PENGARUH PERSEPSI NILAI ANAK TERHADAP JUMLAH ANAK PADA MASYARAKAT DI KECAMATAN BAKTIRAJA KABUPATEN HUMBANG HASUNDUTAN TAHUN 2013

  

PENGARUH PERSEPSI NILAI ANAK TERHADAP JUMLAH ANAK

PADA MASYARAKAT DI KECAMATAN BAKTIRAJA

KABUPATEN HUMBANG HASUNDUTAN

TAHUN 2013

Tanggal wawancara No. Responden

  

Identitas Responden

Nama Jumlah anak

  Petunjuk Pengisian :

Pilihlah salah satu jawaban yang sesuai dengan pilihan ibu dengan memberikan tanda

(

  

√) pada kolom (SS: sangat setuju (4); S: setuju (3); TS: tidak setuju (2); STS: sangat

tidak setuju(1)) yang sesuai menurut anda.

  No Pertanyaan Pengalaman SS S TS STS

  1 Anak dapat memperkuat ikatan perkawinan antara suami dan istri

  2 Anak laki-laki lebih berperan dalam membantu memenuhi kebutuhan dan mendampingi keluarga

  3 Banyak anak, membutuhkan banyak biaya

  4 Mengurusi anak melelehkan badan

  5 Banyak anak menimbulkan banyak masalah dalam keluarga

  6 Ibu yang terlalu sering hamil dapat mengakibatkan resiko kematian pada ibu dan bayi

  7 Pendidikan anak akan lebih terjamin jika mengikuti program KB

  8 Seorang wanita akan lebih rentan terhadap penyakit jika melahirkan banyak anak Pernyataan Harapan SS S TS STS

  1 Anak menjadi sumber daya di hari tua untuk membantu orang tua

  2 Anak akan menjadi kebanggaan di masa tua

  3 Anak akan memberikan ketenangan dan kebahagiaan

  4 Anak sumber rejeki, di masa yang akan datang

  5 Dengan banyak anak, maka semakin banyak yang akan merawat orang tua ketika sakit Pernyataan Kebutuhan SS S TS STS

  1 Dengan 2 anak keluarga lebih sejahtera

  2 Mempunyai anak laki-laki dan perempuan dianggap dapat meningkatkan status keluarga dalam masyarakat

  3 Untuk mencapai keluarga yang bahagia (gabe), dihormati (sangap) dan kaya (mora), harus memiliki banyak anak.

  4 Anak dapat membantu ekonomi orang tuanya, karena dapat membantu bekerja disawah

  5 Anak membutuhkan kakak dan adik

  Pernyataan Motivasi SS S TS STS

  1 Anak sumber kegembiraan

  2 Anak membantu ekonomi dihari tua

  3 Anak memperkuat hubungan suami dan istri

  4 Anak meneruskan garis keturunan, nama dan tradisi Pernyataan Budaya SS S TS STS

  1 Anak Membawa Garis Keturunan

  2 Anak adalah Perlindungan Hari tua

  3 Banyak anak dapat Menghindari Kesepian

  4 Banyak anak Dihargai oleh Masyarakat

  5 Anak Memberikan berkah

  

PENGARUH PERSEPSI NILAI ANAK TERHADAP JUMLAH ANAK

PADA MASYARAKAT DI KECAMATAN BAKTIRAJA

KABUPATEN HUMBANG HASUNDUTAN

TAHUN 2013

Tanggal wawancara No. Responden

  

Identitas Responden

Nama Jumlah anak

  Petunjuk Pengisian :

Pilihlah salah satu jawaban yang sesuai dengan pilihan ibu dengan memberikan tanda

(

  

√) pada kolom (SS: sangat setuju (4); S: setuju (3); TS: tidak setuju (2); STS: sangat

tidak setuju(1)) yang sesuai menurut anda.

  No Pertanyaan Pengalaman SS S TS STS

  1 Anak dapat memperkuat ikatan perkawinan antara suami dan istri

  2 Anak laki-laki lebih berperan dalam membantu memenuhi kebutuhan dan mendampingi keluarga

  3 Banyak anak, membutuhkan banyak biaya

  4 Mengurusi anak melelehkan badan

  5 Banyak anak menimbulkan banyak masalah dalam keluarga

  6 Ibu yang terlalu sering hamil dapat mengakibatkan resiko kematian pada ibu dan

  74 bayi

  7 Pendidikan anak akan lebih terjamin jika mengikuti program KB

  8 Seorang wanita akan lebih rentan terhadap penyakit jika melahirkan banyak anak Pernyataan Harapan SS S TS STS

  1 Anak menjadi sumber daya di hari tua untuk membantu orang tua

  2 Anak akan menjadi kebanggaan di masa tua

  3 Anak akan memberikan ketenangan dan kebahagiaan

  4 Anak sumber rejeki, di masa yang akan datang

  5 Dengan banyak anak, maka semakin banyak yang akan merawat orang tua ketika sakit Pernyataan Kebutuhan SS S TS STS

  1 Dengan 2 anak keluarga lebih sejahtera

  2 Mempunyai anak laki-laki dan perempuan dianggap dapat meningkatkan status keluarga dalam masyarakat

  3 Untuk mencapai keluarga yang bahagia (gabe), dihormati (sangap) dan kaya (mora), harus memiliki banyak anak.

  4 Anak dapat membantu ekonomi orang tuanya, karena dapat membantu bekerja disawah

  5 Anak membutuhkan kakak dan adik

  Pernyataan Motivasi SS S TS STS

  1 Anak sumber kegembiraan

  2 Anak membantu ekonomi dihari tua

  3 Anak memperkuat hubungan suami dan istri

  4 Anak meneruskan garis keturunan, nama dan tradisi Pernyataan Budaya SS S TS STS

  1 Anak Membawa Garis Keturunan

  2 Anak adalah Perlindungan Hari tua

  3 Banyak anak dapat Menghindari Kesepian

  4 Banyak anak Dihargai oleh Masyarakat

  5 Anak Memberikan berkah FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Pengalaman Harapan Kebutuhan Motivasi Budaya Jumlahana k /ORDER=ANALYSIS.

  Frequencies

Statistics

  Pengalaman Harapan Kebutuhan Motivasi Budaya Jumlah Responden Responden Responden Responden Responden Anak

  N Valid

  72

  72

  72

  72

  72

  72 Missing

  Frequency Table Pengalaman Responden

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid setuju

  43

  59.7

  59.7

  59.7 kurang

  29

  40.3 40.3 100.0 setuju Total 72 100.0 100.0

  Harapan Responden

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid setuju

  45

  62.5

  62.5

  62.5 kurang

  27

  37.5 37.5 100.0 setuju Total 72 100.0 100.0

  Kebutuhan Responden

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid Setuju

  42

  58.3

  58.3

  58.3 Tidak setuju

  30

  41.7 41.7 100.0 Total 72 100.0 100.0

  Motivasi Responden

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid setuju

  54

  75.0

  75.0

  75.0 kurang

  18

  25.0 25.0 100.0 setuju Total 72 100.0 100.0

  Budaya Responden

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid setuju

  47

  65.3

  65.3

  65.3 kurang setuju

  25

  34.7 34.7 100.0 Total 72 100.0 100.0

  Jumlah Anak

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid Baik

  23

  31.9

  31.9

  31.9 Kurang baik

  49

  68.1 68.1 100.0 Total 72 100.0 100.0

  Crosstabs Case Processing Summary

  Cases Valid Missing Total

  N Percent N Percent N Percent Pengalaman Responden * 72 100.0% .0%

  72 100.0% Jumlah Anak

  Pengalaman Responden * Jumlah Anak Crosstabulation

  Jumlah Anak Baik Kurang baik Total

  Pengalaman setuju Count

  19

  24

  43 Responden % within Pengalaman

  44.2% 55.8% 100.0% Responden % within Jumlah Anak 82.6% 49.0% 59.7% % of Total 26.4% 33.3% 59.7%

  Kurang Count

  4

  25

  29 setuju % within Pengalaman

  13.8% 86.2% 100.0% Responden % within Jumlah Anak 17.4% 51.0% 40.3% % of Total 5.6% 34.7% 40.3%

  Total Count

  23

  49

  72 % within Pengalaman

  31.9% 68.1% 100.0% Responden % within Jumlah Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.9% 68.1% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square

  7.359 ^a 1 .007 Continuity Correction ^b 6.027 1 .014 Likelihood Ratio

  7.912 1 .005 Fisher's Exact Test .009 .006 Linear-by-Linear Association

  7.257 1 .007 N of Valid Cases ^b

  72 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.26.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Cases Valid Missing Total

  5

  31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.9% 68.1% 100.0%

  72 % within Harapan Responden

  49

  23

  Total Count

  18.5% 81.5% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 21.7% 44.9% 37.5% % of Total 6.9% 30.6% 37.5%

  27 % within Harapan Responden

  22

  Kurang Count

  N Percent N Percent N Percent Harapan Responden * Jumlah Anak 72 100.0% .0%

  40.0% 60.0% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 78.3% 55.1% 62.5% % of Total 25.0% 37.5% 62.5%

  45 % within Harapan Responden

  

Case Processing Summary

  18

  Baik Count

  Harapan Responden

  Jumlah Anak Total Baik Kurang baik

  Harapan Responden * Jumlah Anak Crosstabulation

  72 100.0%

  27

  Chi-Square Tests

  72 100.0%

  49

  23

  Total Count

  30 % within Kebutuhan Responden 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 21.7% 51.0% 41.7% % of Total 6.9% 34.7% 41.7%

  25

  5

  Tidak setuju Count

  42 % within Kebutuhan Responden 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 78.3% 49.0% 58.3% % of Total 25.0% 33.3% 58.3%

  24

  18

  Kebutuhan Responden Setuju Count

  Kebutuhan Responden * Jumlah Anak Crosstabulation Jumlah Anak Total Baik Kurang baik

  N Percent N Percent N Percent Kebutuhan Responden * Jumlah Anak 72 100.0% .0%

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)

  Cases Valid Missing Total

  Case Processing Summary

  b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  72 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.63.

  b

  .071 .049 Linear-by-Linear Association 3.532 1 .060 N of Valid Cases

  2.662 1 .103 Likelihood Ratio 3.763 1 .052 Fisher's Exact Test

  b

  1 .058 Continuity Correction

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 3.582

  (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)

  Exact Sig.

  72 % within Kebutuhan Responden 31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.9% 68.1% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  

Motivasi Responden * Jumlah Anak Crosstabulation

  49

  23

  Total Count

  18 % within Motivasi Responden 11.1% 88.9% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 8.7% 32.7% 25.0% % of Total 2.8% 22.2% 25.0%

  16

  2

  Kurang setuju Count

  54 % within Motivasi Responden 38.9% 61.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 91.3% 67.3% 75.0% % of Total 29.2% 45.8% 75.0%

  33

  21

  Motivasi Responden setuju Count

  Jumlah Anak Total Baik Kurang baik

  72 100.0%

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)

  N Percent N Percent N Percent Motivasi Responden * Jumlah Anak 72 100.0% .0%

  Cases Valid Missing Total

  

Case Processing Summary

  b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  72 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.58.

  b

  .023 .017 Linear-by-Linear Association 5.445 1 .020 N of Valid Cases

  4.383 1 .036 Likelihood Ratio 5.811 1 .016 Fisher's Exact Test

  b

  1 .019 Continuity Correction

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 5.522

  Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)

  72 % within Motivasi Responden 31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.9% 68.1% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  72 100.0%

  49

  23

  Total Count

  25 % within Budaya Responden 32.0% 68.0% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 34.8% 34.7% 34.7% % of Total 11.1% 23.6% 34.7%

  17

  8

  Tidak setuju Count

  47 % within Budaya Responden 31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 65.2% 65.3% 65.3% % of Total 20.8% 44.4% 65.3%

  32

  15

  Budaya Responden Setuju Count

  Jumlah Anak Total Baik Kurang baik

  

Budaya Responden * Jumlah Anak Crosstabulation

  N Percent N Percent N Percent Budaya Responden * Jumlah Anak 72 100.0% .0%

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided)

  Cases Valid Missing Total

  

Case Processing Summary

  b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  72 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.75.

  b

  4.725 1 .030 N of Valid Cases

  .040 .024 Linear-by-Linear Association

  5.480 1 .019 Fisher's Exact Test

  3.599 1 .058 Likelihood Ratio

  b

  1 .029 Continuity Correction

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square 4.791

  Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided)

  72 % within Budaya Responden 31.9% 68.1% 100.0% % within Jumlah Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 31.9% 68.1% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1- Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)

  a

  Pearson Chi-Square .000 1 .994

  b

  Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000 Likelihood Ratio .000 1 .994 Fisher's Exact Test

  1.000 .598 Linear-by-Linear Association .000 1 .994

  b

  N of Valid Cases

  72 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.99.

  b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

  Analisa Multivariat

  LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES Jumlahanak /METHOD=ENTER Pengalaman Kebutuhan Motivasi /CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(.5).

  Logistic Regression Case Processing Summary a

  Unweighted Cases N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 72 100.0

  Missing Cases .0 Total 72 100.0

  Unselected Cases .0 Total 72 100.0

  a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

  Dependent Variable Encoding

  Original Value Internal Value Baik Kurang baik

  1

  Block 0: Beginning Block Classification Table a,b

  Observed Predicted

  Jumlah Anak Percentage

  Correct Baik Kurang baik Step 0 Jumlah Anak Baik 23 .0

  Kurang baik 49 100.0 Overall Percentage

  68.1 a. Constant is included in the model.

  b. The cut value is .500

  Variables in the Equation

  B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 0 Constant .756 .253 8.954 1 .003 2.130

  Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig.

  Step 0 Variables Pengalaman(1) 7.359 1 .007 Harapan(1) 3.582 1 .058 Kebutuhan(1) 5.522 1 .019 Motivasi(1) 4.791 1 .029

  Overall Statistics 12.503 4 .014

  Block 1: Method = Enter Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig.

  Jumlah Anak Percentage

  73.6

  79.6 Overall Percentage

  39

  10

  60.9 Kurang baik

  9

  14

  Correct Baik Kurang baik Step 1 Jumlah Anak Baik

  Observed Predicted

  Step 1 Step 14.359 3 .002 Block 14.359 3 .002 Model 14.359 3 .002

  Classification Table a

  a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

  .182 .255

  a

  Square 1 75.701

  Square Nagelkerke R

  Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R

  Model Summary

  a. The cut value is .500

  Variables in the Equation

  B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 1

  a

  Pengalaman(1) -1.390 .857 2.628 1 .105 .249 Harapan(1) -.269 .697 .148 1 .700 .764 Kebutuhan(1) -.383 .759 .255 1 .614 .682 Motivasi(1) -1.712 .844 4.113 1 .043 .181 Constant 3.513 .995 12.471 1 .000 33.534 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Pengalaman, Harapan, Kebutuhan, Motivasi.

  Correlations

  P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 PTOTAL P1 Pearson 1 -.112 .261 .048 -.306 -.309 -.005 -.074 .414

  Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .555 .164 .800 .101 .097 .978 .699 .041 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P2 Pearson

• .112 1 -.080 -.023 .075 .170 .224 .061 .421 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .555 .673 .905 .692 .368 .235 .749 .044 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P3 Pearson ** .261 -.080 1 .627 -.044 .000 -.032 .553 .543

  Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .164 .673 .000 .817 1.000 .868 .002 .002 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P4 Pearson ** .048 -.023 .627 1 .037 -.084 .300 .659 .566

  Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .800 .905 .000 .846 .660 .107 .000 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P5 Pearson

• .306 .075 -.044 .037 1 -.079 .086 .141 .256

  Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .101 .692 .817 .846 .678 .653 .457 .172 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P6 Pearson

• .309 .170 .000 -.084 -.079 1 .000 .238 .396

  Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .097 .368 1.000 .660 .678 1.000 .205 .040 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P7 Pearson

• .005 .224 -.032 .300 .086 .000 1 .023 .496 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .978 .235 .868 .107 .653 1.000 .906 .030 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 P8 Pearson ** **

• .074 .061 .553 .659 .141 .238 .023 1 .625

  Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .699 .749 .002 .000 .457 .205 .906 .000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 PT Pearson * * .414 .421 .543 .566 .256 .396 .496 .625

  1 OT Correlation AL

  Sig. (2-tailed) .041 .044 .002 .001 .172 .040 .030 .000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

  89

  Reliability Scale: PENGALAMAN Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid

  30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .660

  9

  

Correlations

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 Htotal H1 Pearson

  1 .200 -.189 -.289 -.098 .395 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .289 .317 .122 .607 .048 N

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  30

  30 H2 Pearson .200 1 -.236 .144 .098 .529 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) .289 .209 .447 .607 .003 N

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  30

  30 H3 Pearson

• .189 -.236 1 -.055 .018 .362 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .317 .209 .775 .923 .041 N

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  30

  30 H4 Pearson

• .289 .144 -.055

  1 .367 .535 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .122 .447 .775 .046 .002 N

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  30

  30 H5 Pearson

• .098 .098 .018 .367

  1 .627 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .607 .607 .923 .046 .000 N

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  30

  30 Htotal Pearson .395 .529 .362 .535 .627

  1 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .048 .003 .041 .002 .000 N

  30

  

30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

  Reliability Scale: Harapan Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid

  30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .694

  6

  

Correlations

K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 KTOTAL K1 Pearson

  1 .128 .064 .028 .065 .486 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .502 .738 .883 .732 .006 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 K2 Pearson .128 1 .142 .075 .047 .574 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) .502 .454 .693 .804 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 K3 Pearson .064 .142 1 .000 -.058 .571 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) .738 .454 1.000 .760 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 K4 Pearson .028 .075 .000 1 -.026 .380 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) .883 .693 1.000 .893 .039 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 K5 Pearson .065 .047 -.058 -.026 1 .405 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) .732 .804 .760 .893 .026 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 KTOTAL Pearson .486 .574 .571 .380 .405

  1 Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) .006 .001 .001 .039 .026

N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

  Reliability Scale: ALL VARIABLES Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid

  30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .646

  6

  Correlations M1 M2 M3 M4 MTOTAL M1 Pearson *

  1 .322 -.373 -.097 .482 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .082 .042 .611 .007 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 M2 Pearson .322 1 .053 .000 .636 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) .082 .780 1.000 .000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 M3 Pearson

• .373 .053

  1 .112 .376 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .042 .780 .556 .031 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 M4 Pearson

• .097 .000 .112 1 .565 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .611 1.000 .556 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 MTOTAL Pearson .482 .636 .376 .565

  1 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .007 .000 .031 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

  Reliability Scale: MOTIVASI Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid

  30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .623

  5

  

Correlations

B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 BTOTAL B1 Pearson

• 1 .000 .206 .000 .000 .649 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 .275 1.000 1.000 .000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 B2 Pearson

• .000

  1 -.020 -.079 -.412 .472 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 .918 .680 .024 .020 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 B3 Pearson

• .206 -.020

  1 .059 -.082 .549 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) .275 .918 .756 .666 .002 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 B4 Pearson

• .000 -.079 .059

  1 .082 .481 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 .680 .756 .666 .007 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 B5 Pearson * .000 -.412 -.082 .082 1 .459 Correlation

  Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 .024 .666 .666 .030 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 BTOTAL Pearson .649 .472 .549 .481 .459

  1 Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .020 .002 .007 .030

N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

• . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

  Reliability Scale: BUDAYA Case Processing Summary N % Cases Valid

  30 100.0 a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

  .688

  6