Pengaruh Stress Decreasing Resin (SDR) sebagai Intermediate Layer terhadap Ketahanan Fraktur pada Restorasi Klas I (in vitro)
50
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-State of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
2. Hamouda IM, Elkader HA. Evaluation the mechanical properties of nanofilled
composite resin restorative material. J Biomat and Nanobio 2012; 3: 238-42.
3. Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Mechanical properties and threebody wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials.
Quintessence Int 2010; 41:1-11.
4. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorastive materials. Australian Dent J 2011;
56: 59-66.
5. Asghar S, Ali A, Rashid S, Hussain T. Replacement of resin-based composite. J
Col Of Physic and Surg Pakistan. 2010; 20 (10): 639-43.
6. Moosavi H, Zeynali M, Pour ZH. Fracture resistance of premolars restored by
various types and placement techniques of resin composites. Int J of Dent 2012:
1-6.
7. Papadogiannis Y, Lakes RS, G. Palaghias, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. Fatigue of
packable dental composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 792–8.
8. Karthick K, Kailasam S, PR Priya G, Shankar S. Polymerization shrinkage of
composites-A review. JIADS 2011; 2: 32-6.
9. Ghulman MA. Effect of cavity configuration (c-factor) on the marginal adaptation
of low-shringking composite: a comparative ex vivo study. Int J Dent 2011; 1-8.
10. Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization
shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Cont
Dent Pract 2006; 7(4): 1-14.
11. Franca FMG, Worschech CC, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM, Lovadino JR.
Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different technique. J Cont
Dent Pract 2005; 6(3): 1-7.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
51
12. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. eds. Craig‟s restorative dental materials. 13 th ed.,
Philadelphia: Mosby Co., 2012: 161-81.
13. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of
flowable resin composites. J can Dent Assoc 2003; 69(8): 516-21.
14. Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E. SEM evaluation of internal adaptation
of bases and liners under composite restorations. Dent J 2014; 2:52-64.
15. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H. Effect of flowable composite liner
and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct
composite restorations with different loading strategies. Dent Mater 2014; 42:
619-25.
16. Li Q, Jepsen S, Albers HK, Eberhard J. Flowable materials as an intermediate
layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite
restorations in class-v-cavities. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 250-7.
17. Baig MM, Mustafa M, Al Jeaidi ZA, Al-Muhaiza M. Microleakage evaluation in
restorations using different resin composite insertion techniques and liners in
preparations with high c-factor – an in vitro study. King Saud University J Dent
Sci. 2013; 4: 57–64.
18. Hurmuzlu F, Ozdemir K, Hubbezoglu I, Coskun A, Siso SH. Bond strength of
adhesives to dentin involving total and self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int
2007; 38(4): 206-12.
19. Diana S. Perbedaan kekuatan geser perlekatan resin komposit packable dengan
intermediate layer resin komposit flowable menggunakan bonding total-etch dan
self adhesive flowable terhadap dentin. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu
Konservasi Gigi FKG UGM, 2013: 50.
20. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress
management. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12: 1-11.
21. Badr SB, Ibrahim MA, Banna ME. Compressive strength and compressive fatigue
limit behavior of two fluoride releasing materials. Scribesguild J 2013; 2(3): 30-6.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
52
22. Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of “bulkfilled” posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
Dent Mater 2014; 30: 245-51.
23. Magdy N, Hegazi H, Zaghlol N. Clinical investigation of nano-hybrid resin
composite lined with smart dentin replacement flowable resin composite. Mans J
Dent 2014;1(3):96-100.
24. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure
of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 227-35.
25. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite
based on sdrtm technology. Dent Mater 2011; 247: 348-55.
26. Anusavice KJ. Philips buku ajar ilmu bahan kedokteran gigi. Alih Bahasa.
Budiman JA, Juwono L. Jakarta: EGC, 2003: 227-50.
27. Mccabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Material. 9 th ed., UK: Blackwell
Publishing Ltd., 2008: 195-224.
28. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Studevant‟s art and science of operative
dentistry. 6 th ed., Singapore: Elsevier Inc., 2012: 218-22.
29. SDR Scientific Compendium. SDR: Smart Dentin Replacement. USA: Mildford,
2011: 6,11,13-7.
30. Goes MFD, Giannini M, HipolitoVD, Carrilho MRO, Daronch M, Rueggeberg
FA. Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without
application of an intermediate flowable resin layer. Braz Dent J 2008; 19(1): 51-6.
31. Sarwono J. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu,
2006: 79-92.
32. Watanabe H, Khera SC, Vargas MA, Qian F. Fracture toughness comparison of
six resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 418-25.
33. Ozgunaltay G, Gorucu J. Fracture resistance of class II packable composite
restorations with and without flowable liners. J Oral Rehab 2005; 32: 111-5.
34. Kim R, Lee I. Polymerization shrinkage stress and tooth-restoration interfacial
debonding of bulk-fill composites. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 90-100.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
53
35. Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal
quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. Dent
Mater 2011; 39: 643-7.
36. Costa S, Sousa YS, Curylofo F, Steier L, Neto MS, Gabriel AS. Fracture
resistance of mechanically compromised premolars restored with polyethylene
fiber and adhesive materials. Int J Adhes 2014; 50: 211-5.
37. Pereira JR ,McDonald A, BDentSc, Petrie A, Knowles JC. Effect of cavity design
on tooth surface strain. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:369-375.
38. Gonulol N, Ertan E, Yilmaz A, Ankaya SC. Effect of thermal aging on
microleakage of current flowable composite resins. J Dent Scien 2014; 210: 1-7.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-State of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
2. Hamouda IM, Elkader HA. Evaluation the mechanical properties of nanofilled
composite resin restorative material. J Biomat and Nanobio 2012; 3: 238-42.
3. Schultz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Mechanical properties and threebody wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials.
Quintessence Int 2010; 41:1-11.
4. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorastive materials. Australian Dent J 2011;
56: 59-66.
5. Asghar S, Ali A, Rashid S, Hussain T. Replacement of resin-based composite. J
Col Of Physic and Surg Pakistan. 2010; 20 (10): 639-43.
6. Moosavi H, Zeynali M, Pour ZH. Fracture resistance of premolars restored by
various types and placement techniques of resin composites. Int J of Dent 2012:
1-6.
7. Papadogiannis Y, Lakes RS, G. Palaghias, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M. Fatigue of
packable dental composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 792–8.
8. Karthick K, Kailasam S, PR Priya G, Shankar S. Polymerization shrinkage of
composites-A review. JIADS 2011; 2: 32-6.
9. Ghulman MA. Effect of cavity configuration (c-factor) on the marginal adaptation
of low-shringking composite: a comparative ex vivo study. Int J Dent 2011; 1-8.
10. Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization
shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Cont
Dent Pract 2006; 7(4): 1-14.
11. Franca FMG, Worschech CC, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM, Lovadino JR.
Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different technique. J Cont
Dent Pract 2005; 6(3): 1-7.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
51
12. Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. eds. Craig‟s restorative dental materials. 13 th ed.,
Philadelphia: Mosby Co., 2012: 161-81.
13. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of
flowable resin composites. J can Dent Assoc 2003; 69(8): 516-21.
14. Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E. SEM evaluation of internal adaptation
of bases and liners under composite restorations. Dent J 2014; 2:52-64.
15. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H. Effect of flowable composite liner
and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct
composite restorations with different loading strategies. Dent Mater 2014; 42:
619-25.
16. Li Q, Jepsen S, Albers HK, Eberhard J. Flowable materials as an intermediate
layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite
restorations in class-v-cavities. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 250-7.
17. Baig MM, Mustafa M, Al Jeaidi ZA, Al-Muhaiza M. Microleakage evaluation in
restorations using different resin composite insertion techniques and liners in
preparations with high c-factor – an in vitro study. King Saud University J Dent
Sci. 2013; 4: 57–64.
18. Hurmuzlu F, Ozdemir K, Hubbezoglu I, Coskun A, Siso SH. Bond strength of
adhesives to dentin involving total and self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int
2007; 38(4): 206-12.
19. Diana S. Perbedaan kekuatan geser perlekatan resin komposit packable dengan
intermediate layer resin komposit flowable menggunakan bonding total-etch dan
self adhesive flowable terhadap dentin. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu
Konservasi Gigi FKG UGM, 2013: 50.
20. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress
management. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12: 1-11.
21. Badr SB, Ibrahim MA, Banna ME. Compressive strength and compressive fatigue
limit behavior of two fluoride releasing materials. Scribesguild J 2013; 2(3): 30-6.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
52
22. Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of “bulkfilled” posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
Dent Mater 2014; 30: 245-51.
23. Magdy N, Hegazi H, Zaghlol N. Clinical investigation of nano-hybrid resin
composite lined with smart dentin replacement flowable resin composite. Mans J
Dent 2014;1(3):96-100.
24. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure
of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 227-35.
25. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite
based on sdrtm technology. Dent Mater 2011; 247: 348-55.
26. Anusavice KJ. Philips buku ajar ilmu bahan kedokteran gigi. Alih Bahasa.
Budiman JA, Juwono L. Jakarta: EGC, 2003: 227-50.
27. Mccabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Material. 9 th ed., UK: Blackwell
Publishing Ltd., 2008: 195-224.
28. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Studevant‟s art and science of operative
dentistry. 6 th ed., Singapore: Elsevier Inc., 2012: 218-22.
29. SDR Scientific Compendium. SDR: Smart Dentin Replacement. USA: Mildford,
2011: 6,11,13-7.
30. Goes MFD, Giannini M, HipolitoVD, Carrilho MRO, Daronch M, Rueggeberg
FA. Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without
application of an intermediate flowable resin layer. Braz Dent J 2008; 19(1): 51-6.
31. Sarwono J. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu,
2006: 79-92.
32. Watanabe H, Khera SC, Vargas MA, Qian F. Fracture toughness comparison of
six resin composites. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 418-25.
33. Ozgunaltay G, Gorucu J. Fracture resistance of class II packable composite
restorations with and without flowable liners. J Oral Rehab 2005; 32: 111-5.
34. Kim R, Lee I. Polymerization shrinkage stress and tooth-restoration interfacial
debonding of bulk-fill composites. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 90-100.
Universitas Sumatera Utara
53
35. Roggendorf MJ, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal
quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. Dent
Mater 2011; 39: 643-7.
36. Costa S, Sousa YS, Curylofo F, Steier L, Neto MS, Gabriel AS. Fracture
resistance of mechanically compromised premolars restored with polyethylene
fiber and adhesive materials. Int J Adhes 2014; 50: 211-5.
37. Pereira JR ,McDonald A, BDentSc, Petrie A, Knowles JC. Effect of cavity design
on tooth surface strain. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:369-375.
38. Gonulol N, Ertan E, Yilmaz A, Ankaya SC. Effect of thermal aging on
microleakage of current flowable composite resins. J Dent Scien 2014; 210: 1-7.
Universitas Sumatera Utara