 1995: 281-7.
24. Kanan UAG, Apurva D, Rashida A. Variation in facial index of Gujarati males: A
photometric study. Int J Med Health Sci 2012; 1(4): 27-31.
25. Shetti RV, Pai SR, Sneh GK, Gupta C, Chethan P, Soumya. Study Of Prosopic

(Facial) Index Of Indian AndMalaysian Students. Int. J. Morphol. 2011;
29(3):1018-1021.
nd

26. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2 ed. New Delhi: Jaypee, 2007: 128-130.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

27. Madsen DP. Natural Head Position: A Photographic method and an evaluation of
cranial reference planes in cephalometrics analysis. The University of Adelaide,
2007.
28. Foster TD. A Textbook of Orthodontic. Oxford Blackwell Publishing, 1983:85-89.
29. Arthadini VD, Anggani HS. Perubahan lengkung gigi di dalam perawatan ortodonti.
M I kedokteran gigi 2008; 199-204 (23).
30. Anonymous. World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous people. 2005
31. Fulya I, NarbantgilD. A Comparative Study of Cephalometric and Arch Width
Characteristics of Class II Division 1 and Division 2 Maloccusions. Euro J
Orthod2006; 28:179-183.
32. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. W.B. Saunders Company.
Philadelphia, 1996: 129-45, 166-70, 193-9.

33. Jahanshahi M, Golalipour MJ, Heidari K. The Effect Of Ethnicity On Facial
Anthropometry In Northean Iran. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(11):940-3.
34. Farahani R, Emami M. Estimation of cranial and facial indices in males 19-20
years old. First National Congress of Anatomy, Kerman, Iran, 1993: 55.
35. Torres-Restrepo, et al. Agreement between cranial and facial classification through
clinical observation and anthropometric measurement among envigado school
children. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:50.
36. Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and
bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod
1998;68:557‑62.

Universitas Sumatera Utara

37. Ingervall B, Helkimo E. Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man.
Arch Oral Biol 1978;23:203‑6.

Universitas Sumatera Utara