Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Tarif Impor Bawang Merah terhadap Jumlah Produktivitas Bawang Merah di Provinsi Sumatera Utara

LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1. Data Luas Panen, Produksi dan Produktivitas Sumatera Utara
Tahun 2000 - 2014
Tahun Luas Panen Produksi Produktivitas
(Ha)
(Ton)
(Ton/Ha)
2000

3.015

35.725

11,8

2001

2.917

35.397

12,1

2002
2003

4.521
3.866

36.760
1,7

8,1
9,7

2004

1,4

12,1

2005

1,2

9,1

2006

1,5

8,1

2007

1,5

9,1

2008
2009

1,7
1,6

9,8
9,2

2010

1,7

6,9

2011

1,9

8,9

2012

1,3

8,9

2013

1,2

7,9

2014

7,7

Sumber : Badan Pusat Penelitian Sumatera Utara

39
Universitas Sumatera Utara

Lampiran 2. Impor dan Nilai Impor Bawang Merah Sumatera Utara Tahun
2000 – 2014
Tahun
Berat Bersih
Nilai Impor
(Kg)
(US $)
2000
26.659.209
5.223.220
2001
17.308.234
4.712.123
2002
6.945.748
1.979.594
2003
3.590.611
949.437
2004

5.421.490
1.537.593
2005
5.132.412
1.281.393
2006
12.782.232
5.446.545
2007
35.150.430
15.479.980
2008
20.172.764
8.781.593
2009
190.800
101.756
2010
26.990
55.696

2011
734.362
310.684
2012
8.931.962
4.569.145
2013
21.876.509
10.793.794
2014
15.684.562
7.530.445
Sumber : Badan Pusat Penelitian Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3. Hasil Output SPSS Uji Asumsi Klasik
Descriptives
Statistic
Mean

9,29
Lower Bound

8,41

Upper Bound

10,18

Std. Error
,414

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Pro

5% Trimmed Mean

9,27

Median

9,10

Variance

2,565

Std. Deviation

1,602

Minimum

7

Maximum

12

Range

5

Interquartile Range

2

Skewness
Kurtosis

,726

,580

-,248

1,121

39
Universitas Sumatera Utara

Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Pro

Missing

Percent
15

N

100,0%

Total

Percent
0

N

0,0%

Percent
15

100,0%

Tests of Normality
a

Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic
Pro

,190

Df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.
15

,151

Statistic
,897

Df

Sig.
15

,086

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

39
Universitas Sumatera Utara

b

Model Summary
Model

R

R

Adjusted

Std.

Change Statistics

Square

R

Error of

Square

the

R

F

df1

Durbin-

df2

Watson

Sig. F

Square Change

Change

Estimate Change
,057

1

a

,003

-,073

1,659

,003

,042

1

13

,841

1,320

a. Predictors: (Constant), TR
b. Dependent Variable: pro
Coefficients
Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

a

Standardize

t

Sig.

d
Coefficients
B
(Constant)
1
TR

Std. Error

Beta

9,386

,622

-2,020E-008

,000

Lower Bound
8,041

10,731

,000

,000

-,205

,841

a

Correlations

Upper Bound Zero-order

,000

-,057

Coefficients
95,0% Confidence Interval for B

15,080

Collinearity Statistics

Partial

-,057

Part

-,057

-,057

Tolerance

1,000

VIF

1,000

a. Dependent Variable: pro

Lampiran 4. Hasil Output Paired Sample T- test
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Sebelum

10,67

3

2,228

1,286

Sesudah

8,17

3

,643

,371

Pair 1

Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair 1

Sebelum & Sesudah

Correlation
3

,575

Sig.
,610

39
Universitas Sumatera Utara

Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Mean

Std.

Std.

95% Confidence Interval

Deviation

Error

of the Difference

Mean
Pair Sebelum 1

2,500

1,931

1,115

Lower

Sig.(2
t

df

tailed)

Upper

-2,298

7,298 2,242

-

2

,154

Sesudah

Lampiran 5. Gambar Bawang Merah Sumatera Utara

39
Universitas Sumatera Utara