1-α2 : Nilai baku normal error type I (α=0,05) yang ditentukan 1,96

  Lampiran 1

  2 n = Z 1- α/2 . P (1-P) N

  2 d2 (N-1) + Z 1- α/2 . P (1-P)

  Keterangan: n : Jumlah sampel yang dibutuhkan

  2

  2 Z 1- α/2 : Nilai baku normal error type I (α=0,05) yang ditentukan 1,96 P : Dari penelitian S.C. Leal prevalensi PUFA di negara Brazil yaitu sebesar 26,2% = 0,262 N : Populasi yaitu 1.777 orang d : 0,05

  2

  2 0,05 (1777-1) + 1,96 . 0,262 (1-0,262) = 3,842 . 0,262 . 1777

  0,0025 (1776 + 3,842) 0,262 = 3,842 . 465,574 0,025 . 466,319 = 1788,735

  11,658 n = 153,4 Jadi jumlah sampel adalah 153,4 dibulatkan menjadi 160. 80 orang siswa SMP N 9 dan 80 orang siswa SMA N 15.

Lampiran 2

  Universitas Sumatera Utara Fakultas kedokteran Gigi Departemen Ilmu Kedokteran Gigi Pencegahan/ Kesehatan Gigi Masyarakat

  

HUBUNGAN PENGALAMAN KARIES DAN KARIES YANG TIDAK

DIRAWAT DENGAN KUALITAS HIDUP PADA REMAJA USIA

12-18 TAHUN DI KECAMATAN MEDAN SUNGGAL

  Nama:.................. No. Kartu: Umur:................... Sekolah : ................... Kelas:.................. Pemeriksa: ....................

  1. Jenis kelamin: 1. Laki-laki

  1

  2. Perempuan Pengukuran indeks DMF-T dan PUFA: PUFA PUFA

DMF-T DMF-T

  17 16

  15

  14

  13

  12

  11

  21

  22

  23

  24

  25

  26

  27 47 46

  45

  44

  43

  42

  41

  31

  32

  33

  34

  35

  36

  37 DMF-T DMF-T PUFA

  PUFA Kode Kondisi Skor D

  Decay D Skor M Missing M Skor F Filling F

  2

  2. Skor DMF-T: D + M + F

  3. Kategori DMF-T:

  a. Baik = 0

  • –2

  3

  b. Sedang = 3-5

  c. Buruk = 6-8

Kode Kondisi

  P Pulpitis U Ulserasi F Fistula A Abses

  4. Skor PUFA: P + U + F + A Skor P Skor U Skor F Skor A

  4

  Nama:.................. No. Kartu: Umur:................... Sekolah : ................... Kelas: .................... Pemeriksa: ....................

  PERTANYAAN ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE (OHIP) Seberapa seringkah anda mengalami masalah dibawah ini selama satu bulan terakhir.

  Lingkari (O) pada nomor jawaban anda Tidak Sangat Kadang- Sering Sangat Jarang Kadang (hampir Sering No Pertanyaan

  Pernah (1-2x (>2x tiap (hampir tiap /bln) /bln) mingggu) hari) Keterbatasan Fungsi Pernahkah anda sulit mengucapkan kata/kalimat karena

  1

  2

  3

  4 1. gigi yang berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda? Pernahkah anda merasa tidak dapat mengecap rasa makanan

  2. dengan baik, karena gigi yang

  1

  2

  3

  4 berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  Sakit Fisik Pernahkah anda merasa sangat

  1

  2

  3

  4 3. sakit pada rongga mulut anda? Pernahkah anda merasakan tidak enak/tidak nyaman saat 4. mengunyah makanan karena gigi

  1

  2

  3

  4 anda yang berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  Ketidaknyamanan Psikis Pernahkah anda merasa cemas/khawatir pada gigi anda

  1

  2

  3

  4 5. yang berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  6. Pernahkah anda merasa tegang karena gigi anda yang berlubang

  1

  2

  3

  4 serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  Ketidakmampuan Fisik Pernahkah anda merasa tidak puas dengan makanan yang anda konsumsi karena gigi anda yang

  7.

  1

  2

  3

  4 berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda? Pernahkah anda harus berhenti secara tiba-tiba saat sedang

  8. mengunyah makanan karena gigi

  1

  2

  3

  4 anda yang berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  Ketidakmampuan Psikis Pernahkah anda mengalamai kesulitan untuk merasa 9. rileks/santai karena gigi anda yang

  1

  2

  3

  4 berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda? Pernahkah anda merasa malu dalam berbicara karena nafas yang

  10. bau akibat gigi yang berlubang

  1

  2

  3

  4 serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  Ketidakmampuan Sosial Pernahkah anda merasa mudah tersinggung karena gigi anda yang 11.

  1

  2

  3

  4 berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda? Pernahkah anda merasa sulit dalam belajar atau kegiatan sehari-

  12. hari karena gigi anda yang

  1

  2

  3

  4 berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  Handicap /hambatan Pernahkah anda merasa secara umum hidup anda menjadi tidak menyenangkan/kurang memuaskan 13.

  1

  2

  3

  4 karena adanya gigi yang berlubang serta luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda? Pernahkah anda izin dari sekolah karena gigi yang berlubang serta 14.

  1

  2

  3

  4 luka dan bengkak pada gusi anda?

  5. TOTAL SKOR OHIP-14

  5

  6. Kategori OHIP-14

  a. Baik : <32

  6

  b. Sedang : 33-44

  c. Buruk : >44 Lampiran 6

Frequencies

  [DataSet0]

Statistics

  Decay Missing Filling DMFT N Valid 160 160 160 160 Missing Mean 1.4375 .4875 .1500 2.0688

  Std. Deviation 1.25737 .82407 .37534 1.67528

Frequency Table Decay

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  41

  25.6

  25.6

  25.6

  1.00

  51

  31.9

  31.9

  57.5

  2.00

  41

  25.6

  25.6

  83.1

  3.00

  16

  10.0

  10.0

  93.1

  4.00

  7

  4.4

  4.4

  97.5

  5.00

  3

  1.9

  1.9

  99.4

  6.00 1 .6 .6 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

Missing

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 109

  68.1

  68.1

  68.1

  1.00

  30

  18.8

  18.8

  86.9

  2.00

  16

  10.0

  10.0

  96.9

  3.00

  4

  2.5

  2.5

  99.4

  4.00 1 .6 .6 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

Filling

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 137

  85.6

  85.6

  85.6

  1.00

  22

  13.8

  13.8

  99.4

  2.00 1 .6 .6 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

DMFT

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  33

  20.6

  20.6

  20.6

  1.00

  28

  17.5

  17.5

  38.1

  2.00

  46

  28.8

  28.8

  66.9

  3.00

  26

  16.3

  16.3

  83.1

  4.00

  12

  7.5

  7.5

  90.6

  5.00

  8

  5.0

  5.0

  95.6

  6.00

  5

  3.1

  3.1

  98.8

  7.00 1 .6 .6

  99.4

  8.00 1 .6 .6 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

Frequencies

  [DataSet1] Statistics

  Pulpitis Ulser Fistula Abses PUFA N Valid 160 160 160 160 160

  Missing Mean .5625 .0625 .0625 .0938 .8000 Std. Deviation .75808 .24282 .24282 .29240 1.00814

  Pulpitis

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  92

  57.5

  57.5

  57.5

  1.00

  50

  31.3

  31.3

  88.8

  2.00

  14

  8.8

  8.8

  97.5

  3.00

  4

  2.5 2.5 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Ulser

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 150

  93.8

  93.8

  93.8

  1.00

  10

  6.3 6.3 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Fistula

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 150

  93.8

  93.8

  93.8

  1.00

  10

  6.3 6.3 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Abses

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 145

  90.6

  90.6

  90.6

  1.00

  2.00

  5

  4.00

  96.9

  3.8

  3.8

  6

  3.00

  93.1

  12.5

  12.5

  20

  80.6

  15

  31.3

  31.3

  50

  1.00

  49.4

  49.4

  49.4

  79

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  PUFA

  9.4 9.4 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  3.1 3.1 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

Frequencies Statistics

  Missing

  62

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  58

  36.3

  36.3

  36.3

  1.00

  38.8

  4.4 4.4 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  38.8

  75.0

  2.00

  38

  23.8

  23.8

  98.8

  pert_2

  7

  Pert_1

  34

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  59

  Pert_1 pert_2 Pert_3 Pert_4 Pert_5 Pert_6 Pert_7 Pert_8 Pert_9 Pert_10 Pert_11 Pert_12 Pert_13 Pert_14 N Valid 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160

  36.9

  36.9

  1.00

  21.3

  3.00

  21.3

  58.1

  2.00

  60

  37.5

  37.5

  95.6

  36.9

  3.00

  24.4

  26.3

  26.3

  42

  1.00

  24.4

  24.4

  39

  2.00

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  Pert_5

  3.8 3.8 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  6

  4.00

  96.3

  11.9

  50.6

  53

  19

  3

  38.1

  38.1

  61

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  Pert_6

  1.9 1.9 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  4.00

  33.1

  98.1

  14.4

  14.4

  23

  3.00

  83.8

  33.1

  11.9

  3.00

  2

  59

  24.4

  39

  2.00

  69.4

  36.9

  36.9

  1.00

  93.8

  32.5

  32.5

  32.5

  52

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  Pert_3

  1.3 1.3 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  24.4

  3.00

  84.4

  48

  36.9

  36.9

  59

  2.00

  47.5

  30.0

  30.0

  1.00

  10

  17.5

  17.5

  17.5

  28

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  Pert_4

  6.3 6.3 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  38.1

  1.00

  43

  26.9

  26.9

  65.0

  2.00

  42

  26.3

  26.3

  91.3

  3.00

  14

  8.8 8.8 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_7

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  45

  28.1

  28.1

  28.1

  1.00

  37

  23.1

  23.1

  51.3

  2.00

  51

  31.9

  31.9

  83.1

  3.00

  19

  11.9

  11.9

  95.0

  4.00

  8

  5.0 5.0 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_8

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  33

  20.6

  20.6

  20.6

  1.00

  46

  28.8

  28.8

  49.4

  2.00

  62

  38.8

  38.8

  88.1

  3.00

  17

  10.6

  10.6

  98.8

  4.00

  2

  1.3 1.3 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_9

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  44

  27.5

  27.5

  27.5

  1.00

  59

  36.9

  36.9

  64.4

  2.00

  39

  24.4

  24.4

  88.8

  3.00

  17

  10.6

  10.6

  99.4

  4.00 1 .6 .6 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_11 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  57

  35.6

  35.6

  35.6

  1.00

  38

  23.8

  23.8

  59.4

  2.00

  46

  28.8

  28.8

  88.1

  3.00

  15

  9.4

  9.4

  97.5

  4.00

  4

  2.5 2.5 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_10

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  75

  46.9

  46.9

  46.9

  1.00

  40

  25.0

  25.0

  71.9

  2.00

  37

  23.1

  23.1

  95.0

  3.00

  6

  3.8

  3.8

  98.8

  4.00

  2

  1.3 1.3 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_12

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  57

  35.6

  35.6

  35.6

  1.00

  53

  33.1

  33.1

  68.8

  2.00

  38

  23.8

  23.8

  92.5

  3.00

  12

  7.5 7.5 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_13

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  60

  37.5

  37.5

  37.5

  1.00

  44

  27.5

  27.5

  65.0

  2.00

  39

  24.4

  24.4

  89.4

  3.00

  16

  10.0

  10.0

  99.4

  4.00 1 .6 .6 100.0

  Pert_4

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00

  28

  17.5

  17.5

  17.5

  1.00

  48

  30.0

  30.0

  47.5

  2.00

  59

  36.9

  36.9

  84.4

  3.00

  19

  11.9

  11.9

  96.3

  4.00

  6

  3.8 3.8 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

  Pert_14

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid .00 120

  75.0

  75.0

  75.0

  1.00

  16

  10.0

  10.0

  85.0

  2.00

  20

  12.5

  12.5

  97.5

  3.00

  4

  2.5 2.5 100.0 Total 160 100.0 100.0

DMFT * Kualias_hidup Crosstab

  Kualias_hidup Baik Sedang Total

  DMFT Baik Count 107 107 % within DMFT 100.0% .0% 100.0%

  Sedang Count

  40

  6

  46 % within DMFT 87.0% 13.0% 100.0%

  Buruk Count

  3

  4

  7 % within DMFT 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

  Total Count 150 10 160

  Crosstab

  4

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .455 .000 N of Valid Cases

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 41.699 a 2 .000 Likelihood Ratio 29.629 2 .000 N of Valid Cases 160 a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.

  Chi-Square Tests

  Total Count 150 10 160 % within DMFT 93.8% 6.3% 100.0%

  7 % within DMFT 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

  3

  Kualias_hidup Total Baik Sedang

  Buruk Count

  46 % within DMFT 87.0% 13.0% 100.0%

  6

  40

  Sedang Count

  DMFT Baik Count 107 107 % within DMFT 100.0% .0% 100.0%

  160

PUFA * Kualias_hidup Crosstab

  Kualias_hidup Baik Sedang Total

  PUFA Count

  78

  1

  79 % within PUFA 98.7% 1.3% 100.0%

  1 Count

  50

  50 % within PUFA 100.0% .0% 100.0%

  2 Count

  17

  3

  20 % within PUFA 85.0% 15.0% 100.0%

  3 Count

  3

  3

  6 % within PUFA 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

  4 Count

  2

  3

  5 % within PUFA 40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

  Total Count 150 10 160 % within PUFA 93.8% 6.3% 100.0%

  Chi-Square Tests

  Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) a Pearson Chi-Square 53.549 4 .000 Likelihood Ratio 32.131 4 .000 N of Valid Cases 160 a. 6 cells (60,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,31.

  Symmetric Measures Value Approx. Sig.

  Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .501 .000 N of Valid Cases

  160

Manual chi-square skor DMFT dengan Kualitas Hidup

  Ho : Tidak ada hubungan antara skor DMFT dengan Kualitas hidup Ha : Ada hubunngan antara skor DMFT dengan Kualitas hidup Derajat kemaknaan : 0,05 OHIP

  DMF-T

baik sedang Total

Baik 107 107 sedang

  40

  6

  46 Buruk

  3

  4

  7 Total 150 10 160 Perhitungan tanpa

Yate’s correction

  O E O-E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/E

  • 12,4787 107 6,6875 44,72265625 0,445833333 50,69455
  • 6,6875 44,72265625 6,
  • 0,49222 40 -3,125 9,765625 0,226449275 1,99966 6 3,125 9,765625 3,39673913
  • 3,87166 3 -3,5625 12,69140625 1,933928571 15,7286 4 3,5625 12,69140625 29,00892857

  2 X 41,69937888

  Perhitungan dengan Yate’s correction

  O E 0-E-1/2 (0-E-1/2)2 (0-E-1/2)2/E 107 100,313 6,1875 38,28515625 0,38165888 6,6875 -7,1875 51,66015625 7,72488318 40 43,125 -3,625 13,140625 0,30471014

  6 2,875 2,625 6,890625 2,39673913 3 6,5625 -4,0625 16,50390625 2,51488095 4 0,4375 3,0625 9,37890625 21,4375

  2 X 34,7603723

  2 Nilai X hitung tanpa Yate’s correction = 41,699

  2 Nilai X hitung dengan Yate’s correction = 34,760

  2 Dengan df = 2 dan nilai X = 64,811 , probalitasnya = p < 0,001

  2 Dengan df = 2 dan nilai X = 59,745 , probalitasnya = p < 0,001

  2

  2 X hitung > X tabel, maka Ho di tolak, kesimpulannya: ada hubungan antara skor DMFT dengan Kualitas hidup.

Manual chi-square skor PUFA dengan Kualitas Hidup

  Ho : Tidak ada hubungan antara skor PUFA dengan Kualitas hidup Ha : Ada hubunngan antara skor PUFA dengan Kualitas hidup Derajat kemaknaan : 0,05 OHIP

  PUFA Total baik Sedang

  78

  1

  79

  1

  50

  50

  2

  17

  3

  20

  3

  3

  3

  6

  4

  2

  3

  5 Total 150 10 160 Perhitungan tanpa

Yate’s correction

  O E O-E (O-E)2 (O-E)2/E 78 74,0625 3,9375 15,50390625 0,209335443 50 46,875 3,125 9,765625 0,208333333 17 18,75 -1,75 3,0625 0,163333333

  3 5,625 -2,625 6,890625 1,225 2 4,6875 -2,6875 7,22265625 1,540833333 1 4,9375 -3,9375 15,50390625 3,140031646 3,125 -3,125 9,765625 3,125 3 1,25 1,75 3,0625 2,45 3 0,375 2,625 6,890625 18,375 3 0,3125 2,6875 7,22265625 23,1125

  2 X 53,54936709

  Perhitungan dengan Yate’s correction

  2

  2 O E 0-E-1/2 (0-E-1/2) (0-E-1/2) /E 78 74,0625 3,4375 11,81640625 0,159546414 50 46,875 2,625 6,890625 0,147 17 18,75 -2,25 5,0625 0,27 3 5,625 -3,125 9,765625 1,736111111

  2 4,6875 -3,1875 10,16015625 2,1675 1 4,9375 -4,4375 19,69140625 3,988132911 3,125 -3,625 13,140625 4,205 3 1,25 1,25 1,5625 1,25

  3 0,375 2,125 4,515625 12,04166667 3 0,3125 2,1875 4,78515625 15,3125

  2 X 41,2774571

Dokumen yang terkait

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pendidikan Inklusi di SMP Negeri 7 Salatiga

0 0 13

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang Masalah - Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui Model Problem Based Learning Siswa Kelas 5 SDN Sidorejo Lor 05 Semester I Tahun 2017/2018

0 0 7

Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui Model Problem Based Learning Siswa Kelas 5 SDN Sidorejo Lor 05 Semester I Tahun 2017/2018

0 0 9

BAB III METODE PENELITIAN 3.1 Jenis Penelitian - Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui Model Problem Based Learning Siswa Kelas 5 SDN Sidorejo Lor 05 Semester I Tahun 2017/2018

0 0 13

BAB IV HASIL PENELITIAN DAN PEMBAHASAN 4.1 Gambaran dan Subjek Penelitian - Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui Model Problem Based Learning Siswa Kelas 5 SDN Sidorejo Lor 05 Semester I

0 0 27

Institutional Repository | Satya Wacana Christian University: Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPA Melalui Model Problem Based Learning Siswa Kelas 5 SDN Sidorejo Lor 05 Semester I Tahun 2017/2018

0 0 32

Mudah dan aktif belajar fisika SMA XII IPA Dudi I

0 1 318

Analisis Kelayakan Usahatani Tembakau (Studi Kasus : Desa Batukarang Kecamatan Payung Kabupaten Karo, Sumatera utara)

0 0 12

Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Permintaan dan Penawaran Telur Ayam Ras di Kota Pematangsiantar

0 0 14

Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Permintaan dan Penawaran Telur Ayam Ras di Kota Pematangsiantar

0 1 11