T IPA 1302413 Bibliography

129

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).
Brenchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Angraini,
G.
(2014).
Analisiskemampuanliterasisainsdankemampuanberpikirtingkattinggi
(HOTS-higher order thinking skill) siswa SMAN kelas X di
kotaSolokpadakontenBiologi.
(Tesis).
SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Archer, R.E. (2014). Demystifying scientific literacy: Charting the path for the
21st century. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4 (3), hlm. 165172.
Ardianto, D. (2014). Implementasipembelajaran IPA terpadutemafluidadengan
model
guided
discovery

dan
problem
based
learning
untukmeningkatkanliterasisainssiswa SMP. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Arikunto, S. (2007). Prosedurpenelitiansuatupendekatandanpraktik. Jakarta:
RinekaCipta.
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasardasarevaluasipendidikan. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Bell, R. L., Smetana, &Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction:
Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher,
72(7), hlm. 30 – 33.
Bell, B. A. (2010). Encyclopedia of researh design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE
Publishing.
Brickman, P.dkk. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students science
literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning, 3 (20), hlm 1-22.
Bulunuz, M., Martin-Hansen, L., &Jarret, O.S. (2012). Level of inquiry as
motivator in an inquiry methods course for preservice elementary teachers.
School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), hlm. 330 – 339.

Bybee, R. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. Dalam W.
Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy, hlm. 37-68. Kiel, Germany:
Institute for Science Education (IPN).

Puspo Rohmi, 2015
PENERAPAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DOMAIN KOMPETENSI DAN
PENGETAHUAN SAINS SISWA SMP PADA TEMA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

130

Bybee, R. (2010). The Teaching of Science: 21st-Century Perspectives. USA:
NSTA Press.
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of
scientific literacy. Journal of research in science teaching. 46(8), hlm. 865
– 883.
Chen, Y., Hand, B., & McDowell, L. (2013). The effects of writing-to-learn
activities on Elementary students’ conceptual understanding: Learning
about Force and Motion through writing to older peers. Science Education,
97(5), hlm. 745-771.

Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), hlm.155-159.
Coladarci, T. dkk. (2011). Fundamental of statistical reasoning in education
(Edisiketiga). USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Pendekatankualitatif, kuantitatif, dan
mixed (Edisiketiga). Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
Dahlia,

F.
(2013).
Pengaruhpembelajaran
discovery
terhadappeningkatanliterasisainsdansikapilmiahsiswa
padamateriekosistem.
(Skripsi).
PendidikanBiologi
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

learning
SMP
FPMIPA,


DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and
contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), hlm. 582-601.
Dunst, C. J, dkk. (2004). Guidelines for calculating effect size for practice base
research synthesize. Centerscope, 3(1),hlm.1-10.
Erviani, N. S. (2013). PengaruhpembelajaranInteraktif Demonstration
terhadappeningkatankemampuanliterasisainsdansikapilmiahsiswapadama
teriEkosistem.
(Skripsi).
JurusanPendidikanBiologi
FPMIPA,
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a
measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science
Education, 98(4), hlm. 549-580.
Forgarty, R. (1991). The mindful school : How to integrate the curricula. New
York: IRI/Skylight Publishing, Inc.
Fraenkel, J.R, Wallen, N.E.& Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate
research in education (edisikedelapan). New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.

Puspo Rohmi, 2015
PENERAPAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DOMAIN KOMPETENSI DAN
PENGETAHUAN SAINS SISWA SMP PADA TEMA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

131

Guildford, J.P. 1854. Psychometric methods (2nd edition). New York: McGraw
Hill.
Hake, R. 1998. Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand
student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.
Tersedia di
http://physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/ajpv3i.pdf[diakses 04-022012].
Heiman, G. W. (2011). Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences (6th edition).
Belmont: Wadsworth.
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: a teachers’ guide to the history,
philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hofstein, A. &Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in scienceeducation:
Foundationsfor the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(2), hlm. 28
– 54.

Holbrook, J.& Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy.
International Journalof Environmental & Science Education, 4(3),
hlm.275-288.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatansaintifikdankontekstualdalampembelajaranabad
21. Bogor: Gahlia Indonesia.
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American Schools.
Educational Leadership, 16, hlm. 13-16.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science
Education, 82: 407-416.
Kemendikbud. (2014a). MateriPelatihan Guru ImplementasiKurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemendikbud. (2014b). IlmuPengetahuanAlamUntuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII.
Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Koentjaraningrat. (1982).
Djambatan.

ManusiadanKebudayaan di

Indonesia.


Jakarta:

Lati, W., dkk. (2012). Enhancement of Learning Achievement and Integrated
Science Process Skills Using Science Inquiry Learning Activities of
Chemical Reaction Rates. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46,
hlm. 4471-4475.
Laugksch, R. G. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science
Education, 84, hlm. 71-94.
Puspo Rohmi, 2015
PENERAPAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DOMAIN KOMPETENSI DAN
PENGETAHUAN SAINS SISWA SMP PADA TEMA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

132

Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S., &Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and
scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of
scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics,
Science and Technology, 1(3), hlm. 138-147.
Liliawati, W. dkk. (2014). Analisiskemampuaninkuirisiswa SMP, SMA, dan SMK

dalampenerapanLevels of Inquiry padapembelajaranfisika. BerkalaFisika
Indonesia, 6(2), hlm. 34-39.
Millar, R. (2008). Taking scientific literacy seriously as a curriculum aim. AsiaPasific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), hlm. 1-18.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for
the future. London: King’s College.
Mulia, R. M. (2005). KesehatanLingkungan. Yogyakarta : GrahaIlmu.
Murcia, K. (2009). Re-thinking the development of scientific literacy through a
rope metaphor. Research in Science Education, 39, hlm. 215-229.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education
Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Norris, S.P. & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense in
central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, hlm. 224-240.
Nurlaelati. (2014). Penerapanpembelajaran IPA terpaduberdasarkan model
webbed untukmeningkatkanliterasisainssiswapadatemapenjernihan air.
(Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006:Science Competenciesfor Tomorrow’s World: Volume
1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
Pratiwi, P. A. D. (2014). Penerapan levels of inquiry untuk meningkatkan
achievement siswa SMP pada pokok bahasan optik.(Skripsi). Jurusan
Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2015: Draft science framework. Paris: OECD.
Purwanto, Liliawati, W., &Hidayat, R. (2013). Analisis kemampuan inkuiri dan
hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengahpertama melalui model pembelajaran
berbasis model hierarki of inquiry. DisajikanpadaPertemuanIlmiah XXVII
HFI Jateng& DIY, 23 Maret 2013, Solo.
PusatPenelitianPendidikanBalitbangKemendikbud. (2011). Analisis trend
literasisainssiswa Indonesia dalamstudi PISA 2000-2009. (Makalah).
Puspo Rohmi, 2015
PENERAPAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DOMAIN KOMPETENSI DAN
PENGETAHUAN SAINS SISWA SMP PADA TEMA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

133

DisampaikanpadaKegiatan
Seminar
PISA
KemampuanSiswaInonesiaHasil PISA 2000-2009.
Rahayu, D. B. (2015). Profilliterasisainssiswa
padatemaefekrumahkaca.

(Tesis).
UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Analisis

Trend

SMP kelas VII
SekolahPascasarjana,

Rohayati, T. (2013). Pengaruhpembelajaran interactive demonstration
terhadappeningkatanliterasisainsdansikapilmiahsiswa
SMP
padamateritransportasipadatumbuhan.
(Skripsi).
JurusanPendidikanBiologi FPMIPA, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.
Sariati,

D.

(2013).
Analisisketerampilan
proses
padapenggunaanHierarkiInkuiridandampaknyaterhadapliterasisainssiswa
SMP. (Tesis). SekolahPascasarjana, UniversitasPendidikan Indonesia,
Bandung.

Showalter, V. (1975). Rational of unbounded science curriculum. School Science
and Mathematics, 75(1), hlm. 15-21.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metodepenelitiankuantitatifkualitatifdan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2013). Statistikauntukpenelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
penelitian.

Bandung:

Toharudin,
U.,
Hendrawati,
S.,
&Rustaman,
A.
Membangunliterasisainspesertadidik. Bandung: Humaniora.

(2011).

Susetyo, B. (2010).
RefikaAditama.

Statistikauntukanalisis

data

Trianto. (2007). Model pembelajaranterpadudalamteoridanpraktek. Jakarta:
PrestasiPustaka.
Uno, H. B. & S. Koni. 2012. Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta : BumiAksara.
Wenning, C. J. (2005). Levels of Inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices
and inquiry process. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3),
hlm.3-12.
Wenning, C. J. (2006). Assessing nature-of-science literacy as one component of
scientific literacy. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(4), hlm.
3-14.
Wenning, C. J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific
literacy. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), hlm. 21-24.
Puspo Rohmi, 2015
PENERAPAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DOMAIN KOMPETENSI DAN
PENGETAHUAN SAINS SISWA SMP PADA TEMA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

134

Wenning, C. J. (2010). Levels of inquiry: Using inquiry spectrum learning
sequences teach science. Journal Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(3),
hlm.11-20.
Wenning, C. J. (2011). The Levels of Inquiry model of science teaching. Journal
Physics Teacher Education Online, 6(2), hlm.9-16.
Whitworth, B. A., Maeng, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Teacher’s Toolkit :
Differentiating inquiry. Science Scope, hlm. 10 – 17.
Wisudawati, A. W., &Sulistyowati, E. (2014). Metodologipembelajaran IPA.
Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Puspo Rohmi, 2015
PENERAPAN LEVELS OF INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN DOMAIN KOMPETENSI DAN
PENGETAHUAN SAINS SISWA SMP PADA TEMA PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu